Insert non-formatted text hereCorrected link to [[Saadat Hasan Manto]] from [[Ayesha Jalal]] article. Corrected Spelling errors in [[Ayesha Jalal]] Corrected Errors etc. from [[Ram Gopal Varma]] Added [[Maruti Gypsy]] to ''Gypsy'' ''[[disambiguation]]''

Hello Jon,

You might want to take a look at WP:INDIC for information on Indic texts. Under the section "Inputting Indic Text", it tells you how to go about adding texts for different languages (on different OSes). This is probably what you want to look at. Otherwise, you can go to the specific language page and look up the unicode values for the specific characters you wish to input. The latter method is more cumbersome, so you probably want to look at the information in WP:INDIC. Hope this helps you! If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask. And welcome to Wikipedia! --vi5in^[talk] 19:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand your question exactly; do you mean the Hindi Wikipedia? That's a wikipedia that's written entire in Hindi. I guess I'm not sure what you meant by "load a particular language". --vi5in^[talk] 19:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jon, I believe the information you are seeking is further down the page that vi5in sent you. It depends what operating system you are using, Window 3.1 thru NT, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Macintosh; find your OS and follow those instructions to enable your computer to enter Devanāgarī script. Hoof Hearted 17:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jon Ascton, do you need help with something? --KFP (talk | contribs) 14:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. To put an image on your user page, you have to upload the image via Special:Upload and release it under a free license. If you own the rights to the image, you can select a free license of your choosing from the "Licensing" drop-down list. Wikipedia uses the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), and there are some other compatible licenses. See Wikipedia:Uploading images for more info and if you have further questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. --KFP (talk | contribs) 15:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I haven't found an image of the original work by John Trumbull, although there is a large collection of Trumbull's work at the Yale University Art Gallery. The image that is found everywhere appears to be in the New York Public Library and is an engraving of Trumbull's work by John Rogers. The title of the painting/engraving is "Battle at Princeton". Hope this helps. Rmasbury 13:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

v t e Links for Wikipedians interested in India-related content
This is a collection of links to WikiProject pages and Category pages relevant to India-related content
WP:India	Noticeboard Discussion board Article alerts Deletion talks Unreferenced BLPs India Portal Collaborations of the month India stubs Category adoptions Article requests
WikiProjects	Region India States Districts Cities Religion Hinduism Buddhism Jainism Sikhism Zoroastrianism Islam Christianity State Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chhattisgarh Goa Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Odisha Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Tamil Nadu Telangana Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West Bengal UTs Andaman and Nicobar Islands Chandigarh Dadra and Nagar Haveli Daman and Diu Delhi Jammu and Kashmir Lakshadweep Puducherry Cities Chennai Hyderabad Mangalore Mumbai Patna Culture Translation Classical Tamil Literature Hindustani and allied languages Music Cinema Television Other Education Geography Localisation Caste system Trade History Maps Politics Indian portals Military history Biodiversity, Protected areas & Environment Transport (Railways & Roads) Indian and Pakistani Wikipedians cooperation board
Newcomers	Indian Wikipedians (add [[Category:Wikipedians in India]] to your userpage) India category Wikimedia India English mailing list Wikimedia India mailing list

utcursch | talk 10:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

125.62.115.64

Hi Jagmohan, thanks for your note... There are actually lots of women here on Wikipedia... I checked out your website and found it interesting. I have a wide range of interests, including Hinduism and spiritual matters... You seem to read a lot, like me. :-P What are you reading at the moment? --BorgQueen 10:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your inquiry on my Talk page. (I prefer to keep conversation threads intact.) rudra 07:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, I'll have to do some research. You mean the recent movie, not the original, right? Just out of curiousity, why did you ask me? Czolgolz 12:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you don't have me confused with someone else? I only ever saw that movie once. Then again, I'm a librarian, so I never back away from research. Was the song instrumental or did it have lyrics? Czolgolz 00:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 23:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The full text of the article before deletion was:

"Amerigo Bonasera Is The Corleone under taker."

The article was deleted for lack of context, but can be recreated if you can expand the article to explain its significance. Tim! (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It is a well known fact that the Calcutta "riots" were started by "Direct Action" of Suharwardy. Concelling this fact, and 'secularising' this disaster by throwing the allegation at 'all' communities is something absurd and unjustifiable like Holocaust Denial. It is not going to help anyone (not even your muslim "brothers"). Hey Ram was an incrediblly daring and to-the-point thing, an extremly rare piece of work in our shamelessly secular society. The least we can do is to tell world what this movie meant. (Such films are not made everyday because of censor.)However if your POV is too dear to you you can keep it your way. You can even put 100% blame on the hindus, if you think that will bring communal harmony.

