Hello, JennyOz! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a ((Talkback)) message on my talk page. @ 05:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JennyOz. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui ^雲_水 11:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).[reply]

Hi JennyOz. Wikipedia's signature guidelines require that your signature contain a link to your user page or to this talkpage - please could you amend your preferences to enable such a link? (If you replace the signature text with [[User:JennyOz|<span style="color:black;">JennyOz</span>]] and tick the box marked "Treat the above as Wikimarkup" then it will appear exactly the same, but will contain the necessary link). Yunshui ^雲_水 11:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, JennyOz. You might be interested in enabling Twinkle so you can easily rollback an instance of vandalism yourself. You can do so in your Preferences under 'Gadgets'. Happy editing– Gilliam (talk) 13:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny. I've taken Bullock out again - he's resigning, not retiring (his seat is not up for election this cycle anyway, unless there's a double dissolution). Once the Bullock -> Dodson changeover is effected (as far as I know Bullock hasn't submitted his resignation yet), which should be before the election, there'll just be a little swap down in the Senate tables where the continuing senators are listed. :) Frickeg (talk) 11:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know, trust Bullock to mess things up! On the links - they are being used as our references at the moment. Once formal election guides (like the ABC ones) come out, they can probably be moved down to external links. Frickeg (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't remember the specifics on this, so I looked it up for Jenny McAllister and it seems to be that the parliamentary vote counts as the "election", so Dodson's term has now begun. Frickeg (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words! In general, I usually only add items with an article link, whether it is to an article about the event, or to people or organisations involved. But it's not a strict rule, anything with a lot of coverage should be fine, and may prompt creation of an article. With anniversaries of events, I would probably not include them unless the anniversary itself had an article (such as Australian Bicentenary), just because it is fairly subjective about which anniversaries to include and of course the original event should be in the year article when it happened anyway so it's kind of repeating the information. --Canley (talk) 05:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the 'birthday' greetings Jenny! Just reading the message on your userpage, I hope you're feeling more and more comfortable with your contributions here - you sound like the sort of person that Wikipedia needs more of. Cheers, --jjron (talk) 11:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A belated thanks for the barnstar! This is some of my absolute favourite kind of work to do on Wikipedia, but it's still nice to be appreciated! Frickeg (talk) 05:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Try using the "undo" button first, but it will most likely fail if the edits are old and there have been subsequent edits to that section. If it doesn't work, just edit it back to the original state. --Canley (talk) 08:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a general rule of thumb I don't edit other people's user-space drafts without invitation - I'll wait until it gets moved to article space, as I'm sure User:JennyOz/sandbox/Draft1 will. However if you want me to start on some of the basics (eg WP:SURNAME or WP:NEUTRAL, per my comments on User talk:JennyOz/sandbox/Draft1) while it's still in your user-space, let me know. Mitch Ames (talk) 14:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jenny! Sorry to be out of the loop on this (tied up with some other stuff in real life), but great work! I really think you can move this article into main space (if you need help to do this let me know). Once that happens, you can expect other people will start to modify it but that's OK. They would not do it if they didn't think the article useful and collectively people know about the various policies (I don't think any one human could possibly know them all - I am sure I don't). Kerry (talk) 23:41, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mitch and Kerry thanks both for your messages (and sorry for delay in replying). Mitch, I really appreciate your advice and you are very welcome to make any changes. Thanks though for asking. I will also reply to your specific help back over at the draft talk page. Kerry, thanks for your comments. Funny (ha ha) thing is though..., because it was my first article, I did it via the Articles for Creation process. So now it's waiting with the other 700:) Oh well, luckily I'm very patient. And you're right about no-one being able to know every policy and lots kindly jumped in to share their advice when I asked for suggestions. I look forward to anyone improving the article. Thanks again. JennyOz (talk) 23:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realise it was AfC, but I can help with that! Kerry (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry, Wow! I'm gobsmacked! Thank you! I didn't realise you could do that. I'll do the changes to the red links today, once I absorb what just happened. Thanks a million. JennyOz (talk) 00:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orange Sky Laundry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kerry (talk) 00:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Orange Sky Laundry at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mitch Ames (talk) 13:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Orange Sky Laundry, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in their second year of providing a free mobile laundry service for the homeless, the co-founders of Orange Sky Laundry were jointly awarded Young Australian of the Year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Orange Sky Laundry. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

... for the piano-related clipping. Interesting historical stuff.

I too hate the word "over-arching". See a full list of my pet hates here.

Cheers.

