previous: User talk:Kaihsu/2010s

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bauhinia × blakeana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanchan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Kaihsu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Internal Security Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I notice you use reFill. This is a useful tool but sometimes introduces errors, most frequently inserting the unsupported parameter "|deadurl=y" instead of "|url-status=dead", such as here. I would ask you to preview your edits and resolve any issues before submitting. Thanks. --John B123 (talk) 20:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good day Kaihsu!

Can you please withdraw the Copyrighted mark © you placed at GiuliettaExhibition.jpg as it interferes with the GNU Free Documentation License you released it under. Thank you --Aliwal2012 (talk) 15:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No. Please understand GNU FDL properly. Thanks. Kaihsu (talk) 15:13, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Historical European Commissions has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, remind me in 7 days if it passes and I will move the category as an administrator. Kaihsu (talk) 18:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for sorting this out: now at Category:European Commissions – Kaihsu (talk) 16:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Commonwealth Computer Navigator's Certificate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is strictly promotional in nature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 14:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Homonationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pinkwashing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agent-general, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australian High Commission (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tch tch. The correct expression is "another place". ;-) --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 08:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re this and that @John Maynard Friedman: Thanks, that would really be playing house. By the way, see [1]. – Kaihsu (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you one of those goldarned LIBERAL activist lawyers, trying to overturn the WILL OF THE PEOPLE? Well come that glorious day (oops, Revolutionary Communist Party past slipped out for a moment), there will be an END to Yorepeen nonsense like the FoI Act! If the Central Committee sorry Kitchen Cabinet has decided, that is all you need to know!

;-^--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well that seems to have prodded the sleeping dog! Some poor Winston Smith now has the job of correcting all these malreports. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@John Maynard Friedman: We have always been at war with Eurabia. – Kaihsu (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

:-D --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We have always been at war with Eastasia. – Kaihsu (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Single market, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Captions § Video timestamps. ((u|Sdkb)) ^talk 07:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom , I don't have time for this, I doubt if you do either but!!! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:06, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you thinking what I'm thinking? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@John Maynard Friedman: Sometimes it may be easier to tag the whole thing as WP:POV to warn unsuspecting readers instead of playing whac-a-mole in the text. – Kaihsu (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am trying to wp:AGF for now, that they are genuine blind spots and none of us can claim to be immune from that disease. Also, IMO, too many readers will think "here we go again lefty lawyers nitpicking" and just skip to the 'good stuff', so I'd much rather be subtle about it if I can. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@John Maynard Friedman: Well done. By the way, I visited a tiny but serious library today and realized that there is easily hundreds of pages of well-thought-through and peer-reviewed analysis on such topics published in academic journals even just in the last few months. Ars longa. – Kaihsu (talk) 19:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Enjoy also means "gain advantage from", not just fun fun fun John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § Replace hyphen with en-dash in Wikipedia browser tab name – MediaWiki:Pagetitle. —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am would like the pages I have created to be translated in Scots, Welsh and N.Ireland to make them accessible in all the native languages of the U.K, I don’t however speak any of these languages and so I was interested as to whether there is any cross wiki platforms I could use to get help with this. ChefBear01 (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Kaihsu, I see there is a picture of airplanes at Competition (economics), which was included in your edit to merge the content from Competition (companies). Admittedly, it is virtually impossible to illustrate competition in a photo, but do you thin that the photo actually says anything other than a few planes at an airport? Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 17:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I KNEW THAT! I KNEW THAT! so how come it didn't occur to me to actually write it? See talk:British nationality law#EU and NI-born for why I have no excuse. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Of Chai tow kway and Turnip cake doesn't appear in their Talk Pages but I oppose -- see their talk pages and discuss there.

Condo951795 (talk) 02:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Standard of review, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page De novo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re Race to the bottom: I discovered ((annotated link)) recently and been changing See Alsos to use it as the opportunity arises. See effect at Tragedy of the commons#See also: it turns a list of meaningless buzz words into a useful directory. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interesting that the reason for me to run citation bot was that I saw that you had added a bare url:http://doi. etc. Most unlike you. Oh me of little faith. It didn't occur to me that refill would resolve it. The hidden depths of wp never cease to amaze. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Kaihsu: Should the United Kingdom-Crown Dependencies Customs Union also include Currency Union in the title as the Crown dependencies are in a customs and currency/monetary union with the UK?ChefBear01 (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Template:Europarty ACRE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Europarties in European Council and EU Council has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article East Office has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Articles fails GNG as no independent sources are used nor anything found online that can establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A token of thanks Hi Kaihsu! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, ((u|Sdkb)) talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Government Office and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 12#Government Office until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It appears that the flow chart on the article for the Administrative divisions of Ukraine needs more than cosmetic correction to its description; it needs removal, honestly, since it's no longer how the country's administrative divisions are organized. --Criticalthinker (talk) 04:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I see you reverted my edit to this article with the comment: These bodies do not legislate. Arguably they do. They produce regulations that become as legally enforceable as any other law. As an example, in Queensland, Queensland Rail is a statutory authority. It produces laws prescribing how close a passenger may stand to the edge of the platform, whether a sound device is permissible in certain carriages, how old a child must be to travel unattended and many other things. But they don’t enforce these regulations. They are part of Queensland law and are enforced by the Queensland Police Service who ride on the trains but are not a statutory body. Perhaps we need a better word than “produce.” I am totally open to suggestions. (I am writing this post on my iPad for the first time. Sorry if my formatting is haywire.)

– User:Rumiton

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Kaihsu! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! Chris Troutman (talk) 11:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Brexit, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting I'm a little surprised at such a long-established editor doing this. Captainllama (talk) 13:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you recently removed content from Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TylerBurden (talk) 06:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social market economy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Science and technology.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, China's core interests, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have submitted the article Draft:UK intergovernmental relations, it explains the new systems that replaced the Joint Ministerial Committee Interministerial Standing Committee that the current article]] explains.

It is necessary for the previous article to be kept as it was originally for continuity.

ChefBear01 (talk) 23:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Kaihsu: see Interministerial Standing Committee I have removed my opposition to the merger.ChefBear01 (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Act 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulster Scots.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by BuySomeApples was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This should be incorporated into a page on China's foreign policy or defense, but a single white paper isn't enough to build an encyclopedia article around.

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Kaihsu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British national identity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Bill of Rights.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mansudae Art Studio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pyongyang University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Have you noticed Talk:Northern Ireland Protocol Bill 2022–23#Requested move 6 March 2023? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Small Science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is this a contender for the "Exceptionalism of the Year Award"? IMO, it is certainly odds-on, don't you think? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In your RtM, you haven't set up the target discussion section, I think? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Kaihsu,

I saw this article on the Move log and was curious about the article so I checked it out. I noticed that you are the original article creator so thought you might be interested in recent changes in the article title. I'm not sure if it's on your Watchlist. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Kaihsu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "China's core interests".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 05:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lists of Celts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of Celts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article All-China Youth Network Civilization Convention has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade and has been tagged for other issues

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All-China Youth Network Civilization Convention is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-China Youth Network Civilization Convention until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 12:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]