This talk page is becoming very long. Consider archiving inactive discussions.

SECHSKIES members' official English names are Lee Jaijin (not Jai-jin), Jang Suwon (not Su-won), and Eun Jiwon (not Ji-won)[edit]

Hi. Lee Jaijin's official English name is JAIJIN not Jai-jin or Jaejin. Also, Eun Jiwon's official English name is Jiwon not Ji-won, and Jang Suwon's official English name is Suwon (not Su-won). Please see YG's official facebook for SECHSKIES. ( https://www.facebook.com/OfficialSECHSKIES)

But you have moved these pages without providing any accurate information. As a Wikipedian, you should provide an accurate source, when you make changes to "living persons' documents".

In case of Jaijin, fans have inquired YG and they confirmed that Lee Jaijin is his official ENG name via email. JAIJIN chose this as his official name. Please respect the choice of the artists, and use their correct Official English names.

Thanks in advance! Yelkie (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Yelkie: See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean)#Given name... Thanks. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 08:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It says "If there is no personal preference, and no established English spelling, hyphenate the syllables, with only the first syllable capitalized (e.g., Hong Gil-dong)."

In SECHSKIES members' cases, they have their official English spellings as written out by their agency, YG entertainment, so please do respect their official names.

People can make their own choices in how to spell their names. You should respect that. Especially, if they are celebrities, official names are really important. Please respect their official names. Thanks!Yelkie (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you find James Hooper's birthdate?[edit]

Thanks! If you have the url - I'll put the reference! Also, thanks for Billboard K-town work!!!!

The manga artist Takeda Hiromitsu is not the same! Takeda Hiromitsu on Non-Summit is an actor http://www.hancinema.net/korean_movie_The_Admiral_2p__Roaring_Currents-cast.html Thanks! --Bonnielou2013 (talk) 00:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I bought official Non-Summit calendar in Seoul. See April, Hooper's birthday is April 19. Kanghuitari (talk) 01:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daebak! 당신이 최고예요! I want it! (I was in Seoul Oct 28 - Nov 11 and got lots of pictures of them in advertisements! I will add reference to Non-Summit and James Hooper!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 01:37, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Korean films by admission[edit]

I separated domestic vs. international for a reason; if you really want to have an overall one, please find the proper information for it (for example, Interstellar is missing). Moreover, the data is significantly harder to find vs. domestic films.

dequinix (talk) 23:34, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jungangno Station[edit]

Jungangno Station in Daegu is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. See Daegu subway fire.

And ko.wikipedia dose not have the concept of Template:Only-two-dabs but en.wikipedia has. Sawol (talk) 03:46, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aah, Okay. I forgot Daegu subway fire. Kanghuitari (talk) 04:29, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Nut rage"[edit]

I requested sysop to move this back to draft. It is not ready for mainspace yet. — Revi 04:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I add ((Expand Korean)). -- Kanghuitari (talk) 04:29, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I still want to expand in draft NS. That does not solve my problem, freshness of WP:DYK. — Revi 04:40, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway thanks for the lesson today; draft only in userspace. — Revi 09:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Songsan Station[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. You did WP:Copy and paste move Songsan Station (disambiguation). I reverted it. I requested that moving Songsan Station to Songsan Station (disambiguation) for the primary topic Songsan Station (Uijeongbu). But an admin rejected my request on account of Songsan Station (disambiguation)'s revision history that includes your reverting. Could you agree my request that moving Songsan Station to Songsan Station (disambiguation)? And then I will request that moving Songsan Station (Uijeongbu) to Songsan Station. Sawol (talk) 20:27, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please give the answer. Sawol (talk) 04:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

봉산에 있는 북한의 송산역은 의정부의 역에 비해 저명도가 떨어집니다. 성산역은 스펠링이 달라 틀 처리로 할 수 있는 부분이였고요. Kanghuitari (talk) 04:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Google translation of last message (someone who knows Korean please tidy it) is "North Korea's Songshan station in Bongsan is less than the inverse is also prominent in Uijeongbu. Seongsanyeok parts that can be processed in the framework has a different spelling must've". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"North Korean Songsan Station is less notable. Seongsan has different spelling, so template could be used." (@Anthony Appleyard:) — Revi 23:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings![edit]

Belated Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

안녕하세요 K! All the very best to you on this Christmas and holiday season!
Some editors are passing this message around on WP -
(Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.}
Happy editing and 건배, B
--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 15:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding ((subst:Seasonal Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

@Bonnielou2013: I would send to e-mail this week. wait. :) Kanghuitari (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC) OK!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 01:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kim Ji-young (actress born 1938)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Kim Ji-young (actress born 1938), Kanghuitari!

Wikipedia editor WordSeventeen just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on WordSeventeen's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

January 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Philippe Val does not have an edit summary. What, no New Year's resolution?

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Trafford09 (talk) 20:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gimpo_GoldLine[edit]

Thanks for starting the Gimpo_GoldLine page. I am curious, where did you find the English name for this line? Cheers mate! ₪RicknAsia₪

I find this articles. [1] [2] Kanghuitari (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please look over Where is My Friend's Home[edit]

Please look over, K--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New English pages for Korean people[edit]

Thank you for creating all these new pages. I appreciate all the work you've done. NYDirk (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alisha Heng page[edit]

Why did you tag some pages for speedy deletion?Italic text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:2404:E964:8894:7976:C286:752A (talk) 02:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

She didn't act in Kingsman: The Secret Service, Love, Rosie, Jupiter Ascending and The Maze Runner: Scorch Trials. this article is totally fake. Kanghuitari (talk) 02:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

She did the sources prove it you don't look at the sources and imdb is doing a transfer so it isn't on there — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:2404:E964:8894:7976:C286:752A (talk) 03:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Please don't delete pages you think are fake just because you aren't English and are Korean it doesn't mean u have a right to delete page of real people who dedicate their lives to acting. Stop trolling the Alisha Heng page it is perfectly alright and the sources prove that she was part of the cast. Also she did act in the movies under those credits and imdb is not always correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:2404:E964:8894:7976:C286:752A (talk) 03:07, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, that page is totally fake. Sophie Cookson acted as Roxy of Kingsman: The Secret Service. not Alisha. Katharine Dunlevy of Jupiter Ascending also Vanessa Kirby acted Katharine Dunlevy. not Alisah. Kanghuitari (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

She acted as Grace and Vanessa got replaced so she is notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.113.139.69 (talk) 11:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Valentine's Day K![edit]

Valentine Greets!!![edit]

Valentine Greets!!!

Hello K, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve,
Happy editing, and 사랑, b
Bonnielou2013 (talk) 01:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding ((subst:Valentine Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

What's up![edit]

What have you been up to? If you have time, I did some Korail pages - hope they are OK? I will do 2 or 3 more. You are the expert! What do you think? DMZ Train, O-Train (Korail), V-Train (Korail), A-Train (Korail), G-Train (Korail). I didn't do Re-Direct links to any yet - and my Korean translation on O-Train routes may have been bad. PLEASE help!

But, talk to me about Names first, ie. A-Train, V-Train, etc. - KORAIL has names that way - not the long way. 감사합니다 - B--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC) Thanks again K!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 00:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WOW, You are good. :^) that name is correct. thanx for much. Kanghuitari (talk) 02:47, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing Categories 친구!!! :)b--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:South Korean music stubs[edit]

Category:South Korean music stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Because you deserve it![edit]

		A Barnstar Point
		For your persistence in doing what you think is right!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 02:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The history of Me and You, on the name of the page for Bohemian (band), current.

