Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. On the discussion page for the New Yorker article, you wrote, "How come the whole birth of the magazine gets glossed over? ... Too much on silly Tilley, not enough on the history of the magazine's creation, in my opinion." You're absolutely right. Please go ahead and rewrite the article, rearranging and adding information as you see fit. The article needs a lot of improvement, and any help and expertise you can provide would be most appreciated. Tomgally 11:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You've done a very nice job with the Jerome Zerbe article. I'd like to weave in a bit about his sexuality and the nude photos of actors before they were known. Wanted to float this with you first to see what thoughts if any you have since you've done so much work on the article. Doc 16:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I respect your position and would certainly not want it to take over the article. On the other hand, when a person's orientation has been well known I do think that it is and belongs as a part of history. Doc 02:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sometime you shoudl get around to posting those pics for this article. Would be cool! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.187.190.88 (talk) 03:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For the past 2 days, 2 different "helpers" have removed the Famous Drinkers category from both Dorothy Parker and Robert Benchley. I don't know what they have been drinking, but they obviously do not know anything about these two members of the Algonquin Round Table. Particularly since Parker wrote "Just A Little One" and Benchley penned "After 1903, What?" that both figure into popular culture about drinking... I guess some people have nothing better to do than to pass judgement on others. -- k72ndst 11:23, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There was a discussion that led to the deletion of the category that you could have particpiated in. There was a suggestion for making an article or list instead:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_January_9#Category:Famous_drinkers

I am v upset about it too. I only recently discovered these Goldkenn Remy Martin liquior chocolates, that and 'pound a pint, doubles for £2' at the student union have helped me get over the deletion of my fave categories. I love reading about drinking exploits, and think perhaps the compromise; Category:Notorious drinkers is perhaps acceptable to most, but to me it seems like demonizing the suckling of Bacchus we endure for our manifold sins...Gareth E Kegg 22:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I could see a new catergory termed Drinking Culture that might be more inclusive than Category:Notorious drinkers. I have several good sources and areas to kick in; it could be both literary and pop culture "famous drinkers" along with current trends in social drinking, such as your liquor chocolates (which are delicious). It could be multi-part: people who are known to be proponents of drinking and wrote about (F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway) and people in 2006 who like trying absinthe, to famous watering holes around the globe... the possibilities are as bottomless as a glass. -- k72ndst 01:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I started List of iconic drinkers, which i'll update today, needs more work...but a wider drinknig culture is v goodGareth E Kegg 11:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are the man! I added to your list and alphabetized it, because I know some Wiki style nazi would go after it if it wasn't... I added some quotes and background too. Hope this can grow to a deep article of some good people by some good people. -- k72ndst 9:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

I added Miss Parker to the list, but you should improve my entry :) Gareth E Kegg 12:13, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Word up, it's my round. It has become too populated with Rock Stars and Yahoos, and not embittered gadabouts, playboys and actors, et al. I'll get some more refs in and try and add a few fun stats. Oliver Reed's 104 pints in a weekend still remains the (falling off) bench mark Gareth E Kegg 00:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yawn How can we delete Michelle Rodriguez from the page before it starts creeping up the google rankings? They serve Quadruple G+T's at my student's union for $10. Gareth E Kegg 00:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Should we add Mr Steven Petrosino to the list? For a legend in his own happy hour, he seems quite coy about his great feat, and is a fellow wikipedian to boot! Gareth E Kegg 00:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keggy the Keg - This should be me! Gareth E Kegg 20:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Nazamo changed the lead line slightly [1]. What do you think? Gareth E Kegg 18:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I weighed in on the iconic discussion, what happened to List of iconic smokers? Gareth E Kegg 17:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello K72ndst, the Joseph Pulitzer article currently says [Pulitzer is] pronounced "pull-it-sir". This seems to be a American English oriented transliteration of his name. Such transliterations are useful for the language they are used in (as it is with English), but speakers of other languages may have problems using this transliteration to read the correct pronuncation. If I took the current "pull-it-sir", used it in German, and then translated it back to English, it would end up as "pull-it-zeer". Therefore, the IPA alphabet was established, allowing to give most precise pronuncations.

