Picture of the Day Pottery maker doing his work. Banshkhali, a village a few kilometres from Chittagong town, Bangladesh. For decades locals there have pursued a pottery tradition, crafting all manner of wares from raw clay to fire in the kilns.
Moritz Moszkowski Piano Concerto No. 1 – 2nd movement
Wikipedia and its stated ambition to “compile the sum of all human knowledge” are in trouble. The volunteer workforce that built the project’s flagship, the English-language Wikipedia has shrunk by more than a third since 2007 and is still shrinking.[citation needed] Those participants left seem incapable of fixing the flaws that keep Wikipedia from becoming a high-quality encyclopedia by any standard, including the project’s own.
Halfaker’s study, which he conducted with a Minnesota colleague and researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Washington, analyzed Wikipedia’s public activity logs.[citation needed] The results paint a numerical picture of a community dominated by bureaucracy. In their paper on those findings, the researchers suggest updating Wikipedia’s motto, “The encyclopedia that anyone can edit.”[who?] Their version reads: “The encyclopedia that anyone who understands the norms, socializes him or herself, dodges the impersonal wall of semi-automated rejection and still wants to voluntarily contribute his or her time and energy can edit.”
When asked to identify Wikipedia’s real problem, Moran cites the bureaucratic culture that has formed around the rules and guidelines on contributing, which have become labyrinthine over the years. In July 2012, some editors started a page called WikiProject Editor Retention with the idea of creating a place to help newcomers, fostering a friendlier atmosphere.[citation needed] Today the most vibrant parts of that project’s discussion page have gripes about “bullying done by administrators,” debates over whether “Wikipedia has become a bloody madhouse,” and disputes featuring accusations such as “You registered an account today just to have a go at me?”
Of 5,200 Wikipedians from all language editions of the project, 50 percent contributed more than one hour a day, and 20 percent edited for three or more hours a day (me!).[who?]
Hi!I'm musician from Ukraine and I have read a list of compositions of Kosenko that you made. Thank you for this really greate job:) I saw, that there was a section about songs that needs translations of their titles. All translations seems good. There was only one misunderstanding with words «ударники». It really means «percussionists», but also that word was very common during the time of Soviet union in Ukraine, and has a meaning like «very effective worker» or something like that.But the rest of the translations is ok.
Thank you once more and good luck!
--Natk (talk) 22:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Greetings. Shocked that this was missing!! Can you expand it/translate from Portuguese?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We haven't had the chance to work together yet Dr. Blofeld, but I am sure this will come to happen someday. I am right in the middle of recordings here, and I haven't had much time to spend with my wife and baby due to the amount of work I have ahead of me. Please, tell Rosie that I am in debt with her, something that I intend to rescue as soon as I can. I still don't know when this is going to happen, but as I say, once a Wikipedian, always a Wikipedian. Your admirer, KrenakaroreTK 11:36, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for September 25[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Guide for the Married Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heather Young. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for December 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Selma Kronold, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mount Pleasant Cemetery and La gioconda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm Italian, and in Italian the surname "D'Ambrosio" is generally spelled with an uppercase D. The same happens with similar surnames such as Di Bari or Di Venanzo. About references, see the books Storia del violino, dei violinisti e della musica per violino by Arnaldo Bonaventura, The Guadagnini Family of Violin Makers by Ernest N. Doring, Paganini: The 'demonic' Virtuoso by Mai Kawabata, Contributi storici e letterari by Vincenzo Napolillo, I Signori di Napoli by Sara Prossomariti. I can provide more sources if necessary. My best! Cavarrone 00:26, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No need. We'd better correct the spelling in other pages to avoid redirects too. I'm copying this note you left here to Talk:D'Ambrosio so that others understand what happened here today and prevent them from moving the page back in the future. Thanks, KrenakaroreTK 00:36, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for December 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hans Kronold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reverie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for December 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you, I will go after her. I have found two persons since I began peering into Kosenko's compositions. They have helped me greatly, but what I began still remains in my sandbox. Yes, I will complete the work as soon as I find somebody who might check Kosenko's