Me - 12/17/13 - created page Bohemian (Korean singers) You - 02/10/14 - moved page to Bohemian (band) Me - 02/11/14 - changed back to Bohemian (Korean singers) You - 02/11/14 - moved page back to Bohemian (band) Me - 02/11/14 - moved page to Bohemian (South Korean band) defining (Korean) location of generic name. You - 03/25/15 - moved page back to Bohemian (band).

Ok, Ok, Ok, Ok.......You WIN! The Persistence Barnstar Award above, therefore, goes to you, dear K!

Big Big Shock! - thought you were joking with me!! It's perfect for James Hooper the mountain climber! But Zhang Yuan was last on Montagne de Bueren, will he survive?--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. Yeah, I think so too. :) Kanghuitari (talk) 00:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

K!!! Elin Oğlu - one man looks like young Enes Kaya! And Zhang Yuan will be jealous of the Chinese one, hahaha!!!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 01:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC) You are brilliant! Elİn Oğlu!!! Kanghuitari - I sent email - help!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 17:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Lover (TV series)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating The Lover (TV series), Kanghuitari!

Wikipedia editor National Names 2000 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Need More References

To reply, leave a comment on National Names 2000's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Template:WikiProject North Korea[edit]

Do we need this? So far we have fared fine with Template:WikiProject Korea|nk=yes. The new one also adds categories of its own (eg. North Korea-related articles by importance) that are incompatible with the old ones. We should discuss new talk page project templates at the working group talk page before implementing them to identify such problems. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 02:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

well, see Category:WikiProject Korea North Korea working group. The article number amounted to 2,000. North Korea is one of the countries, and it is a need to separate. Kanghuitari (talk) 00:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, but I still feel like a decision like this should be based on a broader consensus. It has already caused some confusion here. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 13:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhist art and culture[edit]

I see you have reverted me. Your distribution of the combined category is so incompetent I can only ask you to be very careful about doing such changes again. Johnbod (talk) 03:17, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yook Sungjae[edit]

I suggest that you make a draft User talk:Kanghuitari/Yook Sungjae with the added sources first instead of editwarring. You claimed that his film and TV career added extra notability but those parts (the lists) are completely unsourced. Then show the sources in a draft before putting it in the article.The Banner talk 08:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added about 10 source that article include [3] [4] [5]. Their source said "He (Syncopation) male lead.. " why deny 10 source? Kanghuitari (talk) 08:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, if you want to play it that way. Tonight (it is now morning here) I will remove everything that is unsourced. Goodbye. The Banner talk 08:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Yook_Sungjae. Administrator said "allow recreation if sources are found and added to the article". so, I added source. why deny all everything? Kanghuitari (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read better. He said (...) no prejudice against recreation if properly sourced. The point is properly in combination with WP:RS. The Banner talk 08:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that source is properly sourced. Kanghuitari (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to My Little Television does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Trafford09 (talk) 11:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

난 당신이 필요 해요![edit]

Joonie, Moonie! fighting!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 01:56, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Socialtainer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Socialtainer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialtainer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BU Rob13 (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:ATV television programmes[edit]

Hi, in April you tagged Category:ATV television programmes for renaming but did not start a discussion, see [6]. – Fayenatic London 17:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Naming convention (people)[edit]

Hi! Thanks for making many new Korea related articles. When disambiguating a title (e.g. Kim So-hyun (actress born 1975) ) warrants both a qualified ("actor") and year of birth ("born 1975"), a comma should be placed in-between: Kim So-hyun (actress, born 1975). Please review the appropriate guideline below:

[[Name (qualifier, born YYYY)]]. Note a comma should be used and born should not be abbreviated to "b.", so: David Baker (poker player, born 1972) and David Baker (poker player, born 1986).
— (WP:NCPDAB)

Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 13:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve D'maris[edit]

Hi, I'm Denimadept. Kanghuitari, thanks for creating D'maris!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand this article to include why this small chain is notable. Founding and corporate information, as well as what sort of food they sell, might be helpful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Denimadept (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2015 Ji'an bus accident[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 2015 Ji'an bus accident, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: ((proposed deletion/dated...))
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2015 Ji'an bus accident for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Ji'an bus accident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Ji'an bus accident until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Additions to page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Ji'an bus accident[edit]

I have added some information and references to your page Ji'an bus accident. I am interested to learn how to do a "disaster" or "hurricane" page, and found this a good learning experience for me. As always, thanks to you, I have learned many points about WP from your help in WP, and about editing, since you do so many different subjects. (P.S. - there were 2 Ji'an cities in China - I changed it to the border one Ji'an, Jilin. I have discussed and voted on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Ji'an bus accident, where you may want to add Keep if you feel that the page is worth it. Good luck!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 18:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC) It was closed as KEEP! P.S. 보고 싶어요--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films set in mountains[edit]

Category:Films set in mountains, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non Summit and Friends issues[edit]

Missed you! Hope you had a great vacation! See you saw name problem about Samy Rashad! hahaha!!!! (Hope you are OK with the way I changed it, full explanation at User talk:5.168.26.120 since they changed it to Samy Rashad, while you were gone. And QUESTION???? who is going to Australia? Is it Blair Williams and Takuya Terada, too?? One paper yesterday said they will visit Daniel Snoeks, then they changed it! I can't understand? Help!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I visited on Italy, San Marino, Vatican and Dubai. So, I'm late. Missed you, too. I'll check the mail, soon. I'm busy now. Takuya also going to Australia ([7]), Daniel would probably not appear. I also want to create a article of Mark Tetto (now redirect). Kanghuitari (talk) 01:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Did you get to see the Pope's new Hyundai Sante Fe Popemobile? Wow, nice trip! Thanks I saw 6th trip and added. I will help you with Mark Tetto & Vingle - tomorrow - sleepy now!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Beom-soo[edit]

Why did you move Kim Beom-soo to Kim Bum-soo, when they are obviously NOT the "same people" as your edit summary states? Edwardx (talk) 09:26, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Beom-soo, Kim Bum-soo (disambiguation), ko:김범수. Beom and Bum are the same Korean name. (same Korean language, "범") If you find singer (Kim Bum-soo) in Google, you can see also "Kim Beom-soo" too. Kanghuitari (talk) 02:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your move meant that all the content at what is now Kim Beom-soo (businessman) was deleted. I don't know how can you can defend that. Edwardx (talk) 09:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seoul Station[edit]

This is not Korean Wikipedia. You need to discuss if you want to divide Seoul Station. Of course, some of western stations (such as Frankfurt (Main) Hauptbahnhof and Frankfurt (Main) Hauptbahnhof underground) are separated, but in those cases, articles are quite long, or notable by their separated histories. In this case, Korean Wikipedians regard Seoul station as two separated stations, but usual people regard both as same station. So we need to discuss about it. --125.130.41.77 (talk) 06:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline of R3 speedy deletion at Tammora[edit]

I declined your speedy deletion for two reasons. WP:R3 only applies to recently created redirects and this one was created 3 years ago. Next looking back through the history, it says that this was a historical name for Jeju Province. The name was removed along with at lot of other information in this edit. -- GB fan 11:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I fixed Tammora is linked to Tamna. Kanghuitari (talk) 00:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Genius: Grand Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Sang-min. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Cooper at Ladino (Judeo-Spanish) Wikipedia[edit]

Good day:

Just curious: (1) Are you planning to add something more to this article (lad:Bradley Cooper)? Obviously, Bradley Cooper is a notable, etc., actor, and an article on him is legitimate to create. But as you left it, there is nothing in that particular article claiming, proving, etc., notability, and on most Wikipedias, that would be grounds to delete the article, too. I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt on this. I'd also like to encourage you to develop it out at least into a real stub article, as opposed to a one-sentence nothing of an article. (I've got a lot of one-sentence articles there, and am trying to figure out what to do about it.)