I mostly do not use edit summaries, as they slow down my work at Wikipedia and because nice-sounding edit summaries may hide devastating edits done to articles. Putting it in a nutshell: Never trust edit summaries. Always use the diff function. Bye, --Abdull 12:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

It seems kinda obvious, but can you confirm that "Professional wrestler Lou Thesz" was not a member of the Algonquin Round Table? Tks Ling.Nut 03:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is it really necessary? How about Lou Gehrig and Joe Louis? Hayford Peirce 20:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I did as much as I could in a short time. It probably needs more work. I dunno where people come up with this fannish bullshit that they put into various articles! Hayford Peirce 20:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, not good enough: the argument that something should be in the article just because enough idiots think it might have something to do with the subject is a bad reason to keep it in. It doesn't belong, therefore should just be removed. +ILike2BeAnonymous 04:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is nothing that I know of about using a photo in two or several articles, for that matter. The fair use issue is the one to be careful about as they have gotten much harder on the rationale for fair use and some editors are going overboard, in my opinion, deleting images. Doc ♬ talk 03:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you provide a citation for what you recently added to this film article? Information in Wikipedia articles need to be verifiable. --Erik (^talk/_contrib) @ 13:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There needs to be a title for the Cite news template to work -- any chance you can add that? Thanks for your timely response about adding the citation information! --Erik (^talk/_contrib) @ 14:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There isn't one. It's part of a roundup of news gossip in the city. The name of the page is Page Six. And there is no reporter byline either. I have a copy of the newspaper, but the story is not online yet. This is the best I can do. --K72ndst 15:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you have an issue with not providing citations for filming information? I'm aware that the edits of new film information are in good faith, but the content must be verifiable. I just added Washington Square Park filming information based on a citation. Do you have a reason for trying to contact another editor about my removing uncited information from I Am Legend? --Erik (^talk/_contrib) @ 23:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No. As I write this, I am watching them shoot this movie out my window. That is all I will say on the subject. I will not be contributing any other information to this article. I am finished. --K72ndst 02:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They are linkspam, see WP:EL, especially the stuff about the "walking tours" which are commercial whether the organization is nonprofit or not. Wikipedia is not an advertising service. For more info see WP:SPAM#How_not_to_be_a_spammer, particularly the paragraph labelled "review your intentions". It is obvious that those links are promotionally motivated and therefore I've been removing them as spam. 67.117.130.181 03:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks.

Please stop restoring these links. They are spam. You'll notice that I left a few in place which satisfied Wikipedia external links guidelines. If you persist in restoring the inappropriate ones I'll have to request blacklisting of the entire dorothyparker.com site which will make it impossible to add any extlinks to that site. Thanks for your understanding and willingness to stop abusing this charity encyclopedia project for promoting external activities. Regards, 67.117.130.181 03:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop. If you continue spamming you will be blocked from editing. Please stop restoring those links. I see you are also the owner of the site being linked to. That makes them WP:VANITY edits. Thanks. 67.117.130.181 03:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you're claiming dorothyparker.com is an official site of Dorothy Parker (unlikely in my view since her entire estate went to the NAACP) this relationship needs to be documented by reliable sources per Wikipedia's verifiability standards before the link can be included in the article. I've reverted it again, please do not restore without documentation. 67.117.130.181 03:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for catching my goof! I have repositioned the A. S. Tobey reference - I hope it's OK now! MdArtLover 17:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Parker is credited as the lyricist on this jazz standard, is it based on a poem of hers, or did she collaborate with the composer Ralph Rainger? Hope you like the addition of Sinatra and Yeltsin :) Gareth E Kegg 21:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think it was introduced in [2]. Gareth E Kegg 21:56, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yo, check out I Wished on the Moon. Talk:Giovanni di Stefano#Private Eye Article Creepy...Gareth E Kegg 01:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tony Zappone bio

Hi Kevin:

I hope this is your talk page. Your bio above is great but belongs on a stand-alone page in the public part of wiki.

• Sources for Tony Zappone bio:

My primary source for minute details in this article was Tony Zappone himself, whose activities have been well known in the Tampa Bay area during the more than 40 years of his involvement in local media and business.

Note: Absolutely necessary to remove names of private individuals and phone numbers from this list. These are published all over the Internet in Google and a violation of their privacy.

