Please remember that i am a human being, before commenting here. I have archived past talk pages at User talk:Mercurywoodrose/ArchiveX, with X=1-13

I don't know if you remember it, but it looks like you are about to win Wikipedia:Six-million pool. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• There's still a chance he might not, if Wikipedia hasn't reached six million before 26 March 2020. JIP | Talk 22:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, Bri suggested a brief interview for The Signpost. I don't know exactly where we'll put it, but at least part of it will make it into the next issue.
• Q1: What are you going to do with the $6,000,000 prize? (just kidding!)

I don't know, but if i get in a catastrophic test plane accident and have my legs, one arm, and one eye destroyed, I know what I am doing with $6,000,000. Gentlepersons, they can rebuild me. They have the technology. They have the capability to build the world's first bionic Wikipedian. Mercurywoodrose will be that editor. Better than he was before. Better, stronger, faster, with more reliable sources.

• Q2: Do you remember why you made the December 2019 prediction 6 years ago?

I figured I knew just enough about mathematics to make a somewhat accurate back of the napkin estimate for the date, factoring in a bit of the slowdown in new article creation, and believing that this downward trend in new articles would continue. I'm sure I must have done an actual calculation, but the methods I used would probably give an actual statistician apoplexy. It was a miseducated guess.

• Q3: What's the biggest change you've seen in Wikipedia you've seen in that time (other than a couple of million articles)

A team of editors with way too much time on their hands created an automation system for creating new Portals. What's a Portal, you ask? exactly... On a side note, the biggest change that did NOT occur is that the Deletionists and the Inclusionists are still engaged in a Manichean struggle, with neither side winning. The proof of this is that the number of articles has not gone to zero, decreased by a factor of Thanos, or expanded to infinity and beyond.

• Q4: How many articles have you created?

310. using created by me, and adding up the total articles by HAND. Computers! Ha! Who needs them! I did get into the top 400 editors by edit count, which of course is a meaningless measure, but it was fun while it lasted.

• Q5: What's your prediction for the 8,000,000th article? (the 7,000,000 pool is closed)

I cannot predict that, its beyond my processing capacity as a quasi-quantum computer, but I know what i would LIKE it to be. An article about ME, of course. Hopefully for something worthwhile, not notorious. First Wikipedian to be shot into the Sun for being too sarcastic? Well, that's sort of both...

• Q6: Is all the effort going into creating all these articles worth it? Shouldn't we be concentrating on quality over quantity by now? (Sorry, if that one is too serious)

I will answer with an entirely unrelated story: Paul Krassner, in his autobiography Confessions of a Raving, Unconfined Nut, wrote about Stewart Brand, Whole Earth Catalog confabulator, "He could be more of a minimalist than Bob Dylan. I told Brand about the time I went to hear Ram Dass speak, and in the audience a heckler shouted out his capsule critique, "Words!" I told Brand I later learned that the heckler had once ***** a goat. Brand scoffed, "Deeds!""

• Q7: What's your favorite article out of the last million created (since November 1, 2015)?

Aside from my own articles created during this time, of which my favorite subject is Jen Bartel (she rocks), I don't know. How about new articles on things i like? My first thought, I really loved Joker. That article was created, oh, wow, on my birthday! I didn't expect that!.

• Q8: Anything else you want to add? Feel free to be serious, philosophical, sentimental, humorous, thank your mother, etc.

I'm a little sad that new editors will be facing an ever more complete work, with fewer areas to expand without being an expert. Perhaps we should consider erasing Wikipedia every few decades, and recreating it from scratch, to give new editors that initial experience of joy and wonder that they can be part of this, not just an observer, by clicking that innocent little "edit" tab. But maybe there is hope, maybe that sense of wonder will persist into the future. I know I fell in love with Wikipedia, and while I'm no longer obsessed with editing, I may fall in love all over again.