(2) Do you speak Judeo-Spanish, or did you simply write this by modifying something else? If the former, our project could really use more regular contributors, and we'd welcome you to be one of them.

StevenJ81 (talk) (administrator at Ladino Wikipedia 13:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Specific city listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Specific city. Since you had some involvement with the Specific city redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Savonneux (talk) 07:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative city listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Administrative city. Since you had some involvement with the Administrative city redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Savonneux (talk) 07:52, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Criminal psychologist[edit]

Category:Criminal psychologist, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Everymorning (talk) 14:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Korean page for new one?[edit]

Hi J, I see you're busy!!! Do you think a Korean page for Better Late Than Never (TV series) would be good? Any other ideas? This is the first U.S. TV show to remake South Korean show!!! Thanks!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 11:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Thank you!!! I owe you one now!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC) P.S. Did you see this List of bridges in South Korea, I played with it months ago - does it go in any of your Categories?--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:35, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stations[edit]

The reason I have suggested mergers for numerous pages about stations you have created is because the pages themselves currently provide no info aside from the fact that they are stations. That can be covered in the page about the lines to which the belong. Insignificant stations do not need a page of their own. Please do not delete such merger suggestions, instead voice your disagreement on the talk page discussing such mergers if you feel the need to.SecretName101 (talk) 07:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC) SecretName101 (talk) 07:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests[edit]

Have you thought of following the instructions at WP:Requested moves ? Your recent move requests are not formatted properly, and the Move Request Bot is not processing them correctly. -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beck's Coffee Shop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coffee shop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Summit adding Thailand and Mexico?[edit]

Hi J! I have a question for you....can you look at the last addition I made to Non-Summit about possible new members from Thailand and Mexico. Please see if I understood what the newspaper said PD Kim Hee-Jung is saying will happen! Thanks so much - I don't want to say the wrong thing! I think they will be one-day members on the show, like the Visiting Interns before?--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are "Visiting Interns" likes before. Not a cast member. :) -- Kanghuitari (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

XOXO--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 07:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

J! - Great chart! I saw it on KO page but didn't know how to do it! Good job! But, it will get big with more episodes - will we make a chart for each year, ie. 2015, 2016?--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 03:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Like a Lists of Running Man missions? Kanghuitari (talk) 04:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what I was thinking...but this page is not so popular to split up too many times like Running Man. The List of Where Is My Friend's Home episodes is not getting many views. Anyway, I measured the width of the page, and it will take 12 - 13 more "trip" countries. We don't have to worry till the end of next year! hahaha! Let's just keep it whole, it looks good that way! Thanks!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Happy Valley Racecourse fire[edit]

Hi, I'm Olowe2011. Kanghuitari, thanks for creating Happy Valley Racecourse fire!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article is great so far but it would benefit from an expert to expand it. Consider hunting down some people who seem to be up in knowledge. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Sa Sa International Holdings[edit]

The article Sa Sa International Holdings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 19:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled flag[edit]

Hi Kanghuitari, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Miniapolis 22:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works by actor[edit]

Category:Works by actor, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kim Yong-jun (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page V.O.S. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gundars Celitāns[edit]

The article Gundars Celitāns has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 14:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ouroboros (manga), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese drama. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about telephones[edit]

Category:Films about telephones, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Admiral Roaring Currents.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:The Admiral Roaring Currents.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

Disambiguation link notification for November 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Riley (diplomat), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Māori. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Freedom (2014 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Sadler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves reverted.[edit]

I have reverted your page moves of Araya. Per WP:RM, please do not move pages with large numbers of incoming links without first obtaining consensus in a discussion. Also, when creating a disambiguation page, please fix all incoming links before changing the character of an existing page. bd2412 T 05:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History of esports[edit]

Category:History of esports, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tunapuy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertador Municipality. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Punta de Piedras, Nueva Esparta[edit]

What is Santa Ana?Xx236 (talk) 11:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. thanx. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...hope you are well![edit]

Happy HolidaysJ!!!

This user wishes you a very Happy Holiday season--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]

StarCraft player article titles[edit]

So it's been decided in a WikiProject Video Games consensus that professional gamers should (typically) be titled by their gamer names, because this is how they are typically named in English language media. I can't find the archived vote right now but it shouldn't be too hard to find.--Prisencolin (talk) 01:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who is it?[edit]

Hey! I need your help again! I added the photo on Illionaire Records page. In a clock circle, I know Beenzino, The Quiett, Jay Park, Dok2....who is the last one, please? Thanks!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I don't know who is he. It seems to be a company employee of records. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Thank you!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 13:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi J, I think I fixed the spacing problem on the Where Is My Friend's Home chart.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi J, how have you been? I need you again, please! About a new page I just did DEAN (South Korean singer). There was already a Re-direct to (Dean (singer) for Dean Delannoit so I could not name the page - DEAN (singer). How do I put it on this page: [8]??? Thanks!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 09:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

xoxoxo!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 02:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi J Check Where Is My Friend's Home [9] The automated bot did something to your chart for the cast - is it OK???

Stubs[edit]

You have created a series of unsourced stubs about squares. Would you please continue your work on these stubs?Xx236 (talk) 08:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages[edit]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption, Paris, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like ((WikiProject Keyword)) to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 18:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Przemysław Krompiec for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Przemysław Krompiec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Przemysław Krompiec until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Proposed deletion of Nikolai Johnsen[edit]

The article Nikolai Johnsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actor with no reliable sources at all (Instagram is not a source)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Rudolfsheim[edit]

Why do you believe that an unsorced substub is better than a redirect?Xx236 (talk) 11:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your page move[edit]

[10] - please explain the reason. - üser:Altenmann >t 07:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RM as uncontroversial. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 07:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Butarque

added a link pointing to Villaverde

Loco (rapper)

added a link pointing to Mnet

Los Rosales (Madrid)

added a link pointing to Villaverde

Los Ángeles (Madrid)

added a link pointing to Villaverde

San Andrés (Madrid)

added a link pointing to Villaverde

Wards of Madrid

added a link pointing to Villaverde

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heo Solji for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heo Solji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heo Solji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Proposed deletion of Syn Cole[edit]

The article Syn Cole has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dubious notability, single source only passingly mentions the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Categories[edit]

I really wish you had not done [11] Art is not "popular culture" and neither are a lot of classic films. (TV, maybe). I am going to remove the soft redirect and I would like to restore the other categories to this original location. Montanabw ^(talk) 03:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit-war about this categorization scheme, let's discuss it. Montanabw ^(talk) 04:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am re-categozing the articles you moved into Category:Individual horses; that category is a mostly-diffusing category, as otherwise we would have thousands of articles in it. Montanabw ^(talk) 04:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 10:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Baesan Station[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Baesan Station".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Coming from Malachq - I may be confused most of the time. (talk) 17:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jaegung-dong for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaegung-dong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaegung-dong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

South Korean esports player[edit]

Hi, Kanghuitari. There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Park "Lyn" June#Requested move 25 March 2016. Please join the talk if you have an opinion. Thank you. Sawol (talk) 01:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chu Ye-jin[edit]

The article Chu Ye-jin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

Nomination of Ji Joo-yeon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ji Joo-yeon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ji Joo-yeon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Ways to improve Homme (band)[edit]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Kanghuitari, thanks for creating Homme (band)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. In order to avoid deletion please provide more sources so that the article meets notability criteria at WP:BAND

Template:Produce 101[edit]

I was thinking maybe it would be better to set it up much like how Template:VIXX is? Although VIXX's is more in-depth comparatively I.O.I is now less about Produce 101.