PS. Hi, Jenny. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 11:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jenny! I saw your comment to Scott Davis and just thought I'd give you the short intro to coords.

If you are looking at an article which is using the infobox Australian place (as Cowra and most Australian places do), then you can added the coords either as Degrees Minutes Seconds like this

| latd = 33 | latm = 50 | lats = 6 | longd = 148 | longm = 41 | longs = 33

Or if you have decimal degrees

| latd =33.835 | longd = 148.6925

There are plenty of websites that will convert between DMS and decimal degrees if you want to do that, but the infobox supports either format.

In the Australian place infobox, it is ASSUMED you are talking about a latitude that is South of the Equator and East of Greenwich (because all Australia is in the SE of the world), so there is no need for negatives. In other parts of Wikipedia and on Commons, you would put -33 or -33.835 to signify south of the equator.

If you want to know what are the coords of an Australian placename, then this is your best place to go : Gazetteer of Australia.

There's more to coords than the above, so let me know if your needs extend beyond the infobox Australian places and I will try to explain. Kerry (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks @Kerry Raymond: - when I'd had a quick look and compared the coords on maps with those on Cowra, it was the minus sign that confused me so you have just cleared that up for me. Certainly hadn't occurred to me that the infobox had an inbuilt assumption. It takes me so long to look up and fully comprehend each new procedure so your help is very welcome. Thank you sincerely for taking the time to message me with the intro. JennyOz (talk) 22:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to ask me for help whenever you need it; I don't pretend to know everything (Wikipedia is a vast and sprawling beast). Kerry (talk) 00:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JennyOz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Rhiannan Iffland, JennyOz!

Wikipedia editor Canley just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks fine, good job

To reply, leave a comment on Canley's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Canley (talk) 08:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't done new page review for a while, so I hope that was what you needed. If you want to delete the redirect from Draft1 Orange Sky Laundry in your sandbox just mark it with db-author and an admin will delete it. --Canley (talk) 08:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rhiannan Iffland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after being granted a wildcard entry, Australian high diver Rhiannan Iffland went on to win the 2016 Cliff Diving World Series championship in her rookie year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rhiannan Iffland. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny, thanks for your great review and support of the FWT list. I was wondering if you'd be interested in reviewing Australian Cricket Hall of Fame which is also at FLC right now? It's looking a little lonely having received not one glance of attention since I nominated it a few weeks back...! The Rambling Man (talk) 07:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man Crikey, so many heros! Will have a look over. JennyOz (talk) 15:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced warning, on the heels of the FWT promotion, I will soon be looking at listing Trans-Tasman Trophy at FLC, so any review/tweaks you can make on that would be much appreciated. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man, Thanks for the warning:) Will have look at T-TT when finished with ACHoF (but can't commit to any time frame). Congrats on FWT promotion! JennyOz (talk) 08:05, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, there's no deadline, things can hang around FLC for three months sometimes, I tend to try to "canvass" reviewers who I know are keen-eyed, interested in the subject matter and put in great reviews, and their time is precious, so I appreciate any help you can give whenever you can. Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 08:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man, Just to let you know that I will add my couple of points to the T-T Trophy tomorrow. Haven't forgotten:) JennyOz (talk) 18:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool Jenny, thanks! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi J Bar, thanks for creating an article for the Kates' new show. I'm not sure though that there is meant to be an apostrophe at end of its name? JennyOz (talk) 04:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll fix that up. They must have used one in an early article. J Bar (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, J Bar - I thought that might be the case. Thanks JennyOz (talk) 05:38, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I wondered if you would mind taking a look at this article, the latest in my work on the frontier wars in SA? I'd like to get a few opinions before nominating it for GA review. Cheers,

