This user may have left Wikipedia. Monkeyblue has not edited Wikipedia since 2 August 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

|     |     |     |  Userpage Sandbox User talk Subpages

Attacks Negitive Neutral Positive

Remember to sign your comment using four tildes (~~~~).

I have a busy real life. Don't expect a replies in a hurry. 06:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

All old image talk is archived to arch0 All old Userbox talk is archived to arch1

I'm afraid that I must take exception to your edit. First, that you did not really wait to see much discussion about your proposed change. While waiting some number of days is much better than many people do, it is not the same thing as waiting for some amount of discussion. As far as I can see, there was only me objecting at length, and then one other person saying 'yep, do it!'.

Second, I really still don't see much justification for a *change*. You say

I feel that there should be system.

and yet I feel you didn't respond to my pointed questions "why?" and "then why not translate every God-related word in every article?"

If I may give another example. Look at the article Schadenfreude. Now click on What links here on the left 'toolbox' area. See all the uses of this 'non-English' word? Here is a German word, but that has a lot of additional meaning beyond a literal meaning. It has additional cultural meaning and is used as a shorthand word for all that that article talks about. And then there's angst and smorgasbord and many dozens of words, borrowed/added from other languages, that mean more than their literal meanings, by virtue of their cultural meanings and associations.

Look at the article Empathy for example, where they use the word and also give the main meaning

... schadenfreude (taking pleasure in the pain of another entity) ...

They don't replace the magical word with a boring literal meaning, but rather continue to use this word with its rich meanings. If people want to know more about the word they can click on the link. In the meantime they have a basic definition.

I just don't understand the desire to make the language poorer, by taking away 'difficult' words. We grow by learning new words and their associations, not by discarding them. If you want to simplify English for people that find it difficult, please see the Simple English Wikipedia (you can start at my page there, where I make obvious that I know English is difficult, but also that some people appreciate that the fact that it isn't too simple.

'Allah' has additional meanings and associations beyond just 'God'. When you delete the word 'Allah' you are taking away some of the meanings and associations needed by the article as used in the text.

Please reconsider. I think you have reducing ambiguity confused with simplification. Replacing an ambiguous word or phrase with something unambiguous is a "good thing". Editing a text to make it clearer is a "good thing". Simplification is not always a good thing, when it starts to take away things from the article.

Shenme 03:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Muslim

Excuse the order, kept adjusting things and they all went out of order.

• I'm sorry. How am I meant to wait for discussion when nobody is commenting. I replied to your comment and received no return comment. What was I meant to assume? Everyone disagrees with my idea because there was nothing further said?

If you felt that I didn't respond to your question then why didn't you tell me?

• Allah — The main reason for the change is because Allah is just an/the Arabic word for God. This is not any specific god, just God. Whether or not it is related to Islam, Christianity, Judaism or another religion. Why would the latter just use God rather than just using the original words, their god-words carry significance too.

Arabic Christians, when praying, use Allah.

• Removing Allah from the article will not reduce the quality of the English Language. It highlights (or adds) another connection to the word God. I do not understand the need to separate God from Allah, they should be interchangeable. Why not use the native term?
• Loanwords — Loan words are "usually words for exotic concepts or ideas." God is not an exotic concept or idea.

Monkeyblue 03:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I understand that you did wait, and that no other comments were forthcoming. I had really hoped that other people would comment, even trying to draw attention to the 'issue' (I put that in quotes because I understand it is hardly a _big_ issue). Unfortunately, people are too busy arguing in other articles to worry about something this small.

But actually, that is a big part of my underlying concern. Let me clarify. If you look at the history and ongoing conflicts of other articles involving Islam, you would see, I believe, an ongoing low-level assault on many aspects of these articles. In particular I point to Muhammad, and its talk pages Talk:Muhammad, Talk:Muhammad/Mediation and especially the issue Talk:Muhammad/images. While I have come to believe that most (if not all) of the editors wanting changes believe they have defensible and by-policy reasons for each change, I feel that the sum of the changes damage the encyclopedia's coverage of these important areas for the reader.