Maybe something like the following?

I.O.I

Produce 101

Albums	35 Girls 5 Concepts
Singles	"Pick Me"
Contestants	An Ye-seul Chu Ye-jin

I.O.I

Albums	35 Girls 5 Concepts
Singles	"Pick Me"

Nomination for deletion of Template:I.O.I[edit]

Template:I.O.I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Random86 (talk) 01:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unpretty Rapstar has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Unpretty Rapstar, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lee Soo-jung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films set in a fictional populated places has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Films set in a fictional populated places, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 03:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 40–step stairway[edit]

The article 40–step stairway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A stairway that appears in one film is not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Need assistance for page move please[edit]

Hi J, the page which we agreed to name DEAN has been moved by an Administrator to Dean (South Korean singer). He did not notify me or talk to me about the move. He said we can't use DEAN because of the capital letters per: MOS:ALLCAPS. (That was my mistake, sorry!)

I think Dean (singer-songwriter), like this [12] or this one [13] is better - as Dean performs with American artists and South Korean artists. The Dean (singer) redirects to the page here: [14] and is not good to use.

Can you change it to Dean (singer-songwriter), please - because I don't know how? I will let the administrator know we made the change, later, as they have not talked to me. Thanks again, B --Bonnielou2013 (talk) 06:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC) xoxoxo--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 07:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi J, the page will probably be moved back to Dean (South Korean singer). Please don't worry about it. It's OK with me. Thanks for your help as always.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 08:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doctors (2000 TV series)[edit]

Hi, I have noted that you have moved the above article from Doctors (TV series) to Doctors (2000 TV series). This has previously been discussed on the talk page and concluded that Doctors (TV series) was the best option, as there are no other TV series called Doctors. As I haven't seen any new discussion on this, could you kindly clarify why you moved it? Thanks. Adamiow (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Doctors (2016 TV series)... -- Kanghuitari (talk) 01:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Roark for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Roark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Roark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Many thanks for all your efforts in creating and improving articles on the topic of South Korea and your thoughtful help to others! And special thanks for all those pages you've created for "forgotten" women in music and the entertainment industry! Your recent page Jung Mina [15] was added to this current women's project [16]! You truly deserve many awards Kanghuitari! You are very much appreciated! Fighting! Bonnielou2013 (talk) 16:34, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jung Mina has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. Jung Mina, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jung Mina[edit]

On 15 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jung Mina, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jung Mina's song "Jumeokbab" is about her selling rice balls near Gwanghwamun Station? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jung Mina. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of With God (2017 film)[edit]

A tag has been placed on With God (2017 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Proposed deletion of Clare Foley[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Clare Foley, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Clare Foley to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, JohannSnow (talk) 21:17, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gadeok Bridge, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. 2602:306:3357:BA0:7B:B5C0:498B:9B21 (talk) 04:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Gadeok Bridge. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 2602:306:3357:BA0:7B:B5C0:498B:9B21 (talk) 04:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Gadeok Bridge, you may be blocked from editing. 2602:306:3357:BA0:7B:B5C0:498B:9B21 (talk) 04:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Gadeok Bridge. 2602:306:3357:BA0:7B:B5C0:498B:9B21 (talk) 05:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why delete? -- Kanghuitari (talk) 05:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is too short of an article. 2602:306:3357:BA0:7B:B5C0:498B:9B21 (talk) 05:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an obvious reason. Wikipedia has already a lot of short article. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Asian bridge (structure) stubs. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 05:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the rules are the rules. 2602:306:3357:BA0:7B:B5C0:498B:9B21 (talk) 05:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, I added a source, Sources leads to a keep. well, I kept the rules. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 05:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed - new page[edit]

Hi J - can you see my note on my talkpage - I'm afraid it didn't notify you! Thanks!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 01:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi My best J, can you add the Hangul name for Mari Kim please and look it over for me? Thanks!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations Moon, You had all these pages added here! Celebrating Women in Entertainment project [17]: June 1 - Li, Ji-hye, June 1 - Jung, Mina, June 15 - Lee Soo-min (actress), June 22 - Whang Bo-ryung, June 21 - Kim Min-hee (actress, born 1972), June 30 - Seo Jeong-yeon!!!!!!! Now can you add the hangul to Mari Kim for me? XOXO--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whang Bo-ryung has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. Whang Bo-ryung, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 14:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Whang Bo-ryung[edit]

On 7 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Whang Bo-ryung, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that singer-songwriter Whang Bo-ryung's third album was written in a calming acoustic style as a response to chaotic world events such as the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Whang Bo-ryung. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page that needs your monitoring[edit]

Hi there. As you can see, I'm not active in Wikipedia editing anymore, but there's this page I would like you to put on your watchlist, as you're the only one I could remember who frequently edits Korean entertainment pages... There are some fans who're not happy with her, and hence the vandalisms. If you wanna know more, this article will help you. Good thing is that it's now protected until July 22, but I don't know what would happen after the protection expires. Regards. −Edward (^t⋇_c) 17:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Babel 250[edit]

Hi J! I did the English page if you want to do the Korean one. Now Non-Summit has some competition! - same time, I think.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks J!! Where have you been! I was looking to help on Becker's Restaurant and Beck's Coffeeshop....I can't find many references....maybe you can do a page for JR East Food Business and put them both together there - the main company has more references, too.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:18, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation[edit]

Hallo, Please remember that if you create an article like Becker's (restaurant) you need to add a link from Becker's - in this case a hatnote, which I've done, but in other cases an entry on a disambiguation page. Otherwise no-one typing or linking "Becker's" will find your article. Thanks. PamD 08:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Becker's (restaurant)[edit]

The article Becker's (restaurant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Proposed deletion of Beck's Coffee Shop[edit]

The article Beck's Coffee Shop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Category:Books about LGBT has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Books about LGBT, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ringbang (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I'm Off Then (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I'm Off Then (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Off Then (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Category:Superstar K judges has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Superstar K judges, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:K-pop Star judges has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:K-pop Star judges, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any Plans?[edit]

are you planned add Princess Deokhye (film)? by --Sunuraju (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added The Last Princess (film). -- Kanghuitari (talk) 00:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stores in fiction[edit]

Hi, I just started Category:Retailing in fiction, then I came across Category:Stores in fiction which you created two years ago. It only contains two sub-categories. Would you agree to merge and redirect it to Category:Retailing in fiction?

Otherwise, I'd suggest renaming it using the word "shops" rather than "stores", to match Category:Shops. – Fayenatic London 19:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've put Category:Fictional shops back into the other parent categories that you had used. – Fayenatic London 09:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hua Hin - Hua Hin District (redirecting or merging)[edit]

Do you have any objections to Hua Hin being redirected to Hua Hin District? Thank you. 208.44.84.138 (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doug Jung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Blue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation[edit]

When moving pages to create disambiguation pages please remember to fix broken links... Giant Snowman 07:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British television series based on non-British television series has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:British television series based on non-British television series, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 12:30, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am alerting editors[edit]

that I think (or is it a feeling?) might be interested in the discussion going on here based on their past insolvent with this category. Category talk:Sculptures by artist. Stop by and see what you . . . . well . . .... think or feel. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 20:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BAFTA awards[edit]

A quick glance at Category:British Academy Film Awards shows that the film awards are the WP:primary topic for "BAFTA awards" and similar variants of that.

e.g. "BAFTA Award for Best Actor...", not "BAFTA Film Award for Best Actor..."

