Archived
Thanks for the interesting links on the [Nihung http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihang] article. Please use this this as a template for future edits, rather than adding POV. Note that video links are usually used as other reading rather reference. Thanks --Sikh-history (talk) 12:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
This mesage is directed impartially at both user:Sikh-history and user:Khalsaburg:
Gentlemen; it seems abundantly clear that there are significant issues between you which are not going to be easy to mediate; and disagreement as to specific facts is in any case well beyond my level of knowledge. But what is very clear is that each of you is accusing the other of vandalism, and you both appear to be edit warring, and if you are not able to agree may I strongly suggest that you either henceforth ignore each other, or else proceed to dispute resolution. Having advised you, it would not now be proper for me to take further action, but I forsee another admin doing so unless you can reach an accomodation of some kind. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 17:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Please make a formal report of me, and your removal of legitimate references with ISBN numbers will be exposed. Best of Luck. --Sikh-history (talk) 08:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Please remove your focus from the other editor, and wp:assume good faith. I will be encouraging the other editor in the edit war to do the same. Please stop the edit war immediately and discuss, instead, if you have a strong enough interest in the article.sinneed (talk) 15:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Note:above comment was not signed.
From my talk page: "Is that your IP above Sh ? Khalsaburg (talk) 20:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)" Please don't do this again on my talk page. Please focus on the content, not the authors.sinneed (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Using ISBN when those pages do not contain any reference at all equates to obfuscation Khalsaburg (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I was responding to Sineed.
SH, please dont litter my talk page again Khalsaburg (talk) 13:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
THIS IS YOUR BLOG/POV, (TRY NOT TO MISLEAD) this Khalsaburg (talk) 19:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please show me one instant where I have vandalised a page? --Sikh-history (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
"Question to you specifically on AKJ" If you want to discuss edits, please do.
"I can see some collusion with vandalism on your part." It is essential that you wp:assume good faith. I am certainly wrong some of the time. I never vandalize. Your behaviour is incivil, stop now. "collusion" - Wikipedia is a collective work. By that meaning, there certainly is.
"Unless you can answer me directly using the references that were airbrushed:" To paraphrase, I read that as"You are evil...unless you do what I want..." - this is not appropriate. Please discuss whatever change you are unhappy about. "airbrushed" - by using buzz words instead of actually discussing the change, you do not help.
Please focus on the content, not on the editors. If you remain fascinated by editors instead of the encyclopedia, as you seem to be now, you will continue to encounter, and cause, problems.
Please understand that is a formal warning. I am entitled to edit, and even to make errors, without being accused of vandalism. Please behave better.sinneed (talk) 18:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
I believe I have strengthened the wording, and removed some side issues and distracting comments from the "meat" section. Please check to be sure I have not introduced any factual errors or strayed from the sources. And as always, please edit freely, I am just another editor, like you, trying to make Wikipedia better. :) All the best. sinneed (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Informal Mediation has been requested on your recent edit war. Case page can be found here. Leujohn (talk) 05:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Mayalld (talk) 15:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Look Khari/Khalsaburg, you are welcome to make counter allegations. Lets wait for the results. Thanks --Sikh-history (talk) 16:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me. First of all, it is perfectly legal to edit from your IP (no excuse needed). Why are you making excuses for everything. Also, I have taken to account both sides to the argunemt. I still cannot find how you got your viewpoint. Your arguments... I can't see how it stands, but as for the message above, I will warn sikh-history about that. I hope as the case is closed that the bicering between you two will end. Leujohn (talk) 09:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)