Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Way You Make Me Feel, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We are hoping to create pages (ugh) for Clarence Brice and for Philip Field. Much of the info we've gathered so far-- including some from Wikipedia-- refer to them as such, so we are just trying to make sure things are consistent by changing to Clarence "Binky" Brice and Philip Field on this page rather than just Binky (which is a nickname) and Philip Hunter (which is his legal name but not his Artist name). Not sure if there is another way to do this. The edit does not go against the Allmusic refenece that is already there. Thanks for your help. MizButlah (talk) 20:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that I need to reference where I got the info regarding their names? That is what I changed -- I added Brice's real name, Clarence, and I removed "Hunter" from Field's name, since he wrote the song as Philip Field. I don't understand your objection. MizButlah (talk) 22:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input! MizButlah (talk) 22:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MizButlah. You have new messages at User talk:FlightTime/Alternate talk page.
Message added 20:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

- FlightTime (open channel) 20:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Philip Field (musician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 01:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions. We have made some changes and wonder if you would review the draft again. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. MizButlah (talk) 19:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A question, respectfully, regarding your comment that "Discogs is an unreliable source..." Am I mistaken in my understanding that the data found there is culled from the actual album covers, sleeves, records,tapes and CDs that customers find in the marketplace? MizButlah (talk) 14:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, sorry. That wasn't your comment. My error. MizButlah (talk) 14:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Philip Field (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CentreLeftRight ✉ 03:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. The draft has been revised and resubmitted. MizButlah (talk) 23:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NMUSICIAN and demonstrate notability accordingly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philip Field (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Philip Field (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MizButlah! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 07:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. MizButlah (talk) 21:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice. We have made some edits and wonder if you would review the draft again. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. MizButlah (talk) 19:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VersaceSpace was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Discogs is an unreliable source, the primary sources don't count for anything notability-wise, and there's just not enough coverage in this article right now.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philip Field (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Philip Field (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--VersaceSpace 🌃 02:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I intend to continue working on this submission. MizButlah (talk) 02:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A question, respectfully, regarding your comment that "Discogs is an unreliable source..." Am I mistaken in my understanding that the data found there is culled from the actual album covers, sleeves, records,tapes and CDs that customers find in the marketplace? MizButlah (talk) 14:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jovanmilic97 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

East Orange Record's coverage looks to be decent, but that's where it all stops (listings, passing mentions, primary sources). The notability is not WP:INHERTIED from Aurra or Mtume either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philip Field (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MizButlah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philip Field".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:53, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]