Hi Peacemaker67, sure thing! Actually, I read the Waterloo one earlier and just finished reading Dernancourt (noticed the coincidence of name Congreve!). Will get back to you soon. Regards, JennyOz (talk) 09:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jenny! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peacemaker67, I have added some comments to the article's talk page. Sorry I was not able to attend sooner. Thanks for such a comprehensive coverage of the events and their multiple retellings. Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 03:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jenny. Your feedback is really appreciated! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again, JennyOz – I hadn't run across your user name before, so out of curiosity looked at your user page. I also don't like getting in to arguments, so avoid them whenever possible. It looks like you have an attention to detail, so you might like to participate at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. You could help cut down on our backlog of articles needing copy-editing. Some of the articles are in pretty good shape, and only need polishing. Others are in bad shape, or written by a non-native speaker of English, and require a lot of work. Normally, it is not contentious editing, and there's no rush; you don't have to finish an article all on one day. If you're curious, you can look at articles that have been copy-edited already and see in the revision history what the copy-editor did. Look in the archives. I'm sure each copy-editor has his or her own style of copy-editing and what he/she considers important enough to change. If you're really interested in beginning, you might like to look at the tools I've placed at the top of my talk page. Feel free to copy (in edit mode) and paste to your page any that seem useful. (Be sure to click "Cancel" to get out of edit mode.) If you're interested in Australian topics, you might look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia. For fun, you might look at User:Carptrash#I just resurrected, and User:EEng and User talk:EEng.  – Corinne (talk) 16:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jenny, I have the above list at FLC, and I always appreciate your insightful comments, was wondering if you'd have a chance to cast you eyes over it? No worries if not, as you'd expect from me, it's practically perfect........ ! Hope you're well, The Rambling Man (talk) 21:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Rambling Man, will happily look at this tomorrow. JennyOz (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, take your time, any help gratefully appreciated, as always. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following your advice, we now have a fair use image of the statuette at the (still awful but not quite so awful) Laureus World Sports Awards article. Work there continues....... I'm aiming for WP:FTC before Xmas. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks! Looks good, it's a very handsome piece of silverware. Let me know when you are nearing end of fixing Awards article. I won't put it on my watchlist just yet (fear of clogging up). As for Featured topics, I only very recently realised there was such a thing when editing this. The Laureus set should fly through. Regards, JennyOz (talk) 04:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny, a brief departure from the lists I so enjoy making, I've asked Lugnuts if he'd like to help get Ellyse Perry up to featured article status, and then I suddenly thought of you, and wondered if you'd like to join it too? The article is in good shape already but could use a copyedit and source review before we nominate it. What do you reckon? The Rambling Man (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day The Rambling Man, funny you should ask. I spent the weekend swapping between Ian's women's fifer list and, when it was sending me cross-eyed, Ellyse's article. (She is such a magic person. Her interview discussing how she accidentally celebrated her double century on field a tad early was simply delightful.) I only did gnomey edits and only got down to the beginning of her football section. Yep I'm in. There is a massive amount of prose from earlier in her cricket days. Let me know the plan. PS As above, alert me when any more of the Laureus set are ready for FLC listing. JennyOz (talk) 10:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great, once I get clear of my sandboxing for the Segrave Trophy, I'll take a closer look at Perry and see what's happening. With regard to the Laureus lists, well I have six more up my sleeve just waiting for the FLC backlog to clear, plus the main article is now re-worked completely at at GAN waiting for a kind editor to pluck it from obscurity and review it. The lists are: Breakthrough, Sportsman, Sport for Good, Comeback, Team and Spirit of Sport. I'd be happy to take any comments on their respective talkpages should you feel so generously inclined! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hi JennyOz, thanks for the thanks over my edits at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian law cleanup list.

Coolabahapple (talk) 07:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny, the above list is now at FLC, if you have the time and feel the inclination to have a look! Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:29, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jenny, thanks for all your ongoing reviews and support. Laureus World Sports Award for Sportsperson of the Year with a Disability has been sitting without attention for a while now, I wondered if you'd "do your thing" on it if you have the time and inclination? Thanks again, The Rambling Man (talk) 13:20, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Rambling Man, Ha! I had already started looking at it! Am quite keen to help get the whole set finished as they roll through. (Segrave looks interesting too.) Regards, JennyOz (talk) 13:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have a few more Segrave-esque up my sleeve... The Rambling Man (talk) 13:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JennyOz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 December 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ken Catchpole, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T♦C 18:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Thanks for fixing my typo> Pendright (talk) 06:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: I’d like to nominate the USMCWR article for an ACR! So, would I be testing your patience if I asked you for a read through beforehand? If I am, no problem, I’ll understand. I hope all is well down under. Regards! Pendright (talk) 05:33, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pendright, Nice to hear from you again. I thought you might be heading to ACR, have been watching your changes. I will be very happy to have another read through. (All's okay downunder though a bit chilly.) Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 05:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Great, thank you! Pendright (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: As of this hour, I’m unable to find any italics on either the slogan ( Recruiting) or the esprit de corps (Camp Lejeune). What am I missing? Pendright (talk) 06:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pendright, well that's weird. When I view this sentence "Although joint training with the Navy proved satisfactory, it did not engender the Marine esprit de corps that was expected.", esprit de corps appears in italics, and in this, "The slogan Free a Marine to Fight proved to be a strong drawing card for the Reserve...", Free a Marine to Fight is italicised. (I wouldn't worry about them.) JennyOz (talk) 07:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: It is me whose weird! Either I've been out in the sun too long or it's time to pack it in. Anyway, I removed both sets. Humble pie is not as digestable as apple pie. Thanks! Pendright (talk) 12:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Free a Marine to Fight is now supported by two links, one showing pages 1 – 20, the other from 21- 41. Please let me know if this is sufficient or more information is needed. Thanks so much for your time and effort, it sure paid off. Pendright (talk) 01:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pendright, I noticed you'd added the second one. I think it addresses the issue perfectly! Congratulations on the promotion! You deserve one too! Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 02:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for taking the time to provide such detailed comments on the Australian Defence Force article. Nick-D (talk) 10:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nick-D!, always happy to help, especially when Australian articles heading to main page. JennyOz (talk) 10:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Laureus World Sports Awards/archive1 has just been promoted to featured topic. Thanks for your help in getting it there! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TRM, Congrats! I enjoyed the process and learnt a lot - not only the interesting sport content but markup, MoS, collaboration and more. JennyOz (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Vinny Lauwers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vinny Lauwers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Australian yachtsman Vinny Lauwers circumnavigated the globe solo with his "mistress"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vinny Lauwers. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 01:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Australian sports