Jon Ascton (talk)

• Comment – Hey Jon Ascton talk the one thing I can say about Wikipedia is that a majority of the Editors are more than willing, as you put it to take that ; “..incredibly daring and to-the-point thing” article and improve upon it. However, the one thing that will not be tolerate, is an individual pushing her/his WP:POV point of view to the extent that it disallows other individuals, groups or other affected parties to express their thoughts. In the mean time, as an individual, with his or her own believes, “Happy Holidays". Shoessss |  Chat  20:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jon, uploading your own pic for use on your userpage is fine, as long as it is copyright-free and you're happy that other people can take or alter the image. It's an explicit exception to the general rule that images must be "encyclopedic"

Upload your pic at Commons, the central library for all Wikimedia projects, and put "[[Category:Wikipedians]]" at the bottom. You can call the pic into your userpage in exactly the same way as before, and it'll be good practice for any more encyclopedic pics you want to upload. The guidance at Commons is pretty good, but if you have any probs or queries, I'm happy to help. Best, JackyR | Talk 18:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is in reply to your query about Nihang and Akali. The Akali word when used in the form of an adjective refers to somebody/something that is "pertaining to Akaal or the supreme power" or in simple words "Divine". In the form of a Noun it refers to somebody who is:-

1. An admirer and follower of Akaal ie. the admirer and follower of Supreme Power.
2. Khalsa of waheguru.
3. this word is also used for Nihangs

Some of the qualities of an Akali human are that the person should be:-

1. Admirer and follower of the "Supreme Power" and its laws.
2. Though present in the material world, is unique and is not attached too much to that material world.
3. Earns his/her bread by hard work and considers begging as "haraam" (highly illegitimate).
4. Considers happiness/good-times and sorrow/bad-times as both the same under the divine law and part of day to day life. (Particularly, this is in reference to Guru Nanak's philosophy in AGGS where he mentions that "dukh" and "sukh" both have to be faced in this world and asking for only "sukhs" from the Supreme Power is a futile effort and is bound to be rejected.)
5. A person who selflessly works for social cause and protects the Gurdwara's and is always conscious and ready for the struggle for the righteous cause.
6. A person who does not perform the "pooja" of any other "devi" or "devs" but is only the follower and believer of "One Supreme" Akaal and abides by the tenth Sikh guru Gobind Singh

There is a subtle difference between the usage of the words Nihung and Akali. Nihung word in common day to day language has become synonymous with all the people who are born in the Nihung familes. However, the acts of such a person may disqualify him/her from being called an Akali. Similarly, in common day to day language the people of Punjab and neighboring states have begun to call the politicians of the "Akali Dal" political party as "Akali's", however in literary sense they should not be called so.
Hope the above helps, let me know if you have further questions. ---- A. S. Aulakh^Talk 20:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind remarks. My knowledge and interest in Muslim theology and history is modest and I have no academic position. I'm try to avoid making enemies by being as fair as possible and sticking to the facts. NPOV and all that. I'll pass on your comment to my wife. --BoogaLouie (talk) 22:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You left a message on my talk page. I was going to send you an email, but apparently you do not accept emails from users... The Baroness of Morden (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. You have new messages at Aka042's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

--Aka042 (talk) 13:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to upload a picture of a living person, than you are going to have trouble having a non-free image accepted, since the general policy is that only free pictures of living people are acceptable (on the rather ludicrous grounds that since the person is still alive it should be possible to get a non-copyrighted picture of them). You could try uploading it and make an argument for it, but almost certainly someone will come along and remove it, so it's generally not worth the trouble to try. You could look in Wikipedia Commons to see if there's a free picture there of your subject http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ , or check Flickr and see if there's a picture there that's properly licensed.

If your subject is deceased, then you've got a better chance of having a non-free picture used, for instance in the infobox, or as an illustration of something discussed in the article. (Generally, the more connected to the text of the article, the less hassle you will get over a non-free image, but even with the most relevant images, there will be people -- those who disapprove of non-free images under any circumstances -- who will bend over backwards to find a reason to delete your image.)

My advice would be to step lightly, provide as much documentation (i.e. Fair-Use Rationale, source, description) as you possibly can, be quick to add more if an image is challenged, and try your best to keep an even temperment. The tools, and to some extent the rules, are in the favor of those who want to delete your image, so you have to be light on your feet and float like a butterfly. Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 23:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Anurag Kashyap does play a cameo in the film but on wikipedia, in any film article we just put the major' cast only. Check any film. And cameos by directors in their own film are never major.

I have no idea what that is supposed to mean, sorry. - TopAce (talk) 22:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on my Talk page again, so if you don't have it on your watchlist and think you may need to ask for clarification, feel free to watchlist it. If you do respond, could you do so under one heading, rather than two? BigHaz - Schreit mich an 13:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your note on the article talk page.You removed the "Footnotes and references" section heading here. It's been fixed. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see no huge problem in removing the references to religion in the above article. The person's religion seems relatively unimportant in this case, though the Sikh teachings on reincarnation may be what is contributing to her interest in the subject. I would say that if it's not mentioned in the sources, there is no need to include it. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 20:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Reply to this) I have no idea. The only edit I've made to that page was to rearrange the images a bit; I don't know anything about the book or the film. Jomasecu ^talk _contribs 02:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. You have new messages at -Zeus-'s talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

