This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Lordkinbote,
I thought it would amuse those reading about Raymond Loewy that, after designing so many locomotives in life, he happened to design another long after his death through UP's use of his Air Force One livery on UP4141.
It was not my intention to conduct a test nor to be destructive. I find it frustrating that I have not figured out how to contribute to the substance of articles because of my inability to understand the jargon, procedures, and etiquette involved. (For example, I do not know who you are, what your role is, or whether you will see this.) There must be a better way.
Bob Nelson lionelsoni@aol.com
I noticed you put in a bunch of the USNS Mission XXX (AO-xx) articles. You had the class directory after the categories. For some reason that fouled up the alphabetic sorting on the category page. Anyway, I've fixed a few and will do the rest in a second, but wanted you to know that the only thing that goes below categories is a stub.--J Clear 02:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Please do not revert my edits to Transcontinental railroad without providing a reason for your belifs. I am perfectly prepared to discuss the merits of the railroad you suggest is transcontinental in a rational fashion, and in my edit summary have given the reason why I edited the page. The Proffesor 20:22, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page before I even noticed it. Erechtheus 00:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
It was not a test, The film is spanish to belive it or not is up to you.--87.218.133.252 10:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
The message that you left me, which is at User_talk:Wj32, was that I was experimenting with that page. But actually all I did was try revert the vandalism after Luna Satin had reverted the page. Then it decided to revert to the vandalised version. Sorry.
--wj32 04:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for defending my user page! :) Jacek Kendysz 13:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
If you have the time and inclination, I'd appreciate it if you would "weigh-in" on the current discussion at Talk:Hippolyte de Bouchard; it could use some objective, outside feedback. Regards, Lord Kinbote 22:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
I'd love to know if your sources do consistently refer to Bouchard as Buchar (which sounds like the spanish-ization of the French surname, anyway). At least in Argentina, I've never heard something like that. Thanks in advance, User:Ejrrjs says What? 22:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Lordkinbote, thank you for your edits today. Be aware that several editors are actively making changes on this article. As of yet, research and re-write continues with completion expected in about one (1) year. You are invited to make comments on the talkpage. And please take a moment to note the section for new and future editors lableled Please Read. --meatclerk 04:50, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
GA status has been graciously granted to the California Gold Rush article, and if it would be possible, I'd like to tinker with the article for another week or so, and get some additional voices involved, before considering an FA application. In addition, San Francisco was just the FA, and I'm not sure another California-themed FAC would be a good idea quite so soon. Any thoughts?NorCalHistory 22:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Let's resolve the issue on the talk page before any more changes are made. --evrik (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I've registered my move oppose vote on this. Mdhennessey 20:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Would you two please stop your edit warring. --evrik (talk) 21:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
This change to the article Spanish missions in California is another example of the changes I see should be made. --evrik (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)