This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Update (I thought you'd like to know:
"T.R. Threston" is a HOAX! All right already, she does have an elaborate facebook-page, Twitter account, mentioning in annual report of whatever club of travel writers, all uploaded from somewhere, non-valid ISBN and very dodgy, but now finally there is proof that "T.R. Threston" is completely made up! Not even her photoes ar real! That photo from her facebook-"fan" page? Fake! The one from her wordpress page? Fake! Her Twitter? All are fake! You are asking for proof? Well ... lets take the pic from her facebook-fan page for a minute and compare it to this photo of Jessica Alba at Toronto Film Festival 2007. Please note the people in the background ... of course she COULD have asked those who were in the background of Jessica Alba back then, to come join her at exactly the same place to take that photo with exactly the same clothings she might have borrowed them froom Jessica Alba, since she knows all the celebs!), and damn: the same figure, - theoretically, - but ... naaah ... that one is photoshopped! (^_^) And yeah ... all updates on my TALK page ... on all the findings on the Threston-clan! (I still can't believe how someone could have gone through all the trouble making that up!) LagondaDK (talk) 20:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

@LagondaDK: that's astonishing. I have been assuming that she does actually exist, but I begin to wonder even about that. Surely some of her countless twitter/Facebook followers will have noticed that she has borrowed Jessica's hair and necklace? I wonder how long the Wikipedia link will stay on her Facebook page.

I have been boggling my mind over all the things wrong with the self-published book commissioned by her and presented as a reference: author's name is "McHugh" outside, but "McHug" in the text; Edward is described as "a Knights Templar"; "effected" for "affected"; "the family was of nobility class" reads oddly to me, not what a real genealogist would write; and anyway false because the general use of "nobility" is the peerage, Barons and higher, not knights or baronets, and there is no attempt to show anything above the rank of Knight; lot of fluff about how the Templar titles are hereditary, all quoted from the site of the modern Knights Templar who have no connection with the medieval ones - in fact the medieval ones were celibate monks, so no question of the title being hereditary. If she was going to fake noble ancestry, she might have done it more convincingly. Last but not least, there are extensive references cited to that well-known non-RS, Wikipedia! JohnCD (talk) 19:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

I don’t really understand it myself. I mean: that extend of work that has been put into that fake identity or rather identities … As for her facebook contacts: a lot of them are as fake as she is! Take “Andre D’ Orleans” for instance … didn’t we delete his article one or two days ago because he was not noteworthy and the author belonged to AustralianThreston’s sock-farm anyway? Then there is the motivation: why would you do something like that? For the sake of intellectual self-flagellation? There is always money behind it and I somehow believe it has to be money behind this scheme somehow too. But how could you make profit from an article on Wikipedia? You don’t! But you could build up a reputation, a fake reputation. I realized, that all those fake connections of hers, her fake facebook-contacts, business-contacts and so on were somehow related to either publishing, society, celebrities and fashion. There is even a glossy magazine available as PDF file … (its not all that) … with T.R. Threston as editor. And then you come across blog entries mentioning Rose Goodhall and T.R. Threstion, introducing them as “the model” and “travel writer” … the blogger herself claiming to be a fashion designer for wedding dresses, then there is mentioning of a photo-shoot by a model named Angelique Romano, praising T.R. Threston as well … It all hints into the direction of fashion and modeling. Nothing like the catwalk in Paris or Milano, but still … very down to earth modeling, for wedding-dress magazines or modern street-style or stuff like that … That did remind me of a rip-off business built on teenage girl’s hopes and dreams of becoming a model. You’d tell them how beautiful they are, and offer them a photo shoot and they would pay you good for it and also pay you to get their file with a model agency. Since there are so many out there it only makes sense that you’d have to tell them a thing or two about how experienced you are and with whom you are working with and those kids go home, get online and check Google for more information and you will end up on fan pages, blogs of unknown models, magazines and then there is the trustworthy chairwoman of the New York Travel Writers Agency and whatnot … Or how about this: T.R. Threston was said to have been active with KIVA ... an organisation that is supposed to collect money for microfinancing in third world countries but apparently it had been uncovered as a lot of money-collecting and borrowing it to fake people who did not even exist. That too was backed up by fake identities, fake employees, fake social-media accounts and so on ... LagondaDK (talk) 20:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

I believe I figured it out now: It has to be part of that KIVA scam! … T.R. Threston is presented as the Team Leader of this KIVA group and – what a coincidence – she herself has given a loan and Angelique too, who has praised T.R. Threston before on how great the cooperation in modeling was … as a team leader they have to give her a story to back her up, thats why they put that much effort into developing her, giving her a facebook-page and whatnot. The nobility articles on Threstonites from the Middle Ages only served to make her own Wikipedia article relevant as a decendant of nobility! Thats gotta be it! LagondaDK (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi JohnCD, I'm looking for some more references and will improve the article soon. Just give me couple of more months, I will correct it for sure. Thanks.

Akatyayan (talk) 09:34, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Akatyayan

@Akatyayan: No worries! It will only go back on the deletion list if it is left untouched for another six months. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing the undeletion to my attention. I'll most likely propose AfD, as the article seems to be a cut/paste copycvio job from the blog post here (which is dated 2009 as far as I can see). PaintedCarpet (talk) 14:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello JohnCD, thank you for explaining the deletion of the page I created for Wanees Zarour. Would it be possible to restore the page but edit it to remove infringing text? Once it's back up, I can fill it with more neutral statements from recent reviews. Thank you! Isanaht (talk) 00:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

@Isanaht: sorry, we can't restore copyright material, even temporarily. I can email you a copy, if you enable email on your account. To do that, click "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and on the "User profile" tab, at the bottom, enter your email address (which will not be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 11:15, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

@JohnCD: thank you - an email would be great. then can I just recreate the page without the copyrighted material? I've enabled email on my account. Isanaht (talk) 15:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

@Isanaht: copy emailed. Yes, you can re-create the page, but check out WP:Your first article and WP:Copy-paste and take care to keep the tone neutral. The most important thing is to provide references which discuss him in some depth, see WP:Notability (people) and WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

@JohnCD: thank you very much! I read through the articles you mentioned and I have rewritten the page. Please let me know if you notice issues with the page as I continue to build on it. Isanaht (talk) 01:59, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

I am so sorry, I wanted to create a portuguese version and commited a mistake. I will start in wikipedia contributing in my mother language after that I will try to write in English too.

Marcosccorrea (talk) 22:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

	Hello, JohnCD. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Nominated articles page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's talk page. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. NorthAmerica1000 16:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

I'm an employee of Symas and I am researching why our database software, Lightning Memory-mapped Database has so far been denied an article on Wikipedia in spite of the fact that the database itself meets Wikipedia's own published criteria for a dedicated page (notability, etc- I read the whole thing). A deleted article exists here. The article was admittedly thin when it was first deleted, but the article's history is interesting because it contains what appear to be legitimate COI concerns (more reading) directed at the person who initiated the discussion that ended with the article's deletion.

I note that the last activity concerning reinstatement of the article took place in October of last year and that it has undergone steady improvements since then. To my eye, the current version of the article meets Wikipedia's published guidelines for stand-alone articles. Could you possibly take a quick look at the article and comment on any shortcomings that might still exist?

Thanks Mhardin42 (talk) 23:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Dear John:

I'm not going to contest you. Professor Bidhu Bhusan Das was one of India's most venerated academics. Both of them taught across the country, were educational administrators with high profile posts and were legends before the internet came of age, and before articles went on line. In their time, they were mentioned every day, in both the national and local media. Both of them have taught two chief Justices and other justices of India's Supreme Court, cabinet ministers, chief ministers of India's provinces, writers, celebrated poets, administrators, scientists, artists, intellectuals and other legends: http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-otherstates/call-for-greater-industryacademia-collaboration-in-research/article5199548.ece. Considering the flotsam that have Wikipedia pages, I find it supremely ironical that you would not merely allude to deletion, but "speedy deletion" of two of India's most outstanding public intellectuals. Do refer to this article in The Hindu on Prof. Bidhu Bhusan Das: http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-otherstates/call-for-greater-industryacademia-collaboration-in-research/article5199548.ece. Dr. Shashi Tharoor is former Under Secretary General of the UN, a former minister, and an internationally known diplomat, leader and author and spoke in the most glowing terms about Prof. Bidhu Bhusan Das. Here's an entry on Bidhu Bhusan Das in the Library of Congress: http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n89267884.html.

Having said that, I'll say I find your tone rather offensive, and this entire matter distasteful. It seems to be in the manner of a witch hunt. Please delete these immediately. Prof. Prabhat Nalini Das, (please see this article in a leading daily on her in The Telegraph: http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110417/jsp/orissa/story_13863557.jsp I know, would ask that you delete the page on her immediately. Her real life reputation is way ahead of Wikipedia - there are, literally, millions of people who know her just as they know Prof. Bidhu Bhusan Das.

Zachary5050 (talk) 15:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

http://www.un.org/ga/president/61/follow-up/thematic-civilizations/tharoor.shtml

To give you a little perspective, Dr. Shashi Tharoor, who delivered the memorial lecture on Bidhu Bhusan Das, and would not stop praise of a legendary personality, was a candidate for UN Secretary General:

http://www.un.org/ga/president/61/follow-up/thematic-civilizations/tharoor.shtml

Please delete both pages ASAP. I do no justice to their impeccable - and celebrated - life's work by having deletion notices on their bios put up on Wikipedia!!!

http://www.un.org/ga/president/61/follow-up/thematic-civilizations/tharoor.shtml

Zachary5050 (talk) 15:58, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

• I have replied on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 16:47, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Dear John:

I am a native speaker of English. So was Prof. Bidhu Bhusan Das; and so is Prof. Prabhat Nalini Das. Prof. Bidhu Bhusan Das studied at Harvard, Columbia and the most sought-after of all Oxford colleges, Christ Church. At Christ Church, amongst others, Nobel laureate W. H. Auden taught him poetry, J.R.R. Tolkien taught him medieval English literature, and logical positivist, A. J. Ayer, taught him philosophy. That is only the beginning.

How supremely ironical that someone with the name "Cutest Penguin" should sit in judgement over him. And, forgive me, but where on earth is Indraprastha University???

I have corrected Cutest Penguin's page - it is teeming with numerous and horrendous grammatical (in bold) and punctuation errors (P). This is no native speaker of English - he is not a speaker of English at all!

It behoves Wikipedia to adhere to minimal benchmarks of linguistic correctness while nominating "editors". Otherwise, your efforts end up not merely as an exercise in futility; sadly, it ends up as farce.

I wish you well, but please maintain quality control.

