Russian Revolution

Thank you so much for fixing the journal citation error. I was struggling for quite some time to figure out what was wrong. I appreciate your help in fixing the citation. Best regards


FictiousLibrarian (talk). 04:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reward board entry for reference errors/ bare URLs

pinging Edward-Woodrow, i have approximately 1650 lifetime edits on CS1 error fixes (verified here), and these are only the ones i've kept track of by mentioning CS or CS1 error in the edit summary, I've also done 250 (255 to be exact) CS1 error fixing edits after your RB entry (for fairness). - Kevo327 (talk) 22:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reward board

File:CleanupBarnstar.PNG File:Citation Barnstar Hires.png
The Multiple Barnstar
Two barnstars for outstanding work! (Re: Reward Board) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 23:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harts unem

Discord kam tenc ban duk unek vor yes karanam dzez het khosam? Shat hartser unem dzez tal AmanAmanAmaTurq (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blockade of the Republic of Artsakh (2022–present)

Thank you for leaving an edit summary on your recent edit on Blockade of the Republic of Artsakh (2022–present). However, I strongly disagree with your revert. By suggesting that you reverted to the last "stable" edit, you are suggesting the editing, was, unstable? I feel that the claims that the lede needs to be completely restructured and that there are evidently many words that are not NPOV to be perfectly valid claims, hence the templates added at the front. Three different editors have recently agreed that the article has neutrality issues, and it has been written in large parts by editors who are emotionally attached to the subject to say the least. I quite frankly don't understand the revert, as all of the content removal was explained in the edit summary.
Also, keep in mind I was being bold. It's going to take way too much time discussing the addition of every single citation on an article with over 500 sources (WP:REFBOMB and citation overkill, by the way). Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:52, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul Vaurie Citations/maintenance edits are one thing and as I said in my comment, it can be restored anytime (unfortunately it was part of overall edits). And I don't see "three editors" on the talk, if you refer to this discussion [1], I don't see you commenting further and the supposed third editor (Tanz768) isn't allowed to edit in the topic area. Please comment on the talk page [2] about specific things you want to edit and gain consensus first, the latter is very important as there is alot of dispute in this topic area and you can be certain anything contentious is going to be challenged or discussed. Also please check archives for good measure, alot of the things may very well be discussed already and have consensus. - Kevo327 (talk) 06:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]