Wikipedia:Five_pillars

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_talk:Cheatsheet

Wikipedia:User_page_design_center/Introduction

((talkback))

((talkbacktiny))

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WIZARD

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Wikipedia:_The_Missing_Manual

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Userbox

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Service_awards

People

http://www.medievalbookshop.co.uk/press2011/press11091.shtml

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Slowking4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Heraldic_Registry

http://www.baronage.co.uk/2006a/bar-update1.pdf

http://www.internationalheraldry.com/resources.htm

http://www.bryanrawlings.com/links.asp

http://www.academic-genealogy.com/worldancestry.htm

http://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luca_Cordero_di_Montezemolo#section_6

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luca_Cordero_di_Montezemolo

http://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Krupa

http://www.derwinmaksf.com/Derwin_Mak_coat-of_arms.html

http://www.factbites.com/topics/Ian-Campbell,-12th-Duke-of-Argyll

http://www.feudallord.org/lord-of-the-manor.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGeachie_%28surname%29

http://novaheraldia.net/index-folder/o_nas.html

http://www.nobility-royalty.com/id56.htm

http://usarmorials.com/registering-arms

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comtes_Luserne-d%27Angrogne

http://www.192.com/atoz/business/banff-ab45/book-publishers/the-armorial-register-ltd/2002df0b3e1a51c80497031d877758168fea0550/comp/

http://www.araltas.com/services/register.html

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Burkes-Peerage-Gentry-International-Register/dp/0956815715/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1364820516&sr=8-1

http://www.americancollegeofheraldry.org/TANOCT06.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jedburgh

Hello Kiltpin,

Excuse me if I dont' whrite english well. I am french. I have seen one law text that souvenir plot were proposed by a Minister and accepted in 1979 in parliament as legal. I am trying to find it again to show it tou you. I would like to get your opinion. Kind regards --Raymondnivet (talk) 17:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Raymondnivet,

Only a plot of land that is big enough to be registered in the Land Register can be owned in The UK. Unless a person owns the land (that is to say, holds a title deed to that piece of land and has had it registered in the Land Registry) can they call themselves a landowner. Being a landowner is not equivalent to being a Laird. There is a minimum plot size which Lord Lyon has determined will be about 5 acres, before the owner can be called a Laird. The 1 metre X 1 metre plots are only a joke and not intended to be taken seriously. Lastly Laird is not the equivalent of Lord. Kind Regards Kiltpin (talk) 18:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re:Second China War Medal - Colours

It's possible, feel free to change it. --Lubicz (talk) 19:39, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Thanks for asking a great question about creating multiple sandboxes/userspace drafts. You can have as many as you need (well, there's probably some limit eventually), but it's great for you to be working on drafts. Come back to the Teahouse any time!

	Great Question Badge
	Awarded to those who have asked a great question on the Teahouse Question Forum. There are no stupid questions, but some are excellent! Good questions are those that reflect serious curiosity about editing and help others learn. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Ocaasi ^{t | c} 18:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user wears a kilt.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Armorial Register Limited. JohnCD (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Scottish culture kilt

Hi, i would like to have your opinion about a discussion which i started here, thank.Kingroyos (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the info. I will update the information on the Clan Cunningham page. You see it was a bit strange before because you had moved it into the clans with chiefs section even though the article was still saying that there is no chief. I will therefore update accordingly.QuintusPetillius (talk) 19:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Kiltpin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by McDoobAU93 14:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

		The Barnstar of Good Humor!
		Hello Kiltpin.Recently you have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much for signing my guestbook. Cheers.--Pratyya (Hello!) 13:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Armorial Register Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yopie (talk) 21:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Armorial Register Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Armorial Register Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yopie (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Yopie. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 23:17, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Now suddenly you want to collaborate? Three attacks against one article is not collaboration. You will not gain the moral high-ground by pretending to be friendly at this late stage. Editors need only to read the article history to see the truth of your actions for themselves. If you truly want to improve the article as you have said in the past - then do so. Show us all that you want to collaborate. You messaged me here, I will answer here, so all the evidence is kept together. As for respect, I will give you exactly as much as you have given me in the past. Kiltpin (talk) 23:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Kiltpin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Chamith (talk) 15:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

		Ascii002's Guestbook Barnstar
		This user has signed my guestbook and been presented with a barnstar. Sign my guestbook now if you have not yet!	-- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 00:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Grant of arms, by Lord Lyon, to the Armorial Register Ltd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Seal of the Armorial Register Ltd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The full achievement of the Armorial Register Ltd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for doing the arms of Walter de Huntercombe, 1st Baron Huntercombe. Do you do full armorial achievements? I would like to get a fuller version of File:Hugh Trenchard Arms.svg (see File:Armorial achievement of Lord Trenchard.jpg if you have the time. Thanks again. Greenshed (talk) 17:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know where you got the idea that "in summer 1982" is bad grammar. If you search Google you will find the phrase widely used by respectable sources. Why use four words where two will do?

Examples among many millions:

• "the number of incidents of malpractice in the GCSE and A level in summer 2014". UK government.
• "London domain name to launch in summer 2014". BBC News.
• "Your guide to things to do in Warwickshire in summer 2014". Coventry Telegraph.
• "Honey Bees Return in Summer 2014". University of Sussex.
• "These extra services operated in Summer 2014". Dales bus services.
• "The Royal Ballet tours to Moscow, Taipei and Shanghai in Summer 2014". Royal Opera House.
• "A message for students expecting to graduate in Summer 2014". Sheffield University.
• "the number of employers that plan to freeze pay has risen modestly to 10% in summer 2014". Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
• "We are currently accepting applications to start in summer 2014". Durham University.
• "Camouflage and gingham will be the prints du jour for Carven girls in summer 2014". Daily Telegraph.
• "India's tour of England in summer 2014". English Cricket Board.
• "Manchester United had one of their busiest transfer windows in recent memory in summer 2014". Manchester Evening News.
• "They'll play 13 dates in spring 2012". BBC Newsbeat.
• "In autumn 2003, 7.42 million people in employment in the UK were trade union members". Office for National Statistics.
• "360 table eggs from Finnish organic laying hens were collected in autumn 2003". Oxford Journals.
• "The provisional UK medical school intake figure in autumn 2003 was 7,559". Review Body on Doctors' and Dentists' Remuneration.
• "The survey was carried out across England and Scotland in Autumn 2003". Scottish Government.
• "Dematerialisation of UK Money Market Instruments (MMIs) is due to take effect in Autumn 2003". Bank of England.
• "In winter 2010 gritting became a political issue". The Guardian.
• "its banking sector spectacularly imploded in winter 2010". The Guardian.
• "11 of the UK's quirkiest events in summer 2014". Daily Mail.
• "In spring 2011, US energy group ExxonMobil made a horizontal test drill into shale rock". The Guardian.

-- Alarics (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Kiltpin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Kiltpin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Kiltpin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]