This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your are deliberately vandalizing the article. Monogenes does not mean 'only-begotten' though can be used in that context. Ref: Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (BAGD, 3rd Edition). I have given you various cites/references, but your fascist religious outlook keeps removing my additions, which are cited. This is religious bigotry at the worse, deliberately editing out truth to support your religious view. Shame on you. - Jean — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.211.215 (talk) 07:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

@203.109.211.215: If you look at the results of your edit here, you will notice that the first line: Monogenēs (μονογενὴς) is a Greek word is duplicated. You need to check your work before saving? Shame on you for being sloppy. Jim1138 (talk) 07:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

It is not being sloopy when users such as yourself and 'In ictu oculi' delete edits immediately after placement, and I am trying to work with edit lock outs, cannot edits, and removal of edits. This is not conducive to adding to add information, without mistakes. But fine, shame on me for being sloppy on such as non-leveled field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.211.215 (talk) 08:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

@203.109.211.215: Do you always whine and pull the religion card to get your way? Jim1138 (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

and do you always spin doctor and pull the gun trigger to get your way? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.211.215 (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

The 'Always Was Is and Always Shall Be,' CD was released in 1995. The CD can still be purchased online through a number of outlets. The date of release is clearly delineated in the album credits. I am looking at the CD in my hand right now. I have owned it for years! Thank you. Please look at the actual product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mognj (talk • contribs) 19:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Why don't you get a life instead of sitting in front of your computer all day. The high priestess of knowledge, indeed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mognj (talk • contribs) 20:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

@Mognj: I don't know it all. That's why I want you to cite your sources! Perhaps you should try building an encyclopedia the way many others have discussed and agreed to do rather than hacking it to your satisfaction? Jim1138 (talk) 20:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Sits in front of his computer everyday acting as the arbiter of the grand Wikipedia. The all knowing know it all who is the expert on everything. The savior of the western world. And of course, when questioned about anything, cries to the main office about ill treatment.....By the way......a lousy editor who uses only one source! A joke! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mognj (talk • contribs) 21:30, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138, I'm wondering what pages are appropriate to add information about trenchers to. It seems trenchers may be a banned or regulated topic, as all of my trencher-related edits have been reverted.

For reference, when I say trencher, I am referring to the following:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Im a trencher (talk • contribs) 23:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138, I'm wondering what pages are appropriate to add information about trenchers to. It seems trenchers may be a banned or regulated topic, as all of my trencher-related edits have been reverted.

For reference, when I say trencher, I am referring to the following:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Im a trencher (talk • contribs) 23:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)‎

Hi! User page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:5.223.184.21 isn't necessary anymore. That's all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.131.248.135 (talk) 08:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

The current IP edits are clunky and unhelpfully angry, but not unsourced - the Independent article linked in the lede confirms that "Scotland Yard and the Crown Prosecution Service are in discussions as to whether to take action against Mr Mahmood, who could be investigated for possible perjury or perversion of the course of justice." and the article body contains the sourced sentence "The Sun on Sunday announced that Mahmood had been suspended." --McGeddon (talk) 08:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

why are you removing true reported factual edits, please check source (4) you are being dishonest, you should have your editing rights removed all the best 31.185.167.228 (talk) 08:50, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@31.185.167.228: My apology. It appeared that you were adding that information without adding a source. May I suggest adding an wp:edit summary with your edits? Doing so might prevent this kind of thing. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hey Jimmy--you're quite correct that I made that addition to the Christopher Atkins page, but it WASN'T an error. You can check it out for yourself right there in a special edition of People magazine that IS STILL ON THE STANDS. It's the one that features updates on former child stars, as I stated in the entry! I realize it's odd to say that Atkins is an avid nudist, but THAT'S WHAT PEOPLE MAGAZINE REPORTED! Check it out if you don't believe me, but don't change the entry, for it's factual. I do NOT vandalize Wikipedia; in fact, I'm a HUGE fan of Wikipedia, and would never do anything to harm it. I would have cited the specific date of the issue, but I didn't have it in front of me. But like I said, it's still on the stands as of yesterday. Feel free to e-mail me at RadioactiveSeattle@hotmail.com if you still have a problem with what I did. Thanks! BRYAN STYBLE/Miami, Florida — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3:1000:4E2:9227:E4FF:FEF0:BBDE (talk) 05:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

@2601:3:1000:4E2:9227:E4FF:FEF0:BBDE: I couldn't find anything about in on Google. I would suspect this would be mentioned somewhere: chat room, other news sources, etc. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

I got your message about the edits, I didnt know I had to leave a summary, as I've edited things before without leaving a summary. The reason I changed it because the section about Spain had nothing to do with Christianity or religion in general, and the one about the United Kingdom only linked to an article about the Colonial British killing Australian Aboriginals, I dont see any of this has anything to do with Christian Terrorism. Thanks. 58.178.229.20 (talk) 10:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

@58.178.229.20: It really helps a lot to leave an edit summary. I couldn't figure out why it was deleted with a cursory examination. Someone else deleted it with an edit summary. The text you deleted wasn't formatted very well either. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

You are abusing your position, and using aggressive tactics. Are you an admin? Do you justify your hostile and aggressive actions as an admin?129.133.125.225 (talk) 03:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

I've reported your unwarranted acts on the Administrators noticeboard.

