Hi @1292simon. I noticed that you deleted the information in the article BMW N55 about the N55B30T0 version. I was wondering if this was an accidental deletion. This version is listed by BMW as being used in the BMW X4 M40i. There are some blogs speculating that it is also used in the BMW M2, but I have not seen an official publication confirming this. My Gussie (talk) 03:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gussie. Thanks for making the effort to discuss this, I really appreciate it. I removed those models because the information I saw indicated that they would use the upcoming B58 engine, but it now looks like that is incorrect. Sorry about that. If there isn't an official announcement yet on the M2 engine, my preference would be to hold off from adding the M2. But if you think it's worth having there now, I respect your judgement. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 09:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @1292simon. I have made the changes to add the N55B30T0 version back to the article. I agree that it's still premature to list the M2 changes until official confirmation is available from BMW. What I have a read is that the M2 will not have the B58 engine yet, and that the power output is the same as the X4 M40i, but I have not seen an explicit statement of the type of engine that is fitted. My Gussie (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Thanks for adding it back in. 1292simon (talk) 00:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the BMW 3 Series (E90) page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1292simon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BMW 7 Series (E38), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BMW 3 Series Gran Turismo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, I just added an interior shot for the BMW 3 Series (E21) article please see. --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 14:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks for that. Also, nice work finding the E21 interior pic! I admire your searching skills, very impressive that you tracked down a photo with "interior" written in polish. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 09:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just search the E21 categories on Commons. You can find this interior shot with ease in the 316 cat. Also, it is easy to tell that this is a 315 or 316 as it lacks the rev counter and has an analogue clock instead. Best regards, --Jojhnjoy (talk) 09:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 10:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:UNITS: ″In all other articles, the primary units chosen will be SI units (...)″ BIPM: ″It is not permissible to use abbreviations for unit symbols or unit names, such as (...) cc (for either cm³ or cubic centimetre) (...) The use of the correct symbols for SI units, and for units in general, as listed in earlier chapters of this Brochure, is mandatory. In this way ambiguities and misunderstandings in the values of quantities are avoided.″ (Chapter 5.1, Page 130). Why do you change cm³ to cc? --Jojhnjoy (talk) 11:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]