Zachary5050 (talk) 17:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

---

Hey! there, this is Cutest Penguin (pen name). I'm a (insert) native resident of India and most of my contents and articles will be/are about India and Indian personalities. Your suggestions will be appreciated on my Talk Page! Personal life I personally believe that the true identity should not be enclosed since this could be risky. I remember some one who really made my user-page horrible by adding undesirable contents and images. But I(insert) would like to say one thing that, Wikipedia should bring some programmes at (missing article) University and school level so that young mind can be a part of Wikipedia foundation. Once (P)' while addressing a educational seminar in a public school near New Delhi.(P)'I questioned one of very young mind, do he uses Internet? He replied-(P) "Yes, I do use Google, MiniC**p and Wikipedia". (P)_{Subscript text}In response to him (P) I questioned, what is Wikipedia? He answered,(P) "it is a website where any one can edit" (P) adding (P) "I edited once but someone deleted and send me very dangerous messages, something like your IP will be blocked". (P) With this experience I would like to urge Wikipedia and other editors to be not only strict but humble as well while posting any warning messages. Editing History

Kamala Nehru with her Husband and daughter Indira Gandhi As a unregistered user I made several minor and major edits on Wikipedia, but while editing a semi-protected article I was advised by Wikipedia to register myself in order to make contribution under semi-protected article (P) so on 5th June 2014 I registered myself and became one of thousands of volunteer Wikipedian. After contributing my very first own article about VC of GGSIPU, Prof. Anil Kumar Tyagi I became addicted to Wikipedia and made several contribution on Wikipedia. One of surprising thing (!) I found on Wikipedia is the copyright policy, there is no doubt it is very essential to deal with legal issues but some time I found many editors making fun of it. One such incident I found about Kamala Nehru College one of reputed college in Delhi, which was deleted in 2008 as per CSD G11 and when I nominated Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies for AfD it got challenged stating that a institutional organization is exception case and cannot be deleted since it offers recognized degree. After studying the Wikipedia policy for notability and verifiability I withdrew my AfD request and improved the article to meet the Wikipedia standards and maybe that the reason I have kept it in my improved and expend list of articles.

Hello J. You nuked that article (and blocked the editor) created by Mujeebmurda (talk · contribs) but the wikiproject banners that they put on the talk page are still there. Thanks for your efforts in dealing with this. MarnetteD|Talk 17:55, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Oops you got it while I was typing. Nice work. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD|Talk 17:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Here is the link of sakaal times newspaper link for Anamika Mishra's Latest Interview http://www.sakaaltimes.com/Tiny.aspx?K=a1SMD .This clearly proves that Anamika Mishra is a notable and well known Indian author. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.38.17.205 (talk) 20:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Clicking on the "redlink" Anamika Mishra shows the deletion log. Because the page was repeatedly re-created, it has been "salted" - protected against creation - by administrator DangerousPanda (talk), so you should make your request to him. JohnCD (talk) 21:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi:

Please tell me how I could improve the pages on Prabhat Nalini Das and Bidhu Bhusan Das.I have access to some - a few - significant articles from mainstream newspapers, but, as I mentioned earlier, they were famous and venerated before the internet came of age.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachary5050 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Zachary5050 (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

@Zachary5050: I apologise for my delay in replying. The important thing is to find references that confirm what the articles say. Published print sources such as newspapers are acceptable: see WP:Citing sources#Newspaper articles for the information needed. I have placed a message at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#Help requested with referencing which I hope will bring advice and assistance. JohnCD (talk) 22:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello JohnCD,

I'm writing in response to the deletion of the Adilson "Bitta" Lima's page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adilson_Lima).

I am a student of his Brazilian Jiu Jitsu lineage (my 5th degree black belt instructor is Bitta's first black belt) and can confirm he is a legit martial artist. This can be verified through countless YouTube videos, old Brazilian newspaper articles, magazine articles, old photographs with Helio Gracie (the founder of Brazilian Jiu Jitsu), through references from Brazilian Jiu Jitsu legends (e.g., Renzo Gracie, himself) and the IBJJF (International Brazilian Jiu Jitsu Federation).

Please let me know how to start the process of reinstating his page.

Thank you,

Iambrodybjj (talk) 04:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

@Iambrodybjj: as this article was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adilson Lima, it cannot simply be restored. I have moved it to a sub-page in your user space at User:Iambrodybjj/Adilson Lima where you can work on it. What it needs is better references to show how he meets Wikipedia's WP:Notability standard, which looks for "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." For MMA fighters, there is a more guidance at WP:MMANOT. I will put some links on your user talk page with general advice. You may be able to get help by posting a request on the talk page of WP:WikiProject Mixed martial arts, a group of users who are interested in this subject.

Once you have improved the article, let me know and I will decide what to do next; probably I will refer it to WP:Deletion review to see whether there is agreement to restore it to the main encyclopedia. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I am writing regarding a deleted page on Adilson 'Bitta' Lima, who had a wikipedia page before it was deleted in February of this year. Here is the link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adilson_Lima

What was the reason for the delete? Was it just the MMA record issue? Adilson Lima has also had a storied BJJ career including recent wins in the Pan American Games, and World Championships. Links to just a few of his notable wins are (do a search for Adilson Lima and you'll see him in the Super Heavy Weight Black Belts) given in the ref section. here,here, and here.

Adilson Lima has been a substantial person in the Brazilian Jiu Jitsu community for the better part of 30 years. Deleting his page because he did not compete in a 'top tier' mixed martial arts promotion seems like overkill to me. It ignores the well-sourced information available on him with respect to the BJJ community and the important role that he has in teaching and training current top competitors.

On top of that, his MMA competitions were done in the mid-1990's before the UFC became the established organization it is today. Obviously, back in those days the other 'top tier' MMA organizations did not even exist. Here is a page from Sherdog.com, a well respected website that tracks confirmed professional MMA records on Adilson Lima:

http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Adilson-Lima-2012

Finally, on the issue of notability of championships. The International Brazilian Jiu Jitsu Federation is the leading global organization that runs tournaments and does belt credentialing for the Brazilian Jiu Jitsu community. The three tournaments I sourced above, which Adilson Lima won, are all IBJJF tournaments. If that is not notable, then I suggest that you remove Morihei Ueshiba's Wikipedia page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morihei_Ueshiba

as this person, by Peter Rehse's own use of the notability criteria, do not apply to the very person who founded his own martial art of Aikido.

68.65.167.69 (talk) 06:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

See the reply to Iambrodybjj (talk) just above this. I have moved the article into his user-space at User:Iambrodybjj/Adilson Lima, and you are very welcome to help improve it there. See WP:Your first article for general advice, and WP:Notability and WP:MMANOT. JohnCD (talk) 21:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

John:

Thank you for editing both Prabhat Nalini Das and Bidhu Bhusan Das. The pages are wonderful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachary5050 (talk • contribs) 10:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

You added an ((AFD)) template to Emad Rahim, but you don't appear to have actually created a discussion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Well, you sorta created a discussion, but apparently you created it in your sandbox. You might wanto address that. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Patience, I'm getting there... JohnCD (talk) 13:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

OK. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Iam Naresh Poonapalli My userpage was MfD nomination in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Naresh Kumar Raja. Sorry, I'm trying to correct this. Naresh Poonapalli (talk) 13:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

No. All those pages were just you and your friends writing about each other and chatting with each other. That is what social-networking sites like Facebook are for, but Wikipedia is different. JohnCD (talk) 16:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I will be producing a page on a university professor within the next few days. That will certainly be biographical and promotional as it will list her writing, et. al. Will this be an unsuitable page as well?JB, DRAGA design 18:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barenose (talk • contribs) 18:13, 18 August 2014

Replied on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 20:58, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi John,

thanks for your help! I was asked to create the page, I didn't seek it out. I will attempt to follow all the rules…this is my first, and probably only, wiki page.

All the best,

JBJB, DRAGA design 17:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barenose (talk • contribs)

I've restored your deletion of this page. This page is used by both new editors as a sandbox and by AfC clerks for testing. In addition to those uses, it prevents drafts that are moved from userspace sandboxes to being parked in an inappropriate location. I hope you don't think that I am stepping on your toes, I just knew this page was used with a purpose. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 11:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

No worries! Sorry about that. I deleted it because its content was two lines about a non-notable minor, which had been spammed in several places; if I had realised its use, I would have re-created it blank. I deleted its talk page too, which was another non-article, but I don't suppose that needs to be recreated. JohnCD (talk) 11:35, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

I figured that was what you did, so I reverted it back to a clean sandbox page. I wasn't worried about the talkpage, a new one can always be created. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 11:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

hello john, want to know what is the reason for the nominaciondel article Friedrich Count of Luxburg if this article has record of authority from the school library Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) and endorsed by WorldCat - OCLC are valid reasons for it is in the encyclopedic school library, taking intoaccount is a public person and that the content of the article is correct and does not violate Wikipedia policies quitarce should consider the nomination for the article to be deleted.--Von Luxburg (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

@Von Luxburg: As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is selective about subjects for articles. The test for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability, and looks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". The DNB/OCLC references show that the Count exists, but they do not constitute significant coverage.

You are welcome to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedrich Count of Luxburg, but please read WP:DISCUSSAFD first, and do not again remove the AfD notice from the top of the article - that will not stop the discussion.

Your username indicates that you may be Count von Luxburg, or connected with him. In that case, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 17:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi john, I could explain what the subject on which you rely to request the deletion of Article Friedrich Count of Luxburg, if you meet the canons of wikipedia and have encyclopedic and sufficient value references as well as a tab control BND and WorldCat and understand that these are reliable sources that this person exists but implies that being in a witch hunt because they give a reason for the postulation of the article for deletion--Dbianchir (talk) 19:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

@Dbianchir: please read my reply to user Von Luxburg (talk) just above. To repeat: it is not enough that the person exists, because Wikipedia is not a listing directory like LinkedIn or Facebook. To have an article requires evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi john, I have no relationship with the person of the article, or perhaps all apples must come from the same tree or washington all are the same, and only edited or contributed to improve in some aspects the article.--Von Luxburg (talk) 19:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Then that is OK. You will understand that your choice of username made a connection seem likely. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

dear user, Friedrich Count of Luxburg is the current Earl of Luxburg, like the noble families of europas is Luxburg current head of the family; is a well-known public figures and there are sources that support this person is also known acts of altruism towards the needy population from Latin America. through this foundation that directs to helped people in Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador and Peru which have been affected by natural disasters or armed comflictos displacement. the article was edited from a neutral point of view and following the canons of wikipedia.--Dbianchir (talk) 20:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

@Dbianchir: it is no good just saying that, how can you prove it? Wikipedia:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source." If he is a well-known public figure and has known acts of altruism, please add to the article references to reliable, published sources which discuss him and his acts. "Reliable" excludes blogs, Youtube, places where anyone can write anything; "independent" excludes his own websites and anything based on press releases.