Thank you for quality articles about sports people from Australia, such as Rhiannan Iffland and Vinny Lauwers, for improving Van Diemen's Land v Port Phillip, 1851, for diligent corrections with clear edit summaries, "interested in current issues and BLPs in Australia being recorded correctly", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you Gerda! What a lovely note. I feel honoured... and I love blue sapphires! JennyOz (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! It's a Yogo. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1850 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a wonder how many improvements a featured article can have after I've assumed that it's reached the perfect state :D Thank you for the corrections Jenny; really appreciate it. Lourdes 07:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lourdes, Thank you for the work that went into the article, not only an interesting and enjoyable read but an important record of Australian history. JennyOz (talk) 07:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny,

Just so it is clear, my edit summaries are not about you or your edits (which are clearly improvements). I was and am peeved that I made edits in several sections and then got an edit conflict and, as an IP editor, lost all the changes I'd made and was presented only with your last saved version so could not cut-and-paste my changes in. It's a fault in the software.

Cheers, a lowly IP, 125.168.41.242 (talk) 05:01, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP, thanks for your note. I didn't get an alert when saving and I was not aware IPs don't get alerts. I actually had another edit conflict today, with another logged in user, which I noticed when checking via 'show changes' and chose to cancel rather than attempt to save. Anyway, I understand you were frustrated and I did not take your summaries personally. Hope your day got better:) Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 05:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny... to be clear, I did get an edit conflict alert, but all it displayed was your latest saved version, so unlike a usual edit conflict, it did not display what I had done and allow me to integrate the changes. Of course, there is no way that you could have known I was working on any changes. I have no idea if this was a software glitch or a design fault that produces edit conflict notices to IP users that are utterly useless for actually retaining changes from both editors. I just wanted to make sure that you knew the edit summaries were not directed at you.  :) 125.168.41.242 (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		For your assistance on Neil Armstrong Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Hawkeye7! I enjoyed reviewing and learning more about Armstrong. JennyOz (talk) 12:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Thank you so much for your edits of the WAVES article, you have a keen eye. They were also timely, because I’m planning to nominate it for an ACR. Having reviewed the article, do you have any suggestions you’d care to offer. Pendright (talk) 06:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pendright, You're very welcome. I'd been promising myself to read some more of your articles after enjoying USMCWR so much. The one thing I remember noticing was the singular WAVE, mostly when referring to a member (WAVES itself not actually being a plural), but I guessed that was a common usage. I'd be very happy to have another look and will let you know if I have any suggestions. Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 06:48, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: The literature seems inconsistent on that point, so I followed what I thought was the most common usage. Thanks for your kind words and for looking at the article. Pendright (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: With your help, the WAVES article has managed to sucessfully cross the ACR finish line. Thanks again! Pendright (talk) 06:02, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for editing my contributions to Australia at the 2018 Commonwealth Games— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussiesportlibrarian (talk • contribs) 12:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting the dodgy Trove citations, I have fixed the references to The News. I remembered reading a discussion between some Wikipedians and the NLA about this (newspaper names and links in the automatic citations), I think it was this post and this post on the Trove forum? I remember they did roll out some fixes a few years back, it may have been to do with these discussions. Probably a good idea to set up redirects for the capitalisation issues, but they'll have to fix the link to The News at their end. --Canley (talk) 07:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history service award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of two Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period January to March 2018. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 09:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KCVelaga, belated thanks for this! JennyOz (talk) 10:58, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All for your efforts. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 11:57, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

