Hello, Jorahm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article about a lawsuit is not exactly an easy article to write, much less a common one in the world of video games, but you did a great job with Stardock Systems Inc. v. Paul Reiche III and Robert Frederick Ford! --PresN 04:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bless your heart. Even though I made the article I can't take all the credit. I pulled together a solid section from Star Control: Origins and added some of the fantastic reporting from the Star Control fan community. Thanks for giving it a review. Jorahm (talk) 19:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 6 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stardock Systems, Inc. v. Reiche, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in a 2018 U.S. district court case, software company Stardock unsuccessfully tried to claim trademarks for the names of aliens from the game Star Control? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stardock Systems, Inc. v. Reiche), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I've noticed you creating and improve a few articles about copyright decisions concerning look and feel claims! I just wanted to say thank you for creating these pages and doing such a good job on them! Keep it up! DocFreeman24 (talk) 04:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Trying to help! Technology law is my jam. I am trying to decide whether to improve these for quality or to add more cases that are missing. The Capcom case seemed like a big omission. Can you think of any others? Jorahm (talk) 18:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I took a shot at Spry Fox, LLC v. Lolapps, Inc. Jorahm (talk) 03:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Nice, I'll take a look and see if there's anything I can add! DocFreeman24 (talk) 05:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh I'm so sorry, I forgot to reply! Not off the top of my head, but if I remember any, I'll drop you a line! DocFreeman24 (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Colin M -- Colin M (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Colin M -- Colin M (talk) 15:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you again. I tried to do a WP:DYK. Is there someone I should notify? I want to make sure I am doing this right. Jorahm (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 3 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tetris Holding won an injunction in 2012 to stop sales of a video game clone of their famed Tetris game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc.), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spry Fox, LLC v. Lolapps, Inc. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of IceWelder -- IceWelder (talk) 15:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Spry Fox, LLC v. Lolapps, Inc. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spry Fox, LLC v. Lolapps, Inc. for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of IceWelder -- IceWelder (talk) 13:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Spry Fox, LLC v. Lolapps, Inc. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spry Fox, LLC v. Lolapps, Inc. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of IceWelder -- IceWelder (talk) 07:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You placed a ((Merge to)) template on Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. Thompson over a week ago, but have not started the discussion per WP:MERGEPROP explaining the basis. Do you plan on doing that anytime soon? TJRC (talk) 02:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

With the discussion still not started and no reply from you after a week, I've reverted the merge request. Go ahead and reinstate it if you concurrently begin the discussion. TJRC (talk) 20:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Saw your redirect of the Strickland v. Sony article with the summary "per discussion". Which discussion was this? It's helpful to link discussions that lead to page redirects etc. in the edit summary. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• It's on the target article page and I was taking my cues from the edit summary of Beeblebrox. It wasn't clear to me that I needed to link it as well. Jorahm (talk) 18:28, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The discussion on the target article seems to be about Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. Thompson, not Strickland v. Sony. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I started the merge discussions around the same time for the same lack of sources and ultimately the same solution. I am ok with someone who wants to merge in more verifiable information from the merged article. Jorahm (talk) 18:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've reverted the redirect. Although there was (eventually, after some prodding, above) a discussion on Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. Thompson, that was a completely different article in a very different state. There has been no discussion of merging this much more developed article. I've also reverted the merge template -- if almost two months have gone by and you haven't started a merge discussion as required, it's evident that you're not planning on following through on the proposal, and we shouldn't leave inactive hatnotes in the article. TJRC (talk) 02:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Atari v. Amusement World you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Atari v. Amusement World you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Atari v. Amusement World for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Atari v. Amusement World you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Atari v. Amusement World for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there Jorahm, email me if you still need this case. --Usernameunique (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think I am ok for the case personally. Thanks for offering. I just think someone might want a link to it in the article. Jorahm (talk) 17:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Moabdave -- Moabdave (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've asked some questions as part of the GAC review. Please advise when you can.Dave (talk) 23:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp. for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Moabdave -- Moabdave (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Moabdave -- Moabdave (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Capcom U.S.A. Inc. v. Data East Corp. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 09:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Capcom U.S.A. Inc. v. Data East Corp. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Capcom U.S.A. Inc. v. Data East Corp. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 09:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Data East USA, Inc. v. Epyx, Inc. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mhawk10 -- Mhawk10 (talk) 22:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Data East USA, Inc. v. Epyx, Inc. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Data East USA, Inc. v. Epyx, Inc. for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mhawk10 -- Mhawk10 (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Data East USA, Inc. v. Epyx, Inc. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Data East USA, Inc. v. Epyx, Inc. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mhawk10 -- Mhawk10 (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Atari Games Corp. v. Oman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 01:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Atari Games Corp. v. Oman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Atari Games Corp. v. Oman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 20:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good evening. This is with regards to the editing dispute (Talk:Star Control - Wikipedia) as to whether the game's current homepage (www.starcontrol.com) should be listed on the Star Control article. A third party has offered to mediate the dispute to see if we can come to some sort of consensus or, if failing that, a resolution that best meets the encyclopedia's standards. At your convenience, please visit Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard - Wikipedia to enter your summary of the dispute. The mediator will likely ask a series of follow-up questions. Thank you for efforts and time in resolving this. ERegion (talk) 23:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DRN case Reminder Star Control

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman and Talk:Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 19:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaxnaCarta -- MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman for comments about the article, and Talk:Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc. for comments about the article, and Talk:Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaxnaCarta -- MaxnaCarta (talk) 00:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 22 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 1982 court case established that video games may qualify for multiple types of U.S. copyright protection? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 08:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 13 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Midway v. Artic helped establish that video games are eligible for copyright protection as audiovisual works? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. for comments about the article, and Talk:Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 19:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America Inc. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America Inc. and Talk:Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America Inc./GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rjjiii -- Rjjiii (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, this article looks pretty good. I made note of a bunch of small issues. Feel free to reach out.Rjjiii (talk) 23:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America Inc. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America Inc. for comments about the article, and Talk:Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America Inc./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rjjiii -- Rjjiii (talk) 02:41, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 25 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the case Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. was considered essential to the future of video game modding in the United States in 1992? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,098 views (841.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp. and Talk:Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp./GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 01:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp. for comments about the article, and Talk:Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 20:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Micro Star v. FormGen Inc. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Micro Star v. FormGen Inc. and Talk:Micro Star v. FormGen Inc./GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 21:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Micro Star v. FormGen Inc. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Micro Star v. FormGen Inc. for comments about the article, and Talk:Micro Star v. FormGen Inc./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 00:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 18 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the court case Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp. helped allow the game rental market to thrive for the years that followed the case? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 12 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Micro Star v. FormGen Inc., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Micro Star v. FormGen Inc. affirmed that copyright owners have the exclusive right to make sequels? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Micro Star v. FormGen Inc.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Micro Star v. FormGen Inc.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Law Barnstar
		Writing more than a dozen good articles before even reaching the 500-edit mark is a remarkable achievement! I'm not sure I've ever come across someone with such a high density of content creation before. ((u|Sdkb)) talk 17:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much for your kind words and encouragement! Research and writing is essentially my full time career and it means a lot to me that you and this community have noticed the quality of my efforts. I hope to continue writing more articles but it might have to wait until there is another pandemic (kidding!) Jorahm (talk) 17:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]