Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

@MrOllie: I would like to remind you that you are a Wikipedia editor just like everyone of us. You are not privileged. You don't have the right to revert edits just by judging a source as unreliable 5 minutes after the edit, a source that you didn't bother to read. The source has nothing to do with promotion or marketing and it cites reliable literature.116.123.114.153 (talk) 08:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a self published blog and web store. Obviously unreliable, especially for medical claims, which have special sourcing requirements which you can find at WP:MEDRS. MrOllie (talk) 10:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this Ollie person has agenda that are self bias and driven by other people interest, I can see he's a Wikipedia for hire for what purpose? this should be a academic page where all research and citations references should be heard written free from harassment if cited right.. Rockingbeats (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MrOllie, I would like to know why you reverted what I just added on this section: Photographic film#In production

Film Photography Project states on their site that they acquired old equipment from the Svema plant to resume production of Svema branded film in Ukraine.

I do not know exactly when they have started doing this, but there is a capture as early as April, 2018 on the Wayback Machine for this url:

https://filmphotographystore.com/collections/svema-film

Does Shostka, Ukraine not count as another legitimate coating plant?

Is the source not reliable because it is a store site?

Why did you revert my edit?

Thanks,

FilmDoodler (talk) 21:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We don't link to people's web stores. MrOllie (talk) 21:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, can I ask for a link to the directory if you're going to cut that entire section then?

FilmDoodler (talk) 21:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely disregard; I am new here,

I have found out List of photographic films exists. FilmDoodler (talk) 21:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to have corrected an error  :) FilmDoodler (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! @MrOllie I have done a small edit in the page and the link i cited had the detailed information about the topic. what's spam in it?

Content strategist 1 (talk) 22:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your blog does not remotely meet our policy requirements. Adding your site was linkspamming as we define it on Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 22:37, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. but i don't agree with you on this Content strategist 1 (talk) 22:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're allowed to disagree with Wikipedia's policies, but you've got to follow them anyway. MrOllie (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed <this> warning you gave a user using Twinkle, seems that it broke.

From experience if you include "[[" inside a template, but don't close it ( ((subst:void|[[like this)) ), it doesn't do anything.
Although I do realize that your case happened because of a typo (should have been a single opening square bracket). – 2804:F14:80B2:4F01:FD70:3461:5359:B35D (talk) 05:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie: Just wanted to make sure you saw this, since I sent this just as you (I'm guessing) went away for a few days and other -ignorable- edits happened to this page after it. – 2804:F14:80A4:9701:D537:4E86:F39C:17C (talk) 22:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I left a level 2 spam warning and removed the malformed warning. Sundayclose (talk) 23:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

news reporting is a subfield of journalism. all subfields of journalism have article. why you do not let it to have special article? what is your problem? Wikijournalistt (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, they are the same thing per the cited sources. You must stop moving articles and rewriting them based on your personal opinions, which are at odds with the relevant literature. What you are doing is disrupting Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie why did you remove my edit and what talk page are you talking about? You better not say that because the sources are not reliable because they are. Do your research. In the meantime, im reverting my edit. Mmartinezmdr (talk) 21:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kmart's article talk page, where it is discussed that at least one of the sources you used did not support the content, where there is agreement not to cover announcements until the store actually closes, and where it has been explained (many times) that the number of remaining stores cannot be updated until a new source for the number is available. If you don't know how to read talk pages, see Help:talk. - MrOllie (talk) 22:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

send me the "Kmart's article talk page" please. Mmartinezmdr (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Click on the tab that says 'talk' at the Kmart article. Or read the help file I just linked. MrOllie (talk) 22:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie You did not bother to look deeper into this, I was there in late 1970's and 1980's (History). How are your sources reliable on your part to remove contents? DJFLEX-mk2 22:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are no sources cited on that article section. Sources are required to verify content (see WP:V). This is core Wikipedia policy. 'I was there' is not sufficient, readers need to be able to verify the sources themselves. MrOllie (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But MrOllie, you are doing the same as a dictator. Who are you to decide the policies of Wikipedia? Do you know everything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majavic (talk • contribs) 23:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you've been abusing Wikipedia and blatantly violating its terms of use. Just stop spamming us with promotional junk, please. You're not going to be able to evade detection by IP socking. - MrOllie (talk) 23:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you recently posted a warning on my page regarding edit war. however you didn't issue the same warning to User:ජපස I believe user jps was the one who was engaged in reverting my edits and making other changes as well without discussion. I was waiting for other editors to comment and in the next few days to ask for dispute resolution. But you issued a warning to me and made an edit to the article confirming jps edits. It appears to me that your actions may be interpreted by some as being biased towards a specific user. I was wondering if you could please address my concern. There may be a misunderstanding. Westerosi456H (talk) 02:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should worry more about your own behavior and less about jps. Treating Wikipedia as a WP:BATTLEGROUND as you have been is a good way to find yourself blocked. MrOllie (talk) 02:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think your behaviour is treating wikipedia as a playground and you appear to be the one who started this argument. Regardless i'm not going to continue this discussion. Westerosi456H (talk) 02:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]