Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm currently working on the draft for said article, thats why I added him. In general I believe all chess grandmasters are notable, so that shouldn't be an issue. I won't re-add him until the article is public though. jonas (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hmm, I wasn't able to find any WP:BIO or WP:NATHLETE subsections on grandmaster, but looking through old AfDs, it appears that there is some consensus that grandmaster status confers notability. It would be nice if that was added to the policy. In any case, I imagine your draft will be accepted; I won't revert if you re-add the subject to the HS page. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hans Niemann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 03:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Films involved in lawsuits requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colquhoun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colhoun. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 3 August 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2020 Summer Olympics, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 21:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The portrait was deleted by me several times. Sorry if I didn't log in but I've explained several times that it's a fake portrait. One or several people feel the need to keep adding fake paintings of Imperial Empresses and concubines to the articles of the Qing dynasty. No source is ever given to where these portraits are stored or displayed. In the case of Empress Xiaoshencheng you can clearly see that the face has been photoshopped and pasted on the ancestor painting of Empress Xiaoquancheng. The Forbidden City inventory does not mention an ancestor portrait of Empress Xiaoshencheng. There is an half portrait and three leisure portraits of the Empress. TYK1986

A tag has been placed on Longest wikipedia article requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 20:21, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I noticed you just changed the first sentence of the War in Afghanistan page, please be advised that the page was recently the subject of an RFC that determined that the war "is (practically) over, and even if it is technically not, it will almost certainly be by the end of the year." Therefore, that language must specifically be used, pursuant to the admin closing the RFC's ruling.XavierGreen (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In what universe does an RFC consensus mean that this specific sentence should be used. Thats merely the consensus justifying the renaming of the article. Stating that the war ended in 2021 is enough, especially in the first sentence. That wording is not appropriate for the lead section of the article. Also looking at the talk page it seems like youre not the most reliable source and what should be done to that article specifically. --jonas (talk) 21:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 15 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption and tsunami, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. HurricaneEdgar 22:58, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Tax the rich and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 6#Tax the rich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 04:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dumbest Member of Congress and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 14#Dumbest Member of Congress until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 04:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect TikTok war and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#TikTok war until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ((u|Sdkb)) ^talk 21:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emory Tate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extraterrestrial.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hank Pecker and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 8#Hank Pecker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 05:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect BotezLive and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 15 § BotezLive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Anarchyte (talk) 05:34, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Bon courage (talk) 04:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Russian mystery deaths has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 2 § Russian mystery deaths until a consensus is reached. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Jonas1015119

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pbsouthwood and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Baby Q, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 5#Baby Q.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Pbsouthwood)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

· · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 12:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Baby Q has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 5 § Baby Q until a consensus is reached. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 13:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Jonas1015119,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bigolas dickolas for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Bigolas dickolas to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Bigolas dickolas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 15 § Bigolas dickolas until a consensus is reached. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As a response to your question here, well I personally use eBay, but these days it's known for having a notorious amount of fakes. The cheapest place to buy authentic Vietnamese cash coins is actually in Vietnam itself as I bought quite a lot in Hanoi, the best place to meet vendors is at cultural events or local markets (event markets, not regular markets).

Online there are a lot of dealerships, you can simply Ecosia phrases like "Buy Vietnamese coins" or write inscriptions of the individual cash coin that you want. If you have more questions then please ping me. --Donald Trung (talk) 21:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Bird app has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 20 § Bird app until a consensus is reached. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 12:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a Request Move discussion about William IV. Since you participated in the previous move discussion involving William IV, I thought you might want to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junlper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junlper (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paragon Deku (talk) 16:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hibiscus 2.50.152.233 (talk) 14:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]