YW, Jenny. :) Thanks for all your edits on the main article. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 07:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded these stripes for reviewing a total of seven Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period April to June 2018. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

Thanks AustralianRupert and for all you do. JennyOz (talk) 11:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Jenny. Thanks for your efforts. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:11, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you JennyOz for chasing up references for all those exhibitions on Mirka Mora - brilliant! Much appreciated. Jamesmcardle(talk) 13:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hope to see more of you! Tony (talk) 08:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have Apollo 11 up for review at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Apollo 11. We're trying to get the article in shape for running on the front page on the 50th anniversary in July 2009. Could I trouble you to work your magic on the article? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hawkeye7, yeah sure! See you there. JennyOz (talk) 17:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded these stripes for reviewing a total of seven Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period July to September 2018. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. Kges1901 (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

Hi Kges1901, belated thanks for this and for all you do. Regards, JennyOz (talk) 05:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: If you care to offer it, I’d like your opinionh on a grammar situation that has troubled me from time to time. According to Hoyle (American), adding “ing” to the ending of a verb changes both the meaning and the function of the verb. In some cases, it causes the verb to act as a noun or adjective, and in others, it changes the tense of the verb. So,If the word explained is changed to explaining, did a past tense verb become a present tense something else? The more research I do, the more circular it becomes. Anyway, I hope you are well! Pendright (talk) 07:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pendright!, Lovely to hear from you. Crikey! The more I think about your question, the more I am thinking it needs a good thinking! Here are some examples where meaning can change with "ing". He is cooking (present tense verb) or he has a cooking room. Cooking has become an adjective because the room isn't cooking. He is running (verb) in the election but he is in the running (noun). Saying is a verb, or a noun as in 'a common saying'. You are wiring the house - but it becomes the wiring (noun). I am building (verb) something - but a building is a noun. He was drumming (verb) or he got a good drumming (noun) from the boss or even he went to his sound-proofed drumming (adjective) room. We are sailing, that is a sailing boat.

But with explained/explaining... I suppose one could say "that was a good explaining" but we have the noun explanation. Maybe, "that is a good book if you need some explaining". In that sentence is explaining a noun? We need context - want to give me a sample sentence where 'explaining' could be a problem? I'll look forward to finding the answer with you. Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 11:31, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Your examples helped me break through my mental logjam. I’ve been more hung up on tense than on context. So, in the future, I’ll be thinking about context, context, and context. As always, thank you for your willingness to help. I’m well and hope you are too. Pendright (talk) 04:09, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pendright, glad to hear that! Yep, I'm well thanks and it's spring downunder so the weather is more pleasant. Til next time, JennyOz (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: It seems I’m caught between a rock and a hard place and I’m hoping you can help. Let me explain: the WAVES article is now under FAR, and the reviewer had this to say –

• Now, this is a great topic, and I'd really like to see it promoted. Going by the lead, I think it needed a more-thorough copyedit before nomination—though the lead is hard to get right. I haven't looked at the rest. Do you have collaborators who could go over it with fresh eyes? (That is, editors who haven't yet worked on it?) Tony (talk) 01:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

I’ve exhausted my circle of fresh eyes, so would you consider approaching some editor(s) you know to see if they might be amenable to do the deed? In any event, thanks for any help you care to offer. Pendright (talk) 20:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pendright, I've been watching the review and it seems to be in good hands and I'm sure others will chime in. I'll keep in touch with it and you. Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: - Thank you! Pendright (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, Jenny, I trust you are well. I have nominated the New Zealand and Australian Division article for a peer review, which can be found here: Wikipedia:Peer review/New Zealand and Australian Division/archive1. You have a very keen eye, so I would be very thankful if you had a moment to take a look. If you don't have the time, I understand. Thanks. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AustralianRupert, yep I'm well thanks (though feeling a little dispirited by some of the nastiness that seems really prevalent at the moment. None of it involves me and I rarely go near the drama boards but crikey!...) Anyway, I saw the NZAD article on the Aust Alerts page and had already made some gnome notes so will post them at the peer review page very soon. Glad to see you back! JennyOz (talk) 11:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, Jenny. I know what you mean, it can be difficult not to let it get you down sometimes. I appreciate you taking a look. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JennyOz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thanks for your wonderful copy-edits to articles; they're super helpful and much appreciated. Keep up the good work! SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 19:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia articles through copy editing. You are receiving this invitation because someone has noticed the quality of your edits and your commitment to improving the content of Wikipedia. Please see our project page for more information and reasons to join. You may wish to join us during our backlog elimination drives, help fulfill editor requests, or simply become a part of our supportive community. We hope to help you so that you can help make Wikipedia a better place! ~~~~

