Hi. When you uploaded Image:IMGP0629PHB2005DARGO.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with ((GFDL-presumed)) and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually ((GFDL-self)) or ((PD-self)). Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 22:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMGP0629.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 22:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

http://www.myhospitalmap.org.uk/Bridgend/PrincessofWalesHospital.aspx

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion on the article Nick Clegg Says I'm Sorry (The Autotune Remix) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. ansh666 19:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Littlemonday (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Pissflap69". The reason given for Pissflap69's block is: " Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text ((unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)) at the end of your user talk page. ".

• Blocking administrator: Oshwah (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: I've removed the autoblock; you should be able to edit now. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:13, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have no idea who "Pissflap69" is! Paulharding150 (talk) 14:10, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you have a very good point about one candidate being just below 5%. But I did not agree with your solution, since it produced a mathematically incorrect result. So I have added an extra decimal place to the percentages.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neil McEvoy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Labour and Riverside. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YesCymru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YesCymru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 17:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Paulharding150. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huw Irranca-Davies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rebecca Evans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Paulharding150, thanks for creating List of Plaid Cymru AMs!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources and categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Boleyn (talk) - could you help me get the reference list and the 'also see' section' to the bottom of the page? Paulharding150 (talk) 13:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I tried but failed, sorry! Boleyn (talk) 12:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Paul, you added a "Changes by 2017" table to City of Cardiff Council election, 2012 last year, but I'm not sure what it refers to. Is it supposed to give the position of the parties before the 2017 election? And when is "current"? Cheers. Sionk (talk) 17:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Sionk I put it up before the 2017 elections to indicate the then state of the parties as there had been quite a lot of movment (defections, expulsions and by-elections etc) between 2012 and 2017. It's no longer needed so I've deleted it.

Thanks for creating Welsh Labour Party deputy leadership election, 2018, Paulharding150!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A well-organised and well-referenced article.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Cwmhiraeth that's possibly the nicest thing anyone's ever said to me on Wikipedia!

Re your reversion of my changes, while you're right that changes shouldn't consider defections, you're incorrect that it should ignore by-elections. The comparison should be based on previously elected councillors. If there has been a by-election these councillors have been elected. If they subsequently loose the seat at an election, this is a loss. By the way I checked this with the WikiProject Elections and Referendums and they concurred. Sionk (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sionk I would argue that changes in the results table for 2017 should be made in comparison to the results from 2012 - which is how it would be presented by the BBC for example on election night. If the policy here is to do it differently I think the table at the top of the page should some how reflect it.

There were an unusually high number of seats changing hands in Cardiff between 2012-2017, the bulk of which then reverted back to their 2012 affiliation come the election in 2017.

Either way I've added a section to the 2012 page showing defections and resignations (in addition to the by-election section) Paulharding150 (talk) 10:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The list of defections/resignations is handy and well researched/sourced, well done! As for the BBC comparing the numbers of seats in 2017 to the numbers in 2012, well, that is different from counting who lost and who gained seats at the election itself. The election results would normally list the results at the election, rather than comparison with a date 5 years beforehand. Sionk (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:43, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Paul, can I politely add my two penn'orth to Celia Homeford's above? You are still marking most of your edits as minor when clearly they are not. See Help:Minor edit. Cheers! Tony Holkham (Talk) 12:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User talk:Tony Holkham I do apologise, I was treating that box as a minor update I guess. I apologise.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Alun Davies (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eluned Morgan

Welsh Labour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ron Davies

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Littlemonday. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interim Morgan Government, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeffrey Cuthbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Davies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kim McGuinness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Roundmaster (talk) 13:04, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kim McGuinness, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

_pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 19:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Plaid Cymru election. Since you had some involvement with the Next Plaid Cymru election redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm happy for this to be deleted. Littlemonday (talk) 09:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Eustice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Heath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Next National Assembly for Wales election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, this is in reply to your note on my commons user page. You need to be aware of the differences between English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. English Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and Wikimedia Commons is a repository of free-use media. They are both projects of the Wikimedia Foundation, but they are distinct and have different rules.

The important difference here is that Commons only accepts free files, but Wikipedia can in some circumstances accept non-free files. You linked to the picture of John Smith at this URL:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Smith_1992.jpg

You can tell that this file is hosted on Wikipedia because of its en.wikipedia.org domain and the Wikipedia globe logo at the top left of the page. Files hosted on Commons have URLs like this:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mandy_Jones_AM_2018.jpg

A confusing feature is that when you click on an image in a Wikipedia article you may initially be shown Wikipedia page on the image, such as this:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mandy_Jones_AM_2018.jpg

However, that page contains the text

• This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. Information from its description page there is shown below.

This message is not shown in File:John Smith 1992.jpg.

To add a non-free image to Wikipedia you should first establish that it meets the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. Pictures of dead people used to illustrate their Wikipedia articles normally qualify, providing that no free image of the person is available.

To upload an image to Wikipedia you can click on the Upload file link on the left side of any Wikipedia page. Then click on the Upload Wizard link (or you could use one of the alternative links in the 'Wikipedia' column).

You need to include a non-free use rationale. There are instructions for this at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline, but I suspect that most uploaders adapt the rationale from a similar image page. The rationale at File:John Smith 1992.jpg looks ok, or you could adapt one of mine which are listed here.

A separate rationale is required for every place in which the image is shown. While you can often use a non-free picture in the person's biographical article, it is unlikely to be acceptable in other articles. For example, 1992 Labour Party leadership election does not include a picture of John Smith.

Where possible, it may help to crop the image before you upload it and to mention this under "Respect for commercial opportunities". The image should be low resolution, I think the rule of thumb is 100,000 pixels (e.g. 400 x 250), but a bot might reduce high-resolution non-free images automatically.

Feel free to ask me if you need help.

Regards, Verbcatcher (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brynteg School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Lions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Marek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assembly Member (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your addition to Brynteg School has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is not your first warning on this issue. Gab4gab (talk) 12:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Gab4gab (talk), I had copied a paragraph from a school prospectus which to the best of my knowledge is not copywritted and is reproduced in good faith and correctly attributed/referenced. Please could you explain what I've done wrong, rather than copying and pasting a standard warning from wikipedia? Regards Littlemonday (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Littlemonday, thank you for responding. The link you provided for your source results in '404 - Page Not Found' for me so I've taken the liberty of modifying your link. In general published materials are copyrighted with or without an explicit copyright declaration. I did notice there was no mention of copyright in the document. No mention it is public domain either. Perhaps I'm wrong, shall we let the reviewing admin make the call? Gab4gab (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The link works for me: http://bryntegschool.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Brynteg_Welcome_Booklet_2015-16.pdf Happy for you to let an admin decide if it should stay or not. Littlemonday (talk) 15:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also futher to this, the quote is in a book published in 1986, so even if the school's own prospectus is deemed copywrited (even though it doesn't say) it can still be included as look as the book (rather than the prospectus) is referenced: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ChvOUlDH8v9nDr4BuZx5k3zeysL40iBS/view?usp=sharing Littlemonday (talk) 16:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I was wondering if you could please make some fixes on some polling tables? On the page Leadership approval opinion polling for the next Senedd Cymru election it is stated to use dmy dates but the tables are incorrectly dated month and then day. I managed to change this around (see my edit in the history section for how) but it messed up the 'date to' section. I realised how to fix this but I have no programme or automated way to do it and I kept messing up somewhere along the process of individually fixing each date. I was wondering if you could please help? Helper201 (talk) 21:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have fixed this. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]