Hi mike you edited saying I need reputable sources but I have 2 from the telegraph and empire on the dark knight rises page can I not use those 2 as sources again saying it’s regarded as one of the best films ever using there words? They both regard it and are trustworthy or is only one of them since the other is a poll. Thank you Jaszen (talk) 20:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. You also added [1] as a source which doesn't fall under Wikipedia:REPUTABLE. The article already says "and one of the best films of the 2010s" with multiple reliable sources. —Mike Allen 20:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So how many reputable sources would it take to it for it to fall under best films of all time. Telegraph is already one do I need one more? Jaszen (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC) or can I move those 2 sources over from best of the decade to best ever. I apologize if I’m not making sense I’m still a new editorReply[reply]

I guess what I'm trying to say is you will need at least 3 or more reliable sources that call it "one of the best films of all time". The article is a Wikipedia:GOODARTICLE so it's already pretty accurate. —Mike Allen 21:18, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I guess I need one more reputable source. Ok thank you for answering quickly helping me understand. Jaszen (talk) 21:26, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

on the dark knight trilogy there are four sources already saying rises is best ever. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_in_film#The_Dark_Knight_trilogy_(2005–2012) Are they usable? Jaszen (talk) 22:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Those only indicate "best trilogies ever made". You may want to bring it up on the article talk page. —Mike Allen 22:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When you scroll down the page there are 4 links it’s regarded as best films. The. Should I link them to show you? Jaszen (talk) 22:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On my newer edit you said I was bordering on disruptive editing but I was just asking the question the user who removed it posted which was that it might count as an aggregate Jaszen (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User polls and Wiki's are usually not reliable. See WP:USERGENERATED Mike Allen 18:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok thank you for the explanation Jaszen (talk) 18:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mike, I wanted to say hello, and that it is good to see you around again! Hope all is well. :) Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 14:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Erik! I really have no particular reason why I quit editing for so long. Maybe because I was in my early 20s starting new things in real life and now I'm in my early 30s and have no life lol. It is great to see you are still active here, you were one the editors I really admired here. I've just been trying to catch up on new ways to do things. Thanks for the message.  :) Mike Allen 15:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome back! I would say to check out WP:LIBRARY since that is likely new for you and good for in-depth research about certain topics. Other than that, the MOS has changed a little but not too much. There's a new review-aggregator fad in town to use templates to write Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic the exact same way across articles, which I really loathe... There also seems to be a new tendency lately for editors to add in the lead section their OR take on how critics received a film overall. Lugnuts got kicked off Wikipedia. I'm trying to encourage better practices in some ways with my essay User:Erik/Best practices, but it's a very uphill battle. If you have thoughts as a reader about any of these practices, feel free to share and challenge anything. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 14:45, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm seeing a lot more use of templates. Like ((plainlist)) inside infoboxes, ((Short description)), ((Use mdy dates)), etc. Also, I saw that RT template being used on a few big articles like Avatar: The Way of Water and thought it was the norm now. So, I added it to the Saw articles (GAs that are way outdated and am now trying to go in and save). 😞 I have noticed quite of few editors from back then have been banned. :\ Thanks. I will check out the essay.

I see you temporarily removed the marketing section in the new Mario movie's article. How do you propose it be shortened?

Also, I'd like to apologize for my role in attempting to keep the article from being too one-sided in favor of what I call Pratt Apologetics. Colonel Knight Rider (talk) 07:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. It was reverted with no reason given, but I started a discusion on the talk page. Mike Allen 16:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Excuse me, sir, but i've been complained by InfiniteNexus and RedRose about my task force for Skydance Media. I'm sort of new to it and i need to know how to make a good example of a task force. Any advice to making the task force without going... you know. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 20:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I haven't really been active in the last ten years, so I'm not really sure how sub task forces work. I am part of the Saw Taskforce, but when I came back a month ago, I unfortunately found it to be dead. Reading Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/Task forces might be helpful for you. Mike Allen 23:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

yeah, though so far i need to get 6 more members in for a 10-membered work force. Thanks for the fix on The Family Plan. It's a good Skydance film coming up and the studios means a lot to me. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 02:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You cretin: As a professional that I am and as they say in Latin America: I only deal with the circus owner(s), not with the clowns. So don't threaten me, you are not an administrator or anything else and I only answer to the administrators. JeanCastì (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Um, there a reason that your edit relating to the character is reverted. CastJared (talk) 14:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Which edit are you talking about? Mike Allen 15:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

David, which he is from The Last of Us. CastJared (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't. The IP did which I reverted. Mike Allen 15:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not move articles by copying and pasting, then nominating the original for deletion. That destroys the article history, which is necessary for meeting the attribution requirements of our free licenses. And that article had a surprising amount of history for its length.

I've deleted your copied…copy and moved the original article to Draft:The Nightingale (upcoming film) in its place. — Cyrius|✎ 05:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]