All that the present references in the article show is that he wrote this short paper and that his foundation has a website. That is not enough.

I have searched like this:

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

and I do not find anything relevant. Sources do not have to be in English, but they must be published, not private material like family archives, so that in principle a reader can check what the article says, and they need to be about him, not his family.

You do not need to convince me: you need to add to the article references which establish WP:Notability, so as to convince people who will comment at the deletion discussion. The discussion will continue for a week, and you are welcome to comment there. The previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedrich Ulrich Count of Luxburg will show you what form the discussion may take. At the end of a week, an uninvolved administrator will decide what to do, based on the arguments presented in terms of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, not on a count of heads. You are welcome to comment there, but should read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

john what you just told me is to place the references of press releases and blog talk and relate to Friedrich Ulrich Count of Luxburg with social work, this would be enough to give grounds for more than eliminated--Dbianchir (talk) 15:49, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

No. Anything that helps to verify what the article says is of some use, but blogs and press releases will not be enough. As I said above, blogs are not reliable sources (because anyone can write anything in a blog, and there is no editorial check) and press releases are not independent. This is explained at WP:General notability guideline. There is a Spanish version of that at es:Wikipedia:Artículos sin relevancia aparente#Pautas generales de relevancia. JohnCD (talk) 16:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

would then place the press releases or if the newspaper articles, these publications are physical and not digital.--Dbianchir (talk) 16:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes, you can use a newspaper article as a reference even if it is not online. You need to give the name of the paper, the date of the issue, the title of the article, and if possible the author's name and the page number. See WP:Citing sources#Newspaper articles. JohnCD (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

hello john, thanks for your explanation'm looking for sources, here I leave two links http://www.tagblatt.ch/ostschweiz-am-sonntag/transorient/art302977,3560956, http://ve.globedia.com/guajira-venezolana-sufre-sequia Dbianchir (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

The first is not much use, because it is all about the castle and does not even mention the Count's name; the other is better. You do not have to convince me: you have to improve the article with references so that the people who contribute to the deletion discussion will think it should be kept. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

hello john, This is an article where the Count makes a donation of toys to the children of the central hospital in Maracaibo Venezuela Moreno, Carlos Eduardo (2006). "Una Navidad Feliz Para Los Ninos del Hospital Central". Mi Diario La Voz Del Zulia. --Dbianchir (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi john, I need your help to uncheck elimination of article as Yopie is waging a campaign smear my view towards me, towards the article and to the people who oppose the deletion of the article as such, if necessary to amend article I want to know if I have your help. --Dbianchir (talk) 20:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

@Dbianchir: Yopie is entitled to edit the article, as is everyone else. As far as I can see, he has only removed references which were not actually about the Count. It is also reasonable, when a new SPA appears to defend the article, to ask whether there is a connection. The administrator who closes the deletion discussion will be able to see the history and make his or her own decision. JohnCD (talk) 22:17, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

hello john, improved the same and included most reliable sources on the reputation of Friedrich Count of Luxburg but the article was deleted, serious kind enough to guide me or help me to prepare this article to not be deleted again or else I will sary the research done that and post it to your poque could be that my knowledge of wp are not sufientes for the publication; I thanks for reading this post and I hope your grateful response.--Dbianchir (talk) 14:46, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

@Dbianchir: my best advice to you is: give up. You have tried very hard, but you have not convinced any established Wikipedia user that the Count is notable in Wikipedia's sense. In my opinion, any further effort would be "flogging a dead horse".

I looked at your recent additions to the article, but material about his mother, grandfather, great-uncle etc are absolutely irrelevant to the question of his notability, and long lists of catalogue entries from the DNB do not help either - read WP:Bombardment.

If you are determined to go on trying, you should ask the adminstrator who closed the AfD, user Deor (talk), whether he will "userfy" the article for you - move it into a sub-page in your user space where you can work on it. If you do, I advise you to strip out all the material about relatives, and all the references which do not say anything significant about the Count himself. Read WP:Notability (summary) for another explanation of what is looked for.

If the page is userfied for you, you should not post it to the main encyclopedia again without agreement from Deor as the deleting administrator or, if Deor does not agree, without taking it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 16:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

@Dbianchir: another relevant essay is Wikipedia:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

hello john, thanks for your explanation was what I expected to solve the problems of visibility and consegir two books and 15 articles of the count in his performances as a public person but the only drawback I see is that they are in Spanish this would be inconvenient for the article is my question--Dbianchir (talk) 14:45, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, John. Dbianchir has been leaving similar messages on my talk page. I'm in theory willing to userfy the article for him to work on, but I can't read Spanish very well, so I don't feel competent to review his supposed Venezuelan sources and advise him on the possibility of any rewrite's satisfying the notability guidelines. As a rather new admin, I'm probably not as familiar with protection policy as I should be; would it violate policy for me to userfy the article (which has already been deleted twice, under different titles, via AfD) and then move-protect the userspace draft so that it couldn't be moved back to article space without the approval of an admin—preferably one who understands Spanish? I don't want to seem harsh to Dbianchir; but I also don't want to have editors wasting time on dealing with a third creation of the article (if the person's notability can't be established), and I don't want to encourage Dbianchir to waste his time on trying to amend an article that will never be acceptable. Deor (talk) 16:59, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

@Deor: - no, I see no problem with userfying the page and salting or move-protecting so that it cannot be re-posted without permission from an admin or DRV. I think Dbianchir will be wasting his time, since the large amount of work he has already done producing unsuitable references makes it seem unlikely to me that there are undiscovered suitable ones out there, but there is no harm letting him try again. JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

@Dbianchir: read again WP:GNG, particularly:

"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.

The Spanish version of that page is at es:Wikipedia:Artículos sin relevancia aparente. That will show you why references about his great-great-uncle, or his family's old castle, or library catalogue entries like this about a book published in 1922, are absolutely useless for showing notability. Only references which say something substantial about this Count are any use for this purpose. They can be in Spanish, but to be reliable sources (es:Wikipedia:Fuentes fiables) they must have been published. JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much John for re-instating the article ThinkingRock. I have updated it and submitted it for review. Have a good day - Claire — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClaireLem (talk • contribs) 03:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi JohnCD,

Could you please revert to my talk posted on your wall yesterday.

This was with respect to the deletion of page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lakes_Institute_of_Management

Looking forward to it.

Webmaster ajit (talk) 04:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

@Webmaster ajit: you did not post to my talk page yesterday, you posted to User talk:Jac16888, and he has answered you there. However, I can add my advice: the article was a blatant advertisement, the school trying to sell itself, and anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. I am very surprised that it lasted in Wikipedia so long. I looked at the history to see whether there was a neutral version to revert to, but right from the first edit it has been full of "puffery".

You must understand that Wikipedia is not a site like Facebook, for people and organizations to "tell the world" about how wonderful they are. They can do that on their own websites, but an encyclopedia is quite different: its articles should be written from a WP:Neutral point of view, no opinions, no glowing adjectives, only plain facts, neutrally stated and cited to reliable sources.

If you are connected with the school, read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and if you want to try again, use the WP:Articles for creation process so that your work can be reviewed by an uninvolved user. Read User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard and the guide to writing WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 20:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi John,

The page Red Flush Casino was deleted yesterday and I would like to please request that it be undeleted. I am not sure why it would have been deleted as I have taken extra care to use sources that educate our customers about the business. I have also not used any promotional language or use any customer acquisition pages. If you could please undelete the page and point me at the problem with the article I would be happy to edit the page to were it would be acceptable for publication.

Kind regards, Human49 (talk) 07:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@Human49: I will reply on your talk page later today. JohnCD (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello JohnCD, I just noticed that you speedily deleted the article Ambariya Islamic Institute with the reason Article has no meaningful, substantive content. Anbariya is a well noted institute in Ghana with links from several Wikipedia articles. I would like to believe that the deletion might have been an oversight.
Kind Regards.
—Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 09:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@Masssly: the whole content of the page that I deleted was "#REDIRECT [[Name of article]]". You are welcome to write an article about the Ambariya Islamic Institute, but that wasn't one, and there wasn't any more content in its history.

If you can remember what you did that produced that effect, I would like to know, because there have been a number of articles like that recently, and if there is something in the instructions that misleads people into producing them, we should try to put it right. JohnCD (talk) 09:23, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

I am so sorry if things gone wrong on my first try on editing some stuff. I kind of no expert on this but I just want to update something about my favorite Japanese artist [Aya Hirano] but don't seem to know how to do it right in a simple way. I just want to put a link on the following album (FRAGMENTS and VIVID] in order for readers to know the tracklist of this respective album. I don't mean to do it wrong but I can't seem to do it right.

Again I apologize for all the inconveniences I put on this web during my first try on editing something.

--Chiharuvaugh (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@Chiharuvaugh: don't worry, everyone makes mistakes at first, it's the best way to learn. I will give some more advice on your talk page later today, but meanwhile look at the links in the Welcome message on your talk page. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

http://books.google.co.in/books/about/Literary_Criticism.html?id=XwlVPgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

This has been published by Oxford University Press and is still in print. It is widely stocked in bookstores and libraries.

Zachary5050 (talk) 21:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@Zachary5050: you could certainly add that to his article under "Publications". By the way, I do not deserve your thanks for improving the articles; if you click the "View history" tab you can see who actually did it. That's the way Wikipedia works, at its best - gradual improvement by many people. JohnCD (talk) 09:22, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

There's your cookie to you, JohnCD! Clintgabriel (talk) 22:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much - a welcome surprise on return from my break! JohnCD (talk) 22:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

hi JohnCD, this is tomahawk333, i'm wondering if you can give me some insight as to where my account lies at this point in time? i'm unable to sign in and am having trouble accessing the previous conversation 124.176.241.149 (talk) 12:57, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

@Tomahawk333: The previous conversation is at User talk:Tomahawk333. Your account is blocked, but I see no reason why you cannot sign in and edit your talk page. The reason it is still blocked is that it seems that all you want to do here is write about yourself and your music project, although at least ten people have explained to you why that is not acceptable. You were asked whether if unblocked you would accept a condition that you made no edits of any kind about yourself or "Outpsyjah", and you said "yeah sure, i agree", but your most recent request is still asking for "my edits to the 'Outsider' page to be reinstated or allowed to stand". That is not going to happen. You can submit another unblock request if you like, but it will not be accepted unless you make clear that you accept that you cannot edit about yourself or your project, and say what else you want to do. My best advice is: give up, accept that you are not going to be allowed to write about yourself here, and be content with sites like Soundcloud, Youtube, Last.fm etc. JohnCD (talk) 22:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi JohnCD, Thanks for settling my request on ANI. Was it appropriate of me to post that on ANI? This is pretty new for me. Upjav (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Upjav: short answer - yes, quite appropriate, but another time there is more you could do yourself before it needed an admin. I will explain on your talk page tomorrow. JohnCD (talk) 22:19, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, John. I'll talk to you tomorrow. Upjav (talk) 22:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello John, you deleted one page with information that I need to recover for personal purposes. I totally understand why you deleted, but I need you help to recover the information over there (User:Anothercountry/concerts). Because I am not a Admin, I don't have access to deleted pages, so I wonder how you can help me? do you want an email to send the information? Looking forward for your help (Anothercountry (talk) 10:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)).

