Hello, Ketsuekigata, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Simplified Ruleset
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Glossary
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango123 18:47, August 8, 2005 (UTC) P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Hei, why must I conform with what you think is right, as in the case of the "list of sexual positions"? I don't like the idea of a picture showing a black fooker on a white chick. The neutrality demands uncoloured drawings not to offend any user. Out of this matter, you appear to be very unpolite when dealing with a female user that asked against the disturbing pics depicted in the topic, sooker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.84.193.2 (talk) 18:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ketsuekigata and thank you for joining WikiProject Swimming. We are glad you have decided to join us. We look forward to editing with you, and we hope you look forward to editing with us! One of the biggest tasks for us right now, is to put ((WP Swimming)) on as many pages as possible. For other tasks you can do, please take a look at our To-do list, and see if you can knock a few things off. Once again, welcome! See you around the pool, --wpktsfs 01:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you add User:Jokerst44 to WP:AIV when this user hasn't vandalized? --Wafulz 22:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Oh, goodness. I'm sorry. I was actually trying to add someone who vandalized the hall effect article, but I think I copied the wrong username. How embarrassing. I'll go back and put who I meant. Again, sorry about that. --Ketsuekigata 22:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • • Okie dokie, no worries then. --Wafulz 03:25, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I saw that you correctly, er, corrected a grammatical error in the article. You also, however perhaps mistakenly, added a random script link to the middle of the plot summary, which I have since removed.[1] Just thought you should know in case it was a mistake on your part. Good job fixing the prose, though! María (críticame) 00:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re your edit on January 26, could you please explain how the edits which you "undid" were vandalism? While I agree that the change of "SRV Guitars" to "Fender Stratocaster" was a mistake (I did not read the discussion page first), the other edits were of uncited, unclear, or grammatically incorrect text. In particular, the section about his death makes some very detailed claims with virtually no substantiation.--red shirt guy (talk) 00:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Correction- it was the "Drugs and Alcoholism" section, not "Death."--red shirt guy (talk) 00:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oops. I think it looked like vandalism because a whole section was removed without a reason in the summary. Sorry about that. I must have been a little out of it when I made that edit. Ketsuekigata (talk) 19:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback can only be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 02:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm getting an admin to indef block them, hang on. Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 06:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Doing... Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 06:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 06:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Neat! It was getting old. Ketsuekigata (talk) 06:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thats OK. I even added the template to the page myself, it's here. I iz eh wannabee admin XD Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 06:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, Ive recently joined the WP:WikiProject Swimming team. Im committed to getting on top of the project. Since you have listed yourself as a participant i thought i'd let you know what i've done. Ive got a bot thats going through the relevant catagouries that apply to the project and tagging them with our banner. Ive done all the stub class articles and assessed them automaticlly, and im starting on the 3000 other articles that ive identified. So this will mean that we will have all the articles in the scope of the project together and we can start working on them. So if you have any spare time theres going to be thousands of articles that will need assessing. There are around 2000 articles Just in Stub-Class swimming articles, and most of these will need the importance assessed. I think it's important we get all this assessing done, so we can start working on the articles.

Don't fell pressured to start assessing articles, i just thought that since theres going to be so many articles, you should know that theres heaps of work that needs to be done, ill be trying my best once my exams are finished. Remember many hands make light work.

Cheers Printer222 (talk) 13:31, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

m co, I disagree with your views on british english quotation marks. im in ur wikipediaz, defacin ur talk page. HEART woden. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.38.112 (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

Could you explain why you reverted the edit on the above page please?

I have explain on bread and cheese's talk page my justification.

Please see that and get back to me , as I dont see anything wrong with the info given.

Its not advertising.

Hii

Thanks for getting back to me. No worries I will remove the info for the buses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottylawrie (talk • contribs) 20:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottylawrie (talk • contribs) 19:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, you reverted my edits to some of the Lascelles article. There is no assertion of notability and Wikipedia is not a genealogical repository. These individuals, like hundreds of thousands of others, exist only as genealogical entries in databases, etc, while their ancestors might be notable. Being a great-great-grandchild of George V does not make one notable. 142.68.80.29 (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your swift reply! I agree that the articles should be deleted, however, there seems to be a practice to redirect first-order descendants (children) of notable people to their parents. I found this to be the case even with people who have actual royal titles, but who are not notable. Please let me know what you think. Again, thanks! :-) 142.68.80.29 (talk) 19:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Ketsuekigata, Thanks for your efforts for improving the Udaipur article. Taking it one step further, we have initiated a dedicated Wikipedia project for this beautiful city of lakes. To get started with this, we need your support in terms of approval for this project. We are required to provide approval/support in an ongoing discussion at the below link: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Requesting_dedicated_project_for_Udaipur_.28WikiProject_Udaipur.29

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Ketsuekigata. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ketsuekigata. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]