-Zeus-^u_c 04:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

I don't think there is a word Persection...do you ? Then why do we have a page called Persection of Muslims ? Of course it redirects to Persecution of Muslims but why it needs to be so...? Kindly reply on my talk page ...thanks Jon Ascton (talk) 11:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I tagged it for deletion. In the future, You can do it too. Read the page WP:CSD -Zeus-^u_c 15:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, it seems it was an initial misspelling when the article was first created in 2003. Let's delete it. --EPadmirateur (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No ! It is a propagonda page...they wanted to be sure that maximum people hit it...!Jon Ascton (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lets not deleted it. It is reasonable that someone might make this misspelling see this for example. What harm is it doing at the moment? Theresa Knott | token threats 09:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you have got against trying to get the maximum hits for the page. Surely we want people to see our pages? Theresa Knott | token threats 21:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm glad you see my point. Theresa Knott | token threats 05:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jon, thanks for your input on my page. I am aware of this. Nevertheless thanks for the clarification. Some great edits to the Sikh page too. Best Wishes.--Sikh-history (talk) 16:45, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am really impressed with your knowledge on Sikhism. Your contribution on Niihung are brilliant. Thanks --Sikh-history (talk) 22:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I was just thinking about the difference you stated between Nihung and Akali, as they may not be taht different, as the leader of the Nihung Jathas under Maharaja Ranjit Singh was known as Akali Phoola Singh. Thanks--Sikh-history (talk) 14:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What you do is find a style you like the code for mine is
<strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|^{<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span>}]]
then you go to My Preferences, you then will see, about half way down, Signature put your code in to the box beside it and tick the Raw Signature box and save. Hope that helps. Have a look around places like WP:RfA or WP:AFD (a good place to look a lot of editors on these pages) or places were you get a lot of talk page edits and you will see the different types of signatures editors have. Hope that helps.BigDunc^Talk 18:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Jon Ascton  (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and indeed that should go into Kazutsugi's bio, but not into Oda's. -- Y not?

Dude - I'm cool. Revert me if you insist. There's really no further need to discuss it - I'm okay, whatever you do. -- Y not? 17:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced it to the right side of the Zakir Naik-text. IMHO this gives the page a much beter lay-out.Jeff5102 (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jon Ascton. As per Wikipedia:Biographies of living people, articles much not seem critical or promotional of the subject. The article should relay what third party reliable sources have written about the subject. I've been involved in trying to ensure that critique is noteworthy and that it doesn't overwhelm the section, or unduly favour one perspective. This can be a tricky balance to maintain, so if you can suggest any improvements in that regard then that would be quite useful. Regards, ITAQALLAH 22:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jon. I would have to know a little more about the picture in question. Where was it taken, who took it, and is it alleged to be of anything in particular? Is it online, or if not, could you upload it or email it to me? If I can't answer it off the bat, you can try asking over at the Science Reference Desk. – ClockworkSoul 03:13, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recognize the species, so you might want to try the ref desk. Really, though, if we can't identify the species, we can't really say it's a mutant member of that species. - ClockworkSoul 20:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. You have new messages at WP:VPT.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Amalthea 00:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since I had my answer to your comment on my page finished already I'll post it here, as an explanation: When templates are changed, it takes MediaWiki a while to apply these changes to all pages where it is used. That job queue is behaving a bit strange lately, so it takes unusually long. Purging those pages helps, which I'd only done for Jim Tucker. I've purged them all now, so they should all work as expected.
Cheers, Amalthea 01:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How did you find me?

Also, thanks for the welcome, but I've been on Wiki since November 2005 (well, this is my second account dating back to May 2006). ★Dasani★ 02:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you confuse me with someone else? I have nothing to do with Bojil Kolarov :( --Dmitri Lytov (talk) 15:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't canvass request for article improvement to multiple, unrelated editors. Useight (talk) 16:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. You have new messages at Tinucherian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

-- Tinu Cherian - 08:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Al Pacino Mugshot.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People with surname Kolarov , which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sahar Sarid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 11:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi john did you add the infobox for sheela using criminal and if so why? for example she has been released 20 years without further conviction? (Off2riorob (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Extraaptraoxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 18:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:KoenraadElst.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 15:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For what reason? — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 19:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:KoenraadElst.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 22:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

k —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.253.135.110 (talk) 02:14, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:NCC Cadets.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 07:33, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jon,

Sorry for the slow reply, somehow I missed your comment re Ian Stevenson. It seems that you resized the image already? Regarding the additional image, it depends on the copyright status of the image. --babbage (talk) 20:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's several debates over the use of "mugshots" in biographies on WP going on now, and one that you added is orphaned now. While I think there is a good case for including the photo, building consensus will be difficult.

However, from the discussion at WT:BLP#Mugshots_and_BLP ( search for "bioterror" ), the opposing editors may be OK with using it as a non-lead image in 1984 Rajneeshee bioterror attack. But remember there were several arrested, so the article shouldn't show the booking photo for only one person. Squidfryerchef (talk) 13:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw Tarc erasing your comment on the Public Image of Barack Obama talk page. My experience has been that when a user is erased like this, he's lead to believe he's being censored so I thought I'd explain what Tarc hasn't said.