@Anothercountry: yes, certainly I will email you the contents. The simplest way would be for you to enable email on your account - click "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the foot of the "User profile" tab fill in your email address (which will not be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". I will send you the version as you last edited it in Oct 2009 - it was later heavily spammed with multiple plugs for a Venezuelan chef, and I don't suppose you want those. JohnCD (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Perfect!, thank you so much for your help. It is already enable the email. Please send me the one that you said from Oct 2009. Anothercountry (talk) 21:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your quick response!. Anothercountry (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello,

Im curious as to why you deleted the Sakiusa "Junior" Uluvula link and info on the Charlotte Cleverley-Bisman Menengitis article. This was referencing another child whom died due to the disease while giving a quick synopsis of the cause and effect of the disease, and using an example and comparing Sakiusa "Junior" Uluvula to the case that the article was written about Charlotte Cleverley-Bisman

Just don't see why it wasn't relevant, it was used as an example and added a lot of credit and understanding to the article from the readers point of view.

I probably just don't understand the verbiage that is considered for deletion.

Just a suggestion to take a second look.

kona702@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.225.186.60 (talk) 16:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

The article about Junior that I deleted was just two sentences which said he had the same disease as Charlotte but died. Sadly, many people who caught the disease died; what made Charlotte's case worth an article was that she survived. However, since he is mentioned in Charlotte's article I have made a redirect, so that now if you click on Sakiusa "Junior" Uluvula you will be taken to that section. JohnCD (talk) 19:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for saving the day, John. I made a blunder but I'm too careful to want to log in with my admin account where I am right now. --KudpungMobile (talk) 11:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

its ok to delet the article but why did you delete my user page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aftab afridi (talk • contribs) 04:12, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Soo... If it's NO. Where in Wiki I can create my Biography?? Pls Reply at User talk:Useful Encyclopedia. Thanks.

Useful Encyclopedia (talk) 09:49, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Oh! But why some actor ad actress have there own Biography article??? Sooo... Why is it happened if it is can't??

Useful Encyclopedia (talk) 11:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Because they are notable people, see also WP:NACTOR; also, they did not write the articles themselves. JohnCD (talk) 11:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi The page I am talking about is not created by me, and I have absolutely no problem with the deletion itself. I was wondering, can I get a copy of the page's content somewhere (logs etc) so that I can use them for my purpose.

Thanks. Itheamit (talk) 11:30, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

@Itheamit: yes, I can probably email a copy of the text to you; what is the title of the deleted page you want? JohnCD (talk) 11:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Hii, I am Ravi Paliya. Hindu Purohit Sangh is my creation. The page we created is part of the matter submitted by us for registration of the society named as "Hindu Purohit Sangh" under society registration act 1973.This also finds place in our website Hindupurohitsangh.in. This is totally new concept initiative by the society and the content is totally original.

Ravi Paliya (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Ravi Paliya

Sir, Please help me... I want to publish my Article "Hindu Purohit Sangh" on wiki. I assure you that the article is not a copy paste material. Its all my efforts. I found a organistaion named Hindu Purohit Sangh that work for organising Hindu Purohit. Please help me to publish this page. thanks, Ravi Paliya (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

@Ravi Paliya: read the advice I put on your talk page. When the draft is ready, click the green "Submit" button to send it for review, but it will not be accepted unless there are references showing showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." to establish WP:Notability. References to its own website are not enough. JohnCD (talk) 10:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Nice work bringing that to AfD! I tracked down a few outstanding links to the old page in places like List of symphonies in C major, I think I've removed them all.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@Milowent: good, I didn't think to do that. All I did was pick him out of CAT:HOAX, it was the guys from the Unsung Composers website who realised quite how unsung he was and tagged the article. I see he was added to the List of Symphonies article soon after the hoax was posted by an IP geolocating to Norway where the "Gottfried Eschenbach Society" is based. Addition to the other two lists was more recent, just people picking it up from the article I guess. It's alarming how disinformation spreads. JohnCD (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

I wouldn't like to guess how many edit conflicts I have experienced over the years, and from time to time I get block conflicts, deletion conflicts, etc, but I reckon this is probably the first time I have twice within three minutes been beaten to deleting the same page by the same administrator by a matter of seconds. However, I beat you to this. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@JamesBWatson: you did, also by seconds. I went to block him and was a bit slow scratching my head about how someone already blocked since July was still editing - I hadn't taken in that it was his talk page. JohnCD (talk) 20:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Interestingly enough, I was puzzled by the same thing for a while. It didn't look like a talk page. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Well why r u hating so much? is it really bothering you? or what is your problem mate. can you explain to me then why any other company has a wikipedia page??? for example why is it necessary for wikipedia to have a page about chelsea football club... not that i want you to go and delete it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doughdaffy (talk • contribs) 21:33, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

From what i have read on your page you clearly have some issues.... do you do that for just fun? or what is the outcome for you? does it make you happy? As far as i am concerned you are not the founder of wikipedia to be teeling poeple what they can share or not. If i had break some rules i would say nothing... that just lead me to a question are you so miserable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doughdaffy (talk • contribs) 21:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@Doughdaffy: the outcome for me is keeping this an encyclopedia with some standards, not a place like Facebook where anyone can write whatever they like about themselves and their companies. Read what I wrote on your talk page, particularly WP:Notability (summary). Wikipedia is selective about subjects. The test for inclusion is whether people not connected with the company have written substantial comment about it. For Chelsea FC, that is no problem - look at Chelsea Football Club#Footnotes. JohnCD (talk) 21:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

= =

Bro why did you delete my page. I know your UDA. Restore my page or ill get gerry on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigGerryBucky (talk • contribs) 20:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

"articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable"

If I prove that socioblend.com provides services cheaper than top 10 sites ranking on first page. Will that be enough? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MohitMaheshwari91 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Short answer: no, read WP:Notability. More on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Oh you are so quick. I placed the deletion tag on the creators userpage and when I reloaded, the page was gone. You are really a precious diamond for Wikipedia. Keep up the good work! Have a nice day :) Jim Carter (from public cyber) 09:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words, but I don't know what you mean - that one took a whole two minutes! JohnCD (talk) 19:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Why would you delete Page: Kendall Danielle ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenikala (talk • contribs) 19:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

@Kenikala: the reason is explained on your talk page. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social-networking site, so it is selective about subjects for articles, see WP:Notability (people). It doesn't cover the up and coming, only those who have already arrived.

You wrote that she is "an upcoming Canadian Socialite" who has "recently decided to take a step into the public eye and is going to launch her public career in the near future". Good luck to her, but Wikipedia is not the place to do that; it is not for PR or promotion of any kind. Since you are working on PR you should read Wikipedia:COI and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 19:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey John, just wanted to say thank you for the Wiki schooling. Totally get it, will get better with practice. Cheers! Angel Angel Ackrivo (talk) 22:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

I appreciate your undeleting the Lazy Dog page. I will get to those edit suggestions as soon as possible & send in for review. have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CD8D:7080:7DC0:5263:587:8170 (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, JohnCD. I appreciate that you took the time to let me know how to chat w/ other users. Rustypup49 (talk) 09:47, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Happy to help. You have evidently got the hang of it! JohnCD (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello. The page you deleted turns out to be just the top of an iceberg, there's an elaborate series of hoax pages here on en-WP relating to Electrolux, Macedonia and a person named Dimche/Dimce Palenzo (a name that a number of IPs and users have tried to enter as CEO of the real Electrolux, multiple times). Complete with "references" pointing to obviously "home made" websites in Macedonia using the name Electrolux/Elektroluks with a logo that is slightly different from the real Electrolux logo, but pictures etc ripped from the real Electrolux website (which has no mention of any presence at all in Macedonia, or even anyone representing them there). A hoax that has obviously been going on for at least four years. I'll dig deeper when I get time for it, but it'll probably take a week or two, I will then file a report at WP:ANI, but I thought I'd let you know, in case someone requests speedy deletion of more pages. I already have a couple of speedy candidates, but need them to be live since I need their page histories as a reference when digging.
So someone in Macedonia is really living out his fantasies about being a big time entrepreneur, here on en-WP. Thomas.W ^talk 17:20, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Good. Tag them when you are ready. I have already blocked user Electrolux-Elektroluks (talk · contribs). JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

@Thomas.W: - see this - may not be total hoax, looks as though there may be some underlying reality. JohnCD (talk) 17:41, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

I've seen it, he pops up on a number of user created/contributed websites, but that seems to be part of the hoax. Searches on Google for Electrolux Bitola, one of the articles I don't want deleted yet, returns nothing but "traditional hoax websites", i.e. sites where anyone can enter anything. And that entire article is sourced only to www.electrolux.com.mk, one of the "home made" web sites where pictures of products etc have been ripped from the real Electrolux. And why would they try to insert the name Dimche Palenzo in various places relating to the real Electrolux, and even try to turn Electrolux of Sweden into a Macedonian company by inserting false information in the infobox of that article here, if a real company by that name existed in Macedonia? And why is there no link to an article on the Macedonian WP in the article here about "Electrolux Bitola" if there really is a legit substantial company by that name in Macedonia? Note that Electrolux Bitola, an article created by User:Palenzo Dimce, originally claimed that the company has over 10,000 employees, so we're talking about a very substantial company. So my gut feeling tells me that it's all a hoax, one of a number of Wikipedia hoaxes that have originated in Macedonia. Thomas.W ^talk 18:08, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

This user page: User:Palenzo is also connected to it, a fake company with a fake web site and a fake "web shop" with pictures of merchandise but no prices, and where you can't buy anything. So he has branched out into fashion too, not only home appliances. Which makes it crazy enough to be part of some kind of art project. Thomas.W ^talk 18:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

• Hello again. I found this draft: Draft:Dimche_Petko_Palenzo, which was created as a talk page, just like the one you deleted yesterday, but was moved (see page history). It's a hoax, and I have no use for it since the IP that created it, 77.29.173.31 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), also has edited other articles, so would you please delete it? Just to make it a bit harder for the hoaxer to recreate it. Thomas.W ^talk 19:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
• Electrolux Bitola has now been nominated for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Electrolux_Bitola). Thomas.W ^talk 13:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I have commented there. JohnCD (talk) 13:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi JohnCD. I had requested the undeletion of the following article: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah

In response you noted: "You made the same request last January, and it was restored then, but you have not touched it since. AFC is not a place to keep drafts indefinitely. If it is restored again, when do you plan to do anything about it? JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 20 September 2014 (UTC)"

I will work on revisions to the proposed article immediately! My apologies for the delay in revising the article. I did not realize it had, in fact, been previously restored -- an oversight on my part. Thank you for your patience! --Electoralreform (talk) 03:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Electoralreform 03:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Electoralreform

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 07:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

(any chance of reconsideration for it to be returned?)