Whereas in Category:British Academy Television Awards, we see British Academy Television Award for Best Actor. If "Television" is not specifically specified, most readers will assume that Film is intended.

Just explaining my rationale for reverting your recent bold changes to longstanding redirects. wbm1058 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DinDin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mnet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New page for this?[edit]

Hi J, Hot topic. Should we do a page for this? You start it, if so. [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. It was on Non-Summit this week.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 00:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC) I will type up the references....let me know.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 00:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. - I added your newly created pages to this Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge. I added stub tags for 2 or 3 of them, as they were small. Hope you don't mind.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing[edit]

Hi, can you try to source your stubs and add a little more info? Wikipedia:Citations might help.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Key of Life[edit]

i add The Key of Life (2016 film) by --Sunuraju (talk) 04:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer granted[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria.

Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator.

Administrator note You have been grandfathered to this group based on prior patrolling activity - the technical flag for the group will be added to your account after the next software update. You do not need to apply at WP:PERM. 20:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:American horror fiction television series has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:American horror fiction television series, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 01:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-summit cast list[edit]

Hey J - good job - the page was getting big! You moved the references good!

You forgot to add the new page to the Non-Summit template "Related articles" along with Episodes.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 02:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC) It's OK - I added it there - I think I did it right.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 02:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Incheon Grand Park[edit]

The article Incheon Grand Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since creation with no useful content. No good target to redirect or merge to. Probably fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Category:Animation companies has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Animation companies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User group: New Page Reviewr[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 820 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

Nomination of Bigflo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bigflo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigflo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected[edit]

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter #2[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

Improve the tools: Vote here.
Reduce your review load: Vote here

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

Proposal to rename categories[edit]

Please see my proposal to speedily rename: Hugo999 (talk) 02:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bowling on Television to Category:Bowling on television

Category:Boxing on Television to Category:Boxing on television

Holiday greetings![edit]

Dear Kanghuitari - Holiday greetings and thanks for all you do on Wikipedia! You deserve this special star!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 820 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election[edit]

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Sports Chosun[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Sports Chosun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrStrauss talk 19:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections[edit]

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Flores (actor)[edit]

The article Alexander Flores (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Effectively unsourced article demonstrates no notability of BLP subject. Almost certain WP:NACTOR fail – only role of any note if The Maze Runner films, but subject is well down the cast list so does not appear to be a "significant" role. Also, press coverage of subject is sparse so WP:GNG fail as well. Likely WP:TOOSOON (at best).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

New Page Review - newsletter No.3[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 820 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

for you.....[edit]

		The South Korea Barnstar of National Merit
		Dear Kanghuitari, although you never officially joined WikiProject Korea, most of us volunteering there are very familiar with your name and your work. Thank you for all the time you have contributed to creating and editing articles related to South Korea. Please be strong and healthy and eat well while you pursue your new job that is keeping you very busy. Although we are missing you for now, I wish you all the best in the world! We will be happy to greet you on WP when you have time again to drop by, whether it's a return to your previous workload or for just a little relaxation! You have been a great mentor and a good friend to me, my buddy J.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Passion (Christianity)[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_5#Category:Art_of_the_Passion which includes a proposal to merge Category:Passion (Christianity). – Fayenatic London 21:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move request[edit]

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ssa2 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ssa2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ssa2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nomination of Psy from the Psycho World! for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psy from the Psycho World! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psy from the Psycho World! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nomination of 3 Mai for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3 Mai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3 Mai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 820 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Afterlife places in fiction has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Afterlife places in fiction, which you created, has been nominated for possible merging. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up[edit]

Hello! I hope you can join in cleaning-up K-drama pages with international broadcast sections as they are in violation of Wiki guidelines (Wiki is not a catalog/ TV guide). It's also a breeding ground for promotion from streaming sites, legal or not.

I mean, just look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moon_Lovers:_Scarlet_Heart_Ryeo&diff=783257456&oldid=783251917 If that's not what a laundry list (which Wiki vehemently opposes) looks like, I don't know what is. Thanks! Chiefyuks (talk) 03:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested input[edit]

Hello, I frequently see you contribute to articles listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture and would very much appreciate your input on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture#Eradication of variety show sections so that a conclusion towards variety show appearances can be made. Thanks. Abdotorg (talk) 19:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of concert tours of South Korea has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Lists of concert tours of South Korea, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ℯ xplicit 01:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works set in sea has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Works set in sea, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films set in sea has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Films set in sea, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:03, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Police films has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Police films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Non-Summit (2015 cast).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Non-Summit (2015 cast).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text ((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ℯ xplicit 03:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry[edit]

I have blocked your sockpuppet account Countles upon confirmation that this was an account controlled by you. By recommendation, you are only being given a warning this time instead of being blocked. The use of an alternative account to distort consensus is not allowed. This will be your only warning regarding the matter. Any future offenses will lead to an immediate indefinite block. Stick to one account only. ℯ xplicit 00:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2AM (band) has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:2AM (band), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Proposed deletion of Kim Tae-ho (footballer, born 1992)[edit]

The article Kim Tae-ho (footballer, born 1992) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP about footballer which doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 16:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Voice Kids (Dutch TV series) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Voice Kids (Dutch TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Voice Kids (Dutch TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Municipalities of Venezuela[edit]

Can you create more municipality stub articles, e.g. for Falcón State, Yaracuy State. See your Valdez Municipality now with wikidata-enriched infobox. 78.55.250.151 (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of awards by South Korean musicians has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Lists of awards by South Korean musicians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) 15:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Television occupations has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Television occupations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jaqen (talk) 17:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oceans in fiction has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Oceans in fiction, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Welcome back, sort of![edit]

Hi J...I know you haven't been totally gone, but I was surprised to see your edit on Billboard K-pop song list!!! Great job on Wanna One songs! I missed you! I have one more episode (Ep. 177) to add to Non-Summit....Do you think they will come back in March?--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: ((subst:NPR invite)). Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Code: Secret Room[edit]

Template:Code: Secret Room has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 14:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Genius (TV series) contestants has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:The Genius (TV series) contestants, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 14:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Code: Secret Room contestants has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Code: Secret Room contestants, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 14:44, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Hockey League venues has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:American Hockey League venues, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 17:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Years new page backlog drive[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

The total number of reviews completed for the month.
The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Memoirs of a Murderer[edit]

Good day! Are you sure that the primary topic for Memoirs of a Murderer is not the music album by King 810? --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 177.8 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a ((help me)) notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:32, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

special:diff/819787455 etc[edit]

Hello. Please tell me (or the person) if you want to delete some articles (like template or category) I (or other person) created. Thanks. --Garam (talk)

'Aeni' phrase is not use in worldwide. Kanghuitari (talk) 17:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Google search. That phrase is not use in Worldwide. Kanghuitari (talk) 10:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

한국어 사용자이신 것 같은데, 'Aeni'라는 단어는 전세계적으로 통용되는 단어가 아닙니다. Manhwa, Anime 랑은 달라요. 단순히 한국어권 사용자에게 '애니메이션'이라는 단어의 줄임말로 사용되는 것이지, '한국산 애니메이션'을 뜻하지 않습니다. Kanghuitari (talk) 10:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

