This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I reverted your move of this article. Please discuss this on the article talk page and get a consensus for the move. Thanks. BMK (talk) 02:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, although I processed your C2E request for Category:English-language hymns, it seems to me that it would be desirable to reinstate Category:English hymns, as Category:English-language songs gives the model for how the English-language hymns category should be constructed. That is to say, hymns – like songs – should be classified first by country of origin, and only categorised by language if they are from a country where the language is not the majority language. What do you think? – Fayenatic London 10:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Ah, I didn't realize they were doing it that way. That makes since. I'll go ahead and start splitting by country and make the English-language hymn cat look like the corresponding song one. Thanks. --JFH (talk) 13:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome! Let me know if you'd like me to help by making the bot transfer all the contents to another category under C2E again. – Fayenatic London 14:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Would you please call the bot off English hymns? I want to move the English ones there, but the bot moves them back. --JFH (talk) 22:01, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Actually, if you could just move Category:English-language hymns back to Category:English hymns, that should work. I've pulled all the non-English hymns out. --JFH (talk) 02:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

OK, that is done now, and the bot should not change any new things that you place in there. – Fayenatic London 22:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Have you given up on Category:English-language hymns? It has been tagged for deletion as empty now. – Fayenatic London 14:23, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Based on our conversation, the only hymns that would go in that category would be English-langue hymns written in non-English speaking countries. I haven't come across any such hymns, so for now I have no problem with it being deleted. --JFH (talk) 15:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

I've started a peer review of the Mark Driscoll article. Since you've worked on that article before I would definitely welcome your input. -Sigeng (talk) 22:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Reformed Churches of New Zealand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:36, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:The Gospel Coalition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

See proposal here Template_talk:Infobox_theologian#Propose Infobox academic :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sacramental union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regeneration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey. Thanks for reviewing the article. I'm actually recovering from gallbladder surgery with complications right now, so I can't address the article right now. Eventually, I plan to improve it, and I can guess I will nominate it again. Thanks again. Ltwin (talk) 04:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

There has been a raised issue with Questia renewals because right now it requires signing up for a brand new account, but I was discussing it with other Library members. If you have ample amounts of saved data on the free account, I would consider holding it back for a bit, but I could give you another code to make a brand new account. Sorry to have missed your request earlier. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Days of humiliation and thanksgiving, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plague. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Westminster Assembly you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 18:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

I've left a few minor suggestions on the review page. Tim riley talk 19:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wolfgang Capito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Christian liturgies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Fayenatic London 10:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

The article Westminster Assembly you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Westminster Assembly for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Greetings. For your information, when the Church of England refers to itself as being "Reformed" it is not using the word to describe itself as "Calvinist" but in a generic sense of the word. Cheers, Afterwriting (talk) 07:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

You may like this. Mikhail Mishchenko (organ) at the Lutheran Church, Zelenogorsk (Terijoki). Both pieces wonderful, I think. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

On 24 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lord's Supper in Reformed theology, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Reformed theology, the sacrament of the Lord's Supper is believed to strengthen Christians' union with Christ by the spiritual eating of his true body and blood? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lord's Supper in Reformed theology. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Reformed baptismal theology you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 16:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

The article Reformed baptismal theology you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Reformed baptismal theology for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 14:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reformed baptismal theology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Cunningham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

The article Reformed baptismal theology you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Reformed baptismal theology for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 07:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Martyr Vermigli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christ Church Cathedral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

On 29 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reformed baptismal theology, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Reformed theology, baptism is believed to be a replacement for circumcision as a rite signifying forgiveness of sin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reformed baptismal theology. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 03:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Martyr Vermigli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamentations. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Christian worship practices, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peter Martyr Vermigli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 11:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

The article Peter Martyr Vermigli you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Martyr Vermigli for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

In case you're interested! Josh Milburn (talk) 22:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