Dear John,

I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask - but I was wondering if the Pythia (band) page could be considered for un-deletion. I just went to update it and found that I'm about a year late for the discussion on it's deletion.

I thought that they would pass the notability guidelines in that

1 - (subject of press) They have been covered in UK's primary metal magazine Metal Hammer (One 2 page spread on the band - issue released 8th Feb 2012 (probably March issue) pages 64 and 65, numerous concert reviews and their albums have been reviewed. Singer Emily was "Miss December" in Metal Hammer's maidens of Metal calendar (2010). They have also appeared in the other rock press magazines such as Terrorizer (extreme metal magazine), Powerplay, Kerrang although I don't have details (but I can ask to find them - some details on their FB page https://www.facebook.com/PythiaBand/info ).

4 - (tours) Not sure if this counts but they have performed numerous tours with artists that are on Wikipedia (such as Leaves Eyes, Arch Enemy, Dragonforce and Serenity). They have also played on the bill of one of the main UK metal festivals - Bloodstock - there is a fair amount of information on them on the Bloodstock site http://www.bloodstock.uk.com/events/boa-2012/bands/pythia They have also played at the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_Female_Voices_Fest (2010) but are one of the few bands on the page not to link to a wikipedia page.

5 - Labels - their debut album was released through Genepool / Universal UK and worldwide and with Japanese label Spinning in 2011

6 - (notable musician - although only one) Their singer (Emily Alice Ovenden) is one of the singers from the Mediaeval Baebes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medi%C3%A6val_B%C3%A6bes - who have received good attention in the UK including TV coverage. Their last album did quite well I believe - http://www.amazon.co.uk/Kings-And-Angels-Christmas-Collection/dp/B00F9B2O8G/ref=pd_sim_m_h__1?ie=UTF8&refRID=0139Y1D0RAD3TTRDRWPW

The artist behind one of the album covers was Brian Froud - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Froud and there is more info on the bands press coverage here https://liveandloud.com/artists/pythia

They have also had famous actor Brian Blessed appear on their recordings - not sure if that counts!

So - I was wondering if they could be reconsidered. If there is any proof of the above that is required (for cites) I can try to find the issue numbers by posting on their FB group.

Any advice on the best way of presenting information in hope of getting the page restored would be great!

Kind Regards,

 Willzuk (talk) 17:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi John,

Was looking for the page and it says you deleted it and I'm wondering why and what state it was in when you deleted it.

Thanks!

Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notverynick (talk • contribs) 22:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi John, I need your help you took down Gregg.P. Sullivan"s which was up for 2 years . I need to put it back up and I need your help please . He is a public figure and he was not web hosting as sited in the deletion He had it up as reference linked to his face book page .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gregg.P.Sullivan Please help me get it back up . I am also having trouble in creating a new account could I have a phone number to speak to a human please. Best,Enid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.182.82.62 (talk) 16:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

The reasons are very well explained on his talk page --| Uncle Milty | talk | 17:42, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Apologies for delay in replying while I was on holiday. As Uncle Milty says, the reasons are explained at User talk:Gregg P. Sullivan: briefly, Wikipedia is not here to provide a web-hosting service for people to write about themselves or post their CVs. There are sites like LinkedIn and Facebook for that, but Wikipedia is different, not a social-networking site but a project to build an encyclopedia.

If you have trouble with the form you get by clicking "Create account" at the top of the screen, click on Wikipedia:Request an account where there is advice. You may choose a username related to your real name, or not, as you wish (see WP:REALNAME for some considerations), but it should not be the name of any other living person, or of any group or organization.

If you are employed by Mr Sullivan, and plan to write about him here, you should first carefully read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Just as a heads-up, I've created this as a redirect to 4Music because he presents a number of shows on Channel 4 sub-channels (T4, E4 and the ones I watch are on 4Music). Could you restore the deleted revisions "under" the redirect? I am interested to see if there is anything worth sculpting an article out of.--Launchballer 21:02, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

@Launchballer:  Done. The actual reason for deletion was BLP-prod - no references - but at a glance I doubt if he is notable enough for a stand-alone article. JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello John

Why did you delete the ISPE page? I can understand if it is because you can't stand elitist groups, but then I would also delete Intertel.

http://www.thethousand.com/

You just don't believe it exists? Not that I personally think that there has to be information about it and maybe the society wants to stay as close-knitted as they are. So again, why did you delete it?

Best regards, marika — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marika999 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

@Marika999: I have no objection to elitist groups, and deletions are not decided by my personal opinions in any case. The point is that Wikipedia is selective about article subjects: no-one doubts that ISPE exists, but that is not enough. The inclusion criterion is called Wikipedia:Notability and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." That test asks, not "Is this subject important or significant?" but the more objective question "Is there evidence that people not connected with this subject think it important or significant?" I deleted the ISPE article after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Society for Philosophical Enquiry (2nd nomination) decided that there was not the necessary independent coverage to establish notability.

The article on Intertel was also deleted by another administrator for the same reason after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intertel (group) (2nd nomination). JohnCD (talk) 17:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear John

Thank you very much for your quick response. May I ask you what are the criterias regarding "necessary independent coverage to establish notability." and who decides? Maybe ther is a link where i can find the criterias und who decides about notability? It would be a general interest, not regarding any article at all.

Best regards marika Marika999 (talk) 18:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

For an overview, see Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. The actual guidelines are at:

• WP:Notability
• WP:Notability (organizations and companies)
• WP:Identifying reliable sources

As to who decides, any user can nominate any article for deletion, but only administrators can actually delete. If the article gives "no credible claim of significance or importance" (a lower bar than notability) it may be speedily deleted, but any doubtful case will be decided by a deletion discussion like the ones I linked, a process described at WP:AFD. The nomination is listed, any user may contribute and after a week an uninvolved administrator decides whether there is a consensus to delete, based on the arguments not on a count of heads. The no-consensus default is keep. JohnCD (talk) 18:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi User:JohnCD, i have no idea of the strange IP that has been abusing Wikipedia in the last hours on the Article i wrote on Gerald Milton without any legit or respectable reason.However i wanted to protest but didnt know how to go about that. Please look into the article i wrote.Thanks and Sorry for this whole mess — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dope99 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

@Dope99:. Don't worry about the IPs, they are just a nuisance, removing the AfD template from the article does nothing to stop the debate. The WP:Notability standard the article will be measured against is WP:MUSICBIO, and I have to say that it doesn't look to me as if he meets it. You are welcome to comment at the AfD discussion - read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. The debate will normally run for seven days, and then an uninvolved administrator will decide what to do. JohnCD (talk) 22:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

John

I noticed my page on Sanjib Sahoo was deleted. The page was blank as I am working on the content.

Can you please respond back with details on why the page was deleted? Also, would appreciate any help/guidance you can provide in getting this page created.

Thanks T — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikicontributorTH (talk • contribs) 02:30, 14 October 2014‎

Replied on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 13:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Why wikipedia is unsafe to post my details — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norlan245 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Egonovism. Since you had some involvement with the Egonovism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DeistCosmos (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Does it really matter whether or not an article is 'only' promoting a product or service? In the cases of the TuneCore and CD Baby articles, I think it is clear that they are using wikipedia to advertise their service. Their websites are e-commerce sites. Now, granted, I can see where an article for something like Ebay might exist... because Ebay also changed the internet and e-commerce as a whole. But, in the specific cases of TuneCore and CD Baby, I don't think they 'changed the world' in a way that would warrant letting them limbo under the bar of an 'acceptable article'. The real question is: Why are these 2 companies allowed to have articles while other products/services are not.

TuneCore is also listed on RipOff Report.com here http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/tunecorecom-music-review/brooklyn-new-york-11201/tunecorecom-music-review-peter-wells-tai-morita-please-read-this-review-before-signin-595671

If you go to google and type in Cd Baby or Tune Core... Wikipedia is one of the first things that pops up. I'm telling you point blank that they have cleverly disguised a way to format their articles to use wikipedia to advertise their service. Furthermore, on the FIRST LINE of TuneCore's article it says it's a service. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Spilotro (talk • contribs) 22:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Anthony Spilotro (talk) 22:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

@Anthony Spilotro: If you type anything into Google, Wikipedia is one of the first things that pops up. G11 unambiguous advertising or promotion speedy deletion is intended for things like (from my yesterday's deletion log): "X is a world-class YZ manufacturer... We are proud of our long heritage and our reputation in producing innovative and high quality YZ products that meet our customers’ and consumers’ distinct tastes."

The criterion for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability and does not require the subject to be an eBay or a Microsoft. The test is whether there is evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."

If you think the article is misleading, you are free to edit it, provided you cite a reliable source for what you say. Read WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for what to do if your edits are reverted. If you think it should be deleted, you are free to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which will start a seven-day discussion to which anyone can contribute. JohnCD (talk) 11:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

PS - I see that you tried to nominate TuneCore and two others at AfD, but you have to do more than simply add an entry to the daily log. Advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 12:03, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

	Great Answer Badge
	Awarded to those who have given a great answer on the Teahouse Question Forum. A good answer is one that fits in with the Teahouse expectations of proper conduct: polite, patient, simple, relies on explanations not links, and leaves a talkback notification. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
You are knowledgeable and kind.   Bfpage |leave a message  00:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you very much! JohnCD (talk) 12:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

But i can post article in Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.193.103.111 (talk) 06:18, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

@Norlan245: - I guess this is you. Please log in before you edit, and sign your messages by ending them with four "tilde" characters ~~~~. Yes you can post articles, but they should not be about you or your friends or family, because this is not a social-networking site. Read Wikipedia:Your first article for advice, and consider using the WP:Article wizard to help guide you through the process. JohnCD (talk) 12:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Respected sir

we have created page "Dr Sukesh Zamwar" but you deleted it before we edit it so please give us page details

thanks & Regards V S Dongre

Vsdongre (talk) 07:00, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

@Vsdongre: I deleted the page Draft:Dr Sukesh Zamwar because it was a copyright violation, copied from http://buldanaurban.in/md.html. Please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste. JohnCD (talk) 14:32, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi John CD

I noticed that there was a deletion of the page 'Hooj Choons' on August 24th 2014. After reading through the 4 reasons you outlined for page deletion, I believe this wiki was ok. Maybe copyright was the issue?