General statements about the overall tone or viewpoint of an article aren't usually useful to improving it and so they tend to get dismissed as WP:SOAPboxing. If you have a concern over a particular issue being missed (because it's unfavorable to Obama) or being needlessly included (because it's favorable to Obama), I'd admonish you to try that angle instead, showing sources that demonstrate the issue. Attacking the general tone of the page because it's written by Obama lovers only serves to put editors on the defensive and goes nowhere toward addressing constructive improvements.--Louiedog (talk) 17:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jon, you have again added the mugshot ater it was removed as blp protection, there has been quite a lot of discussion over this at which you have not joined in, it you insist on inserting this picture please discuss it on talk. regards. Off2riorob (talk) 21:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jim Tucker. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Tucker. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Her mug shot is there but at the bottom. I was actually wanting to get a mugshot of Osho and uploaded it but I'm trying to get a free license for it because that was one of the objections by Off2riorob. Osho has a significant arrest/controversy section and the mugshot should be there to go with that section. But for now I'm focusing on getting a free license for the image if I can get one, i.e. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 15:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The cat "Jain people" is new and I dont think it should be used. Maybe you can find an existing category by looking at the people listed in: List_of_Jains. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 15:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I moved this question from my Talk page.

You seem to know a thing or two about Laser pointers. Please tell me can Green pointers blast baloons or burn paper etc. I read they do, but practicaly they don't seem to...kindly reply on my talk page

 Jon Ascton  (talk) 14:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would be very surprised if a green laser[1] pointer that is rated "eye safe" (Class 2) could cause the effects on paper or balloons you mention. This report deals with the safety situation and notes that lasers over 0.5 W output (Class 4) do pose a burning hazard. Unfortunately I have no experience to answer your question better. I have only experienced being flashed once accidentally by a (red) pointer during a lecture, with no ill effect. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 15:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not me "gov". Some other cove. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 13:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct, I'm claiming there's no such thing as racial memory. I would be convinced the other way, of course, if there had ever been a double-blind scientific study that demonstrated that there is. Comet Tuttle (talk) 22:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jung as a liar: That is one way of putting it. The better way of putting it is that Jung never experimentally verified his speculation. My understanding is that he never even tried, which puts his work way outside of the scientific method. Comet Tuttle (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WillCuppuSignature.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 23:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't mind it that you replaced my infobox image of Will Cuppy's signature with an edited version of your own -- the quality is all right from a display standpoint -- but I think that the version I used is better in that the printed type in the background can be used to authenticate the signature as having appeared on a standard WWI-era U.S. draft registration form. (Sometimes "cleaning up" an image means the loss of useful information.) In any case, you need to deal with the "speedy delete" tag on your version. I had absolutely nothing to do with that. Thanks for letting me know about your edit. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 19:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Barbara Hannah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ipatrol (talk) 15:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jon Ascton. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mangal Dhillon, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:47, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I considered it, read the sources there, did a quick Google search, and determined that it met the qualifications. I would also ask in the future that you be a little more polite in your CSD-tagging. Accusations that it was self-written, and some of your WP:SOAP statements are a little contrary to WP:AGF. If you feel it should be deleted, then nominate it for WP:AFD. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That does it. All I wanted was expert opinion of someone like you. I wanted you to consider it, which you have. Jon Ascton  (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Satwant.gif. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jim Tucker. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Tucker (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[2], you can delete this message after you read it. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 14:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Though I am not the believing type and have never seen a ghost etc. I am nevertheless troubled by a small entity when I am about to fall in sleep or on brink of wakefulness. It pulls off the bed-clothes etc or presses my limbs here or there and even pulls me back to bed when sometimes I get up and try to run. I am totally unable to cry or speak at such moments  Jon Ascton  (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incubus would indeed be the article you're looking for. There are many internet forums for discussing paranormal experiences.--Wetman (talk) 20:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also Sleep paralysis and Night terror. From "sleep paralysis" article:

In addition, the paralysis state may be accompanied by terrifying hallucinations (hypnopompic or hypnagogic) and an acute sense of danger.[8] Sleep paralysis is particularly frightening to the individual because of the vividness of such hallucinations.[7] The hallucinatory element to sleep paralysis makes it even more likely that someone will interpret the experience as a dream, since completely fanciful, or dream-like, objects (often described as looking distinctly demonic by those who experience the paralysis)[citation needed] may appear in the room alongside one's normal vision. Some scientists have proposed this condition as an explanation for alien abductions and ghostly encounters. This description seems to match your situation.
Do you actually see it? Can you describe it? Maybe you should try to find a way to get a picture/video of it. Does this happens regularly?--151.51.45.45 (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have read incubus article. But in my case I am not a woman and the thing does not do any sexual act. It seems to be a small child trying to stick to me desperately Jon Ascton  (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The opposite gender equivalent of an incubus is a succubus, although, as indicated, incubi/succubi are usually considered to be sexual in nature. Poltergeist is a term used for mischievous spirits, which has no sexual connotation. -- 174.31.194.126 (talk) 05:46, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The hypnagogia article might have some useful info for you. 66.127.52.47 (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