I am getting more snarky attacks on my talk page.129.133.125.225 (talk) 01:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Would you like me to put them here instead? I'm open to suggestions. Elizium23 (talk) 02:40, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, so I just saw you left a message for me about some vandalism done on this page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Royal_baccarat_scandal&oldid=619230690), however that wasn't me. I'm not a user here, but I can show you my history one way or another, or whatever other means I can use, to show you that this is my first time going onto this page. 184.171.192.106 (talk) 03:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim,

On Steve Clark's page here and noticed you were the last to edit it. I have some more info about personal life if you'd like to add, being that he lived in my home in Michigan in 2009 and more.

Thanks,

Adam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.205.82.82 (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Excuse me but mt.angel population is 4.100 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edger01 (talk • contribs) 07:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Can I add information which i know, to an article? The edit i made to page Samsung Galaxy S5 is not from any source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajayy99 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Can i add information i know to an article. The edit i made to the article Samsung Galaxy S5 is not from any source, it is what i know. Ajayy99 (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

I was attacked by a user, and you side with the attacker. Is that standard Wikipedia practice? 129.133.125.225 (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

You assert that me saying that someone is lying is a "personal attack" when it is not. However, that person was so angry with the changes, he violated revert edit rule, **and then went looking at my history of changes and started attacking all of them** And yet I am supposed to be the problem. You do not know what you are doing. You jump into disputes without understanding what has been happening, and then you leave threats on my talk page that you're going to have me blocked. You are the reckless person here. 129.133.125.225 (talk) 20:25, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

I didn't violate any such rule. I made four reverts in four days. That is perfectly well within the limits of reality. Your edits are against consensus, and furthermore against the verifiability policy, so you don't have any rights to keep them in. Your last post is again a personal attack. You need to review WP:CIVIL and keep a cooler head in disputes before you can expect to come here and have us work together with you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

"Your edits are against consensus" Bull. This was never addressed by consensus. There was no such discussion. "and furthermore against the verifiability policy," Absolutely incorrect. You cannot prove that any central authority to name the church exists. In fact, your posts indicate that you know there is no such thing. "Your last post is again a personal attack." That's an irrational comment. "and keep a cooler head in disputes before you can expect to come here" I'm not the one who went and followed through my history and attacked every other post I made. You're lying again.129.133.125.225 (talk) 20:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

"I didn't violate any such rule. I made four reverts in four days." That certainly seems to be an admission that the Evensteven account is a sock puppet of yours. 129.133.125.225 (talk) 20:45, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Has been Vandalising stuff — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.235.172.251 (talk) 03:26, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Why did you erase my edit to One Night Stand (2008)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philgta5 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

@Philgta5: You didn't cite a source. Jim1138 (talk) 03:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

What is a source? Sorry. I'm new to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philgta5 (talk • contribs) 04:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

You need to change the incorrect information regarding the biographical section of Maududi. The names listed as "influences" are incorrect. They are the ones who influenced from Maududi's thoughts. And he did not graduate from Darul Uloom Deoband. Read his information. This wikipedia page is misguiding and misinforming viewers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:C56A:C500:917E:F4F7:32CF:3FA8 (talk) 05:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 2604:2000:C56A:C500:917E:F4F7:32CF:3FA8 (talk) 05:19, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I changed and deleted the names as there is no verifiability. I added a footnote for you to review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Za2198 (talk • contribs) 05:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Tecnmaticity, I recently got your message that you have reverted my changes made on Online "Journalism in India". I guess that there was no error from my side and I would like you to revert back the changes that you have made. And I'm sorry that I didn't put a suitable reason for the changes that I made, if you want then I can give edit that article myself with appropriate reason. Moreover I live in india and as per popularity, I made those changes, so that the person with more notability should be highlighted. Anyways apart from all this, let me know your response. Thank you.

Technmaticity (talk) 06:32, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Edit: I didn't got your reply and therefore had to made changes myself in the page with appropriate reasons. I think you won't find it harsh/offensive. And yes, I have put suitable reason this time. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Technmaticity (talk • contribs) 06:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

We talk about an unilateral decision, when the opposite side didn't have any option. They weren't equal partners. So this isn't a treaty, this is an unilateral dictate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.249.247.244 (talk) 07:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

82.231.88.102 (talk) 06:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Bonjour !

