Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Antony Kay have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Antony Kay was changed by Knowledgework69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966532 on 2021-06-26T23:50:55+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:50, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Friedlemon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Antony Kay have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — Friedlemon⭐ ^💬 20:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Kingdom of Goatstonia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Hipkins, you may be blocked from editing. There is currently a discussion on the talk page. I am sorry but I am going to be reverting your edit, please seek consensus to change on the talk page before changing again. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 14:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just a general note. Knowledgework69, if you are in a content dispute with other editors, the appropriate way to sort this out to post on the talk page of the article where the dispute occurs. It is not appropriate to use the talk page of the other editor. It is essential to give other editors the chance to chip in and that is why the article talk page is the only appropriate place for having that discussion. Schwede66 20:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to John Loughrey (Royal Super fan). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you I posted it too early earlier by accident Knowledgework69 (talk) 16:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Knowledgework69! Your additions to Liverpool College have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Very well, I'll no longer oppose adding a pipelink to Monarchy of the United Kingdom. All the more so, as changing the redirect at Charles III's infobox, would mean adding pipe-links to the infoboxes of George I's to George VI's infoboxes. GoodDay (talk) 17:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Knowledgework69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Loughrey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]