Most worrisome to me, I believe that the sum of the changes could easily be used to "show obvious evidence" of the bias against Islam/Moslems/etc. within Wikipedia. Each change is defensible, but I wonder if it is not reasonable to look at the result of all of them and conclude "Wikipedia is in the hands of anti-Islam forces". (or some such inflammatory statement)

And so I bothered you over your small change. Because though I try to avoid troublesome areas (I'm not a Miss World candidate and so can't hope to "contribute to world peace") I get frustrated at what I see when I stumble onto raging controversies like which and how many representations of Muhammed to put into that article. (And I had never heard of the term 'aniconist' before, so I guess it is educational)

I didn't want to bother you too much. I've explained my worries, and you've explained your reasonings. We can wait for other discussion. It is merely a surface-level change. I just worry about what might be read into it on a deeper level. But that's why they like me at work - I worry so much, no one else has to. (and they sleep better for it!) Shenme 04:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I really don't mind. I just stumbled over Allah/God (what I would call a quirk) in the article. I didn't expect there to be much discussion, I would either have 'NO NO NO' yelled at me or no-one would care. I thought it would just be a visual adjustment and that would be it. I can understand where you are coming from. Revert. Monkeyblue 04:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As a side thought, Christians don't call God Allah. Sure they can mean the same thing & Allah indeed is the Muslim "God", but you'd never see the word Allah replacing God in the Bible, nor the English word God replacing Allah in the Koran. Thanks, Spawn Man 05:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

English Christians don't call God Allah. Arabic Christians call God Allah. If it were a Arabic bible then I suspect that it would have Allah. The Koran like the Torah is always used in its original tongue (I think).

Hi there! I would just like to extend a warm welcome to WikiProject Kayaking. We have lots of open tasks if you would like to help out. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask on my talk page. Cheers, Bennyboyz3000 21:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just a note, no big deal - but you might want to take a look at Overlinking, especially the second bullet, characterizing overlinks as "Links that have little information content, such as linking on specific years like 1995, or unnecessary linking of common words used in the common way, for which which the reader can be expected to understand the word's full meaning in context, without any hyperlink help"; and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) advising in favor of "avoiding distracting information, such as extraneous links (internal or external)". Regards. --CliffC 18:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm still pretty new. Thanks for the tip. Monkeyblue 23:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Umm...you still used weasel words. Who in particular is "a faction of users"? bibliomaniac15 03:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedians' are the people who write and edit articles for Wikipedia. Some people might think that Wikipedist would be a more appropriate name, as an encyclopedist is someone who contributes to an encyclopedia. "Wikipedian", though, suggests being part of a group or community. So in this sense, Wikipedians are people who form The Wikipedia Community. A faction of users believe that Wikipedistian is the most appropriate even though it is almost impossible to say.

-- Wikipedia:Wikipedians

Note the "Some people ...", then [my edit] "a faction of ...". This is not an encyclopaedic article, it is humourous (or supposed to be). Reverting my edit was a little harsh.

The weasel words are there, one can ignore them. Thanks, Monkeyblue 03:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, I understand. At least I reverted the Homo wikipedophilus vandalism. bibliomaniac15 03:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. The wikipedophilus link was well spotted. Monkeyblue 03:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

Sorry I have been so slow to the message you posted ages ago on wikipaddle (http://wikipaddle.org/wiki/Forum:Wikipaddle_license%3F). The license was chosen for similar reasons to that as wikitravel, however I think it would be useful to have the wiki under the same license as wikipedia, which would allow content to be used across wikis. I do not know how to relicense the wiki but if you have any ideas on how to do it then please say. I think if I emailed everyone that signed up to the wiki and said we are relicensing it under GFDL in 30 days and gave them time to object or remove their content if the wanted that would be ok? Any other ideas? --George Drummond 10:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think that the change in policy would have to start with a vote of members. Before any licensing changes take place. If the license change is accepted then you should be able to start the re-license. I am currently looking into the proper way to change the license if the change has been accepted. Thanks, Sorry about the delayed response, Monkeyblue (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll gladly accept your offer! However, I already know most of the basics, I'm just looking to participate in something other than WP:UBX. So maybe the adoption period will be short, and a little more casual than other adoptions. The Userboxer^Complain/_ubx 15:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sounds great. Monkeyblue 10:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So, is there anything to Wikipedia besides discussions, and articles? Or is there a very, very strict policy against non-wikipedia-related affairs going on at Wikipedia. Also, what can a person, like me, with little or no knowledge that is not already in Wikipedia, so to help the project? --The Userboxer^Complain/_ubx 21:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What are you interested in? I am currently working through Freedom of speech & Freedom of speech by country mainly referencing and rewriting. Pretty much, contribute to what interests you, whatever that is. Monkeyblue 13:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I'll start working on geography-related articles, particularly on Canada, but I'm a geography nut anyways, so I'm pretty sure that I'll be able to help out as I can. The Userboxer^Complain/_ubx 19:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, please check out (and maybe iron out the bugs) of a new Main Page Alternative that I made. I am really rather new at this (strict syntax guidelines are not my thing), but after several hours of trying, fixing and threatening to smash my computer, I finally completed a sort-of-buggy version. Thanks. The Userboxer^Complain/_ubx 20:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks great! I have made some quick CSS fixes. TODO;:

• For usability reasons all widths should be as relatives (%, em, pt) but this does not need to be done for ages.
• I'm not at a MS computer so I can't see how my changes look in IE.