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello JennyOz, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 05:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding ((subst:Seasonal Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

		Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history)
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for October to December 2018 reviews. MilHistBot (talk) 01:05, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

Hi Jenny, thanks for all your comments (as usual) and particularly at Kevin Beattie's FAC. Dweller and I were wondering if you'd be able to have a quick/slow/meticulous look at Alf Ramsey who we made a major surge on in mid-2017, got it to GA and then walked away. I think content-wise it's fine for FA, but would certainly benefit from your eagle eyes. If you can't, or simply don't want to, not a problem at all. Cheers, The Rambling Man (talk) 15:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC) P.S. I may be heading down under in late February, can't wait![reply]

Hello TRM, Yep, will have a look over Ramsey. It'll take a while, (what a full life he had!) and I have a few other things underway but will get there. Coming down under? Feb is a great time to visit, just like the other 11 months! JennyOz (talk) 10:29, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, thanks, and take your time, of course. And yes, probably a two-stopper, Melbourne and Sydney, can't wait! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny, just wondered if you had any idea as to if/when you might be able to take a look at Alf? Cheers, The Rambling Man (talk) 13:38, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've replied on the last of your points. Apologies for the delay. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 11:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edits! What brought you to Solrad 1? Neopeius (talk) 14:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neopeius, I just noticed I hadn't replied to your message. Sorry for my rudeness! I came across Solrad 1 in the dyk queue and enjoyed reading it. I sometimes give my 2 cents at FAC and am hoping to get back there soon and will look forward seeing your articles there. Regards, JennyOz (talk) 07:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Well, SOLRAD 2 is about to pass FA too :) --Neopeius (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for January to March 2019 reviews. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

@JennyOz: Hello: Could you tell me the two most popular style guides used in British English? And in your writing, do you or do you not place a comma before the word which? And why or why not!

I hopw you are well!

Pendright (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pendright, nice to hear from you! Yes I'm quite well thanks, hope you are too. Well, as an Aussie, I use our styles though they are usually close to British. There are many guides listed at style guide but each can have some different "rules" and only confuse anyone trying to find a definitive answer. Even with our own MoS house style guide, you'll find editors debating fine points. I tend to google when I have a style query and read a few sites to gauge best use.

I'm not the right person to opine on precise rules but most importantly to me, the style will depend on the subject area and concision. I just go with what "sounds" best and I'm happy if somebody tweaks what I've written. I think we should always write with the reader in mind, not grammar pedantry.

As for "which"..., some might say "always" but it depends on clauses and length of the sentence. For example, in "Apples are a fruit which grow on trees." I wouldn't use a comma because it's a short sentence that doesn't need extra punctuation to help with understanding it. For a longer sentence like "Apples, which can be green or red, grow on trees.", the comma breaks it up for the reader. (I read an article recently with a sentence so long and with so much punctuation, including multiple commas, colons and semicolons, I had to read it about three times to understand it. It would have been far better for readers if broken into a few shorter sentences. That punctuation was probably "correct" but our purpose is for readers to learn something or to quickly find what they're looking for, not to show the ability to weave a paragraph into a complex single sentence.)

I am also aware that some things I was taught aren't necessarily right. We all had a Miss Snodgrass!

Don't be too concerned. If you're working on another fine FAC, the reviewers there will suggest or tweak any punctuation that really matters.

Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 07:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Thank you so much for sharing your common sense approach to Wikipedia article writing. British English does have its variety of style guides. American English has a few style guides as well, but the Chicago Manual of Style is probably the most generally accepted choice for general writing. Even (so-called) generally accepted rules are open to interpretation and they often are. I guess that’s why they call writing an art.

I’ve been working on an article that was promoted to GA in 2015, with the expectation of nominating it for ACR. When I’m done, do you think you might have time to take a look?

All the best! Pendright (talk) 23:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep Pendright, I'm familiar with Chicago MoS and its authority in the US. I'd reckon that across all English language MoSs, whether universities, media houses or even commercial organisations, they probably agree 90+% on grammar "rules".