On 26 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peter Martyr Vermigli, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peter Martyr Vermigli was allegedly challenged to a duel with a double-edged axe by Theodore Bibliander over the doctrine of double predestination? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Martyr Vermigli. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

On 27 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peter Martyr Vermigli bibliography, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peter Martyr Vermigli's best known work, the Loci Communes, is a compilation of excerpts from his biblical commentaries published after his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Martyr Vermigli bibliography. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Martyr Vermigli bibliography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Book of Kings. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

reformed theology

Thank you quality articles on such as Westminster Assembly and Reformed baptismal theology, for creating stubs for churches and categories such as Category:English Anglican theologians, for redirects and images, for reviewing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Gerda Arendt, I really appreciate it! --JFH (talk) 14:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

16 July 2016

Thank you for helpful comments in the FAC! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1400 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for Peter Martyr Vermigli, "an influential but lesser-known Reformation theologian who has experienced a renaissance of scholarly interest. He was born in Italy and converted to Protestantism after meeting Italian reformers. He fled the Inquisition in his forties and spent time with Bucer in Strasbourg, Cranmer in England, and Bullinger in Zurich."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Two years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for today's Westminster Assembly, "a committee of theologians called by the Long Parliament to reform the Church of England during the Civil War. The Westminster Assembly created documents which are part of the constitution of virtually every Presbyterian church in the world."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:25, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! 20:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded for bringing the article on Peter Martyr Vermigli to featured article status. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

By the way, do keep me up-to-date on similar articles nominated at GAC or FAC. I can't make any promises due to RL commitments, but I'll make an effort to take a look at them. (I'm doing my best to write about more academic topics myself, but my focus, given my own interests, will mostly be on contemporary moral and political philosophy/philosophers rather than the history of religious thought/theology. Nonetheless, we're not that far apart!) Josh Milburn (talk) 14:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much, J Milburn. Right now I am taking somewhat of a break but starting in November I plan to get Ninety-five Theses up to FA hopefully in time for the 500th anniversary of the Reformation (10/31/17). I'll keep you updated. --JFH (talk) 18:59, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Maturen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chase|^talk 04:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Result was deletion request declined. 69.50.70.9 (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for creating the article on Fake news site !!!

I added a little bit to it from a few sources.

Do you think it now looks good enough to not be deleted from Wikipedia?

69.50.70.9 (talk) 03:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lord's Supper in Reformed theology you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fake news websites is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fake news websites until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kaldari (talk) 21:37, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Jfhutson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The article Lord's Supper in Reformed theology you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lord's Supper in Reformed theology for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 15:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Jfhutson. I'm just posting to let you know that Peter Martyr Vermigli bibliography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 23, 2017. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ninety-five Theses you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 16:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Ninety-five Theses you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ninety-five Theses for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 16:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Ninety-five Theses you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ninety-five Theses for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 16:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Why did you change the capitalization of templates, like you did ion this edit? The name of the template is ((Bibleverse)), as you can see. If you don't want to capitalize it when you add it yourself, at least don't change it when it is already capitalized. Please also note that AWB and other automated tools may not be used for such changes. Debresser (talk) 10:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, this was how my find and replace was set up. I will be more careful next time.--JFH (talk) 12:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

I appreciate it. Debresser (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

My apologies for reverting your change. I forgot that there was no 2 Philippians. Thanks for correcting it! KNHaw ^(talk) 04:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

No worries! --JFH (talk) 04:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.

You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.

