Full-time corporate magician and illusionist. Would like to volunteer to work WikiProject Magic areas of stage illusions, current full-time nationally known illusionists, and bios of notable professional magicians in Las Vegas, and in the New York / New Jersey / Pennsylvania areas.
To give you a quick answer, the link is this. An encyclopedia article does not direct those seeking information to an area where the must pay or even just provide an e-mail address, which it did, in order to read the material to which you are directing them. It also appeared that the article is 5 years old. Also, Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files, so an external link (which yours was, it's not a reference) must significantly relate to the article. You also placed it incorrectly in the references section when it's an external link. I will be happy to help with anything else, although I'm just an editor, and if you feel that I'm wrong you do have the ability to revert my edits. Mjpresson (talk) 19:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
==References== ((reflist))
WP will place them in numerical order wherever you put ((reflist)). Hope that's a little better. It's actually very easy. I compiled myself a help page off of my main page, take anything you need from it. Mjpresson (talk) 20:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
All information in Wikipedia articles should be verified by citations to reliable sources. Our preferred method of citation is using the "cite.php" form of inline citations, using the <ref></ref> elements. Using this method, each time a particular source is mined for information (don't copy word-for-word!), a footnote is placed in the text ("inline"), that takes one to the detail of the source when clicked, set forth in a references section after the text of the article. In brief, anywhere you want a footnote to appear in a piece of text, you place an opening <ref> tag followed by the text of the citation which you want to appear at the bottom of the article, and close with a </ref> tag. Note the closing slash ("/"). For multiple use of a single reference, the opening ref tag is given a name, like so: <ref name="name"> followed by the citation text and a closing </ref> tag. Each time you want to use that footnote again, you simply use the first element with a slash, like so: <ref name="name" />. In order for these references to appear, you must tell the software where to display them, using either the code <references/> or, most commonly, the template, ((Reflist)) which can be modified to display the references in columns using ((Reflist|colwidth=30em)). Per our style guidelines, the references should be displayed in a separate section denominated "References" located after the body of the article. | |
Inline citation code; what you type in 'edit mode' | What it produces when you save |
Two separate citations.<ref>Citation text.</ref><ref>Citation text2.</ref>
((Reflist)) |
|
Templates that can be used between <ref>...</ref> tags to format references ((Citation)) • ((Cite web)) • ((Cite book)) • ((Cite news)) • ((Cite journal)) • Others • Examples |
And there's also Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference just fill out and place between
<ref>these</ref>
Glad to help anytime. If this is all too much for your talk page, you (or I) can move it to a subpage for you with a link to it on your userpage. Mjpresson (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
As you may have noticed I've been away for a while. Thanks for volunteering your time to the project. Do you still need help or have you found your feet in the mean time? - Mgm|(talk) 09:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Saldan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Saldan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PriceDL (talk) 18:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)