museum in Kiev or any other a little more interested in explaining to me the meaning behind his compositions. Thank you very much indeed. KrenakaroreTK 14:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In Special:Diff/616518975, you added the text "lon_min407" to the infobox. I'm not sure whether you meant lon_min=40, lon_min=47, lon_min=07, or something else. I guessed 40 with Special:Diff/645654319. Can you check on this? Thanks, Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Frietjes has fixed the problem. Thank you ! KrenakaroreTK 19:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done ! Politics, specially Brazilian, is something very hard for me to digest my dear. I am an artist for I was born with wings ! KrenakaroreTK 21:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I see you were born with wings, and a quill, too, as you write well. Thank you for bringing Therezinha Zerbini's article to light. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, Any chance of translating these for us?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ha ha ha ha ha ha... Dr. Blofeld, if I saw you on the streets I'd most certainly say: Donald Pleasence, what you're doing here my friend (I really love the guy) ? I was reading your "likes and dislikes" on your User page today. Yes, films are very interesting, specially about obscure places hidden in a corner of the world (that makes me a bit more excited once I like tourism). Sometimes, I think that maybe I should reveal that music turns me on or pay him a visit and leave a message to a classical composer like Moszkowski (I collect his recordings, although I'm a bit busy with finding some information on Viktor Kosenko's compositions. Actually, I have just grabbed my hands on his manuscripts stored in the Vernadsky National Library's Manuscript Department in Kiev, which gives me the chance to produce something that has never been done before) ! But then again I remember that I'm about to take the plane back to Rio this coming August, this time with my wife and daughter, for a two-year retirement from Prague. Yes, I can do that, but why two little stubs ? KrenakaroreTK 21:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So are you going to create them or what? Perhaps Cattus could?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I was, but something happened. I've got somebody very close to me in the hospital. I can't put my mind on this now, sorry Dr. KrenakaroreTK 20:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Therezinha Zerbini has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]
Hello, Krenakarore. Therezinha Zerbini, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 16:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You know specifically when ? Where did you get this info, please ? Thanks, KrenakaroreTK 22:47, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It was mentioned in passing in Michael Dummett's Game of Tarot. The Stewart Culin collection contains a late 19th century pack which can be seen here and here. The high card of each suit is marked by a red stamp which is why the two high cards of the suit of tens is known to have been dropped before that time. You should also check out Gernot Prunner's Ostasiatische Spielkarten which contains a large catalogue of Chinese cards. --Countakeshi (talk) 07:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I know. I am a card game researcher, and what you've been doing here on card games in general was done by me, and previously by Hans Adler and User:2005. Nonetheless, you have an advantage once you're deeply involved with eastern cultures, so it seems. I have never read Tarot Games, but I've been trying to find it to buy. Thanks for providing the links, specially the mentioning of Gernot Prunner's Ostasiatische Spielkarten.
You said there: "At the end of each round, various bonuses can be achieved by producing melds from captured cards." This gave rise to another, named... ? Let me show you this conversation: January 2010 to August 2011. Anything you wish to comment, please ! KrenakaroreTK 06:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I see that you are researching information about the origins of Khanhoo and Mahjong? Andrew Lo wrote about Kanhu (看虎, Watching Tigers) also known as Douhu (斗虎, Competing with Tigers) in an article in The Playing-Card XXXI No. 5 p.221-229. An article by John Berry right after it compares and contrasts the Ming game to the Qing game. Lo translated a manual by Pan Zhiheng, the only surviving manual of that game. It coexisted with Madiao during the late Ming dynasty. Unlike Madiao in which tricks are played with one card each, Kanhu was a multi-trick game where combinations of cards are thrown and can only be beaten by higher combinations (see Tien Gow and Luk Fu). Hu (tiger) is one of the higher combinations and beats lower combinations called leopards. Neither Kanhu nor Madiao is related to the Yezi (Leaves) game of the Tang era. That game was a board game played with dice, the rules of which were lost during the Song dynasty. "Leaves" game was then reused during the Ming-Qing era to refer to card games which is why confusion arose about the Tang board game.--Countakeshi (talk) 11:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I research about the origins of Kanhoo (kanhu), whch was the very reason that brought me to Wikipedia.