다시 말하지만 절대로 '한국산 애니메이션'을 뜻하는 단어가 아닙니다. Manga, Manhwa, Anime랑은 다릅니다. Kanghuitari (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is only your opinion, I think. I already said to you in special:diff/819998767. See [24]. We can find it as many as 21,300 results (it is not few.) in Google. And please use English, because here is English Wikipeida. For this, see WP:SPEAKENGLISH. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 15:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And I already said to you about this actions without talk. But you are still repeating it. Please stop your actions. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 15:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Garam: 영어 능력이 좋지 못해 영어를 썼다가는 제 의견이 와전될 것 같아 그렇습니다. 이해바랍니다. 해당 구글 검색량이요? 좀만 검색된 문서 둘러보세요. 위키피디아에 적었던 내용을 언급하는 문서만 뜨지 독자적으로 Aeni가 쓰는 문서는 거의 없습니다. 차라리 한국 애니메이션 분류를 만들거면 '2006 South Korean animation' 이게 나을 것 같은데요. 애초에 한국 애니를 뜻하는 문서도 Aeni가 아니잖아요. Kanghuitari (talk) 13:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think, this text is the main example about Aeni. And see [25]. Then, contrary to what you said, mirror sites at link 24 are only a few results in Google. Aeni is not only about South Korean animation, and North Korean animation is also Aeni, like Pororo the Little Penguin. In other words, all Korean animations (animations in South Korea, animations in North Korea, and animation studios of South Korea etc) is Aeni. Finally, based on what you're telling me (you said, "애초에 한국 애니를 뜻하는 문서도 Aeni가 아니잖아요"), IU (singer)'s name is only "아이유", not "이지은", because "IU" (아이유) is the article name. But it is not true, isn't it? First of all, "wikipedia articles" may not be used as source. For this, see WP:WPNOTRS and WP:PSTS (If it is hard to read you well, see ko:위키백과:신뢰#자비출판 and ko:위키백과:확인#순환참조 as similar texts in Korean Wikipedia. But Korean wikipedia's policies are not exactly the same with English wikipedia's policies.). Thanks. --Garam (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Walk of Fame Europe[edit]

The article Walk of Fame Europe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article created in 2015; no sources tagged since May, 2017. No independent, reliable sources found in English, just travel sites. Brief, official website in Dutch only. Opening in Rotterdam attended by mayor of Hollywood, California. Only two edits since single edit creation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neonorange (talk) 13:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review Newsletter No.10[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LC Waikiki[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on LC Waikiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. deadwikipedian (talk) 10:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Produce 101 (Chinese TV series)[edit]

Hi, I'm Heliosxeros. Kanghuitari, thanks for creating Produce 101 (Chinese TV series)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Idol Producer could be used as a guide instead

EROS ^message 02:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Novels set in heaven has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Novels set in heaven, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs about women has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Songs about women, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018[edit]

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules

New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.

Editathons

Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

The Signpost

The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my proposal to rename the “Winter Olympics categories[edit]

Category:2018 Winter Olympics venues to Category:2018 Winter Olympic venues; and for earlier years from 2018 back to 1924 (23 categories) Hugo999 (talk) 11:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about Facebook has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Films about Facebook, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news

The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.

As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.

There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.

Other

A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.

Moving to Draft and Page Mover

Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js^(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget. In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions. MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues. User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js^(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy `importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' );` into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page) User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js^(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): `npp_num_pages=20;` (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50). User:Primefac/revdel.js^(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you. User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js^(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link. User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion. User:Evad37/rater.js^(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: `rater_autostartNamespaces = 0;` to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js^(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js^(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
User:Primefac/revdel.js^(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js^(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link.
User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
User:Evad37/rater.js^(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeon Jung-kook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BTS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018[edit]

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Kanghuitari, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018^[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal

There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!

Project updates

ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.

New scripts

User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js^(info) — A new script created for quickly placing ((copyvio-revdel)) on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018[edit]

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Kanghuitari,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW

Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cheongha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cheongha-myeon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Heart Barnstar
		for a WP buddy that has encouraged me, saved me and made WP a lot more fun than imaginable! My best time on WP has been creating pages with you and letting you handle the tough stuff!. - Our 4th Anniversay is coming up in a few days!!! - You are a rock dear J! Thank you for not leaving us! Fighting!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 02:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC) with love![reply]

Category:Romantic comedy animation has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Romantic comedy animation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 22:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creating categories[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari,

I came across this category you created, Category:Husbands by person, and I can't figure out what you intended it to be used for. How did you imagine this category would be used?

By the way, you should really archive your talk page which is too long to be able to find anything. Could you reduce it to just messages from 2018? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

Category:SDN48 has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:SDN48, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheongha-myeon[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cheongha-myeon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

NPR Newsletter No.17[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

News

The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the ((rough translation)) tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.

Discussions of interest

Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
((db-blankdraft)) was merged into G13 (Discussion)
A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.

Reminders

NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.

NPP Tools Report

Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Daesung has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Daesung, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ℯ xplicit 00:30, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Animation festivals has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Animation festivals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:06, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:South Korea[edit]

Portal:South Korea, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:South Korea and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:South Korea during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pldx1 (talk) 20:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.18[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News

Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Discussions of interest

A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fukuoka City Transportation Bureau[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fukuoka City Transportation Bureau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPSeoul-invite[edit]

Template:WPSeoul-invite has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. PC78 (talk) 14:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terms for females has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Terms for females, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Works about firefighters[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Works about firefighters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rockstar Games games[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rockstar Games games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

New Page Review newsletter November 2019[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 820 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools

It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.

Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.

Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Flowers in fiction[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Flowers in fiction requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

New Page Review newsletter December 2019[edit]

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Masked Singer[edit]

Hi. Not sure if you saw the ping. Would you please comment at Talk:Masked Singer#Titles? Thanks. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 00:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs from animated films has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Songs from animated films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, we have over 44,000 stubs! A good opportunity to improve stubs for your area!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Controversies related to the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Controversies related to the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies related to the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia categories named after South Korean filmmakers[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia categories named after South Korean filmmakers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with coronavirus disease 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Mundo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cancelled video game events[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cancelled video game events requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cancelled video game events[edit]

missing clarification[edit]

Why this, and why without propoer editsummary? -DePiep (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic and sports, I created a simple category. Kanghuitari (talk) 19:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is an illegal renaming/move process. Stop it. -DePiep (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We use '2019–20' (wiki insert hyphen), your category name is wrong. not '2019-20'. Kanghuitari (talk) 19:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also re this (a fact I already mentioned to you BTW), your editing is incorrect. Consider this a warning against disruptiveediting.

I strongly suggest that you revert the emptying & speedy-delete-tagging the category. -DePiep (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -DePiep (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Referendums are not elections[edit]

Both are forms of voting, but a referendum is not a not a subset of an election. I am not sure why yoy pointed me to the Referendum article, as it also says nothing of the sort (perhaps as it has the election sidebar, but you'll notice that Referendum is only there as a related subject, not a sub-topic). Cheers, Number 5 7 16:24, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Open Door Church and Category:Religious organizations associated with the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic[edit]

Hello, could you provide a source or explanation for your Category addition via this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christian_Open_Door_Church&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=946349531&oldid=945333065 - I couldn't find anything on a connection online quickly ... Regards, -- marilyn.hanson (talk) 23:06, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the 2020 Summer Olympics for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the 2020 Summer Olympics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the 2020 Summer Olympics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Category:Concert tours cancelled due to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Concert tours cancelled due to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 15:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coronavirus WHO cases and deaths

Why do you keep turning this page into a template? It doesn't seem like a template to me. Anguswalker (talk) 20:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the video game industry for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the video game industry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the video game industry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Category:2020 coronavirus pandemic in Asia has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:2020 coronavirus pandemic in Asia, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starzoner (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Water transport of heads of state has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Water transport of heads of state, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2019–2020 Japan–South Korea trade dispute into 2019 Boycott of Japanese products in South Korea. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic by country and territory has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic by country and territory, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films based on real people has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Films based on real people, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hanafuda[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hanafuda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is empty and no longer needed

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hi Kanghuitari. There are no other categories at this level for a type of playing card, so it is inconsistent with our category structure. But happy to discuss. Bermicourt (talk) 15:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari

Thank you for creating 2020 coronavirus pandemic on Diamond Princess.