Je suis Ferdinand LACOUR, j'habite en France, je suis un ex-militaire et je fais parti d'une association Franco-tamoule, La France MGR Péravai, dont le président est Monsieur Murugu Batmanabin. J'ai vécu dans ma jeunesse, pendant cinq ans en Inde, à Pondichéry, exactement.

Il se trouve que je suis devenu rédacteur sur Wiki que depuis peu de temps. Je ne maîtrise pas parfaitement tous les outils !

Je me suis spécialisé sur la question de M.G.Ramachandiran dit MGR, en France. Je suis entrain de faire un livre sur ce personnage en langue française.

J'ai amassé durant pas mal d'années une somme importante d'informations sur MGR. Je possède une chaine sur Youtube (Vous tapez Ferdinand Lacour MGR) et une autre sur FreeBox, où je diffuse régulièrement des films ou des reportages sur MGR.

Je peux vous communiquer mon e-mail : lacourferdinand@hotmail.fr

Maintenant je souhaiterai savoir quel est le problème que vous m'accusez ?

Ferdinand LACOUR

In English :

Hello,

I am Ferdinand LACOUR, I live in France, I am an ex-serviceman and I make party of a French-Tamil association, France MGR PÉRAVAI, of whom the president is Mister Murugu Batmanabin. I lived in my youth, during five years in India, to Pondichéry, exactly.

It turns out that I became a writer on Wiki that recently of time. I do not master perfectly all the tools!

I specialized on M.G.Ramachandiran's question said MGR, in France. I am spirit to make a book on this person in French language.

I amassed during quite a lot of years a large sum of information about MGR.. I possess a chaine on Youtube ( You type Ferdinand Lacour MGR) and the other one on FreeBox, where I spread regularly films or reports on MGR.

I can communicate you my e-mail: lacourferdinand@hotmail.fr

Now I shall wish to know what is the problem which you accuse me ?

Ferdinand LACOUR

82.231.88.102 (talk) 06:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Ferdinand LACOUR82.231.88.102 (talk) 06:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

You sign your name without explanation. Jim1138 (talk) 06:53, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138: your swift reversal of an edit to the Scottish independence page also reverted grammatical changes that are valid. I accept your issue about the general nature of the article—I have relocated the content to another page, as there is nowhere for the events of this year to be sufficiently documented—but a thorough check of the revision would have revealed the aforementioned edits. Cheers,--Soulparadox (talk) 08:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

@Soulparadox: Are you referring to this edit to Scottish independence which I undid here? Or, this edit to Scottish Governement which I undid here? If you would please link the article here and perhaps a wp:diff or date and time, that would help. You can undo other's wp:revert, but Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

No problem. I received your latest message about the content being elsewhere in the article, so it is all good on that front. Now that I have had a break, I will eventually attend to those minor grammar/syntax issues. Regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 07:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jim1138

I have just written a new article for wikipedia about the History of Warfare documentary series. I would like it if you may please review it to see if it passes wikipedia requirements for new pages because it has three references to the New York Times review.

Privatesteverogers (talk) 10:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jim1138

I just finished the changes you ask for me to do on my article. Thanks for your advice I was able to improve it in a lot of areas. Can we publish it on Wikipedia now?

Privatesteverogers (talk) 04:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Jim, hi,

Sorry for having taken so long to respond to your action.

I am NOT VERY SAVVY in terms of how to navigate Wikipedia & often find it challenging (especially, in light of time management, being the sole care-provider of a post-stroke partner...).

Anyway, I NO LONGER remember my edition to the Atlantic ocean entry/value & have no record kept thereof (would appreciate a reminder/link to it... :) ;)

I am NOT sure, when removing it, what you meant by it appearing to be "a test"...&would appreciate your explanation (if you could send it to my email address-that would be best :)

Kind thanks,

AviAK63 (talk) 08:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Don't abuse me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leorooroo (talk • contribs) 10:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

al hasan al basry is muslim scientist he is the first one to know bought light before this anderson even before instine and he is the first to know bout light scattering not anderson so don't steel arabic inventions and claim that it's done done by non arabs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.55.155.20 (talk) 10:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

@217.55.155.20: Please write an article on Al Hasan Al Basry. Don't take over the Anders Jonas Ångström article. Jim1138 (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey jim . I was add extra information to dan bilzerian. Why you delete it ? It's true info. Please don't delete it. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Be2pac (talk • contribs) 11:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

on you notion about Maryam Mirzakhani Wiki page. Proferssor Mirzakhani has lived in US for more than 10 years,and during this time period which continues as we are talking,she has married to a US citizen(John Vornak,an IBM researcher:http://theory.stanford.edu/~jvondrak/). So I believe what that can best describe Prof. Mirzakhani's current citizenship and nationality is to say that she is an Iranina-born mathematician who currently resides in California,US.do you agree with me? Rezameyqani (talk) 11:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

on you notion about Maryam Mirzakhani Wiki page. Proferssor Mirzakhani has lived in US for more than 10 years,and during this time period which continues as we are talking,she has married to a US citizen(John Vornak,an IBM researcher:http://theory.stanford.edu/~jvondrak/). So I believe what that can best describe Prof. Mirzakhani's current citizenship and nationality is to say that she is an Iranina-born mathematician who currently resides in California,US.do you agree with me? Rezameyqani (talk) 11:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

