User talk:Lokys dar Vienas/Archive1

Hi! Labas!

Thank you for contributing to Lithuania related articles! I just noticed your edits to Lithuania-related articles and thought you would like to join the Lithuania WikiProject, an initiative to improve coverage of Lithuania-related topics on Wikipedia. You can read the top 10 tips for Lithuanian editors, ask a question, get updates on new articles, and figure out the best way you can help. To stay informed you might want to add the WikiProject page to your watchlist and sign up. Feel free to join anytime!

-- Pofka (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Za Beograd, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:59, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, List of hillforts in Lithuania, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for this interesting article, which I've reviewed. I've also done some light copy-editing. It wasn't clear whether you intended UK or US spelling, as there were elements of both. I've normalised it throughout to UK spelling, but by all means change to US spelling if that's what you had in mind, as long as it's consistent. Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 07:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry - thought you'd finished. I'll leave it alone while you're working on it but please note the point about ENGVAR consistency. Ingratis (talk) 07:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erla (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erla Þorsteinsdóttir. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Dnieper into Dnieper basin. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DanCherek: - Talk pages marked with "copied". Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 20:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Gerasim Adamović is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Lokys dar Vienas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Za Beograd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Za Beograd (2).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:08, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]