Vol. 31 (2002-2003)
No. 5 Playing the Game: More Whist and comments on Tuppi Chinese Money Suited Cards
L.P. Holmblad - Danish playing-Card Maker: The Tarok Packs Pan Zhiheng's 'Xu Yezi Pu' Part 1
Tuppi: Lapland's National Game
No. 6 Playing the Game: Card Games in Iran
A Pack for the Prague 1908 Jubilee Exhibition Pan Zhiheng's 'Xu Yezi Pu' (Sequel to a Manual of Leaves) Part 2
Playing-cards of the Cuming Museum
By Kanhu, also known as Douhu (Dohu), you mean: Chinese Money Suited Cards by Andrew Lo, are you sure ? Another question is 看虎 Watching Tigers or 看虎 Watching the Pot ? So, by melding cards from captured cards gave rise to Dohu ? This is the very moment in time I have been researching for. For me, this moment is like standing in front of a door, which is closed, but I want to go through. I need to understand when the matching card game known today as Khanhoo was devised and put into practice. I wish to know the name of this game, how it was played, and compare them both. It would be very nice of you to lay your hands on the article Khanhoo (and believe me, you're the first user I ask this favor). I need more historical information. Do you play Khanhoo ? KrenakaroreTK 22:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"Xu Yezi Pu" (Part 1) is about the Ming version of Kanhu and is written by Lo. The article right after it is "Chinese Money-Suited Cards" by John Berry and it discusses links between the Ming game and its Qing successor. I will try to rewrite the Khanhoo article but I will have to gather more sources and compile them together. Here are some other interesting sources: the game of cuajo/kuwaho and 18th-century Chinese melding terminology. I'll also have to read "Asian Games: The Art of Contest" which also mentions Chinese card games. I believe "hu" originally meant tiger but was corrupted to mean lake or pot during the Qing dynasty. My theory is that the earliest card games were trick-taking games like Madiao, then they became multi-trick games like the Ming-era Kanhu, and finally became melding games like Qing-era Kanhu and Mahjong. I don't play Khanhoo.--Countakeshi (talk) 02:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)--Countakeshi (talk) 02:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not to rewrite it once the bulk of the article deals with game playing, but to add more historical content and describe the evolution of the game. What you have just said "about the Ming version of Kanhu" and "links between the Ming game and its Qing successor" might sum it up and that interests me greatly. How to play the game is there in two versions, Wilkinson's and that described by Culin. People around here added to the article and I would like to keep their contributions as well.
Your theory is correct, there was trick-taking games like Madiao (which evolved and gave rise to Khanhoo as we know it today), and multi-trick games like Tien Gow. The important here is not to confuse the readers and keep the article focused on the matching game itself (the article is about Wilkinson's version, that's why the western title Khanhoo) with all those sets of combinations.
Cuajo, yes I know. Before me coming to Wikipedia there was nothing on the net about Khanhoo, just an entry from Sid Sackson's Card Games Around the World. I still want to have it translated into French, Spanish, German and Italian to propel the information. I have been playing the game for 17 years and never exhaust discussing procedures, discards, memorization and strategy. I also collect sets produced by De La Rue. KrenakaroreTK 22:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have no better word to thank you than the word "thank you" itself. It is amazing how the article has now got greater depth with your timely intervention. Although I would like to keep a few things there for reference purposes, I have no time now to make the changes once I am in South America. Nonetheless, I can't go without saying I am greatful to you for everything and also that I am copying this conversation to my talk page for archival purposes, with your consent of course ! Oh by the way, I still look up to a colorful picture to replace the black-and-white one you put there to illustrate the article Khanhoo. A million thank you again for elucidating a few things about the game, nomenclature, and related content of course, once I have this game in great account. What it is and means today is a lot more clear in my head thanks to you. KrenakaroreTK 01:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You're welcome. I don't mind if you save this. Regarding the picture, you would be unlikely to find any coloured cards dating before the 20th century. Money-suited cards are monochromatic except for honour cards which are marked with red stamps. There are a few things I left out of the article. Pan Zhiheng is the only known source for the old rules which he wrote down in 1613. He learned the game in 1609 and witnessed the creation of the Pangolin combo. He says a certain Li Baowen invented this meld during one winter's night in Nanjing in a room by the Qinhuai River. You may have noticed that the highest special combo in the Ming game, the Hero, did not survive into the Qing game. It is also the only special combo without a card from the Cash suit. Pan's allegorical explanation is that the Hero is one who has abandoned greed to lift the morale of his army. Culin and Wilkinson disagreed regarding one of the melds in the Qing version. Wilkinson's account matches the "Wealth" combo in the Ming version and is more logical but he never published this discovery. Agreeing with Wilkinson is Tcheng Ki-tong (1890), which may be a pseudonym of Frenchman Adalbert-Henri Foucault de Mondion. By comparing the two versions, the Qing special meld of 1, 2, and 3 Cash isn't really a special at all and is just a "boy". --Countakeshi (talk) 15:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You may be interested to know that the Vietnamese game of Tổ tôm is closely related to the Qing version of Khanhoo.--Countakeshi (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear Krenakarore, I've decided to be WP:BOLD and copied your list of Kosenko's works to the main space. Thank you for the enormous work you did! I'll be using this as a great example to educate our "academics" who spend their careers on things far less important than such a basic but crucial work as compiling lists of works of composers.