Sure, I'll be happy to look at your latest. (And then I'll look forward to following its review. I learn so much from watching how the reviewers fine tune articles. I find ACR probably the most collegially respectful and helpful process on here.) Let me know when you're ready. Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 01:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Thanks, I'll ping you then. Pendright (talk) 20:07, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @JennyOz: I’ve finally finished trying to fine-tune the Cadet Nurse Corps, the article I mentioned to you. It was promoted to GA in 2015, but was in need of some repair. I hope to nominate it for ACR in due course. Anyway, thanks in advance for your walk through. No hurry. Best wishes. Pendright (talk) 04:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day Pendright, I'll have a read through this week. If I come across any minor typos, I'll tweak them as I go and if I have any suggestions or questions I'll add them to the article talk page. You okay with that? If not, just tell what you'd prefer. I'm looking forward to learning about this service! Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 06:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Sounds good, and thank you again. Pendright (talk) 06:16, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Thanks for spotting and correcting my errors and omissions. I did, however, reverse lower case fiscal year back to upper case. When used for a specific year it is upper case. Hope all is well in your part of the world. Pendright (talk) 20:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pendright, All good, no problem. I have a few minor questions to ask and should finish them tomorrow. I understand re the years. All relatively okay downunder, though I'm not particularly fond of winter! JennyOz (talk) 10:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Hi. I seem to keep coming across you making small, but frequently important, edits to articles. They are appreciated and please keep them up. Gog the Mild (talk) 08:19, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Gog the Mild - I am agog! Best wishes, JennyOz (talk) 09:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Groan! That is Jeenynely punny. I should Oztracise you. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between July and September 2019. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 01:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

Thank you for having a look at A Voyage Round the World before it will hit the Main Page! However, I am not sure whether I should agree with this edit: all of these books cite him as "George Forster" (and so does the original title page). On the other hand, while GF was known as George while in England, most of the literature about him uses the German form "Georg Forster", including the only English-language biography (by Thomas P. Saine) and the Encyclopaedia Britannica. The Royal Society uses George. I think there's a case to be made for harmonising all appearances of the name, but I would prefer to use the names as used in each of the publications (which then means using both Georg and George). One of these days I'll try to write something useful about this and add it to Georg Forster, but I haven't quite decided what to do... Let me know what you think about how to approach this in A Voyage Round the World. Happy editing, —Kusma (t·c) 19:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kusma, Thanks for your message (and for the article). I agree and have undone the last of my changes. My confusion stemmed from Gbooks and WorldCat both using the "Georg" spelling in their entry text, though their images of the Title Page and book cover of course show George. (A trap I'll be aware of in future!) I'm not sure harmonising is better than a simple note explaining the two spellings? BTW, the Liebersohn article (currently ref 20) at Common-Place - when I attempted to check its spelling the URL did not resolve but I found it here. I was not sure whether to change the URL. Thanks again for the article. I've never read much about Cook's second voyage and have made a note to read Forster's report when time allows. Regards, JennyOz (talk) 03:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. It is quite confusing with people tacitly using a different spelling of the author's name than on the title page (and I do the same in the article...) I put a standard web archive link in for the Liebersohn citation for now, but maybe your link is even better. Thank you for pointing this out! —Kusma (t·c) 06:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i want translation to page from Czech . How can i create a page? Baran Ahmet (talk) 16:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Baran Ahmet, Welcome to Wikipedia! You will find information at this translations page and you can ask for advice at the help desk. JennyOz (talk) 02:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Clive James, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Does the Oz suffix indicate you are Australian? If yes, would you mind also checking the Australasian Antarctic Expedition for pollution by nasty foreign varieties of English (though I get the impression that, like the Canadians, the Aussies are pretty laid back about the arguments that consume the British and Americans). If no, then I will leave you in peace to go back to your appreciation of Black Sabbath or Frank L. Baum. Yomangani^talk 17:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yomangani - oh yes, definitely an Aussie. Wear your deerstalker proudly. And yes, we're pretty laid back but can get very "displeased" if our spelling is "corrected" to nasty foreign varieties. I found no transgressions. Thanks again, JennyOz (talk) 18:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewers Award
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your top class and unusually thorough reviews. Long may you generate them. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny. I do a fair it of both copy editing and article reviewing myself, and fairly frequently nominate articles. However, and apparently this is not unusual, I struggle to adequately check my own work. I was quite serious earlier, and if you were to run any future nominations of mine through your diligent review process I would be most grateful. Regardless, excellent work. Do please keep on doing it. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gog the Mild, Sir you are too kind. I get two advantages reviewing your (and many others') nominations. I enjoy your style and I learn about subjects I thought I had little interest in! And if any of my comments are a net positive to the project, it's a bonus. Please feel free to ping me if I miss any noms, especially if time or lack of reviewers becomes a problem. Thank you for your kindness. JennyOz (talk) 06:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Madam: I am not, I believe, "too kind"; but, in fact, rather the reverse. You are also generous, and I shall certainly tuck away that kind offer against the day when I am stuck for a reviewer.