Hooj Choons is one of the greatest UK Trance and Progressive music labels from the 90's. They were responsible for some of the biggest hits on the scene...Nalin & Kane's 'Beach Ball', Three Drives' 'Greece 2000' and the timeless classic 'Cafe Del Mar'. I can appreciate that you probably have no idea what I'm on about :)...but from a die-hard follower of this label, I can safely say they were one of the most influential and important contributors for my beloved scene. Very important history and I would love to see the page reinstated.

You can visit Hooj Choons website at www.hoojchoons.co.uk, and view there extensive discography at http://www.discogs.com/label/238-Hooj-Choons

Obviously I don't know if copyright was the issue, with the deleted entry. If this is the case, can that portion be erased and have the site re-instated?

Many Thanks

72.182.121.130 (talk) 17:55, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

I have restored Hooj Choons. The problem was not copyright, it was that the article was pretty thin and did not suggest that the label met Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, called WP:Notability, which asks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:Notability (summary) and WP:Notability (music). Another user enquired after it recently - see my advice to them at User talk:Notverynick#Hooj Choons.

Since it was deleted under a process called WP:Proposed deletion, is restored on request; but unless it is improved, it is likely to be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, a different process which would start a debate lasting seven days.

You are welcome to improve it; see the WP:Tutorial for a start and read WP:Your first article for advice, and also WP:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source". At one time the article was considerably fuller, but much material was trimmed out because it was unsourced and unverifiable.

If you are going to work on it, I suggest you register an account, which is easy and free. That is not essential, but it would make communication easier. JohnCD (talk) 21:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi The page I am talking about is not created by me, and I have absolutely no problem with the deletion itself. I was wondering, can I get a copy of the page's content somewhere (logs etc) so that I can use them for my purpose. ^ same thing as her/him I would like a copy of the deleted page. Plus the reason it was deleted. Name of the page: Shahida Ahmed = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahida_Ahmed . Please send it to my email <redacted> and delete this message as soon as you see it because I don't want my email out there please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inoofy (talk • contribs) 20:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

See reply on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 22:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

My email is now accessible, please send the maximized and the trimmed away copy (both) as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inoofy (talk • contribs) 17:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done JohnCD (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

delete and undelete
Thank you for welcoming and warning, for dealing with deletions of articles due to vandalism, spam, promotion, nonsense, hoax, for assisting the precision bombing in Howard Roark style, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you, I think... I shall have to read that book! JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

It's a long book ;) - in short: he rather bombed his creation than have it distorted. Wikipedia still has a Main page with toy blocks in different colours, instead of something like the design above ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

We were working on a Money and Fame page for our business that you have deleted. We are currently working with media outlets and have a publicist to write out our story but we have stopped all operations because of this deletion. I'm the CEO of the company and I have been in artist Management and Artist development for over 10 years. Our company is a registered trademark based out of Canada. Our domain is www.moneyandfame.com / our social media is @moneyandfame . We post celebrity news. WE host events which you can find on youtube ( moneyandfameTv. Our business partners are Proffessors and individuals who specialize in event planning. We produce and sell merchandise on www.cureandcause.com . I dont know how this works but please reinstate our page and let us know our next steps.

Thank you . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.160.117 (talk) 22:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

You can contact me directly Sami@moneyandfame.com Would appreciate a promp response. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moneyandfame (talk • contribs) 22:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

@Moneyandfame: Wikipedia is not a place for publicity or promotion. Paid editing is very strongly discouraged and is permitted only under strict conditions which include full disclosure - see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. The "publicist" you hired has been banned from editing Wikipedia for persistent undeclared paid editing, which is prohibited by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, and is illegal (as covert advertising) in some territories, including the USA and the European Union. However, they continue, setting up strings of new "sockpuppet" accounts (over 100 identified to date) to try to evade detection. As a banned user, all their contributions are automatically deleted and will not be restored. I suggest that you ask for your money back. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Ow-some job. Keep it up. Wishing you all the best. Ranjithreddy45 (talk) 13:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you very much! JohnCD (talk) 22:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for deleting that for me :) Renweba (talk) 19:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

No problem! For future refernce, ((db-web)) wasn't the right tag there, it only applies to articles, but as the page was entirely your work, ((db-author)) did fine as a deletion reason. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 22:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, per WP:LEGAL, I want to report the legal threats here [1] and here [2]. User:Sami Abboud appears to be the same person as User:Moneyandfame, who you had blocked. Anyway, just wanted to let you know, thanks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 03:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi John, did you get a chance to review the Pythia band page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Willzuk/Pythia_%28band%29 - I have added a lot of extra links for references to press appearances in widely available magazines. There is now a new page for Pythia (band) so I was wondering if there is an easy way to combine? Thanks Willzuk (talk) 11:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

On reflection the newly created page is very well written so I have started to add some bit and can add more references if that gets reviewed for deletion. Thanks again for your help Willzuk (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

@Willzuk:. That looks good - you merge in whatever will improve it from your version. We might need to do a history-merge to maintain attribution to the authors of the earlier version - I'll think about that tomorrow. When it's done, I'll consider whether to send it through AfD again. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks John. I think my version was becoming more focused on as many references as possible to prove notability whereas the newer version is more geared around presenting facts that are hopefully of interest to the reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willzuk (talk • contribs) 17:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

hi john,

I agreed with what you said, and i have edited the article and submitted the draft without any promotional activity and i would like to know that as the User is FredrickEllifsen/Prajyot Mahajan but i would like to have the article with the name Prajyot mahajan and not FredrickEllifsen/Prajyot Mahajan. Also let me know how long it would take for this submission and approval.

Till the period page gets approved please do clean up : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prajyot_mahajan

When any person searches on google "Prajyot Mahajan",people should get wikipedia information about prajyot mahajan. let me know what else can be done to send the draft review from the user:Prajyotmahajan and if possible give me your email id for appropriate communication.

Regards, Fredrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prajyotmahajan (talk • contribs) 10:43, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

dear john,

i do look after it as i am using both account but now onwards i will be using only user:prajyot mahajan. thank you

Regards Fredrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prajyotmahajan (talk • contribs) 10:45, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

hello john, As the user account Prajyot mahajan is of mine , i would like to delete that account having username : Prajyot Mahajan. so that i can us only User:Fredrick

Regards Fredrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by FredrickEllifsen (talk • contribs) 11:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Accounts are not deleted, but I have blocked Prajyotmahajan (talk) because accounts with names of living persons should not be used by anyone else. Use FredrickEllifsen (talk) only. I will reply to your other points later today. JohnCD (talk) 11:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

hi john, i would like to know with what name the article present in draft of User:FredrickEllifsen/Prajyot_Mahajan will be posted after getting approved as i will want the article with the name Prajyot Mahajan.

and a warning message is being shown below the draft page i.e

Warning: This page should probably be moved, but a page already exists at Draft:Prajyot Mahajan. Regards, Fredrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by FredrickEllifsen (talk • contribs) 11:23, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

hi, please do unblock my user:prajyot mahajan as i want to change the username of that account, because it seems very weird and awful when followers of prajyot mahajan see the content that this page is being deleted. so please do unblock that account as soon as i change the name of that account you can block it again.

regards fredrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by FredrickEllifsen (talk • contribs) 15:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft deleted as a hoax, with claims copied from elsewhere; user blocked. JohnCD (talk) 17:46, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear john,

This is riya rathore from nashik(seo expert) we do apologize for putting some fake stuffs from sungha jung article to the article of prajyot mahajan. We assure you that we will provide you all the real matter with official licenses proving the position of our artist prajyot mahajan. We want you to please do unblock the IP address of the user FredrickEllifsen, rajnandan23, Prajyotmahajan. We take care that we will be posting all the real authorized article. Once again we say sorry from our organization team. Also let me know the proper procedure of how to make the article on artist of our city who won national awards.

Regards, Riya Rathore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riyarathore (talk • contribs) 04:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear john ,

We heartily apologize for the mistake of copying contents. but we make sure that we will provide you with real matter and stuffs that is related to the artist prajyot mahajan itself. sorry for wasting your past time. please do a favour of unblocking the IP of users: rajnandan23, FredrickEllifsen, Prajyotmahajan. Please give us a chance to post the article in a real manner. as the artist is a national award winner also we can give you newspapers article and reference links and other official stuffs so that you will be able to get that the contents are real. let us know the whole procedure to submit the article then no matter if it is paid stuffs. just let us know the process.

Hoping for the best Reply

Thank You, Arthur Winslet. (Nashik comm. head) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.106.124.65 (talk) 05:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

No. I have wasted enough time trying to help you. You thought Wikipedia would accept any ridiculous story you chose to tell, and now I do not believe a single word you say. Any blocked accounts may request unblock on their talk page, following the instructions there, and another administrator will consider the request. JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Why You deleted my article???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.79.36.154 (talk) 12:49, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

What article do you mean? JohnCD (talk) 13:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: User talk:ExcelSoftware&Systems

Did you want "block account creation" ticked?

Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

No, I didn't, I have undone it. Something funny happened with that block - I tried, twice, to do it with the Easyblock script, and each time the system said the user was already blocked, so I did it manually and botched it. Thanks for picking it up! JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy to help. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi John

I believe this was put up by my ex in order to attack me in public pages online after I've called it off with him a few weeks ago. He is a US citizen and I live in NZ, please help me understand how Im able to get things stopped from being put up online by him in various such sites and blogs. This is violating my privacy and rights as an individual and is a complete for of harassment. I await your response and also would like to thank you on deletion of whatever content was put online by <name redacted>. He is from Seattle, Washington state and I shall also be reporting this to my local NZ Police as well as the US Consulate to start actioning the various pictures,emails and online abuse my family and self receive from his email practically daily. If you're able to assist me on this issue I would be most grateful. Look forward to hearing from your end soon. Thanks

Ana — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.56.202.223 (talk) 19:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

I am sorry that you are being harassed like this. As far as Wikipedia is concerned, the contribution was never an encyclopedia article. It was submitted as a draft, declined and flagged for deletion by a reviewer, and deleted by me within ten hours of first submission. So far as I can tell, it was not picked up by Google.

We take things like this very seriously: I have now amended the user's talk page so that your name is no longer visible there. Any further attacks from that account will result in it being blocked. As a further precaution I have "salted" your name for a year - protected it so that no article with that title can be created without permission from an administrator.

So far as other internet sites go, I'm afraid you will have to approach them yourself - the Internet is an anarchy with no form of central control, but most sites have some form of "abuse" contact. Our articles Cyberbullying and Cyberstalking say something about the legal situation which you may find helpful. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear John,

I thank for the help, it was very kind of you!