Hi, I left a message on Talk:List of iconic drinkers. In short, the images you added on the article (with one exception of Image:Musorgskiy.jpg are not public domain. Garion96 (talk) 08:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because the images do pass the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria on other articles and simply because this article was on my watchlist. Garion96 (talk) 09:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It seems kind if pointless, but feel free to copy the above message to Talk:List of iconic drinkers. Since I explained it enough already. Garion96 (talk) 07:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Re your message: Governors Island has been open for Open House New York on the first weekend of October for the last few years. I'll update with a citation. (The NY Times isn't always perfect.) Station1 18:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferber1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hullo Sir, I hope I find you in a hangover or worse. What think you of this new wikiproject? Gareth E Kegg 22:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you have an issue with material that's been added to Algonquin Round Table, Dorothy Parker or any other article, I certainly encourage you to add appropriately sourced material. Not really seeing what the benefit to Wikipedia in general or ART-related articles in particular is for you to go around bitching on peoples' talk pages instead. Otto4711 01:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've just read the above comment. Hideous. I might buy your book actually. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 17:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not sure what the problem is with some commercial links. Yes, I have added some links to some pages but this was not done for the sole purpose of advertising. Contributors from this site (wikipedia) have many times in the past linked to our site for the purpose of providing links to reference material for almost all subjects. We have been in business for more than 20 years working with LIFE magazine solely. We have the largest collection of magazines and one of the largest data bases in existence for LIFE including even LIFE themselves. LIFE magazine frequently sends people to us for the purpose of research; services that even they cannot provide as well as we have for many years. I have made additions to some of the pages that were lacking information or have made corrections. I have not been placing large ads on pages willy-nilly, I have linked some pages to our site to provide a resource for information that some people may want. The links have not been in the form of “Come to our site and buy, buy, buy” they have been place as unobtrusive as possible; they don’t even use our name in the link heading. Many contributions from wikipedia reference articles and information obtained from LIFE magazines why are the readers not allowed to know that they can still purchase these classic articles from a reputable source that spends many hours each week helping people locate information, many times without a purchase involved.…Gregglbk (talk) 15:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to reply, however even in your own reference to "Links to be avoided" looking at # 5 you will see that wikipedia has created a way for people to link to both commercial and non-commercial book sites. I ask just what is the difference between books and magazines. the only think is that magazines do not have an "ISBN" number to use as a reference. This makes for a very unfair situation. If you look at #4 in "What should be linked" you will see that "Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews". So.... If we were selling books with reviews and interviews I could create a link using the ISBN number to a whole list of providers and sellers, but because we provide issues of one of this country's most highly regarded periodicals for over 75 years that includes some of the most memorable reviews, interviews and content but happens to be a magazine without an ISBN number, you believe we can not create a small unobtrusive link to allow reads access to the information contained within these issues. This does not seem in keeping with wikipedias own guide lines of not being censored. You seem to have become the gaurdian of wikipedia posts as only you have taken exception to any of the links I have added. Gregglbk 15:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's inevitably over :( Gareth E Kegg (talk) 19:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Than you for your nice words about my Harold Ross portrait. You might be interested in a new Dorothy Parker portait I just posted on Wiki. I have also ordered your Parker book. I saw it when I was in New York last year and regretted not getting it. Simonfieldhouse (talk) 04:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for adding the beautiful imageElan26 (talk) 19:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Elan26Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NBenchley1.jpg, which you've sourced to Estate of Nathaniel Benchley. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 15:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hello...thanks for the message. i found at least two sources indicating both parents were actors as well. i'm not sure how i omitted that they were hoteliers. [3][4]--emerson7 16:13, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including ((WPMILHIST Announcements)) there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, article logistics, and other tasks.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts and copy-editing alerts.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 04:37, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 22 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bayeux War Cemetery, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Richard Short (artist), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Richard Short. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thanks for adding the website and blog citation. However, while the blog url is perfectly valid to support the passage about the blog, the url for website url you provided does not make any mention of him being sought-after, or any of the musicians mentioned in that passage.