PS. It is possible that you may enjoy this. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:28, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article has a bit of a troubled history, and I clearly shouldn't have sent it on without more rigorous editing--I guess I was a bit tired. Thank you so much for all your good work; I really appreciate it. User:Grlucas, I know you already know it takes a village, and JennyOz did some great work. Drmies (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies, JennyOz, and Benjamin Fincher: Thanks for all your efforts. Well done. —Grlucas (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies and Grlucas, Thank you for your kind messages, and for all you do for the project. It's a wonderful village to be part of. JennyOz (talk) 08:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Grlucas, 947 pageviews--that's 946 1/2 more than our students usually get... Drmies (talk) 15:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 7 reviews between January and March 2020. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

Thank you for your part in bringing Australasian Antarctic Expedition to the Main page today, in memory of Brian. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny. You were good enough to do a review for Battle of Cape Hermaeum at ACR - here. I think that you missed my ping, and I didn't re-ping as it didn't attract any further interest and I withdrew it after six weeks. It is now at FAC - here - and I wonder if you might be able to have another look at it? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Gog the Mild, see you there. JennyOz (talk) 08:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jenny, appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And yet again I arrive at your door with my begging bowl. I have recently done some work on Punic Wars; before I nominate it for GAN and FAC it could really do with a good hard examination from someone who knows what they are doing. Obviously, if time or motivation doesn't permit I entirely understand. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:52, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gog! I am just back after rolling technical problems with my devices. It'll take me a few days to get back into the swing of things. While I am a bit hesitant to offer any promises, (in case probs start again), I'd be delighted to look at your article. If I disappear again, please know it's out of my control. Now, tell me what are your preferences. Want me to just jot down comments? Or would you be happy for me to adjust typos (if any) etc, and if so, all in one edit or in stages for you to undo any easily? Happy to work to whatever you wish. JennyOz (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny, that sounds pretty rough. You are a star! I foolishly entered the WikiCup, and the final round starts soon - assuming that I get through. My competitive spirit is seriously kicking in! I won't enter again, but right now I am hooked. I completely understand that your technical issues may reoccur, so I shall treat anything you can do as a wonderful bonus. My suggestion would be just write all and any suggestions straight into the article. There are few enough of your ideas that I ever wish to challenge, and if I do we can discuss on the talk page or I can just BRD revert! However you like; for me it is as easy to review 10 edits by you as it is one. Thanks again. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK Gog, no problem, I'll probably start it tomorrow. See you then! JennyOz (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Gog, I'm up to Cannae so still a little to go. Just wanted to let you know in case you were concerned:) Will do my changes and add questions tomorrow. JennyOz (talk) 13:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In your own time Jenny, I am more than grateful to you for doing this; I am certainly not holding you to a schedule. But thanks for the update - sounds as if you're two thirds of the way through the text. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have just sneaked a peak. Amazing work. Although it is a bit embarrassing seeing all of my sloppiness laid bare. Thank you. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gog, thanks for your kind words. (Sloppiness? Nonsense! It's amazing how little there is to do in such a mammoth article!) I have a few left-over misc suggestions/questions. Shall I put them on the article talk page? JennyOz (talk) 16:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JennyOz, that would be great Jenny. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 5 reviews between April and June 2020. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

Thanks Peacemaker67, JennyOz (talk) 08:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure that it's a good idea to speak about "First World War" when it's a 1920s topic, and no Second in site yet. We call places by their historic names at a given time, - why not wars? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day Gerda , guess I agree! Regards, JennyOz (talk) 11:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of adding sparkle to articles. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Gog the Mild submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I would like to nominate Editor JennyOz. They are in many ways the epitome of a Wikignome: inserting useful grammar corrections and MoS compliances in a helpful and almost ridiculously modest way. They also do a fair bit of assessing, at all levels. It can be embarrassing to have them point out the basic errors in your FAC, but this is more than compensated by the knowledge that after JennyOz has visited, whatever the article's other flaws, no one is going to pick at the grammar. I have taken to leaving a saucer of milk out by my articles, in the hope of attracting their attention. Numerous other highly experienced editors regularly ask JennyOz to check over their articles. I think that an EotW award would be an appropriate reward for years of putting that final sparkle on Wikipedia's best articles.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

((User:UBX/EoTWBox))

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 15:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]