Great effort, Monkeyblue 14:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great! Whatever you've done, its sure causes less confusion, especially with the extra lines of tabular code that I put in. I'll fix the rest of the pages to conform with the first one sometime within the next few days. Thanks again, The Userboxer^Complain/_ubx 19:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've tested the alternative in IE, it works pretty well, except that there is no longer any gap between the header section and the tabs. I'll see if I can fix it with the little skills I have. The Userboxer^Complain/_ubx 14:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

happy to help :} ♥Fighting for charming Love♥ 14:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Monkeyblue! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel 05:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the message left on my talk page. The reason I reverted the edit was it does not fall under the heading that it was under and it seems like the statement was not a discussion topic - seems like some random statement by somebody. However, I am happy for you to revert the edit =) Thanks. --Cyktsui 13:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for understanding. Monkeyblue 22:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, thanks for pointing that out. I no longer contribute regularly to Wikipedia, and now use it for reference only, so I don't use the templates any more. To that end, you're welcome to change the template ad-lib or make a derived version if you want. Thanks for letting me know. haz (talk) 14:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I reviewed you. If you have any questions or comments about your review, or anything else, please contact my talkpage. Cheers, wpktsfs 03:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spamsara 22:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AMAZING! Wow I was about to do exactly the same thing with swapping the image on exactly the same minute. Wow!!! How strange ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you?" Contribs} 12:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Who'd have thought! Monkeyblue 06:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Monkeyblue,

I wrote a little piece on the freedom of speech page about wikiscanner. Because I seriously think this is an issue. You deleted it with this vague incrowd comment: Oh no! Wikipedia's cabel strikes. This is not a discussing, we state what we can refference. I saw your page and think it is against your own personal policy of being friendly as stated on this page. That's too bad. I am serious about the dangers of Wikiscanner and think it should be discussed. Also, maybe especially on Wikipedia. Any place here you suggest for commenting on Wikipedia and the freedom of speech? Thanx 3wisemen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 3wisemen (talk • contribs) 04:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I personally do not think that it is a notable issue. I am happy to be convinced otherwise. Please remember that all content should be citable. Thanks, Monkeyblue 08:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a backlog of 52 users at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user. Please consider offering adoption to one or more of these users. Don't forget to change their ((adoptme)) template to ((adoptoffer|Monkeyblue)). Thank you for your continued participation in Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. xenocidic (talk) 19:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Monkeyblue! I'd like to leave a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully today (and to my surprise) with 83 supports, 4 opposes, and 2 neutral. What I have taken back from my RFA is that I've perhaps been too robust in debate and I will endevour to improve upon that aspect of my usership. I would like to thank you again and state here that I will not let any of my fellow Wikipedian's down. Thanks again! --Jza84 |  Talk  11:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, Have replied on my talk page. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 12:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI. I am in the process of working on the ICF Flatwater Racing World Championships as well as getting the biographies on Canoeing at the Summer Olympics if you would like to assist. Chris (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A friendly reminder from the Adopt-a-User project =)

Hey there Monkeyblue! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers!

• Notice delivery by xenobot 14:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll just say that the flat box directory is nows fully usable. ResMar 23:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI. The 2009 ICF Canoe Sprint World Championships is up for GA nomination. Chris (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please have a look at the refresh and see what you can add when you have a moment? Thanks Thruxton (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Melbourne Meetup v t e Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/45 - Friday 8 December, 2023 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 05:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on User talk:Cellphones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 06:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cc-sampling hc.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:31, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 02:47, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Jayadevan's system, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Batting, Curves and Revised (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Postdam Schloss pano.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, you have previously indicated that you would be interested in attending Melbourne meetups. A meetup will be held on Wednesday August 12, 2015 6-8pm. Please check out Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 29 for details and add your name to the list if you think you can attend. --Michael Billington (talk) 12:24, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Monkeyblue. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mäntyharju.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. XXN, 14:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Melbourne Meetup v t e Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne (watch)
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi, I've just made a doodle poll to vote on the best date for the next Wikimeetup in Melbourne (Beer Deluxe, Fed Square). Would be great to see you there. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 12:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Date of next Melbourne meetup decided:

• When: 6-8pm, Sunday 8 July 2018
• Where: Beer DeLuxe, Flinders St

T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 01:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Tango-audio-x-generic.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Tango-emblem-favorite.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Tango-mail-mark-junk.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]