Have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsqneti (talk • contribs) 11:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

My pleasure. JohnCD (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

You wrote "...We should look elsewhere for the reasons why the numbers of people who want to do this fairly thankless task are falling..." I think you hit the nail on the head there.

So, there's lots of speculation as to why the numbers are falling. Finding out would seem like the natural thing to do in order to find a solution. So, how do we find out? The folks at Wikipedia:WikiProject Statistics are pretty smart. Maybe they could connect it to something, like the trend of other editors leaving. Maybe a poll asking the community? I don't know. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:00, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

I really don't know - it has been discussed endlessly. It would take a fairly large-scale survey. One problem, as someone pointed out at WT:RFA, is that people may well say "RFA is too hostile" when they really mean "I don't actually want to take on that job". I think there has been a corresponding fall in the number of people doing other back-room tasks like commenting at AfD and MfD.

On the bright side, R.Gloucester's WP:VPR#Proposal: administrators must be civil servants, not politicians seems to me a really good suggestion. When the current RFC fails, I would consider trying to work that up into a concrete proposal. JohnCD (talk) 09:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi John. I noticed that the WP:NFOOTY shortcut is a bit off-target. When I clicked on it, I end up at the Badminton sub-heading of Wikipedia:Notability (sports)! The football/soccer section is a bit higher up. Do you know how to correct that? I can't see anything in the page code that would seem to cause a problem. --Drm310 (talk) 16:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

It's erratic - often it works correctly, sometimes not. Writing WP:Notability (sports)#Association football is no better. It's unsatisfactory, because that's a link I often need to use explaining to newbies why their footballer article has been deleted. I once asked about it at WP:VPT. I can't now find that question in the archives, but the answer was that it is to do with a glitch in the relative timing of various overlapping simultaneous actions within the system and (by implication) nothing can be done about it. JohnCD (talk) 22:57, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Please see this page, which might interest you. RGloucester — ☎ 03:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear John,

Hello, i am writing to you ask about Shahida Ahmed's wikipedia page that has been deleted. I am interested in her work and i would like it if you please email me the page even though it has false information. This is my email account deemajassim@gmail.com, hope you reply back, Thank you.

sincerely, Demitria J. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.203.141.29 (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done JohnCD (talk) 18:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello JohnCD,

I apologize making bad things on Wikipedia creating a Rocco Ventrella article. I understanding that's hard to create it on Wikipedia and for this reason I'm abandoning this my wish for now.

Thank you very much and again my apologies about.

Best regards,

Managementrv

Thank you for understanding so readily that Wikipedia is not really for what you hoped to do. I apologise that we do not make it clearer at sign-up time what it is and is not for. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quick question--this page was deleted in this AfD and recreated by (I think) the same user. Could you compare the new version with the deleted one? I don't think it meets WP:N as is, because the non-profile sources barely mention him. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 15:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Origamite also posted to my talk page about this, and I have deleted the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

@JamesBWatson: at first glance it looked like a G4, but I wanted to do a more careful compare before deciding, and have not got round to it. You have saved me the trouble - thanks! JohnCD (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes. I too thought that at first glance it looked like a G4, but did not make a decision immediately without further checking. However, that further checking convinced me it was indeed a G4. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Mr John,

As per previous pages i observed were kind of fake material with the article prajyot mahajan. i have got stuff that proves to be the true and real matter regarding prajyot mahajan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonharold24 (talk • contribs) 07:43, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

I do not believe any of the claims about him. Even his own website is largely copied from Kotaro Oshio's website, and Reverbnation shows less than 400 song plays total, though on Facebook he talks of 2.6 million views. Please stop wasting our time. JohnCD (talk) 19:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

I want to leave Wikipedia permanently. For this .what can i do ? plz do it fast. --Adh!prakash (talk) 11:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

@Adh!prakash: The easiest way is simply to abandon the account - walk away and don't edit again. You can blank your talk page, if you like. If you want more than that, I can't do it for you, you have to follow the instructions at WP:Courtesy vanishing. JohnCD (talk) 12:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi John, I was working on a page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_institute_of_Business_Studies ) and was about to update the same with some relevant information things like talks by India's ex president Mr. A P J Abdul kalam, Kapil Dev and other dignitaries from professional word but by accident the page got deleted. You bein a veteran please suggest should i go and make a new page or the same can be recovered. Please suggest. Thanks for your time on this. Let me also know if can connect with you on any social networks. I remain with best regards, Amar Amarkrishnajha (talk) 12:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

@Amarkrishnajha: - I have restored the page, and moved it to Bengal Institute of Business Studies with a capital "I" for "Institute". Sorry about that - it was deleted because by this edit you actually blanked the page completely, and that is taken as a request for deletion because users often delete a page and leave it blank when they want to abandon it. JohnCD (talk) 12:45, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, JohnCD for your help. I will follow your advice. I have also contacted the source to get permission to use their material. I will wait until I hear from them before I decide how to add to Wikipedia. Bob Kinney (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright is complicated - more on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 16:39, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks JohnCD, I will take your original advice, it sounds much less complicated and will give me practice on posting here as I am a newbie!Bob Kinney (talk) 17:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

You were involved with the article; I invite you to discuss the current page move request. --George Ho (talk) 16:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

I have already commented at the RM. JohnCD (talk) 16:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank You for the admin help and guides in my talk-page. Hope to be blessed by you.

Sajan Subba (talk) 23:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi JohnCD, Just discovered your answer to my question on Atama's talk page. Thanks to have so magicaly and efficiently popped up to my help ! All the best, Krazycram Krazycram (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Re: Deleted rebecca.pokorny sandbox account.

Will you please send me a copy of what the page was prior to deletion? I was editing to get more familiar with basic coding for my night class. I have limited access to practice at home. Please, will you send me a copy of the page? Without a log of the work, and practice time shown, I will not be able to complete the course.

I can emailed at rebecca.pokorny@gmail.com.

Thank you in advance,

Rebecca Pokorny

 Done JohnCD (talk) 21:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Did you receive the username change request? Thanks for the help, by the way. Capt. Tightpants (talk) 21:12, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

@Capt. Tightpants: no, I didn't, and I don't see in your contributions that you have sent one. Anyway, you don't send it to me, you go (while logged in) to WP:CHU and follow the instructions there. JohnCD (talk) 21:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I think I solved the problem, whatever it was. Thanks for the help! Capt. Tightpants (talk) 22:12, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

...and I see you are already renamed, good. That was quick service from CHU! JohnCD (talk) 22:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

I had accidentally marked the wrong subpage for deletion. I removed the delete request template from the page, but you still deleted it. I would like User:HuffTheWeevil/Majors/row restored, please. Thank you. HuffTheWeevil / talk / contribs 16:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

@HuffTheWeevil:  Done - sorry about that! JohnCD (talk) 20:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! HuffTheWeevil / talk / contribs 21:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

sorry for your trouble. I created the page starting off at the HE Wiki. you may complete the delete process.

RaymondPui (talk) 15:31, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

No worries! JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Hey i was just wondering why my page was deleted. And how I could get it posted thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephvau (talk • contribs) 21:19, 16 November 2014

@Stephvau: If you mean Antonio Serzedelo, it hasn't been deleted - I left a note on your talk page yesterday to tell you that it was moved to Draft:Antonio Serzedelo and is in the queue waiting for review. This edit summary says you requested that move to draft space on IRC. JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Raouf.mhamdi (talk) 16:48, 17 November 2014 (UTC) Dear Mr John, I'm Raouf Mhamdi Webmaster of Auris Hotels Group. Auris Hotels is a company for hotels management. I have created the "Auris Hotels" page to subscribe our brand and to be visible on wikipedia Could you please inform us why our page was deleted and what we have to do to publish our brand on wikipedia Thanks

@Raouf.mhamdi: I'm afraid you have not understood what an encyclopedia is. It is not a free advertising platform for companies to "subscribe our brand and to be visible on wikipedia". What you wrote was the company's story that it wants to tell the world, written in pure PR-speak: "internationally benchmarked Auris Standards that offer variety, comfort, quality and value for money... the highest standards of professionalism and integrity... a visionary and dynamic team... high end lifestyle facilities... " etc. That is the sort of marketing fluff that companies put on their websites, and indeed it was a straight copy of yours, but anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. JohnCD (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi John. Since you protected The Cantos of Ezra Pound as a hoax, do you also want to delete and protect The Cantos of Ezra Pound (film)? Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 19:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

I do indeed, thank you. What's more, I will now start an SPI on this gang of hoaxers - I thought they had got the message and stopped, but evidently stronger measures are required. JohnCD (talk) 19:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hey thanks for your help and patience with me editing my signature. Have a great day and happy editing Needs2learnmore talk 22:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

(misplaced unblock request - will reply on relevant talk page). JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Not your fault, I'd think it represented a company too - but this is actually a single user without any organizations behind it per an email they sent to UTRS. I've gone ahead and unblocked the account. They are an aviation enthusiast.--v/r - TP 22:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

@TParis: that's not what their deleted userpage said: "RevAir is an Australia based group of airline current and past employees that have created various pieces of content about airline travel. From booking your trip to locating lost items in time we will have all the information you need to be an informed member of the traveling public. look for us on Facebook - RevAir" JohnCD (talk) 22:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

I know. Apparently he was exaggerating his employee pool. It's just him. He runs a facebook page talking about things in aviation that interest him and tricks of the trade that he knows of (like cheap tickets). I told him not to advertise his facebook page here and not to try to portray himself as an organization anymore. He explained what each part of his username meant and it's definitively personal and could not really ever represent an organization.--v/r - TP 22:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

OK, no worries! JohnCD (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

why you delete my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammad junaid jan (talk • contribs) 13:03, 22 November 2014‎

@Mohammad junaid jan: I told you on your talk page here - Wikipedia is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves. JohnCD (talk) 14:07, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Why have you deleted the Wikipedia page about James Gowan? I have an essay to write on him and no idea where to start researching him now, please put it back up. No matter how vague, I need this! I could even give you information to add. Please and thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.12.224.239 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 26 November 2014

I'm afraid the deleted article would be no help to you - all it said was "British architect (more to come)", but no more came. You can find some references to him in James Stirling (architect). A Google search on "James Gowan architect" finds quite a few references, and should be a starting point for you. It certainly looks as though Wikipedia ought to have an article on him, but that won't happen till someone is interested enough to do it - why not consider having a go once you've done your essay? Ask me if you need advice. JohnCD (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Also, see List of projects by James Stirling#Projects designed under the name of "James Stirling and James Gowan". JohnCD (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you deleted two pages concerning public statues in my neighbourhood. They are not a hoax and bring joy to much of the community and I see no reason for them not to be on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.172.198.216 (talk) 06:39, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

As a global encyclopedia, Wikipedia is quite choosy about subjects for articles. The test for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability and looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:Notability (summary). Those articles were deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale the emu decided that there was not enough coverage to show notability in WIkipedia's sense. Sorry. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

JohnCD, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX!

04:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

Can you please explain why you have blocked Mendip United Wiki page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.121.197 (talk) 18:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

The block notice explains: Wikipedia accounts are for individuals only, so there can't be a "User:Mendip United F.C." account. Also, user pages are for the individuals who are here to help build the encyclopedia to say something about themselves and their Wikipedia activities, not for people or clubs to "tell the world" about themselves. That's what social-networking sites like Facebook are for. I'll add some more advice on the account talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 18:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks for going into more detail about why you blocked our page.... However, many other clubs and teams seem to have pages which tell viewers about themselves.

I have just looked and Liverpool FC have a page which explains about their history, their players and various other details.

How is this different? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.88.59 (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

There is no user page User:Liverpool F.C., the club do not have a Wikipedia user account and would not be allowed to have one. There is an encyclopedia article Liverpool F.C. about the club; that is quite different. It is not the club's page, it is Wikipedia's page about the club. Liverpool F.C. did not write it, and do not maintain it: there are WP:Conflict of interest rules that say they should not edit it.

What you wrote was a sort of club home-page, the club talking to its supporters, using the first person ("we" and "our"). That's fine, but the place for it is your own web-site or a social-networking site like Facebook. Wikipedia is not a web-host for that sort of thing.

If you want to consider writing an encyclopedia article about the club, that may be possible, but it would be quite different, and doing it would be more difficult than you think. I will provide more advice on User talk:Mendip Utd FC, but not until tomorrow. Meanwhile, read WP:Your first article and WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 22:05, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longwell_Green_Sports_F.C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.88.59 (talk) 23:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, it is different because (a) as with Liverpool, it is not a user page User:Longwell Green Sports F.C. but an encyclopedia article, and (b) what it says is verifiable because it gives a lot of references. If you want to write an article about Mendip United, see the advice I have written on User talk:Mendip Utd FC. JohnCD (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Would you please correct your deletion rationale for this article? The article subject appears to be an entirely different person from the one whose article was sent to AFD five years ago? I'd already declined the G4 after checking that out. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for pointing it out - the PROD template shrieks in red if there has been a previous AfD, and I just saw it was a writer and didn't check the birth dates. JohnCD (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Why did you delete this page? It wasn't even up for 20 minutes before you deleted it. He is a real YouTube broadcaster with 282 videos, and many fans. I don't get it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbtiller (talk • contribs) 10:11, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

@Barbtiller: There are thousands of real Youtube broadcasters. The test for inclusion in Wikipedia is whether there is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see WP:Notability (summary). More advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 12:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi JohnCD,

My name is Matt, I work for Alarm.com, Inc, and I wanted to ask you to provide more direction around and input on the changes you felt necessary to our entry. We drafted the entry to provide factual information, referenced where necessary, about our company's history and technology. It was largely untouched for more than a year. Rather than just deleting so much of it, I'd like to work with you to understand how we can work together to provide a complete picture of our company without eliminating key points and relevant information. Thank you and I look forward to your feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.77.151 (talk) 01:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't recall having had any involvement with this article, but I have now looked at its history. What I see is a basic article being built up by a number of single-purpose accounts into something which includes marketing-speak like "a significant player... a secure and cost-effective option... provides complete peace of mind... " but more significantly is a long catalogue of all the products and services the company offers and their features and virtues. That is an advertisement, the story the company wants to tell the world about itself and its products, suitable for your website but not for an enyclopedia article, and I am surprised it lasted so long before someone noticed and reverted it.

The thing to make clear is that Wikipedia is a project to build a neutral encyclopedia, not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves. There are plenty of sites like Facebook for that, but Wikipedia is different.

When writing about your company here, you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and should read that guideline and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Note in particular that when editing Wikipedia on any subject where you have a COI you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use (and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising) to declare your interest. You are also very strongly advised not to edit such subjects directly, but to make suggestions on the article talk page for uninvolved users to consider. If there are factual inaccuracies in the article, please point them out. You may also suggest additions which would be of interest to the general encyclopedia reader (rather than the potential customer), but Wikipedia is not here to help promote your company. If discussion on the talk page does not reach a WP:Consensus, there are WP:Dispute resolution processes. JohnCD (talk) 13:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

We definitely understand the purpose and intent of Wikipedia, and we want to have information about Alarm.com to be factual and informative. Editing an entry in a way that makes it more reflective of this purpose is very different than reverting to a description of our company that's outdated, inaccurate and misleading. I would request that you actually edit the input rather than just revert to something that's misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.105.120.70 (talk) 15:09, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Please explain on the article talk page where it is outdated, inaccurate and misleading. JohnCD (talk) 22:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Yes0139 (talk) 16:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

• No worries! JohnCD (talk) 22:49, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with the italics conundrum! It seems that the problem was that I was including the apostrophes inside the double brackets, as I was trying to type in a link for an article name that is in italics. It's good to have administrators! Cap'n Tightpants (talk) 21:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

My pleasure. One tip: when adding apostrophes, it's very easy to miss one or add one too many, which wrecks the whole layout - essential to use "Show preview" to check it looks right. It doesn't take an admin to answer helpme's, I just happened by. When you have more experience, you can check CAT:HELP yourself and see if there are questions you can answer. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 22:38, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear John CD,

The Page you Deleted from Abuja Declaration 1989 on the 04-12-2014 was the Original Message, the massage you Reverted was the inferior massage from Nura Alkali, Please be fear in your dealing. Nura Alkali Change the Message from it original form. Do you like what is happening in Nigeria now? Can't you see the rate of poverty that was created in the Name religion? Please I beg you be realistic let Nigerians and the world be aware of this mission.

You live in a great country where you tolerate each other no matter your race, more than 15,000 people have been slaughter in their cold blood for no reason in the name of religion. Nigerians need to be aware of this information, keep this message please I beg you in the name of the of the Lord your God.

The message was not copied from www.nairaland.com, they copied it from www.wikipedia.com to www.nairaland.com for easy access to many Nigerians because it is Nigeria most visited website.

Let there be peace in Nigeria and Africa will be in Peace!(Cooklabel (talk) 10:14, 5 December 2014 (UTC))

@Cooklabel: We understand that it was not copied from www.nairaland.com, and that is why it was restored after deletion in September.

The version you put there was more or less how the article Abuja Declaration (1989) started out in 2010, but Wikipedia articles are not tied to one version, they change and develop, as you can see in the page history. Anyone can edit them, and disagreements have to be resolved by discussion on the talk page, not by edit warring. If you think the present article can be improved, please make a suggestion on the talk page, but we will not simply go back to the 2010 version. Also note that:

• You will need to give reliable sources for what you say, Wikipedia is not a place for opinions.
• Nor is it a place for advocacy or campaigning, we require a neutral point of view.

JohnCD (talk) 22:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

I am dmitri senda, otherwise known as george seynda. My on line persona is either falkie or the guy from pittsburgh. While i did not create the page mentioning me, it was done with my blessing. My videos are being re-posted on at least 5 websites, george noory and art bell watch them on a regular basis. Was i not famous enough for you, while others who only have a claim tomfame through an inheritance( paris hilton) or noteiriety ( snookie, kim kardassian ) and have little or no talent other than their bust ir butt size.

My videos are also,posted and discussed on bellgab and the pittsburgh post gazette re posts them as well on,their news feed and has done so for 3,years.

I fail to understand what you consider substantive content given that there was a lot of content in the entry.

Everyone famous started out as not famous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.50.156 (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Note that * i * did not create the page one of my fans did.

96 subscribers, 30000 you tube views. Im sick in bed and people are asking me for new videos. I would not know how to create a wikipedia page by mysellf.

George ( my middle name ) senda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.50.156 (talk) 04:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

One more thing. When you answer someone why can't you do it in colloquial english ? Your answers read like an encyclopedia entry wriiten by a very liteal computer.

If you google the guy from pittsburgh, i'm all over the place. I've read your reasons and i'd need the da vinci code to try to figure out what you said in normal everyday speak or even in pittsburghese.

George senda

Din't see any tildes on my ipad.

Seems to me Wikipedia has a built in bias against internet pages not controlled by mass media publishers. If it isn't in a news source or book or some mainstream source you consider it unworthy of publication and irrelevant.

This, from an internet site created by users of the internet is most puzzling and disturbing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.50.156 (talk) 04:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

I'll try to explain in non-bureaucratic language. Wikipedia is a quite different sort of site from social-networking sites like Facebook, or fan-sites or gossip sites. Here are three of the ways:

• People are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves here (I know you didn't, but if you have an article you shouldn't edit it: it won't be a home-page, or blog, or your article; it'll be Wikipedia's article about you.)
• Everything added to Wikipedia should be verifiable from a reliable, published source. That's so that a reader who wants to check what they read here can see where it comes from. That means what people know from their own experience, or what they have found out by personal interview, can't be posted here. Youtube, Facebook, blogs, fansites, anywhere without some sort of editorial control and fact-checking, don't count as reliable. You wrote "If it isn't in a news source or book or some mainstream source you consider it unworthy of publication and irrelevant". No, we consider it unreliable.
• Wikipedia is quite choosy about subjects. The "notability" test is whether people unconnected with the subject have thought it important or significant enough to write about. You wrote "Everyone famous started out as not famous" - sure, but this isn't the place where they get famous. First, they get famous, then people write about them in reliable sources, then there can be an article.

I told user Barbtiller (talk) who wrote the page about you, on his talk page, that if he thought he could find suitable references, I would restore it into a draft page where he could work on it. I haven't heard from him yet. JohnCD (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi John,

We communicated earlier this year about a page I created for the documentary film Hearts of the Dulcimer. My understanding was that the page was rejected because there were no outside reviews of the film other than newspaper articles. Since we've last communicated, there have been two reviews, one by a prominent trade magazine called Dulcimer Players News, and the other by a publication called Video Librarian.

The Dulcimer Player News article appeared in their print-based magazine, so there is no link to the article. Here is their website: http://www.dpnews.com. The article was featured in their Summer issue.

Video Librarian's review is online and appears here: http://www.videolibrarian.com/othervideo.html#Anchor-36624

Would you please reinstate my Wikipedia article and consider it to be released on Wikipedia?

Thanks, pdelich (talk) 21:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)pdelich

I don't recall the conversation, but I can look into it and advise you, though I'm afraid it won't be till tomorrow. I am out of time tonight. JohnCD (talk) 22:40, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

No hurry, thanks John. pdelich (talk) 22:44, 5 December 2014 (UTC)pdelich

Replied on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 11:19, 7 December 2014 (UTC)