Thanks,

Smallbones_(smalltalk) 05:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations for winning the Wikipedia:Six-million pool! JIP | Talk 19:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

woooooohoooooo!!!! Congrats to you!!!!!! How are you celebrating? --User101010 (talk) 20:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What a shame it had to be an insane TDSer... Alex Devens (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

extra thanks to you for reading part of my userpage. notice i have not made a single edit of a political nature that i can recall, as i am too close to that topic. oh, and FU too for that wonderful effort at shaming and humiliating me by labelling me when you dont know me. right back at ya bub!!Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:17, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! (And damn, I was only a few months off this time...) Robofish (talk) 21:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo! Good job and have a good 2020! :) TheDaJakester^Talk 22:59, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks all. what else would i do? im going to disneyland!! no, im eating a pickle. Nathans kosher pickles are quite good. so are Bubbies.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:09, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COngrats on winning the six million pool! Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some people are expressing concerns (a concern I share) about the content of your user page, which seems to have several sections which run afoul of WP:POLEMIC and WP:BLP in particular. Perhaps you could review what you have there, and take down anything which could be viewed as unhelpful in the light of those policies. Thanks. --Jayron32 15:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

will do. give me a bit of time please, but i will remove at least the obvious personal statements.i was not aware of that policy, though i probably could have discerned it.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 15:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--Jayron32 16:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chushingura English movie poster 1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mercurywoodrose, just wanted to let you know I removed the section about the Berkeley Research Reactor into its own article, and widened it a bit. best, Pratat (talk) 07:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Columbussalamelogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fruit Gushers packaging.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mount Saint Joseph Cemetery (Hayward, California) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable cemetery that fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Burrows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Burrows (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 13:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mission Hills of Hayward Golf Course is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission Hills of Hayward Golf Course until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skywest Golf Course is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skywest Golf Course until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:McMinnville UFO Photograph.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Veryhungrycaterpillargoogle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Northern California Public Broadcasting has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you may be interested in, Jessi Slaughter cyberbullying case, has just been undeleted. Any help you could give to this, included BLP-related edits, would be very much appreciated. --Bangalamania (talk) 11:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simon Chimbetu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Founder. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CityOfHayward.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shambhala Publications books has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jar'Edo Wens hoax is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jar'Edo Wens hoax (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Mercurywoodrose:

I work at the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, and was wondering if you might consider helping me with some updates to the page. I understand I am in a conflict of interest relationship with SVCF and respect the related Wikipedia rules to not edit the page directly. Given you are a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject California/San Francisco Bay Area task force, I was wondering if you might find it a good use of your time to go over to the foundation’s talk page to review my proposed edits. I appreciate your time and any feedback you may have for me. Thank you and best David svcf (talk) 17:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Reducedfatrufflesbag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HarperOne logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How come did you classify Mother of Storms as low importance, Not just once but twice. It's got nominations for major literary prizes up the wazoo. What gives? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tonic water with quinine Can I have a delivered to my house? I live in Hurricane Utah. Also the only place I seem to be able to get it is Harmons, in St. George Utah. But they seem to always be out of it. 199.101.205.145 (talk) 17:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Primus Power is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primus Power until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oliver Virk (talk) 10:20, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Elbert Benjamine AKA C. C. Zain.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Church of Light#Brotherhood of Light which doesn't really meet WP:NFCC#8. This file was originally being used a stand-alone article about Benjamine/Zain in C.C. Zain, but that article was merged into the one about "Church of Light" per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. C. Zain. Most as part of the merge related cleanup, the image was also simply moved to "Church of Light" as well, but that completely changes the justification for the file's non-free use. Generally, a non-free image of a deceased person is often allowed when the image is used for primary identification purposes in the main infobox or at the top of a stand-alone article about the deceased because the entire article is about the deceased and this usually considered sufficient to meet WP:NFC#CS and long as the remaining nine non-free content use criteria are all also satisfied. However, moving the image to another article, particularly to an in-body section, completely changes the justification for the file's non-free use and in such cases a much stronger justification (e.g. actual critical commentary obout the image itself) is considered necessary than simply wanting to show the individual in question. There's nothing really in article about Benjamine/Zain in the article about the church that reqiures the reader actually see this particular image. It's nice perhaps, but not needed to understand anything written in the article; therefore, using it doesn't really significantly improve the reader's understand to such a degree that not seeing it would be detrimental to that understanding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alameda County sheriffs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 22:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Chamberlain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Chamberlain (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hirolovesswords (talk) 08:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]