Return to User Page

Reasons for Deletion

[edit]

Shortcut

Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):

Haplogroup J1c3d (Y-DNA)

[edit]



User IDLast NameOrigin3
9
3
1
9
4
2
6
3
8
8
3
8
9
|
1
3
9
2
3
8
9
|
2
4
5
9
a
4
5
9
b
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
3
7
4
4
8
Y
C
A
I
I
a
Y
C
A
I
I
b
5
7
8
3
9
5
S
1
b
5
9
0
4
7
2
4
3
6
4
9
0
4
5
0
4
9
2
5
6
5
EVH4GJ1c3d Modal Haplotype 24 of 67 markers to predict J1c3d within a genetic distance of 3.Unknown 121411161311308911111420222281688121281211

References

[edit]

"The basic rule – with some specific exceptions outlined below – is, that you should not edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission.JohnLloydScharf (talk) 02:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KISS Keep It Simple Structure-Simplified English#Specification structure

[edit]

My file

[edit]

I actually don't want to make the file public right now (don't want it used just yet). I am not a PhD scientist (yet at least) or anything, I just made it for fun (sorta) originally. Do you mind if I email it to you instead?--Yalens (talk) 01:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I have uploaded it, it is available at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edited_Distribution_Haplogroup_J2_Y-DNA.png. As you can see, I based it off the older wiki file and did not totally blot out the 10% and 20% marks of the earlier file. But I tried my best to represent what I saw in the releases (Battaglia '08, Balanovsky '11, many of Nasidze's, Yunusbaev '06 , Wells '01, Semino '05, Perichich, Abu-Amero, etc...). As you can see it is still a work in progress. --Yalens (talk) 01:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, after thinking it over, I have decided to delete it. I am only an amateur in genetics. I think I should only reproduce what sources say and that's it. I didn't cite my sources properly (I don't even remember some of them at this point), and I just don't think its appropriate for me to post maps that could end up being used here and there without me even knowing about it. So I'm going to delete it. Sorry about this. Hope you got a look at it before I deleted- if you didn't and you really want to see it, I can email it to you. Sorry again. --Yalens (talk) 02:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I got it. It needs work and I do not know your methodology. Tofanelli used online software from Hawaii an just tossed in some Lat/Long that is totally without individualization. He then put it in his paper and said he'd tell you how he does it if you email him. The supplemental data is on his My thought is you should have a list of birth places that go with the data rather than just tagging 184 men, of which 18 may be J1 in Kazakhstan. Then he lets the software spread it out so it looks more meaningful than it is. What the software does with a 1000 points of measurement for weather, he lets it do with 30-40 points from collection points of swabs whole populations. As you may have guessed, I am not impressed with his methodology. JohnLloydScharf (talk) 03:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bottom line-The Map is wrong and not Verifiable

[edit]

BOTTOM LINE-the Map is wrong:

________________________

http://ychrom.invint.net/upload/iblock/94d/Hassan%202008%20Y-Chromosome%20Variation%20Among%20Sudanese.pdf

Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. John Lloyd Scharf 10:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

More