This user is not currently active on Wikipedia. MilborneOne has not edited Wikipedia since 7 September 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

Hi, recently there is a bunch of unregistered IP accounts that made changes to Road Signs in Malaysia. For example, look at a recent reverted edit: Recent Diff. These accounts seem to replace newer format signs to older format signs, changing new svg files back to old png files and removing the descriptions of each sign.

After geolocating all these IP accounts, they seem to be from Indonesia from the same ISP. Here are the IPs that made disruptive edits to the article (so far): 114.122.164.68
114.122.167.108
114.122.165.81
114.122.169.242
114.122.167.25

Its gotten to the point where they made edits everyday just to be reverted by another user. I hope something can be done.

Thanks ItsTomato (talk) 10:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Semi-protected to encourage talk page discussion. MilborneOne (talk) 10:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

After the protection time was over, the IP users continue to do disruptive editing on Road signs in Malaysia, still with a different IP from the same ISP. I don't think they will even consider discussing at the talk page since all of these edits were mobile edits.

I hope something can be done. Maybe block these IP users from editing Wikipedia unless logged in, but they probably will just come back with more different IPs. ItsTomato (talk) 12:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Proposed airlines of the Channel Islands indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I noticed you were recently doing some work on the Aircraft section of Epic Aircraft. I have some COI edit requests currently open for that article, including an overhaul of the Aircraft section to make it more accurate and add citations. Would love your feedback if you have a moment. Thank you! Mary Gaulke (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Mil. Are write ups of commencement of specific International flights from an airport notable? Please take a look at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kempegowda_International_Airport#Renaming_and_expansion_(2009%E2%80%93present) this. A write up on Ethiopian, United, Air India'a commencement from Bangalore. I don't think these are notable. Would like to know your opinion. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 03:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Milbourne One, once again I come to ask for your help and place a protection on the article Fortaleza Airport. Someone using only an IP number has been writing comments on the page, stating his/her own opinion against given references. The question pertains the operation of a charter airline from Warsaw. This person is well-known: for years he/she has used several names in the past and lately only uses IPs. It seems to be the same person because one can trace the edits to an IP located in Hamburg, Germany. Thanks so much, Brunoptsem (talk) 15:45, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello MilborneOne, I noticed that a bunch of users is tagging an abundance of sourced content in airport and destination lists (or removing recent additions alltogether), stating that "independent" sources are mandatory and referencing the official airline or airport schedule is not valid. To my understanding this clearly contradicts our current policy regarding this kind of sources which was fine for ages. Additionally, there have been added hundreds of invisible remarks to airport articles that independent sources must be used without having concensus to to so - this highly discourages editors to change or add any destinations, even if they can state an official source. Would you please have a look at this, e. g. edits like this (of which there are dozens the least). Best regards! 2001:A61:3A6B:4B01:6D00:A7F9:C35F:54CE (talk) 12:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The given example is a source request on an unsourced addition. IP is also removing maintenance templates like here. As far as I know, you can request better sources. And a request does not make it mandatory. The Banner talk 12:56, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry to bother you, but there's a situation brewing on the Ukrainian Air Force page - which I'm trying to tame but, one editor is having none of it. reverted this source? - reverted Nigel Ish source note(s) - and is contesting this consensus / discussions have been going in circles. input would be appreciated - cheers FOX 52 ^talk! 03:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Really confusing but clearly some of the changes are wrong, there was a discussion about images in the current aircraft tables a while ago that said we should not do it. I will have a look later when I have time. MilborneOne (talk) 12:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year!

MilborneOne,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
MasterMatt12(talk) 23:31, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

MasterMatt12(talk) 23:31, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year!

MilborneOne,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Would you mind taking a look at Mifiin's behavior in this discussion? They have been disruptively uncivil throughout the discussion and seems to be POV pushing and WP:CHERRYPICKING. - ZLEA _T\^C 04:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page watcher) I've been watching the discussion, and they're definitely being disruptive. I haven't commented there yet, as I've been busy offline tonight. ZLEA, you should probably drop a note at WTAIR if you haven't already to get some more eyes on the discussion. BilCat (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, MilborneOne. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 15:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:1980s Lithuanian agricultural aircraft has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:12, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Milborne One

I just checked through your aircraft photos,and they're fantastic.

Being a huge classic aircraft fan, can you tell me if you will upload more classic aircraft photos, especially airline photos, in future?

cheers Ted Ted 707 (talk) 05:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lithuanian agricultural aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lithuanian bomber aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Atlanticex-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, there seems to be some mis-info on the difference between the Fairchild 21, and the Fairchild KR-21 which are two completely different aircraft. Is there a way to properly edit, or even create a separate KR-21 (A/B) page? My family owns both a KR-21A and KR-21B. The Fairchild 21 aircraft was a neat, but obscure aircraft. The KR-21A & B were popular sport planes of the early 30’s and more exist than the wiki page leads readers to believe. Thanks! 8KCAB (talk) 04:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Proposed Star Alliance members indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wishing MilborneOne a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! interstatefive  00:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Adam Cuerden on finding and using images

After more than ten years, isn't it time to trust IP users again?

And at this time, it is a hard test, because there is actual an Osprey crash, so if the next days no major vandalism occurs, it's safe.

Thank you in advance, 87.150.127.12 (talk) 15:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please don't unprotect the article. It's not worth the hassle. BilCat (talk) 23:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bilcat: Don't prejudice. There is a lot of information in need to be updated, significant work to do.

And all i want is a test after 10 years: Bilcat and others: We all have removed vandalism before. So 1 or 2 more are not significant to me. For you, Bilcat?

Thanks, 87.150.127.12 (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have options, including using talk page edit requests, and/or using a registered account, to make changes. As to vandalism, some articles are perennial targets, that one included. Unprotecting it right after a crash is a bad idea, in my opinion. Wait a few months for the story to die down, and then request unprotection at WP:RFPU. BilCat (talk) 02:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So, what is about removing semi-protection after over 10 years now? 87.150.112.181 (talk) 09:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Oppenheimer biopic

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on how WP:SIZE matters

Flagging bc I mentioned a conversation you participated in: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#SimpleFlying.com Avgeekamfot (talk) 08:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Russian invasion of Ukraine Op-ed: Nick-D on writing Rhodesian military articles

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

Happy First Edit Day! Hi MilborneOne! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]