@Rezameyqani: Did you read what I put on your talk page several times? I said "Cite your source". Putting it on an wp:edit summary or on my talk page is not citing a source. You should also add an wp:edit summary explaining your reasoning wp:page history. You have not left any edit summaries on Fields Medal and what edit summaries you left on Maryam Mirzakhani's page don't describe what you did. For instance: "Some updates on Maryam Mirzakhani's Wikipage". Most changes could be construed as "some updates". "Changing citizenship per citation" would be useful. I have no problem with your changes, provided you cite your source on the article page. Attempting to give you advice and getting this response is really getting frustrating. Jim1138 (talk) 23:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim, On the Stansfield College page you posted that "This article appears to be written like an advertisement." How can I improve it to have it sound less like an ad. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veshant (talk • contribs) 10:11, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

@Veshant: I would suggest looking at other college articles. The wp:tone should be encyclopedic. Text such as (in the article): "A degree from the University of London is a mark of excellence, respected by employers and universities worldwide" would be considered wp:puffery and should be avoided. Jim1138 (talk) 10:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi there JIM,

please see this message i sent to a fellow user (also admin, check it out here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mattythewhite#Serious_stuff), maybe it'll shed some light on why this person, which you reverted at least in André Gomes, is doing what he is doing.

Attentively, happy editing (please reply here if you choose to do so) --84.90.219.128 (talk) 21:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

By the way, judging from Ivan Cavaleiro or Steven Vitória, he re-reverted after you took action, beware. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 21:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

• Continues to revert even the administrator User:Mattythewhite with the summary "biased UEFA", when UEFA.com is the governing body of European football and its website is 100% reliable as a football-related source. I give up reverting him, you folks will deal with this accordingly methinks.

Attentively --84.90.219.128 (talk) 23:29, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

• Don't want to reply fine with me, but just to notify you he's also reverting you, at Eduardo Salvio! --84.90.219.128 (talk) 00:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

AL, didn't you leave Wikipedia? 188.81.115.107 (talk) 00:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Why are such biased references added to the Honours section? 188.81.115.107 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Not sure how I messed that up, it was supposed to be a simple redirect. Sorry about that. DSkauai (talk) 04:55, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Good day! How can I delete a recent post I have made? Thank youLucyousbeck (talk) 06:10, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Lucyousbeck

@Lucyousbeck: Are you refering to Sheena sanares? If you are the primary and only significant author, you can add ((db-author)). See wp:Speedy deletions#g7. Please avoid adding stuff to the top of my talk pages such as the "====Heading Text====" that you added. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi jim the truth is that Eddie mabo is 56 thanks😄😄😀 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Your friend 6969 (talk • contribs) 07:16, 18 August 2014‎ (UTC)

@Your friend 6969: If Eddie Mabo was born 6/29/1936 and died 1/21/1992, he was 55 when he died. If the dates are incorrect, please change, but wp:cite your sources Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 16:32, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Sure, you are within your rights to remove valid information that takes (literally) seconds to verify. As somebody who fixes lots of newbie edits I just personally think it's counter-productive to delete correct, non-controversial information. Because you could also add a "citation needed" tag. But you are correct, you certainly did nothing out of bounds in deleting the correct, non-controversial information that an IP added to the article without a citation. Cheers Rikster2 (talk) 17:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

@Rikster2: I could, but I did leave enough info for the anon to learn to add a citation, including an invitation to ask questions of me here. By allowing unsourced material to be put on articles, I suspect you are encouraging others not to add citations which I find rather troubling. Perhaps you should contact the anons yourself and offer advice on how to add a citation? Jim1138 (talk) 18:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

How did I allow unsourced material by adding a citation? You should take a look at WP:PRESERVE by the way, you might find it interesting. You also might want to finish reading WP:BURDEN to the part that says "If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it." Last, you should remember that I didn't start this conversation with you, you did on my Talk page. You are probably a good guy, and I am sure you mean well, so I'll stop with that. Rikster2 (talk) 19:55, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

@Rikster2: Actually, you started the conversation with your edit summary here. I did thank you for adding a citation on your talk page. Note: WP:V is part of WP:Five pillars where WP:PRESERVE is not. I would suggest that you encourage others to cite their sources rather than just add them yourself. I do encourage others to do so btw. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