User:Prof tpms, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good Article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Prof tpms)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Prof TPMS (talk) 23:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Prof tpms. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2020 coronavirus pandemic on Diamond Princess, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Prof TPMS (talk) 23:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversies related to the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Controversies related to the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak. Since you had some involvement with the Controversies related to the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Soumyabrata ^{stay at home 🏠} _{wash your hands 👋} ^{to protect from COVID-19 😷} 10:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 coronavirus pandemic in New York[edit]

Hi, User:Kanghuitari it has been suggested on Talk:2020 coronavirus pandemic in New York (state) that part of your contributions to pages relating to the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in different counties in the state of New York should be deleted. If you would like to stop this please vote oppose to this suggestion on that talk page, thanks. User:Frontier Place (talk) 12:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Category:Health by city has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Health by city has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi2canibe (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Music events cancelled due to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Music events cancelled due to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 15:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Concert tours cancelled due to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Concert tours cancelled due to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 15:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Concerts about the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Concerts about the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 15:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic benefit concerts has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic benefit concerts has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 15:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs about the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Songs about the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 15:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Music events postponed due to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Music events postponed due to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 15:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about families has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Films about families has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 22:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Musicians by South Korean band has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Musicians by South Korean band has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:55, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil by state[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil by state requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Nomination of Mangyongdae Line for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mangyongdae Line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangyongdae Line until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Category:Detective writers has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Detective writers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 22:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entertainment television channels[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainment television channels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Nomination of National Tax Service of South Korea for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Tax Service of South Korea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Tax Service of South Korea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Proposed deletion of James Cade[edit]

The article James Cade has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. HeartGlow ^(talk) 02:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Musical characters has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Musical characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:35, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Camille Chamoun Sports City Stadium[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that you have done a lot of edits involving Category:Camille Chamoun Sports City Stadium. Can you please explain your edits? Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SMALLCAT. Kanghuitari (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The key words are "with no potential for growth". The 2019 Lebanese Super Cup isn't the first and won't be the last edition played at the Camille Chamoun Sports City Stadium. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 12:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eyes on Me The Movie.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eyes on Me The Movie.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 6th: NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE[edit]

September 6, 2-4pm E.S.T: NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE
You are invited to join the Sure We Can community for our NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE - this Sunday, Sept 6th, 2020. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into other languages; as well as, brainstorm ideas about how we could use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19. Please join us, all skill levels welcome! Is there an idea you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? Have an idea how we can use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19? Please, let us know by adding it to the agenda. Sunday September 6 NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE (optional RSVP on-wiki). 2:00pm - 4:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

September 6, 2-4pm E.S.T: NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE

You are invited to join the Sure We Can community for our NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE - this Sunday, Sept 6th, 2020. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into other languages; as well as, brainstorm ideas about how we could use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19. Please join us, all skill levels welcome!

Is there an idea you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? Have an idea how we can use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19? Please, let us know by adding it to the agenda.

Sunday September 6 NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon - ONLINE (optional RSVP on-wiki).

2:00pm - 4:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

--Wil540 art (talk) 20:12, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Hendry[edit]

Hi there, you created the above disambiguation page last week, no problem with that but you did not deal with any of the resultant disambiguation links. I have now fixed those for the footballer (which was the majority), could you please do the same for the wrestler? Crowsus (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Film controversies has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Film controversies has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 02:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aviation accidents and incidents in the Mediterranean has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Aviation accidents and incidents in the Mediterranean has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 08:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hotaka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Hotaka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Religious romance films[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Religious romance films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television series set in a fictional country[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series set in a fictional country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Category:Aviation in the Mediterranean Sea has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Aviation in the Mediterranean Sea has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People on coins[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:People on coins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

New Page Patrol December Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Films about nuclear accidents and incidents has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Films about nuclear accidents and incidents has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:26, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Categories by locality in South Korea[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Categories by locality in South Korea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Nam Ji-hyun (disambiguation)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nam Ji-hyun (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexataylor07 (talk) 02:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Józef Joniec for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Józef Joniec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Józef Joniec until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works set in fictional locations has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Works set in fictional locations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lokomotiv Yaroslavl plane crash has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Lokomotiv Yaroslavl plane crash has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Survivors of infectious diseases has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Survivors of infectious diseases has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 10:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Masked Singer contestants[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Masked Singer contestants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Category:Airlines of South Korea accidents and incidents has been nominated for renaming to Category:Accidents and incidents by airline of South Korea[edit]

Category:Airlines of South Korea accidents and incidents has been nominated for renaming to Category:Accidents and incidents by airline of South Korea. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deaths from the COVID-19 pandemic by city has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Deaths from the COVID-19 pandemic by city has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 19:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Period films has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Period films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Double Patty.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Double Patty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films set in South Jeolla Province[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Films set in South Jeolla Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cultural depictions of English men[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cultural depictions of English men requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Category:Television series about journalists has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Television series about journalists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Us Again (film) (March 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This does not meet the notability criteria for upcoming subjects, which have quite strict requirements per WP:CRYSTAL. If the short has now been released then adding reviews of the short published in reliable sources (like newspapers and magazines) could show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Us Again (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Us Again (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kanghuitari! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cultural depictions of English people[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cultural depictions of English people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Australian monster movies[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Australian monster movies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

Concern regarding Draft:Eyes on Me: The Movie[edit]

Hello, Kanghuitari. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eyes on Me: The Movie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about mobile phones has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Films about mobile phones has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 15:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Double Patty (May 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Double Patty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Double Patty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Explorers of the Atlantic Ocean has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Explorers of the Atlantic Ocean has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Syn Cole[edit]

The article Syn Cole has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage of this artist. Only sources found are of his releases, which are not independently notable. Fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Nomination of Syn Cole for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syn Cole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syn Cole until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Jalen Folf (talk) 05:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Animated western (genre) animation has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Animated western (genre) animation has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Twice (group) has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Twice (group) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Italian language in Luca (2021 film)[edit]

Please stop repeatedly restoring Italian as one of the languages for Luca (2021 film) in the film's infobox. The primary language in the film is English, and only a small amount of words are spoken in Italian. This is also explicitly stated in sources such as this Decider article. If you want to discuss this further, you should open a thread on the article's talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 02:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works about Interpol has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Works about Interpol has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Aosta Valley in fiction[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Aosta Valley in fiction indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Animated western (genre) films has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Animated western (genre) films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Animated films set in the United States by state[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Animated films set in the United States by state indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Category:Songs about cherry blossom has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Songs about cherry blossom has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Prisons in fiction has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Prisons in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Time travel anime and manga has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Time travel anime and manga has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Link20XX (talk) 04:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:505 Games games has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:505 Games games has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OceanHok (talk) 19:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Category:Award-winning films has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Award-winning films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 19:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Award-winning television series has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Award-winning television series has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 19:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021 backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol \| November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The multi-genre disaster film categories you created hves been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Disaster horror films and the other multi-genre disaster film categories you created have been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Culture in England by region has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Culture in England by region has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/SMS left/Gyeonggang Line[edit]

Template:S-line/SMS left/Gyeonggang Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/SMS right/Gyeonggang Line[edit]