succubus and incubus date from pre industrial times. Modern famous hypnogogia of the same kind are aliens of whichever kind are popular in that time and place. I find my hypnogogic entities (usually ghosts, people or spiders) act nicer if I talk to them, and often go away if I ask them if they're real. --203.202.43.54 (talk) 06:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The good folks at the Reference Desk are not permitted to provide any medical advice at all. Advice and commentary from random people on the internet is not a substitute for medical/psychological/psychiatric help if something is happening which troubles you. Your primary physician would be the first person to see if such experiences trouble you. (Original research) It is certainly alarming if one has the sensation that there is some intruder and one is unable to get up and respond appropriately. This may occur (very rarely) in the sleep of anyone. There is motor inhibition which normally prevents people from running around responding to dream experiences, for obvious reasons. This system can sometimes get a bit out of order, so that one is aware of the inability to move. Another out of order condition can lead to sleepwalking. Edison (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

once when I was 14 or so I had a very convincing moment where I could have sworn that a coven of witches were surrounding my bed chanting something, while I was completely unable to move. snapped out of it in a bit, but it gave me the complete and total willies for a day or two. This happens (as best I understand the psychology) when you wake up quickly but incompletely: body movement is still suppressed as in sleep, the semi-awake mind tries to move, can't, and quickly confabulates a dream-like sequence to explain your inability to move. what it dreams up (like any dream) is a codified representation of your current anxieties, but without a much longer discussion of the experience I couldn't say what those are. Suffice it to say it's not abnormal unless it's consistent and recurring over a fairly long period of time (in which case you should consult a therapist).

incidentally, deep breathing will usually dispel it quickly, if you're present enough to remember. the extra oxygen wakes up both the body and mind. --Ludwigs2 04:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ih —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.253.142.210 (talk) 08:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are the color printers like this any good ? How are their results ? Are they economical enough to use ? Is the quality like standard color magazines we see or inferior ?  Jon Ascton  (talk) 20:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

   The specs for the indicated printer don't seem that great. If you want a printer which produces magazine-quality color prints yet is pretty economical, you should be looking at certain inkjet printers rather than laser printers. I would personally recommend the Hewlett-Packard Officejet Pro 8500 All-in-One A909b Printer (CB862A). I bought mine for less than US$400.Rocketshiporion (talk) 02:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Magazines use offset printing. Offset printing is a wonderful technology -- both cheap per copy and high quality. But, as you can see from the picture in the entry I linked to, offset printing presses aren't available to you and me.

The best color prints you and I can get are printed by inkjet printers. The dye-based inks that come with most inkjets blend colors well, but they aren't as great at producing sharp, clear text. Laser printers excel at printing precise shapes (e.g., text). The best tradeoff I've found is the Canon Pixma iP4700. It has five ink cartridges inside:

1. cyan (dye based),
2. magenta (dye based),
3. yellow (dye based),
4. black (dye based), and
5. black (pigment based).

So, not only do the photos look great, but it also prints very sharp text, because it uses a pigment-based ink for text. You can buy one for only $50 online. Plus, the ink isn't very expensive, because the printheads are separate from the ink cartridges in the Pixma. As you may have guessed, it's what I use. But no matter what printer you use, don't try to save money on paper. You won't get good results unless you use high-quality paper.

On another note, I'm not a big fan of HP printers, because they have a tendency to jam. I'm a computer repairman, so I've actually had some calls to remove jams from the HP OfficeJet 8500 mentioned above. Laser printers are also high maintenance. You have to clean out a laser printer each time you replace the toner, or the rollers will start to foul your paper.--Best Dog Ever (talk) 03:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If one wants to buy a digital camera, how much mega-pixel is ideal ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon Ascton (talk • contribs)

If you just want to view images on your computer, 2 or 3 megapixels is fine. If you want to generate large images for printing or reproduction in magazines, then you need as high as possible. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The chances are that any camera currently on the market will have more pixels than you need. See The Megapixel Myth (compare megahertz myth). There are a lot of other features that differentiate point-and-shoot cameras. For example, some do better in low-light conditions than others; some have better flash illumination; some have optical viewfinders while others don't; some let you control the exposure time and aperture, while others don't; some can take wider angle photos than others; some have tiltable LCD screens; some have better lenses, and some just plain take better looking pictures. Sites like dpreview.com can help you compare picture quality and features of different models. -- BenRG (talk) 05:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the others, megapixels are largely irrelevant over 8-10MP unless you're wanting to make large scale prints of your photographs (I'm talking exhibition-size prints). Most cameras on the market offer this amount of megapixels because it sounds impressive even if you just want to do some photos at a friend's wedding. There are many other factors that are more important, especially with single lens reflex (SLR) cameras, most importantly of which are the speed of the lenses/apertures, ISO, noise reduction etc. Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  10:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second the above, except I'll suggest that the "largely irrelevant" threshold is even lower. 5-6 MP, on a camera with a good lens, is more than sufficient for general use. I've blown up pictures from my 6 MP camera to 30"x20" with excellent results. If you're not going to print stuff larger than 8"x10", you can go even lower -- 3-4 MP would be fine. And as Cyclonenim noted, at this point, every new camera with a decent lens will be at this point or higher. You might want to check various consumer magazines; I'd expect that Consumer Reports (among others) has done several digital camera evaluations. — Lomn 13:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You want to leave some room for people to crop and use the so called "Digital zoom". APL (talk) 14:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

