Hello, Jim Derby. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Hello, Jim Derby. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there! Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Hi Jim, I've read that you are interested about articles related to wood structure or wood works. Try to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Woodworking and I think this will help you--Wakowako (talk) 05:50, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think that your article is pretty solid now and should pass through with flying colors. If for any reason it does not, let me know. I will be happy to create the article for you, there is no reason that is shouldn't go through now. It's well written and the sourcing is real solid. --Sue Rangell✍ ✉ 02:29, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You may also want me to create the article for you if you are affiliated with the guild in any way, as I am a neutral 3rd party. --Sue Rangell✍ ✉ 02:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Timber Framers Guild, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Hi Jim, just a heads-up on some of the arcana of wikilink syntax.
MediaWiki (the wiki engine behind WP) forces all page names to have their initial letter capitalised. Because this is then implicit, links don't have to specify it. So linking to an article like Bressummer from within the middle of a sentence works just as well with [[bressummer]] as it does with [[Bressummer]] and rather more simply than [[Bressummer|bressummer]].
It's also possible to decorate wikilinks by using suffixes, e.g. [[jetty]]ing gives jettying, without needing the pipe form.
Thanks a million Andy. I had noticed simpler links that still worked but I had not looked to see an easier way. :) Jim Derby (talk) 23:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for your efforts on timber framing. It's a great start on bringing woodworking topics up to scratch. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Personal User Award: the Oak Leaf and Acorn Hex Sign
The stylized leaves of the white oak in their fall colors on this Pennsylvania Dutch hex sign are a symbol of strength; acorns denote youth and great prospects. This award is given as a courtesy for edits that strengthen and reinvigorate a Wikipage, even if they may not qualify for a particular Barnstar. I second the previous conferral of the excellent new editor barnstar for your work on timber framing, and confer in addition a Personal User Award for your willingness to keep at it and improve it. ElijahBosley(talk ☞) 23:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Articles related to architecture over the past two weeks are listed automatically by AlexNewArtBot.
This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.
This template will be updated regularly. If you would rather not receive this bulletin, just delete it from your talk page.
Hello and welcome to the WikiProject Architecture - here's the bulletin - if you don't like it just delete it from your talk page, otherwise, it automatically updates. Please give me or one of the other project members a shout if you need any help. Kind regards ELEKHHT 07:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Interesting to see your edit recently. I've only see the third edition of Fowler's book, can you tell me what stacked board construction involves?
I'm not sure about the Masswall heading, it's not a term in normal use. ProfDEH (talk) 17:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi ProfDEH. You are correct that masswall is not a widely used term. I am still learning how to write an encyclopedia and I am finding that sometimes technical terms which sum things up in one or two words may not be the best choice unless they are already widely known. You or I can gladly change the heading to something like "Wall construction". Mass wall seems to be the more common spelling as I search online. Part of the Oxford English Dictionary definition gives the sense of mass as "...A body of coherent and (really or apparently) ponderous matter of relatively large bulk...". The term is used in construction for stone, brick, horizontal log, horizontal board and plank walls, in other words, walls which are stacked up without voids. I was not able to find a dictionary definition of mass wall but I think it is a relatively common term in the construction industry. [1] Here is a reliable source which uses the term. Fowler simply called the "stacked board wall" a "board wall". He has probably provided the best description of this type of historic carpentry of any written source going on from page 41 to 52 about these walls. The first edition of A Home for All is here: [2]. Eventually I intend on writing articles for board wall and some other types of carpentry currently absent from Wikipedia. The only Wikipedia example I can refer you to now is the article Wildfell which has images of stacked plank construction (I recently edited this article to use the term stacked plank wall). Thanks for contacting me. I have made some edits supported with references only to have them promptly deleted instead of discussed so I appreciate your civility. Jim Derby (talk) 20:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Welcome, let me know if I can help in any way![edit]
Greetings and welcome to Wikipedia, Jim! I've seen your name a few times on the edit list, and seeing as you are interested in related areas (my big ones are architectural history and history of technology), I figured I ought to welcome you. I dropped you a welcome at the Commons, but I'm not sure if you will see it there, so I figured I'd say hi here too. If I can be of any assistance in pages, projects, or general info on where to find things or a second pair of eyes, let me know, and when I have time I can try to help out. Best wishes, Morgan Riley (talk) 19:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Have been lurking for a while on your edits to barn. It's beginning to get a little image-heavy and the see also list is in danger of looking like a category. I think that overall you are doing very good work, but you might want to start thinking about whether it might work better to add more general summary content about barns, and on the specific designs, create some sort of thing like "List of types of barns", perhaps in an annotated chart looking like the one in National Register of Historic Places listings in Lewis and Clark County, Montana. Chart syntax is a pain in the ass and it's time-consuming, but might be the way to handle all the images and the new articles you have on different types of barns. You could also do a similar chart-with-pictures within the existing article, the way we did at Leopard complex. Just some ideas. Montanabw(talk) 22:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the input. I agree. "Barns" are a very large subject and as the information is compiled I agree the various topics should be discussed in different articles and the list separated or worked into the text. Thanks again. Jim Derby (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you on behalf of WikiProject Forestry! We appreciate your contribution(s) and invite you to join us in further improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to forestry. Feel free to ask questions or make suggestions on the project's talk page.