Template:S-line/SMS right/Gyeonggang Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Iranian film remakes has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Iranian film remakes has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Film remakes by country has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Film remakes by country has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 19:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Don't Look Up (disambiguation)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Don't Look Up (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ASUKITE 17:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Don't Look Up (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Don't Look Up (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Don't Look Up holds both topics. Unless a third one is found, this page is redundant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 07:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Merlin has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Merlin has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs from Frozen (2013 film) has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Songs from Frozen (2013 film) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Remakes of Iranian films[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Remakes of Iranian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

A barnstar for your efforts[edit]

		COVID-19 Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to COVID-19. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sioen[edit]

The article Sioen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability, it also contains a single unreliable source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bell towers in France has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Bell towers in France has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Exo (band) has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Exo (band) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 11:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Epic film series[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Epic film series indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Animated epic films[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Animated epic films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Category:Leporidae in popular culture has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Leporidae in popular culture has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 820 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 861 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing ((subst:NPR invite)) on their talk page.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Mother and son films has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Mother and son films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Father and daughter films has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Father and daughter films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mother and daughter films has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Mother and daughter films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tourism in Primorsky Krai[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tourism in Primorsky Krai indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000^[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.^[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, ((NPP backlog)), to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14275 articles, as of 00:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing ((subst:NPR invite)) on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luri (singer)[edit]

The article Luri (singer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject doesn't meet WP:SINGER criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Orphaned non-free image File:Josée film poster.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Josée film poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tourism in Vladivostok[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tourism in Vladivostok indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on![edit]

New Page Patrol \| July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lee Su-hyun[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lee Su-hyun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Poirot09 (talk) 12:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about solitude has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Films about solitude has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Toys in fiction has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Toys in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Denzil Remedios for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denzil Remedios, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denzil Remedios until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs about clocks has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Songs about clocks has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs about the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Songs about the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination: MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers: The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing ((subst:NPR invite)) on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP message[edit]

Hi Kanghuitari,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Exploration of the Atlantic Ocean[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Exploration of the Atlantic Ocean indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Proposed deletion of Crisis Escape No. 1[edit]

The article Crisis Escape No. 1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There doesn’t seem to be any sources on the web.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 18:41, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol \| October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South Korean philanthropists[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:South Korean philanthropists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Category:Harry Potter locations has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Harry Potter locations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jontesta (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cervecería 100 Montaditos for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cervecería 100 Montaditos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cervecería 100 Montaditos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Edit.pdf (talk) 13:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Category:Thriller drama films has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Thriller drama films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entourage (American TV series) seasons[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Entourage (American TV series) seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Category:Baseball in North Korea has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Baseball in North Korea has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shiho Yano for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiho Yano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiho Yano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nswix (talk) 04:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about real people has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Films about real people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Television series set in fictional locations has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Television series set in fictional locations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 04:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Categories by islands has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Categories by islands has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Skovl (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Culture by islands has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Culture by islands has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Skovl (talk) 14:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History by islands has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:History by islands has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Skovl (talk) 14:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:North Korean confectionery[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:North Korean confectionery indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:North Korean desserts[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:North Korean desserts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Category:Films about robbery has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Films about robbery has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jo Young-nam[edit]

The article Jo Young-nam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established. Only one source, which is actually him talking about someone else. Only 3 sentences long.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 20:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Webtoon Hero Toondra Show[edit]

The article Webtoon Hero Toondra Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2015

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:54, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jo Young-nam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jo Young-nam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Young-nam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 16:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:History of Carinthia (state)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Carinthia (state) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive[edit]

New Page Patrol \| May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Hendry (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Joe Hendry (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

surplus to requirements per WP:TWODABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sceptre (talk) 00:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about Kamikaze has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Films about Kamikaze has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kamikaze in fiction has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Kamikaze in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentary films about insects has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Documentary films about insects has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the ping and you can ignore this. I sent the CfD before noticing List of insect documentaries and am now filling out the category with entries from there. No trouble after all! QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:44, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hard science fiction films has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Hard science fiction films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 07:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New pages patrol needs your help![edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Film productions suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Film productions suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol \| October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol newsletter[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2300 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medical-related conspiracy theories has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Medical-related conspiracy theories has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Star Trek vehicles has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Star Trek vehicles has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 11:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Transport disasters in fiction has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Transport disasters in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about transport disasters has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Films about transport disasters has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Clocks in fiction has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Clocks in fiction has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about violence has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Films about violence has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Airlines of the Republic of Artsakh[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Airlines of the Republic of Artsakh indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Society Game contestants has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Society Game contestants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 11:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Siblings in fiction has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Siblings in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 18 § X in fiction II[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 18 § X in fiction II on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Farms in fiction has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Farms in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chicago Seven in fiction has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Chicago Seven in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 18 § X in fiction III[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 18 § X in fiction III on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction IV[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction IV on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 09:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction V[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction V on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction VI[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction VI on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol \| January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 21 § X in fiction VIII[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 21 § X in fiction VIII on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 21 § X in fiction IX[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 21 § X in fiction IX on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction X[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction X on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:33, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction XII[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction XII on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bookstores in fiction has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Bookstores in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction XIII[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction XIII on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:School-themed animation has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:School-themed animation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 31 § High schools and secondary schools[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 31 § High schools and secondary schools on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 12 § People by occupation and city or town[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 12 § People by occupation and city or town on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Examinations and testing in fiction has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Examinations and testing in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about examinations and testing has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Films about examinations and testing has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artur Francuz for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artur Francuz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Francuz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jarosław Florczak for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jarosław Florczak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarosław Florczak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artur Ziętek for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artur Ziętek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Ziętek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zdzisław Król for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zdzisław Król is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zdzisław Król until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bronisław Gostomski for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bronisław Gostomski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bronisław Gostomski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katarzyna Doraczyńska for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katarzyna Doraczyńska is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katarzyna Doraczyńska until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Truck road incident deaths has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Truck road incident deaths has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 06:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 29 § Category:Works involved in plagiarism controversies[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 29 § Category:Works involved in plagiarism controversies on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. House Blaster (talk · he/him) 00:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Education by city or town[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Education by city or town on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Organisations based in Viken[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Organisations based in Viken indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Economy of Viken[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Economy of Viken indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Category:Recreation by city[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Category:Recreation by city on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Organisations based in Vestfold og Telemark[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Organisations based in Vestfold og Telemark indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Economy of Vestfold og Telemark[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Economy of Vestfold og Telemark indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Economy of Troms og Finnmark[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Economy of Troms og Finnmark indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Category:Indoor ice hockey venues[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Category:Indoor ice hockey venues on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South Korean soul singers[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:South Korean soul singers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South Korean soul musicians[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:South Korean soul musicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South Korean rhythm and blues guitarists[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:South Korean rhythm and blues guitarists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History of countries on work has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:History of countries on work has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Blu Volley Verona players has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Blu Volley Verona players has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Maister1921 (talk) 17:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beverley Elliott for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beverley Elliott, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverley Elliott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024[edit]

Hello Kanghuitari,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

v t e I.O.I
Lim Na-young Kim Chung-ha Kim Se-jeong Jung Chae-yeon Zhou Jieqiong Kim So-hye Yoo Yeun-jung Choi Yoo-jung Kang Mi-na Kim Do-yeon Jeon So-mi
Albums	35 Girls 5 Concepts (with a contestants of Produce 101 or as a Produce 101) TBA
Singles	"Pick Me" (with a contestants of Produce 101 or as a Produce 101) TBA
Related articles	Produce 101
Category