This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Rajkot, Sahiwal District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

 DIVINE  16:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Donetsk People's Republic. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:50, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But, isn't Wikipedia supposed to be neutral and the Donetsk and Luhansk PR are not "puppet states" of Russia. They were created out of unrest, and they are allied to Russia, but they cannot be considered puppet states. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 12:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Twajeel Airport, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 15:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tatar literature, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have a few comments on Tomskiy Khutor, Pakistan.

1. Have you checked the coordinates? They lead to a deserted area on the map. There is no air force base.

2. The Shina and Balti names seem to be read as [tsomskiy] and [tsomtskiy] respectively. Not [tomskiy]. Are you sure they are correct? Also Tomskiy Khutor doesn't sound very Shina or Balti. Do you know anything about its etymology?

3. Do you have any other sources of information about this settlement? In English or Urdu.

Thank you very much. Mrkvkn (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is just some place I found on Google Maps, and I though I would just add it on Wikipedia. Same thing I did with Rajkot, Sahiwal District. You can search Tomskiy Khutor on many places like these [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. In Shina and Balti 's' sometimes becomes 'ts' so for the Shina and Balti one, I thought 'ts' would be the correct way because Tomskiy Khutor does sound Pakistani really. And the airforce base comes from here, [6], it says that when I search up on Google, and it says it is on a village in Gilgit-Baltistan near the Indian border.

Thanks. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 22:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Actually only link 5 is more or less valid. I also have seen this map. And a couple more maps dated in 2000's. But after researching of dozens British, Soviet and US maps of 19-20th centuries I haven't seen this settlment.

Links 1-3 are internet services, that just have parsed Tomskiy Khutor from Google Maps.

Link 4 is probably a mistake. It's a forum about poetry. I can't find any mentions of the settlement. Maybe I just haven't read attentively enough? Tell me, please, if I'm wrong.

Link 6 is a list of points on a map. There's no mention that Tomskiy Khutor is or was an airforce base.

I'm still researching about it. Please, let me know if you also find more information.

Best regards. Mrkvkn (talk) 18:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Shekhani dialect. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There's already an existing page (a redirect) at Shekhani dialect. If there's consensus, the content here can be merged into that page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shekhani dialect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 19:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Twajeel Airport and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 10:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Volten001 ^☎ 08:53, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mankiyali.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created it, sorry I forgot to add it. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much mate for helping me with the Battle of Bakhmut article. — Baba Mica (talk) 18:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 11:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Midna Ruda. Thanks! _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 01:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

67.84.186.22 (talk) 20:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 67.84.186.22 (talk) 20:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I have been to Xinjiang, there is no genocide! Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 20:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan

Thank you for creating Boniyar Tehsil.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

add a ref for the census figure

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|MPGuy2824)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan

Thank you for creating Kathal Hil Patribal.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

add a ref for the population figure

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|MPGuy2824)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already added references for the population. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I appreciate your efforts at improving Wikipedia's coverage of the languages of Pakistan: these articles certainly need some attention!