In addition, the paragraph on his speciality coffee, and the first and third paragraphs in the Street Studio section are unsourced. The second paragraph in that section has a citation, but the page to which it links does not make any mention of the material asserted in that paragraph. The personal info in the article (date of birth, place of birth, alma mater) are also unsourced. If there are specific pages on his site or on other sites that can be used to support these specific assertions, then can you add the urls to those pages? Let me know.

Also, I noticed that instead of just reverted the portions of my edit that you disagreed with, you also reverted my copyedit of the punctuation in the Watchmen mention at the top of the article. It really is best not to do blanket reverts if portions of the edit are valid.

If you need any help or have any other questions about editing, just let me know. Thanks! Nightscream (talk) 19:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I understand. Good luck! Nightscream (talk) 21:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It doesn't look like you've been informed that your image is being discussed: Wikipedia_talk:Images#Question_about_a_photographer.27s_displeasure_with_my_crop_of_his_PD_pic. – Dicklyon (talk) 19:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've added some commissions to the start you've made. Robertson deserves more encyclopedic treatment! I've just found out that he designed one of the gemelli temple-banks at 14th Street and Eighth Avenue, from which Balducci's is withdrawing.--Wetman (talk) 06:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:28, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your welcome, I didn't realize you had just made it. Thanks for the help.--Kumioko (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey K72, Thanks for you contribs on the Belonoha article. I agree Morbid was a little abrupt on the page. Sometimes Wiki can be a tough place with all kinds of people/editors rubbing shoulders on every article. I think you are a very good editor and it would be a shame to lose you. I hope you stick around, we need more nice people on Wiki. Peace!-- — Kbob • Talk • 14:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

K72ndst, I am very glad that you wrote the article Lucy Stone League (on 2Jan06), thank you, thank you. I am in the process of providing some source references for it, and updating it – to help WP readers. Can you please provide a source, a citation of some sort, some evidence verifying your two sentences which follow, in quotes? (I have worked hard to find any evidence, with no success.)

• "In March 1922, the Lucy Stone League was the first to fight a New York City ordinance that tried to forbid women from smoking in public places. The group helped stamp out the ban before it could be enforced."

The best would be for you to just insert the reference into the article yourself, rewriting the quoted sentences if needed. Alternatively, you might choose to help in this matter on the article's talk page. Or, you could help via a message on my talk page so I'll be aware of it. If I do my update before any help from you, I may move the quoted two sentences to the talk page of the article, parking them there to await your help in this matter. Thanking you on behalf of the WP readers, For7thGen (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 19:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Oh so long ago, you removed a photo of some children from the article North Fork, California. However, IMO, the photo added value to the article by showing a detailed photograph of the monument of the geographical center of California. Would you be willing to re-add it? Griffinofwales (talk) Simple English Wikipedia - Come and join! 19:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:42, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Kevin - a note to say I've added images to your page about Brookwood. Have a look at: http://www.wyrdlight.com/brookcwgc/cemeterymilitary.html or http://www.wyrdlight.com/brookcwgc/USAbmcpop.html - if there is a photo there you think might add to the article let me know. You'll also see a bit about the Eagle Squadrons. PS I hope the changes add to the article WyrdLight (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC) Kevin - thanks for the note. Very interested in your Bayeaux site pictures - it seems we share a passion for "remembrance photography". As suggested I've added a couple of images to Brookwood American Cemetery and Memorial to show more of the grave markers. Hope this adds to the article WyrdLight (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 03:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes! You're still alive, oh my baptism of fire with iconic drinkers has passed, how we shone. I like this guy, a decent Manhattanite like yourself. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 01:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I removed the unsourced birthdate. Please cite a reliable source. The article used to give 1954, also unsourced. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 08:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed: Remembering conflict

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Des Taylor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Des Taylor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:19, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command Op-ed: The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

I have responded to your question on the HMS Assistance talk page. Shipsview (talk) 10:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways Op-ed: Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance Interview: Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history Op-ed: Ian Rose looks back on 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed: TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview: Featured picture participants Op-ed: TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed: We can (not) advance Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay: Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944 Op-ed: TomStar81 on empires of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum" Op-ed: TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two) Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland Timeline: Events of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites Op-ed: TomStar81 on the rise of air power Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare Op-ed: Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I