You will be reported to admins for false vandalism accusation. 2409:4072:796:B467:DBD8:9737:B792:5FC2 (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, MSubhan009, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Veronika (Ukrainian singer), seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for Organizations

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorials
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! POLITANVM ^talk 12:41, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to 65 (film) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 14:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Pakistan Star
		Keep updating WikiProject Pakistan. MKhalidButt (talk) 02:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Habibullah Mayar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Habibullah Mayar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, MSubhan009! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you there?? Sheikh Habib Rahman (talk) 13:43, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I am here.Muhammad Subhan (talk) 13:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I need your help on Wikipedia! How can I contact you more easily? Sheikh Habib Rahman (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Origins of enterprise architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attribute. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have reverted your last edits to National Council of Jewish Women because you added far, far too many wikilinks. Please review MOS:OVERLINK... we should not normally wikilink common, everyday words. SaltySaltyTears (talk) 06:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SaltySaltyTears (talk · contribs). Thank you for updating me about this policy of Wikipedia. Please keep guiding me.Muhammad Subhan (talk) 06:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome! There were some good edits you made to that article. Some good grammar corrections. Perhaps I should have taken the time to remove the unnecessary links, and leave your good edits... I will go and look at them and add them back. Anyway, thank you for your contributions. SaltySaltyTears (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Casino game. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:46, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi MSubhan009, I'd like to ask you to be more careful when you copyedit articles. You have made a substantial number of copyedits to articles, and unfortunately many of them have either added grammar errors or changed the meaning of the text. I have checked 10 random edits from your contributions history, and only one didn't add any errors. For instance, I don't understand why you added "them" here, why you changed the name "Blackboots" to "Black boots" here, or why you changed "being" to "is" here, changing a perfectly grammatical sentence to a run-on sentence. The copyedits mentioned in another notice above, to National Council of Jewish Women, were also not improvements. British English spelling ("labour") should not be used in articles about organisations in the United States (more information WP:ENGVAR), and "a long involvement in" is not an improvement on "a long improvement with". It is also rather pointless to copyedit fundamentally inappropriate text such as this; the first of the changes you made in that edit changed a grammatically correct sentence to a sentence fragment, but even if it had been a correct change, the text was basically an advert, which is not appropriate in Wikipedia. That edit also changed text that was quoted straight from a source. Did you check the source to verify exactly what it said?

You have made several hundred copyedits to different articles, and they all need to be checked. Your contributions history also shows that you are making these changes very rapidly, with only a few minutes between each edit. Again, please be more careful, and make sure that each and every change you make is actually necessary, or at least not an error. --bonadea contributions talk 07:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bonadea: Thank you for writing a detailed comment and teaching me the right way for editing Wikipedia. Please keep teaching me by have close look at my edits. I really understand how to do copyedits in the right way. Muhammad Subhan (talk) 13:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:UA85 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UA85. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  GeneralNotability (talk) 02:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MSubhan009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wasn't aware of the use of multiple accounts policy of Wikipedia. MKhalidButt (talk · contribs) is my account, but I don't have any link with UA85 (talk · contribs) and Marktala (talk · contribs). I really apologize, If Wikipedia policies and guidelines were heart due to the misuse of multiple Wikipedia accounts. Please unblock this account and continue your block on my second account User:MKhalidButt. I am learning Wikipedia policies and guidelines and I understand from this block; Wikipedia is not allowed the misuse of multiple Wikipedia accounts. For accountability and increase, community trust Wikipedia is generally expected to use only one account by an editor. I understand the case of block and I think the block is no longer necessary because I understand Why I am blocked from editing, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions on Wikipedia. Thank you. Muhammad Subhan (talk) 12:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

Oh come on. Learning? Bullshit. MER-C 14:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@GeneralNotability: you blocked me from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Would you like to review my appeal? I wasn't really aware of the use of the multiple account policy of Wikipedia. I will never repeat this mistake again and will focus on constructive edits. Muhammad Subhan (talk) 13:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If I hadn't blocked you for using multiple accounts, I would have blocked you for spamming. I believe you are related to UA85 based on your choice of spam websites, though it's always possible you're adding the same spam independently of each other. It's spam either way. Further, I would expect that most administrators will find it difficult to believe that you were acting in good faith when you added "references" to, for example, sketchy Polish and Portugese casino websites. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GeneralNotability: I agree with you that references added by me are spam, due to lack of knowledge of policies like Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines which help me to understand good sources and bad sources. On the other hand, I will focus to read, understand and practice all the major policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. With time I will get help from my mentor @Ahmetlii: and some other experienced editors on Wikipedia. My primary focus will be productive contributions to Wikipedia.Muhammad Subhan (talk) 18:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]