This is my explanation for the creation of a new page.

“In the name of the law” is a feature film about a San Francisco policeman. On many sites, including the original Wikipedia article on the movie, Honus Wagner was mentioned as have a prominent role in the film. This is not true.

I thought this required a two-prong correction.

1. First, I corrected the page “In the Name of the Law (1922 Film)” removing references to Honus Wagner. I thought it wasn’t appropriate to explain the Honus Wagner mix-up on the actual movie page.

1. Second, I thought I should create a second page to explain how Honus Wagner connection occurred. I requested the creation of a new page – “In the Name of the Law (1922 film Honus Wagner).”

This is my rationale for requesting the creation of a new page titled – In the Name of the Law (1922 film Honus Wagner). I think an explanation for the Honus Wagner mix-up should be published somewhere. Note - I am not requesting this page should replace the existing page "In the Name of the Law (1922 film)"

If you have a better solution to clarify this mix-up – please advise.

Thanks

Mtjannetta (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Micheal,

I am unsure how to reach out, so forgive me if I broke any rules, or left this in the wrong place. Through ancestry.com and a photo album left to me by my grandfather, who was a projectionist for Paramount for 40 years, I discovered that my great uncle's photos album have been digitized by the State of California but never annotated, so the photos are largely undiscovered. Leslie E Cuffe began working for Famous Players Lasky in 1920, and went on to be the camera techician for Cecil B DeMille ( with location photos of the Ten Commandments) and Clarence Badger and others. I am not a film buff, but know what I have stumbled upon is of great interest to others. His photos include the projectors from the 1918 film lab at Toronto Tech, pre-production location photos from Old Ironsides, the location filming of The Golden Princess, and wonderful set photos from The Ten Commandments, etc, etc. From director Clarence Badger he purchased his ranch in Lone Pine, which was the site of the Ganga Din.

All I want to do is share, but I have no idea how to do it. And, you sounded like a nice guy :)

Thank you, Karen InmemoryofCuffe (talk) 16:08, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In the Name of the Law (1922 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:In the Name of the Law (1922 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Mtjannetta! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MatthewVanitas were:

r

e

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm having a really hard time understanding why you devote *so* much of the article to the Honus Wagner issue. Is this some huge bone of contention over the course of a century or something?

It appears to be completely out of place and disproportionate, and a distraction from actually covering the film itself and its significance and impact.

If we're missing something and somehow Wagner's role or lack thereof is vital to an understanding of the film, please post a message at the top of this page explaining it so we can understand. Do not post it as a section heading, just post it as regular text and sign it, at the top of this Draft page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In the Name of the Law (1922 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:In the Name of the Law (1922 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great article. Keep up the good work. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at In the Name of the Law instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

But you already knew that because you linked to the page. We don't need pages designed to debunk some error or misconception like this. Add a little bit of sourced info in the existing article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In the Name of the Law (Honus Wagner) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:In the Name of the Law (Honus Wagner), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 10:41, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Life's Greatest Game.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please take a look at the WP:MOS, regarding italics and bolding.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Onel5969)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:30, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Onel5969: Thanks for your corrections. I have one question. I would like to differentiate between the actual actor's name and the character they play. You suggest I should not bold their name. In order to achieve my goal should I use <em> instead? Thanks Mtjannetta (talk) 17:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. First, I hope you don't mind, but I formatted your question to me. This makes it easier to follow threads on talk pages. Second, if you're asking how to differentiate Jane Thomas (the actress) from Mary Donovan (the character), that's what the "as" denotes. Anyone reading that knows that X as Y in a cast list means that X is the actor and Y is the character. Hope that helps. In general, if you have a question about formatting, or how to do something, you can go to the project which covers the subject, in this case it would be Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. If you go to their assessment page, you can find the a link to their list of FA quality articles (you can click on the "159" in the statistics section and it will show you a list). These are the highest quality articles. However, since they are more in-depth, they usually have casting sections, rather than simple cast lists. In this instance, it's more helpful to look at the "B" classed articles. I clicked on one at random, After Earth, and you can see how they formatted it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:07, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Onel5969: Thanks for the tips. I have joined the Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. Since the use of excessive bolding is frown upon, what do you think about this solution instead?

I've done a little bit of work on films myself. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. Keep up the good work.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Mtjannetta (talk) 02:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I have started a discussion about this article at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Emilie Johnson. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, A Lady's Name, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 20:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, A Lady's Name, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 20:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A Lady's Name, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 21:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. In reference to your creation of Category:Emory Johnson, we don't categorise films by who was involved with them, per WP:PERFCAT so I'll be requesting it's deletion. Also when you create a new category, you should always add categories to it in turn, to connect it to the category hierarchy so that humans and maintenance bots can find it. It also means having a browse of existing categories to see how they fit in. In general we don't have eponymous categories for people unless there are a significant number of articles, templates etc involving them, there's a reasonably high bar for them to be created which most people don't satisfy. Cheers.Le Deluge (talk) 07:52, 14 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there,

I've noticed you've done a lot of spelling edits to the common riding article. However as this is a particularly "Scots" and Britsh English article. It includes a lot of scots spelling and grammar. e.g. Rideout not Ride out or Reiver not Raider. And the use of Neighbouring not Neighboring. I'm not sure on the whole ou vs o or z vs s rules on wikipedia. But in many instances the corrections don't seem to fit. What is your thoughts on reverting parts of it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lady-shirakawa (talk • contribs) 14:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Lady-shirakawa

"The United States and Great Britain are two countries separated by a common language."

Sorry for the delay. My apologies for using a US English dictionary on your article. I should have noticed what was happening. The beauty of Wikipedia is - you don't need my permission to "reverting parts of it." You can certainly undo most, if not all, of my corrections. Maybe you could place a comment (Making text invisible ) at the top of your article e.g. This article uses the British English dictionary. Mtjannetta (talk) 23:33, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just think it's polite when you've put all of the hard work in :) Lady-shirakawa (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Dorothy Davenport has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DannyS712 (talk) 02:12, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating The Yaqui (1916 film).

User:Onel5969 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Nice job on the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Onel5969)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Phantom Express LP01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Non-Stop Flight, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 20:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I see that you're still using version 2.02 of WPCleaner. This version is outdated, but due to a change in WMF servers, it can't update itself now: see this discussion on how to update WPCleaner (it's a one time job, after that it should update itself). --NicoV ^{(Talk on frwiki)} 20:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Life's Greatest Game Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Black Friday Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	A Stranger from Somewhere is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]