My edit summary was not the start of a conversation. You were not forced to post on my Talk page, you chose to. Note: both WP:V and WP:PRESERVE encourage editors to fix problems vs. revert them. Adding sources where they are missing is without question improving the encyclopedia (I also counsel new editors btw), whereas removing correct and non-controversial information from articles without trying to source doesn't. As I said in the first message on this thread, you certainly were within your rights to do what you did (and as I also said, I am sure that you mean well). But that doesn't make it the best (or only) move. Rikster2 (talk) 20:26, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

@Rikster2: It's only uncontroversial when the info is accurate. When you figure out how to get citations to be added to articles with the edit, let me know. I'm all ears. Until then... Jim1138 (talk) 22:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

How dare you say that the link I put to Sharon Cuneta was a bad link? It's a true link don't you see? Whether it's a good news or bad news, the fact that it's true, so who are you to remove it?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.71.116.54 (talk) 07:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

The name of Union council is Fazla Kachh. Please change. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fazal_Katchh&action=submit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.108.76.10 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 20 August 2014‎ (UTC)

@5.108.76.10: I can change the name. Do you have a link that supports this? The name should be supported by as stated in wp:v. See wp:reliable sources for what would be acceptable. Also, the reference on Fazal Katchh is dead. Do you have something to correct it with? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Just to let you know, the edit I made on the user page of Ollie231213 was NOT a test. It was a normal edit. Please fix your mistake, the edit is not against any policy. (Deaths in 2013) (talk) 04:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

@Deaths in 2013: See WP:NOBAN Jim1138 (talk) 04:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at 88.104.22.9's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

88.104.22.9 (talk) 04:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Horse Protection Act of 1970 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The '''Horse Protection Act of 1970''' ('''HPA'''); codified ((usc|15|1821|1831)))((efn|Full details: ((USStatute|91|540|84|1404|1970|12|09)), amended ((USStatute|94|360|90|915|1976|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Not vandalism. Terrorism perpetrated by Israelis against peaceful Muslims is a fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.188.166 (talk) 07:18, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey Jim, I met Arjun Kapoor and asked his actual so he told me its 6 ft 0 inches. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.208.88.186 (talk) 08:25, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

"rv vand to last good version"
Thank you, member of the subtle vandalism taskforce, for welcoming and reverting vandalism, for redirects and attention to detail, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

There are two categories of plot summaries:

1. Gives the general gist of the story, generally excluding specific details of character deaths, romances, falling-outs, and many others, unless they are a vital part of the plot in progress. For example, if a character death is a crucial motivator for another character, and thus drives the story forward, an exception could be easily justified.

2. A blow-by-blow account of the entire story, generally considered inappropriate for an encyclopedia.

I see example #1 much more often in Wikipedia, and thus considered it the standard approach. Am I incorrect?

The prevalence of example #1 is also the reason spoiler tags are generally unnecessary in Wikipedia articles, for they would be redundant. I can therefore agree with not making them part of standard editing procedure. (And thank you for pointing me to that page elucidating Wikipedia's policy on spoiler tags.)

That said, the section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars:_The_Force_Unleashed_%28project%29#Story appears to include elements of both examples, generally following the tone of example #1, with the exception of one significant plot detail which would normally be found in a description following the model of example #2. The fact that it doubles as a significant spoiler is perhaps incidental.

Do you disagree?

Gibbousmoon100 (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

@Gibbousmoon100: I'm not that familiar. I would suggest Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary for a guide. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:20, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. The following sentence from that page seems to indicate that that entire sentence should be deleted, rather than having a spoiler tag placed before it: "However, when summarizing a plot and choosing what details to include, editors should use discretion. The advantages of exhaustive coverage of the work are in dynamic tension with the desire to preserve the artistic qualities of the work for readers.[4] Wikipedia should contain potentially "spoiling" detail where it substantially enhances the reader's understanding of the work and its impact but be omitted when it merely ruins the experience of the work of fiction for our readers." Does including the death of the protagonist at the conclusion of the story enhance the reader's understanding of the work, in your opinion? Gibbousmoon100 (talk) 06:36, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

@Gibbousmoon100: I would think the protagonist's death should be discussed. Otherwise, the plot would be incomplete. Someone who saw the film and wishing to refresh their memory would want that info. Someone who hadn't seen the film and doesn't want it spoiled should stop at a heading of "plot". Stopping can be difficult! Should the heading "Story" be changed to "Plot"? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:43, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

I disagree with you for the reasons I already outlined (namely, that I consider example #1 to be a superior plot description to example #2), but if you were to argue that this particular example represents a gray area, I would have to concede to that. But I've read many dozens, if not hundreds, of great plot summaries on wikipedia (of stories I've already seen or read) that gracefully exclude spoiling the very end of the story. In any case, I don't care enough either way to push the issue, not being a huge Star Wars fan. But I expect the paragraph left as is to both surprise and "ruin the experience of the work of fiction for our readers" for long-time users of wikipedia who are accustomed to plot summaries that adhere to my example #1 above. Gibbousmoon100 (talk) 07:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