The reason I decided to do this is that I've finally got a reply from the director of Kosenko museum where she said that even they don't have a complete list of his works nor do they have all of his manuscripts. She said that the only way to continue the research would be to go to Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, where some manuscripts may be. However, this task is not something I can do in near future (I don't live in Kyiv). I know a musician who works in the Library researching Ukrainian baroque music though and I'll try to reach for his help with this. However, I think at this point, although incomplete, your list is the most complete list of Kosenko's works in existence and should be in the main space.
Thank you once again, Krenakarore, and please forgive me for these enormous delays on my side. Truly yours, Yury Bulka (talk) 14:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yury Bulka, this was an unusual and bold step, but it's not really the proper way to go. There are two problems. First of all, you didn't ask the editor's permission; that's not really OK. Second, you copied the text into the mainspace, and that removes the history. In this case, that also removes the evidence of the extraordinary amount of work this editor put into it. So I took the bold and unusual step of deleting the article, and I note that only a few more edits were made, so there wasn't much history to delete. Rosiestep, this was an unusual case, but I don't really see the advantage of cutting and pasting and whatnot. We can do that, of course, but ONLY if Krenakarore is OK with what the article looked like in mainspace. Krenakarore, it's up to you: keep it in your sandbox (but Юрій Булка has a point: you're hiding your candle under a bushel), move it to mainspace yourself via a simple MOVE, in which case the history is all yours, or have me do the work of restoring the article again in mainspace with your entire history in it and a few edits by Юрій Булка. Drmies (talk) 02:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you. This list is not only incomplete, but needs a lot more work and effort put to it. Also, it presents some inconsistencies and other issues yet to be addressed. And yes, the importance of the article in question does go beyond Wikipedia. Mr. Shcherbakov, President of Ukrainian Composers Union and correspondent-member of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts will assist me from now on. Too many people involved in all this work, beyond boundaries. Thank you for your understanding, patience and assistance. I will move the article to mainspace as soon as it is ready. KrenakaroreTK 23:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Drmies:, I just want to make clear that I didn't at all intend to claim Krenakarore's work (I'm sorry it may have appeared so). When I copied the list in the edit summary I explicitly thanked Krenakarore for his priceless contribution and gave a link to the original sandbox. I couldn't just rename the page because he's already working on another article there. How else can I fulfill the attribution requirement of the license? Also, since it's already cc by-sa on the sandbox, I already have a permission to make a copy provided that I fulfill the requirements of the license. Also, I'd like to know which rule exactly I broke (and how I could have done it properly instead) and by which criteria the article was removed. Thanks, Yury. --Yury Bulka (talk)
I strongly suggest that we should try to resolve this problem by encouraging Krenakarore to put the list under development on the mainspace. I fully understand Юрій Булка's concern to post the list of compositions in connection with the article but also appreciate the problem of attribution. To sort things out, would it not be possible to give users the benefit of three years of hard work by moving the file at User:Krenakarore/sandbox into the mainspace, possibly with an explanation that the list is still under development?--Ipigott (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just want to add that this list if already of extreme value despite being incomplete. There's no such detailed list available anywhere else, and I think it's just a pity to have such a useful resource buried somewhere in the history of a user namespace subpage. --Yury Bulka (talk) 21:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 6[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jāzeps Vītols, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Invitation to a virtual editathon on Women in Music[edit]
Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool[edit]
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.
Thanks,
Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Krenakarore. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Krenakarore. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The Numismatic Collaboration of the Month will be making a return in May. Feel free to make nominations.
Project news
As you can see, the project now has a newsletter. This first issue was sent to all members, but future issues will only be sent to users who subscribe.
A new task force focusing on American currency has been started.
A barnstar was created for the project last month, Enterlousy was the first to be awarded.
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal!
With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.
If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here
I wanted to nominate it for DYK, but many sections are still not referenced at the end, - a minimum requirement. Will you do it? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sure, my pleasure ! I'll do it tomorrow morning ok ? KrenakaroreTK
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Comet Jacques.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cắt tê until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 28[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of compositions by Alexandre Goria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offenbach. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 4[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
.png){kind=logo}