However, CCD chips come in limited sizes. Within a given class of cameras, more pixels usually means smaller pixels, which means more thermal noise. So you may get a higher nominal resolution, but more details will be lost in the noise, and the image will look washed-out. 5 megapixels used to be the sweet spot when I looked a while back. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody has mentioned battery life! This is one of the the most differentiating parameters left between otherwise "equivalent" performance cameras. If this factor is important, consider the negative impact of a larger sensor, LCD screen, and more powerful processor that often go along with "high-end" cameras. This is a parameter which can vary widely between different vendors. Nimur (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved this thread from my Talk page. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I asked this question because there is a such hindi novel which is written by an author who often indulges in plagiarism and I am sure he has stolen the plot from some such english novel...!

 Jon Ascton  (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you have evidence for "being sure" nor, if true, that any more than a trivial plot idea has been reused. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Features Solution : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Computing#New_Features

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sheela Mugshot.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FUR = added.  Done! ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. You have new messages at Cassandra 73's talk page.
Message added 17:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

Nope, I'm afraid not.

Specifically, I've got the "Cyclopedia of Magic, edited by Henry Hay". It's a handy resource for looking up things to do with stage magic, however, it makes me remember how difficult print references can be to use. Wikipedia has spoiled me! Sometimes it's tough to look up a trick if you don't know the name that magicians refer to it by.

Anyway, I'm not a magician, so take my recommendation with a grain of salt. I picked it up used at Abe Books, after I noticed it was used as a reference in several of Wikipedia's magic articles. APL (talk) 20:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I didn't take that picture. I just moved it from English Wikipedia to Wikimedia Commons, so it would be available on other projects. The author was Renato Schmidt. Maybe he can explain, though he's not very active. Superm401 - Talk 02:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked over Wikipedia:Notability (books) and I don't see how Segedy's book, Hampton Road, is notable per our guidelines. I'll go through those criteria here:

1. I can't find any third party published works through either Google News or Google Books. The only result under Google Books is the book itself.
2. If the book had won even a minor literary award, I would expect the author to have put it in his own article but he didn't. And again, I can find no mention of any award for this book.
3. It hasn't been made into a film, etc.
4. Without any awards or anything of note, it's unlikely that it's taught anywhere.
5. The AFD for the author isn't going well for him, so without the author being notable, the book fails here.

So, in the end, I'd have to say that the book isn't notable either. Dismas|^(talk) 02:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After a quick search, it seems like it should be notable enough for an article. Just a few links for you: This article from The Hindu uses it as the basis for an article. And then there's this from Time. Additionally, it's part of the University of Michigan Press. So, it would seem that they use it for their curriculum. It's up to you whether you want to write the article but I'd say it's probably notable. That said, books or Indian culture aren't really my specialty. Dismas|^(talk) 09:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit are you referring to? I don't remember ever making that change but I could be mistaken. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 08:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

: One is here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guru_Hargobind_Thermal_Plant&action=history

and one :http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guru_Nanak_Dev_Thermal_Plant&action=history

Whoops. Sorry about that. Yeah, just a typo. Explains why I didn't remember doing that. :) I use copy and paste alot. Very good chance that I made the edit, copied it for the next edit, etc. If you find any others, let me know. I often catch those immediately (if you see me ever revert myself, thats generally why) but not that time. Apologies. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 08:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That article was deleted because its content had been copied verbatim from an external source, which is not allowed.

You're welcome to write a fresh article on the subject. DS (talk) 11:42, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Miscellaneous#What_is_the_best_.28free.29_tool_to_convert_.avi_to_animated_Graphics_Interchange_Format.3F

Did you forget to add a license tag for this image when uploading.?

Wikipedia takes copyrights seriously, so images need to have an appropriate license tag

You may wish to read Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags/All and Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators which will assist you :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Notesfromoverground.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Well then change it to what it should be :) The options are basically state school and independent school. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 04:46, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. You have new messages at Astronaut's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Astronaut (talk) 11:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. I think you did in fact ask the wrong person. According to this diff it was someone else who added the plot summary. Either way, I recommend removing the first part of your question, written in bright red letters. It basically calls another editor a coward in a way that I'm sure you meant to be humorous, but might be perceived differently at the receving end. It is also entirely irrelevant to the question. ---Sluzzelin talk 06:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. You have new messages at Kubigula's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

I use Safari partly because my own computers are Apples and partly because I generally dislike Microsoft products. I've never liked anything that Microsoft has put out. At work, where I have to use Windows, I use Firefox. I haven't really used Safari on a Windows machine, so I can't say whether I like it or not. I've used Firefox on Windows because it is the most advanced browser for Windows that isn't IE. Additionally, there are a few work related reasons why we need to use Firefox, so Safari isn't an option. The things that we do at work that require Firefox simply don't work under IE.