@Gibbousmoon100: I bow to your superior expertise. I am not one for films in general. Thanks for the discussion. I hope I didn't make this overly complex. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jim1138: Ditto. I am leaving the entry as-is. For as long as I am a new wikipedia editor (albeit a long-time user), I will concede to the opinions of more experienced editors. Thank you again for the informative links and information. Gibbousmoon100 (talk) 11:43, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jim1138

I just finished the changes you ask for me to do on my article. Thanks for your advice! I was able to improve it in a lot of areas. Can we publish it on Wikipedia now?

Privatesteverogers (talk) 04:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

@Privatesteverogers: Sorry, I thought I replied to your last post, something must have gone haywire. Were you planning on going through WP:AFC? AfC appears to be rather backed up. I am not familiar with the process and probably not the best person to ask. You could take a look Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation here. Also, you can ask questions at wp:teahouse. Hope this helps. Jim1138 (talk) 04:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

No need to worry Jim I was able to find a guy and he is showing me how I can post the article to wikipedia, I coulf take a while because there so many articles to review so in a week or so I should get my anser in a few days.Wish me luck!!! Privatesteverogers (talk) 03:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

@Privatesteverogers: Best of luck! It looks pretty good to me! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

???? I am discussing edit warring. What are you taking about. 68.50.21.190 (talk) 18:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

O really? 68.50.21.190 (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138, The addition to where Haileybury is located is actually right. Haileybury has opened a new campus in Beijing in the last year. It is one of the campuses mentioned on notices. I am a student at Haileybury, Brighton myself, so I should know. Thanks (HEROBRINEROXTHEWORLD (talk) 00:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC))

@HEROBRINEROXTHEWORLD: The link you used was red, so you probably did not format the link correctly. As the article is titled "Haileybury, Melbourne", saying it is located in China would be confusing. I would suggest adding it somewhere else on the page. Remember wp:verifiability and to wp:cite your sources. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138 Thanks for the advice. And by the way, I didn't intend to put a link in the Beijing campus. That is why it was red. But thanks anyway. (HEROBRINEROXTHEWORLD (talk) 02:41, 25 August 2014 (UTC))

you're comments are IRRELEVANT and so is your stop sign. do something else with your time. Until you know the facts, don't coment either.

(Leftjab1234 (talk) 02:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC))

dear Jim, many of the data are not correct at all. please change it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amalagiri (talk • contribs) 06:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

There's something 'odd' happening with your talkpage as the text is running off the left hand margin and I can't see it! Nb. I am editing with an Android tablet. Preview works, but once I save it it goes 'strange' :-\ -220 of ^Borg 10:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

@220 of Borg: Thanks. It only showed up when the window was rather narrow, so I didn't see it. Needed both the <div style="float:right"> and a line with space in the front for it to happen. Jim1138 (talk) 23:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Yep it looks OK now, was 'weird' before!--220 of ^Borg 01:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138
I also came across Mohan Bose (talk · contribs), whom you reverted at North Bengal (NB), when they created the unsourced North Bengal, Bangladesh, which now appears to me to be text copied from NB. They again deleted most text from NB here soon after you reverted their unexplained edit there.

They have also made unexplained/unsourced edits edits to Jalpaiguri, which has a history of sockpuppetry. AGF, I have only a suspicion at the moment but WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sayan Basu/Archive may enlighten. Regards, 220 of ^Borg 10:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

No comment about this? I noticed just today that they actually appear to have split North Bengal (NB) into two pages North Bengal, Bangladesh and North Bengal, India. NB seems to be page that has suffered a lot of POV editing as a look back in the history shows the page has been much bigger than it is currently.
(Me fella thinkum maybe dispela boi beum sockypuppet. 'Pig' tok pisin?)  ;-) --220 of ^Borg 02:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

My granddaughter has just been diagnosed with Premordial Drawfism. She is a twin. Her twin brother does not have it. 172.56.8.146 (talk) 04:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

@172.56.8.146: Why did you send me this message? Jim1138 (talk) 08:07, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Why are always undoing the edit which I am doing in the article "Jalpaiguri"?!!

Hi,

sorry it was my mistake! I accidently deleted the text! I was going to restore it, but you beat me to it! Thanks for sorting it out!

