Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 10:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 Isla Vista killings. Nick Levine (talk) 12:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:JoeyCoffin reported by User:Acroterion (Result: ). Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 12:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Courcelles (talk) 13:10, 15 March 2023 (UTC)JoeyCoffin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here JoeyCoffin (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline. "Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you. 331dot (talk) 18:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JoeyCoffin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here JoeyCoffin (talk) 13:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JoeyCoffin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Edit warring is broader than violating 3RR. 3RR is a bright line to cross, but one can be determined to be edit warring with fewer reverts(as stated at WP:EW). In any event, you are blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia. It has nothing to do with what the blocking admin thinks of your edits. I might suggest that it would help if you agreed to abandon editing about the event you were editing about and tell us what topics you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 19:28, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I WAS here to build an encyclopedia, by adding information that is true, important, and sourced, just as I did.
Please place new posts at the bottom for proper flow. 331dot (talk) 19:28, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
JoeyCoffin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I WAS here to build an encyclopedia. I added information that was true, and important, and even made sure I had the right sources to back it up. JoeyCoffin (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is just trolling. I've don't think the encyclopedia would gain anything by unblocked you. Talk page access revoked. Ponyobons mots 20:44, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
is closed. Unsurprisingly. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)