Another reason that I don't like IE/Microsoft is that they seem to be under the impression that they can decide the way things should be done and everyone else should just follow along with that. One loose example of this is IE's use of the term "Favorites". Everyone else calls the Bookmarks but for some reason IE is different. There's no point. Why not just call them what everyone else calls them, Bookmarks! Then there are tabs. Firefox and the rest have had tabs for years before IE ever did. Why?! I can't count the number of people who I've had to teach about tabs here at work simply because they use IE at home and had never heard of tabs.

I could go on but I'm starting to ranting. Does this answer your question? Dismas|^(talk) 02:17, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from File:Wellofdeath.jpg. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you failed to notice was that the image has been replaced.  Jon Ascton  (talk) 12:30, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bookcoverofcarrnovel.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:13, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although mentioning her history of anti-Semitism would be appropriate in the article on Ms Christie herself, it is not necessary in the article on the Awards.

I strongly doubt that the rules for the contest specify what attitude participants must have towards Jews. DS (talk) 01:12, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of this article now. I have completely re-written it starting from August of this year. I especially find it interesting the list of ingredients that can be put into a pomander. I can e-mail you with further details IF you feel you need additional on this or you can e-mail me with questions pertaining to whatever you might be curious about. I have written several articles lately pertaining to perfume and aromatic spirits. I find it totally fasinating, especially that of how pomander got its name pertaining to ambergris. --Doug Coldwell ^talk 23:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ambergris means Amber Gray and is French. Many pomanders made in medieval times used this ingredient. It was very expensive. They have since switched to a synthetic in modern times. Fascinating, don't you agree.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 12:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, my article on toilet water came up today as a DYK. The article I followed up next on perfume cushion I am even more proud of. I have submitted it for a possible DYK.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 12:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In a book I have here on my desk hints & pinches by John T. Walter (Hill Steet Press, 2002, ISBN 1892514982) it says: The English name "pomander" is a transliteration of the French name for them, "pomme de ambre" (amber apple), since the most common pomander on the continent (I assume Europe), in ancient times, was an apple stuck with spices and rolled in powered ambergris as a preservative. In the Middle Ages pomanders went in every linen or clothes cupboard, were as common as aspirin tablets today. That's what it says, word for word.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 14:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a website that explains how to make a pomander. It also says that originally, cloves were stuck into an apple and it was rolled in ambergris to preserve the scent. I believe the apple (or orange) was let to dry first.
http://generalhealthtopics.com/sandalwood-cedar-and-spice-canadian-tradition-crafting-127.html

Have you ever done this as a child?--Doug Coldwell ^talk 23:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jon, I've not yet tracked down the etymology of lenter, but I wanted to be sure that I'm on the right track. Is this a word that appears frequently in Indian English discourse, or is it regarded as not an English word at all? I ask because I haven't been able to find its spelling in Hindi, Urdu, or Punjabi. I think that would be the first step to finding an etymology. LANTZY^TALK 03:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lantzy, I can't thank you enough if you can track this word for me. It is almost a mystery ! It is liberally used in Punjabi speech only but I have never seen it written in punjabi or any other language.  Jon Ascton  (talk) 06:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no expert on Punjabi orthography, but I tried every possible spelling and came up with nothing on Google. I even got clever and looked through some Sindhi and Balochi dictionaries, but without results. I'm beginning to favor the idea that it comes from the English "linter", a dialectical variation of "lean-to" (in fact, "linter" is probably the older word, with "lean-to" being a later reanalysis). "Linter" is itself a probable cognate of the English "lintel", from Old French, ultimately from the Latin "limitaris". There's also the distinct possibility that Punjabi "lenter" comes directly from the English "lintel". It's not difficult to imagine the conceptual leap from a horizontal beam over a door or window to a horizontal span across a ceiling. Desi "Lenter" seems to be used in the sense of "roof", not simply "beam", but such a semantic drift would not be remarkable. I have no hard evidence for this etymology, of course, but it's the only hypothesis I've come up with. If I happen across a big Punjabi or Urdu dictionary, I'll take a look. It seems odd that such a mundane word, related to a commonplace concept in no way obscene or obscure, would entirely escape the notice of lexicographers. I think it's the fact that it's so mundane, and yet so elusive, that has me fascinated. I'm not generally enthralled by ceilings. LANTZY^TALK 07:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry about that edit! It wasn't vandalism. I clicked new section on the Humanities desk but I forgot to title it so that's what happened! Major Oops on my part! :( Sorry!!--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 05:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Thanks for uploading File:Nathram Godse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiDao: @WikiDao:

Jon, your "no kings" question is back... Wikipedia talk:Reference desk#No Kings question. Are you done with that question? Could you put up a "resolved" tag if so? Thanks WikiDao ☯ (talk) 21:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I have just put a resolved tag there. Thanks

Jon, can you shed any light on this question at the Humanities ref desk? WikiDao ☯ (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. You have new messages at WikiDao's talk page.
Message added 05:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

Hi, I don't know if you are just joking, or if you are serious, but i don't know what exceptional abilities you saw in me.. about that calculus thing, actually, calculus is part of our curriculum.. there are friends of mine, of the same age as me, who are currently doing mathematical analysis, but i don't even know what it is... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harnithish (talk • contribs) 10:56, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jon. Someone asked a question on my talk page (see User talk:WikiDao#More on Ganesh Chalisa) about the notability of our Ganesh Chalisa article. Can you comment at all about that there? And maybe help explain exactly what is meant by the word "chalisa" and what place chalisas have in the practice of Hinduism? Is a chalisa more like a "poem" or a "prayer" or a "hymn" or...? Thanks! :) (and, hey, I haven't seen you around the RD in a while... hope you're well!) WikiDao ☯ (talk) 20:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you please tell me if any green laser pointer is powerful enough to lit up matches. Thanks.Kindly reply on my talkpage.  Jon Ascton  (talk) 16:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How would I know without more details? If it's 200 mW or more, and pointer-style so poorly IR filtered, odds are good. Also, that it will cause eye damage instantly if you screw with it. SBHarris 17:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:OnlyVimal.jpg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:OnlyVimal2.jpg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mynewpicwithnikon.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Animatedswastika.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Girlunderfire.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sahar Sarid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahar Sarid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 22:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blastrajnagar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Middle eastren warrior.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Writeratwork.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Writeratworkbe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:32, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you take this photo? Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:32, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:KoenraadElst.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:09, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Savarkar3xt 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Keyboardpic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Satwantbh.PNG. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Ghat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 09:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harpreet Singh Sidhu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harpreet Singh Sidhu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Solomon7968 (talk) 14:15, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Darkarenabookcover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Maisarkhana.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lehramohabatthermalplant.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lehramohabatthermalplant.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Khurmi (surname) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Just (yet another) Indian name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sheela Mugshot.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ThermalPlantBathindathis.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote that Hillary SAW the monk tulpa with his own eyes when he was at David-Neel's house. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alexandra_David-N%C3%A9el Are there any places on wikipedia where this is mentioned? I'd love to know more about this. --RThompson82 (talk) 18:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jon Ascton,

This is a specific axial type of inductor that is widely used, and the photo also taken by me. Thanks for your accuracy on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vahid alpha (talk • contribs) 05:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jon, How did you change the link to your user page to green from blue. It looks really cool. Johnnyg150 (talk) 22:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Novels by Pathak has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Punjab Police (emblem).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you are also the user Uncle Dan, you shouldn't be messing with his comments.[3] ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Colonel G.B. Singh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

• File:Colonel G.B. Singh 1.jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Jon Ascton|<span style="border:1px solid DarkGreen;padding:1px;"><font style="color:White;background:DarkGreen" size="0">&nbsp;Jon Ascton&nbsp;</font></span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Jon Ascton|<font color="DarkGreen" size = "0">(talk)</font>]] :  Jon Ascton  (talk)

to

[[User:Jon Ascton|<span style="border:1px solid #060;padding:1px"><span style="color:White;background:#060;font-size:x-small">&nbsp;Jon Ascton&nbsp;</span></span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Jon Ascton|<span style="color:#060;font-size:x-small">(talk)</span>]] :  Jon Ascton  (talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 22:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings: I've run into this song in a YouTube video about the IVC (if the time in the link doesn't work and you land at the beginning of the video, it's happened to some people, it's 22 minutes and 15 seconds into the video (22:15), so you can get to it manually). Unfortunately no one has ever been able to tell me anything about it or even tell me what language it was in. Some people have suggested it was possibly Panjabi or Sindhi. Can you tell at least if it is Panjabi? The song is apparently about the Ghaggar-Hakra River, an intermittent river flowing only during monsoon, whose bed is believed to be that of the ancient Sarasvati. Thank you for any help. Cheers, Basemetal 14:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC) PS: Do you know anyone here who may know Sindhi or Punjabi or any of the other languages in that area?[reply]

I got your name from the local embassy under Panjabi, so I assumed you spoke Panjabi. Apologies if that's not the case. Basemetal 15:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The song is in Punjabi. It is a folk-song, probably being sung by a Pakistani singer. Thanks  Jon Ascton  (talk) 01:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caste system in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambedkar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:Caste system in India were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Pathakbookcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Ascton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NIMHNS.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Extraaptraoxy.bmp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:NCC military exp.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:NCC26JanParade.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Young Child with Bhangra Costume.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jon Ascton! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:Local Embassy.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wellofdeath.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thatsmeofcourse2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ramlilaatmuktsar.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]