D — Preceding unsigned comment added by RCS89 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

100 Days Of Love is a Malayalam Movie written and directed by Jenuse Mohamed starring Dulquer Salmaan and Nithya Menen in the lead role — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.175.104.223 (talk) 13:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim, you recently undid an edit of mine regarding an addition to the antifoul paints page, your issue was with a lack of citations. As I happen to work for one of the companies that I didn't name (remaining neutral!) I know that there aren't really any completely independent sources of information regarding effectiveness of the technology, bar a few magazine reviews (if these could be called impartial is again debatable!) and the various companies own websites. Would these magazines be an acceptable citation ?

I am not aiming to advertise any company, just to add information that there is an alternative technology to these paints.

With thanks, Sheldon — Preceding unsigned comment added by SheldonP101 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

@SheldonP101: Yes, a magazine citation would do fine. Thanks for asking. If you want me to fill out the reference, I would gladly do so. For a detailed ref, you can use template:cite journal or template:cite web. Thanks for asking! BTW: what would you call such a coating? "anti-fouling paint", "antifouling paint", or something else? My American dictionary seems to prefer "antifouling". Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

That clears that up, thanks! I have actually started a page in my sandbox regarding the technology so I will add it to the list of references I have yet to put up. I don't think there is a real issue with what the paint is called, the same way that you would probably call rubbish trash (presuming that you have an American dictionary because you are American!)Fouling is a wide term used to describe anything unwanted on a surface, so 'to antifoul' or to 'use anti-fouling paints' is what I usually go by, but I dont even think about it, and now I look back I have used both! (I guess its more writing style after looking up the grammar rules!)

With thanks, SheldonP101 (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

100 Days Of Love is a Malayalam Movie written and directed by Jenuse Mohamed starring Dulquer Salmaan and Nithya Menen in the lead role

Fb :https://www.facebook.com/100DaysOfLoveOfficial https://plus.google.com/u/0/+100DaysOfLoveOfficial — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basil9886 (talk • contribs) 14:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Dear Jim 1138,

Please use sinhaladic.com to translate 'nemma' which is the sinhala word to english word bend. please visit the description of treasure voyages of general zheng he which describes the namunukula mountain as parrot's beak mountain becasue of this charateristic bent.

Cheers! 61.245.173.29 (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim,

I am Tim Watson, and was just providing updated information on what I'm doing now, and my children.

Thanks,

Tim Watson tim@upliftsystems.com (404) 245-4447 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:0:9E00:5C2:1EA:4A0A:FB03:C737 (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

New to Wikipedia I feel ashamed for the human hair industry I love so much to read such twoddle on the 'Artificial Hair Integrations'. There is nothing 'artificial' about human hair..and the list goes on. There are many posts on 'talk' which say the same. I would love to overhaul it without biass. Many of the comments on 'talk' should happen. Is this possible in an easy fashion or do I need to spend weeks earning a Wiki degree? LynneWalsh (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@LynneWalsh: If you wish, I could format references for you. You could make a list in your sandbox (User:LynneWalsh/sandbox) and let me know when you want them formatted, I would be happy to do that for you. You can also ask questions at the wp:teahouse, if I'm not available. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:39, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jim It is known that the time period that Inuyasha takes place is the futile era. All I did was add that to the synopsis — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJones3704 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@JJJones3704: Perhaps, but given there could be issues with calling it that and I don't see it in Sengoku period, so per WP:verifiability, I ask that you add a WP:RS. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 23:39, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Is citing a quote from Kagome in a specific episode good enough? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJones3704 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@JJJones3704: I Googled "Sengoku period" with "futile era" and got one hit: fanfiction.net/u/4357376/foxgirl8 As that alternate name is not common, I am concerned that your addition might be construed as derogatory. Perhaps you shouldn't add it. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:27, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough. It's probably more known as Futile Era in the American version of the Anime. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJones3704 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Feudal era, not futile era. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:34, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

I was in the middle of typing a deletion request for an article (TVRage) which had nothing except a redirect to an unrelated article. In Correct (talk) 01:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Please don't blank pages with no explanation. Your used of wp:proposed deletion for a redirect is improper. Please use a wp:rfd Jim1138 (talk) 01:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Please stop 'watching' my edits to wiki articles, as you have recently commented on my talk page on Cairns. You have NEVER even edited the Cairns article, and I doubt you even know where it is, so you 'response' on my talk page was unnecessary. The edits were non-specific as I couldn't see the full size just editing the 1 section, so I saved it instead of doing it all over again. I would appreciate you not stalking me and I am asking you as nicely as I can, and I will only do this once. Greatly Appreciated. Luxure (talk) 09:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Please stop blackmail. >Jim1138. The political stance of the coverage of the newspaper, and that, to a comprehensive introduction to the report, other than to determine it, there is no proof of Shoga. In the case of Asahi Shimbun of Japan, for the "right of collective self-defense", reports attitude can be seen in a third party as a matter of course it is the editorial in the Asahi Shimbun. Articles footnote written by I, is an article against the editorial "right of collective self-defense" in the Asahi Shimbun in the past. That is, other than the method that I wrote, there is no verifiable way.