Thanks for the suggestion. Normally I don't do translations from other wikis: I've found that with the exception of de: most of them are rather sloppy on referencing, so that I eventually have to chase the sources as if I am writing the article myself.
The topic you suggested seemed interesting to me, however I would not be satisfied with simple translation, for a number of reasons. (May be I am overusing due diligence :-). But I am working on it. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:45, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I created a section to address Yutsi's proposal to merge Miller into Gristmill. I added your name as 'support' based on my understanding of your comments in a prior section. If I failed to adequately capture your direction, please feel free to strike my summary or correct it to reflect your opinion. Thanks, SBaker43 (talk) 20:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/New England Barn concern[edit]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/New England Barn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Hello Jim! Since you seem to know something about architecture, perhaps you could help me translate an article from German. If you don't know German, it doesn't matter. The problem is one word that means a kind of roof design: Kreuzdach. It literally means "crossroof", and this, apparently, is a roof with two ridges that cross at right angles to each other, and a gable at each of the four ends, whose lower corners touch each other at the building's corners, rather like what you see in this diagram. Do you know if this is simply called a "cross roof" in English? You can never be sure of these things (Satteldach in German, for instance, does not mean the same as "saddle roof" in English, even though Sattel means "saddle"). Thanks for any help. Kelisi (talk) 01:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello Kelisi. Sorry about the long delay in responding. I was not ignoring you, I simply have not had time for Wikipedia. I tend to have more time in the winter. To answer your question, I do not think there is an English name for the cross roof you have presented. I have a vague recollection of seeing a roof like you show and I think it may be an element of a particular architectural style, but I cannot remember what style. I will look into it more. Thanks for noticing I like architecture. I like being helpful but I do not know German, typically I use a machine translator to get a sense of foreign language sites but often the specialized words I use are not translated. In other words I do not know how much I can help. What article is it? Jim Derby (talk) 19:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No problem! The English translation is in this article. The original German is in this article. I have tentatively translated the term "cross roof". I'm afraid I don't know where you might find a picture of the Catholic chapel at Stromberger Straße 14 in Daxweiler. Thanks for any help, though. Kelisi (talk) 01:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
to the present time; including what is now Gilford, to the time it was disannexed''.. Gilmanton [N.H.: Printed by A. Prescott, 1845. 140, 142. Print.</ref>
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Model Farm may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
* [http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/feature/school/2011/Model_Farm.htm The story of a model farm in
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Asphalt shingle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
An additive known as '''SBS ([[Styrene-butadiene}styrene-butadiene-styrene]])''', sometimes called rubberized asphalt, is added to the asphalt
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tar paper may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
[[underlayment]] with [[Asphalt shingle|asphalt]], [[Wood shingle|wood]], [[Shake (shingle)|shake]]), and other [[Roof shingle|shingles]], or even gravel, since tar paper itself isn't particularly
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Asphalt shingle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
and ASTM D3462-87 (Asphalt Shingles Made from Glass Felt and Surfaced with Mineral Granules), ASTM) D3161, Standard Test Method for Wind-Resistance of Asphalt Shingles (2005),
John Harvey Lovell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Hi Jim
Ref. your change to Dwang, I am just curious about the usage of Platform Framing as I have never head this expression before and I have been around construction in a number of countries. Where is it used? I think the US calls it balloon framing and Australia and New Zealand talk about stud walls. Timber Framing may not have been the best because it may well be steel or aluminium. Not sure we have hit on the right term as I suspect the Platform Frame might be a minority use term that will not be understandable by others. I posted the picture many years ago. Ex nihil (talk) 02:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Ex nihil. I took a quick look at your user page and I must say I am always impressed with people who can speak several languages and have been able to travel the world. Wow! As for platform framing, it is the standard method of building houses with wood in the U.S.A. and I looked for a book which gives a good description of platform framing and balloon framing which is Residential Framing: A Homebuilder's Construction Guide, chapter 5. Balloon framing in an American term also. The image I changed the caption on is clearly not a timber frame in American English, I will be interested to know what it is called in other forms of English. By the way, the section on balloon framing in Framing (construction) is not totally accurate yet, but the general information is correct and the big difference between this and platform framing is the studs extend two floors in balloon framing. Platform framing the studs only extend one floor and the joists are laid on wall plates. Each floor level is a platform. I do not know how many platforms can be used, most houses in the U.S. are one or two stories. Stud wall may be the best term to use. Thanks for asking. Also, I have never heard of dwang before so I looked at the American English synonym blocking and there is an article Blocking (construction) which probably should be merged with dwang. Jim Derby (talk) 00:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Retainer wall for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