This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

Useful links

• All template-protected pages
• User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
• Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection

Happy template editing! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Jfhutson. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 07:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 07:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello everyone, and sincere apologies if you're getting this message more than once. Just a heads-up that there is currently work on an extension in order to enable CSS styling in templates. Please check the document on mediawiki.org to discuss best storage methods and what we need to avoid with implementation. Thanks, m:User:Melamrawy (WMF), 09:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Hospice général.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the Peter Martyr Vermigli article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 8, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 8, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I saw that some time ago you participated in discussions regarding Catholicism and Catholicity on the page Talk:Catholicism (term). Recently, some of those discussions have been reopened, and maybe you would be interested to take a look? Thanks. Sorabino (talk) 12:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

@Sorabino: This is a mess that I'm not sure I have the energy to untangle now, but I'll offer my 2 cents. I'm frustrated that someone wanting to read about the Protestant, non Anglo-Catholic concept of catholicity (what a Presbyterian means when they say I believe in the holy Catholic church) is going to have trouble finding that topic in the pedia. But I recognize that the Catholic Church is the primary topic for catholic and Catholicism. I don't know how to fix it but that's why I got involved back in the day. --JFH (talk) 18:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

I hear you. That is why I stated in discussions that we need a general article on "catholicity" as a theological concept, and also we need to reestablish the page Catholicism (disambiguation), that would help users to navigate articles on different types of catholicism. Thanks for your comment. Sorabino (talk) 18:58, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the Ninety-five Theses article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 31, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 31, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Looking at Magna Carta, I wonder how you'd feel about an infobox for the the Ninety-five Theses? - I see the same problem of small writing that is not readable at a glance. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

I used infobox book for several reasons. One is I want to link to wikisource, but I also don't like some of the terminology of infobox document which seem more appropriate to treaties and corporate documents. --JFH (talk) 19:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. DYK that I believe that the Reformation never ended? - Reformation - reformation. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the "short work" that started the Reformation, and your hope for Main page appearance coming true! - My idea of celebration was to start an article on Luther's most famous song, which was not in English. That dream did not come true ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I would like to inform you that my translation of your article 95 theses (cs:95 tezí in Czech) has been nominated for the Czech Wikipedia's FA (see cs:Wikipedie:Nominace nejlepších článků). Best,--Ioannes Pragensis (talk) 09:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

@Ioannes Pragensis: Well that's wonderful! I hope the Czech's enjoy it! --JFH (talk) 19:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Jfhutson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hey Jfhutson. I've seen the work that you've done on several Calvinism related articles. I've been looking at the articles on New England theology and New Divinity for a while and have really wished they were in better shape. I have not been able to research it enough to make many improvements or even know where to start. Could you possibly take a look at them and do what you can or, if not, do you know any editors that might have the knowledge and interest to work on these? Thanks Ltwin (talk) 04:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello,

There will be some changes to the way wikitext is parsed during the next few weeks. It will affect all namespaces. You can see a list of pages that may display incorrectly at Special:LintErrors. Since most of the easy problems have already been solved at the English Wikipedia, I am specifically contacting tech-savvy editors such as yourself with this one-time message, in the hope that you will be able to investigate the remaining high-priority pages during the next month.

There are approximately 10,000 articles (and many more non-article pages) with high-priority errors. The most important ones are the articles with misnested tags and table problems. Some of these involve templates, such as infoboxes, or the way the template is used in the article. In some cases, the "error" is a minor, unimportant difference in the visual appearance. In other cases, the results are undesirable. You can see a before-and-after comparison of any article by adding ?action=parsermigration-edit to the end of a link, like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Foss?action=parsermigration-edit (which shows a difference in how ((infobox ship)) is parsed).

If you are interested in helping with this project, please see Wikipedia:Linter. There are also some basic instructions (and links to even more information) at https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-ambassadors/2018-April/001836.html You can also leave a note at WT:Linter if you have questions.

Thank you for all the good things you do for the English Wikipedia. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the Westminster Assembly article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 1, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 1, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jfhutson! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:08, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Chinese Calvinist and Reformed theologians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:40, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Feel free to weigh in here as to whether the Scholasticism template should have a search box or not: User_talk:Epiphyllumlover#Search_boxes_on_templates.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 23:47, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.

You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.

This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a ((ping)) for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.

Useful links

• All template-protected pages
• User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
• Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection

Happy template editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 00:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.