Or, if Nosere articles newspaper addition to the news and,'s liberal newspaper the Asahi Shimbun, do you become proof that you say?

Your claim is haphazard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niconicodouga (talk • contribs) 11:35, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Niconicodouga (talk) 11:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)==Example New York Times== In accordance with policies of Wiki, Can you presented by issuing the source, that the New York Times is a liberal tone?

Niconicodouga (talk) 12:16, 30 August 2014 (UTC)These are all the title of the editorial in the Asahi Shimbun against the right of collective self-defense of Japan. July 19, 2012 Right of collective self-defense - remarks of Prime Minister fragile (Asahi Shimbun editorial) September 14, 2012 Liberal Democratic Party presidential election - I want to hear is prepared to bear country (Asahi Shimbun editorial) January 28, 2013 Defense review - description of the prime minister is not enough (Asahi Shimbun editorial) February 9, 2013 Right of collective self-defense - the prime minister what do you want to (Asahi Shimbun editorial) March 20, 2013 '10 Iraq - Politics (Asahi Shimbun editorial) remorse and verification April 29, 2013 Day of Sovereignty - Only then summarize the mistakes (Asahi Shimbun editorial) May 22, 2013 Enemy base attack theory - Na increase the tension of useless (Asahi Shimbun editorial) August 3, 2013 Right of collective self-defense - first with the exercise of rights and personnel (Asahi Shimbun editorial) September 17, 2013 Exercise of the right of collective self-defense - related to the foundation of the Constitution (Asahi Shimbun editorial) September 28, 2013 Prime Minister UN speech - If you say pacifism (Asahi Shimbun editorial)

Niconicodouga (talk) 12:17, 30 August 2014 (UTC)In the Japanese version, editorial, can not usually browse.

Asahi Shimbun is a liberal newspaper that represents Japan. Do you make reckless claims and if it has not been expressed newspaper is, liberal things themselves, that there is no evidence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niconicodouga (talk • contribs) 03:29, 30 August 2014 (UTC) Description of the political stance of the Asahi Shimbun, editorial comparison of five companies newspaper of Japan. Especially compared and verified site that specializes on "the right to collective self-defense". [1] Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niconicodouga (talk • contribs) 03:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from intimidation. 1. Stance of the newspaper, in describing space for five major Japanese newspapers of the English version already Has been described in the source without that it is a liberal, but it has not been deleted. 2. Source indicating that it has posted an editorial against the right of collective self-defense is presented already. Furthermore, concluded by the fact that you are opposed to the right to collective self-defense, you can determine that liberal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niconicodouga (talk • contribs) 03:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

@Niconicodouga: You added the content, you cite it per WP:BURDEN. You might read WP:CIVIL. I am far more likely to work with you if you are such. BTW: No. 2: what are you talking about? Jim1138 (talk) 04:16, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Niconicodouga (talk) 11:30, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Please stop blackmail. >Jim1138. The political stance of the coverage of the newspaper, and that, to a comprehensive introduction to the report, other than to determine it, there is no proof of Shoga. In the case of Asahi Shimbun of Japan, for the "right of collective self-defense", reports attitude can be seen in a third party as a matter of course it is the editorial in the Asahi Shimbun. Articles footnote written by I, is an article against the editorial "right of collective self-defense" in the Asahi Shimbun in the past. That is, other than the method that I wrote, there is no verifiable way.

Or, if Nosere articles newspaper addition to the news and,'s liberal newspaper the Asahi Shimbun, do you become proof that you say?

Your claim is haphazard.

Niconicodouga (talk) 12:19, 30 August 2014 (UTC)After that it can not diverted to the source of the English version of the content you have written on the Japanese version of the Asahi Shimbun, Asahi Shimbun, to be published only in the English version, the article inconvenient to their own, it was not the fact Who would?

I will question the essential problem.

Niconicodouga (talk) 12:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)How is that even the correct article, the only article of the Japanese is not observed as a source? It is despicable racism was on the grounds of language.

I'm the one who blanked the Pear Linux page. Couldn't say it has any useful content before blanking — it was redirected to Linux distribution where there is no word about Pear Linux itself. So, the redirect was misleading. It could be redirected to Operating system or Application for no much difference.

Pear linux itself is a less popular Linux distribution, and it's worth mentioning only because it shows a severe effort to copy Apple OSes look and feel. I guess the best solution is to place a stub article on the Pear Linux page. --31.28.118.179 (talk) 12:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

@31.28.118.179: The redirect could be deleted. To do so, a wp:redirects for discussion (RFD) should be used. Someone looking for Pear Linux would be confused finding a blank page. If the redirect is absurd (such as windows redirecting to geranium), I would suggest leaving it alone. Thanks for the note! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 15:52, 30 August 2014 (UTC)