Hello MriNiun,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dirge/The Weaver's Lament for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ziyankhan1 (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid I have removed or nominated for deletion all your contributions to Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Commons. You can't take works created by others, and claim them as your own or as licensed under the CC-BY-SA license.

• Your contributions to the book articles were copied from Amazon. All Wikipedia text is under the CC-BY-SA license; obviously, you can't do this if you are not the copyright holder. (While Wikipedia allows brief and properly attributed quotations where the article requires them, under the fair use doctrine, this doesn't apply to your contributions. The summary itself wasn't subject of the article, and you or anybody else could have easily summarized the book in their own words.)
• Likewise, you can't upload book covers to the Wikimedia Commons under the CC-BY-SA license, if whoever owns their copyright hasn't in fact released the art under that license. (Under certain circumstances it is acceptable to upload a low-resolution image of a book cover to English Wikipedia instead; see the unfree/fair use policy.)

Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what happened here, but would you mind making sure any new articles you create include more details than simply a picture without any text outside the caption? For all that stubs are valued, it's an imposition on other editors to expect them to fill an article out from that state. › Mortee _talk 01:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]