Hi Jim Derby! :) It'd be very helpful if you could support this request (click!), so the Driehaus Prize would be considered to be included at "In the News" every year. So far only the Pritzker Prize is considered, which is a pity for all architecture fans imho. Thank you, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hey Jim, thanks for your work on the Cement article. I noticed that some of the history info you added to the "Early uses" section duplicates stuff in the "Modern cements" section just below it. Maybe you could find a way to incorporate both of them into one narrative? AmateurEditor (talk) 01:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scaffolding may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Hi, the article you created, New England Barn, was accepted, but the notice went to me as I helped to resumbmit the article. Just to let you know. Thanks! Darylgolden(talk) 00:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Come-A-Long, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hoist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association concern[edit]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association[edit]
Hello Jim Derby. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: ((subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association)), paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. C679 05:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please send permission for release under a CC BY SA license to permissions-en@wikimedia.org per WP:CONSENT. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Expanded clay aggregate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aggregate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mortar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 30[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bench dog, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clamp. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You may be interested in this type of construction. I saw several examples in Millheim, Pennsylvania and Aaronsburg, Pennsylvania (both historic districts) in Centre County, PA. Not built from logs, but from planks. My goodness though, what planks! The first pic has some explanation, but let me just say 4 inches thick, 2 feet wide super planks. There's a sign in the first pic that implies that it was built in the 1870s. Up in the mountains of PA it was a major lumber district. Any info would be appreciated. Smallbones(smalltalk) 01:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Jim, I reverted your good faith initial contrib to the motives section of the occupy article. You and I AGREE that this dimension needs to be added, but I thought your text was a bit heavy on WP:Original research, and inserted too much illustrative detail about unrelated, or too distantly related, specific cases. Let's work on improving it. I should have some time over the next several days to add bits but would welcome your trying again. Let's start a high level with RSs that say the Occupation's motives included land use issues. Cheers, welcome to the article. PS, check my contribs to the article for the text I attempted to add, and also talk page archives. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi News Guy. Thanks for the note. It certainly is discouraging to put hours of reading and editing into an article and have it deleted (reverted). Of course I am going to disagree with you about removing my edit. I will also criticize you for allowing the information currently in the section to stand because it is embarrassingly inaccurate...the occupation was not about anyone's religion. Two things I may have been too bold about were including the word "primary" as the motivation and making a reference to the historical Wild West. The motives of the group being based on land use conflicts is not widely or clearly reported but is has been referenced by reliable sources. I only included three references in my edit but I had read more than ten articles and none of what I wrote was my own creation. Thank you for letting me know that I wrote about the Bundy's 2014 standoff in a way that seemed "too...illustrative...unrelated, or too distantly related". I am not sure how to improve that but the 2014 standoff and it's cause is very relavant.Jim Derby (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please take a look at "Roof pitch", for I have just checked something you added two years ago - and it's WRONG ! ;-)RobinClay (talk) 21:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just came across your work n Rainscreen. It's a minor topic, but you really improved the article. Felsic2 (talk) 16:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Jim Derby. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MagneLine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 23:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Jim Derby. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milk soy protein intolerance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David notMD (talk) 02:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello! In the article on American historic carpentry, in one of your initial edits in 2014, you left a sentence incomplete… and it's still incomplete today. It's in the section on Plank-frame houses, last sentence that starts with "Some examples of plank frame houses are" and ends, tantalizingly, with "and the" – Justinbb (talk) 20:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Jim Derby. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect "Wood science". The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 28#"Wood science" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 14:58, 28 August 2020 (UTC)