However, I don't think large-scale additions of images with the Urdu spellings of the language names are helpful. If a language isn't written at all, such an addition will be plainly incorrect. If the language has a written tradition, then you'd need to find the spelling of the name within that tradition: there's nothing to guarantee that all the conventions of Urdu spelling would apply. And without a source for the spelling, the image is a form of WP:OR, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Uanfala (talk) 12:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of Northern Pakistani languages with the help of the Forum for Language Initiatives (FLI) have now been written, you can see this on their website. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 12:22, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you find the native spelling of a given name on that website (assuming this is the spelling in an orthography that's accepted by the language community and not merely proposed by linguists), then you can use it. But in that case you need to add a reference to where you got the spelling from. Uanfala (talk) 12:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But where? Should I add it on the file page? Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 13:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the source on the file page should be enough as far as the image is concenred. And if you write out the name of the language within the article text, you should add a reference there as well. Uanfala (talk) 13:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Karakalpak.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created it, and I put it on there. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 22:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for File:Crimean Tatar.svg! But I see a that there is a mistake in Crimean Tatar Arabic script, there is written قرىم but needs to be قريم. TayfunEt. (talk) 08:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TayfunEt.: Many Turkic languages that use the Arabic script use "ى" instead of "ي" or "ی" because it represents the vowel "i". You can see this on Wiktionary [7]. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 20:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Muhafiz-e-Pakistan: How goes it. These bare-url that your using on these articles are very poor. Can you please take a look at WP:REFB and start using proper cites. For google book references, you can copy the the url field in the book citation dialog and it generates the citation for you. scope_creep^Talk 09:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: what issues did you see in the article (apart from the use of bare urls) that necessitated blanking it? @Muhafiz-e-Pakistan: it's important to provide at least the basic details (author, title, year and publication), because they describe the source used, and because web addresses may change over time. You can have a look at WP:REFBEGIN and the pages listed there for further info. I've got two further points to add to that. When possible at all, it's preferable to list the page numbers in the source that support the relevant statements in the Wikipedia article: when checking out the references in a Wikipedia article (either as a reader or an editor), you don't want to have to trawl through hundreds of pages in order to find the one passage that the article author used. Also, when citing online resources, it's best not to link to the pdf file directly (like this: http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/bitstream/123456789/15972/1/Hamid%20ali%20baloch%20balochi%202018%20uni%20of%20balochistan%20quetta.pdf), because the file locations may change in the future; it's better to instead link to its metadata page (in this case: http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/handle/123456789/15972), partly because that page is much more likely to stay permanent. Uanfala (talk) 11:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala:, @Muhafiz-e-Pakistan: These articles have been reverted by the linguists guys because they are not sufficiently detailed nor correctly defined in their language subgroup nor referenced properly and i'm just following suit. Linquistics is complex. More than that they are full of bare urls which in this day and age is unacceptable. They are listicle articles, no better than what you find in a blog, and that is probably the reason why they're being reverted. scope_creep^Talk 12:39, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: who are those linguists guys? The only revert on Makrani is by you [8]. I've had a look at some other pages in your recent contribs, and I don't see anything different [9] [10]. Is there some talk thread that I'm missing? Uanfala (talk) 14:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: why are you reverting all the language articles I created? You should probably start doing this with Rangri dialect (Malvi), Gowro, and other articles that barely have anything on them. The citations I added on these articles were reliable and I added a lot of information, especially on the Rangri dialect (Haryanvi) page. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: Ok, I didn't know thanks for telling me. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 16:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muhafiz-e-Pakistan, just a question about the list of alternative names of the language mentioned in the first sentence here. Where in the cited paper by Spooner is the passage that supports these names? This has a second reference, to globalrecordings.net, but that's not generally a reliable source, so should be avoided. Uanfala (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: @Muhafiz-e-Pakistan: (edit conflict) I was told by somebody at the beginning of year, who explained they are often copies from external language sites with no real academic content, in a complex area. Copies effectively. I didn't notice it at first, but when I checked a few it was clear. I don't rememeber where I saw it, or who it was. It was months ago. I wouldn't revert those other articles you have mentioned above, as they are not being reviewed, even though one or two of them are chronically bad. They are no more than copies from external sites, and don't constitute a proper academic article, in a relatively complex subject area. Not one of the references are valid in any of the articles you have mentioned about. scope_creep^Talk 16:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

scope_creep, yes, the linguistics of South Asia is a complex area, at the very least because of the confusing variety of language names (which means, for example, that a single language name may be used by two different sources to refer to completely different language varieties) and because of the widely varying quality of the literature (which means one needs to be really selective). But you got me properly confused now. they are often copies from external language sites, what is a copy of those sites? I don't get it. Among the references in this version, not a single one is valid? The first one, for example, is an academic paper by one of the foremost authorities in this area, the second one is an entry in a commonly cited encyclopedia published by OUP... why are these not valid? Uanfala (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: @Muhafiz-e-Pakistan: This article presents a slightly different problem. This is a good article:iversion with good sources. What it doesn't have is good references. They are bareurls WP:BURL. In a five to ten year period, every one of these apart from, perhaps the Jstor ref will be a dud. Completely unusable, so they are still dud refs. What is the point of writing an article like this, when you know it is going to be damaged in such a short time. What is the use of it. The article can be reverted, obviously. I have made by point. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan, please take a look WP:REFB and please add proper citations. Doi's can be put into the cite journal doi field, click on the icon and it will populate the reference for you. There is so need for bare urls in 2022. It is unacceptable. scope_creep^Talk 18:16, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So the only issue with those articles after all was the fact that their references were bare urls? scope_creep, I don't believe there's anything in the guidelines that will allow the blanking of content just because its refs aren't well-formatted. Helping new editors improve their references is great, but please don't revert their article creations just because of that. Uanfala (talk) 18:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: No. This is a slightly different problem to those that are copied almost verbatim from dodgy wordpress sites, blogs and places like that and usually NPOV for some reason. A new editor shouldn't be puting in bareurls. This is 2023, not 2006. It is really sloppy practice and is below the standard expected of new articles. If there was attempt to create proper references, fair enough, but there wasn't. Instead, its the assumption that somebody else will fix, its ok. But it doesn't get fixed. The numbers aren't here on WP for that now and never will be. They will never get fixed, so its needs to be done at the beginning. Do you know, I heard they teach high-school kids to write WP articles in Scottish schools now, those in media classes. scope_creep^Talk 18:49, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there really is anything among the articles you've reverted that is copied from other websites, scope_creep, then you should really be explicit about it, because that may involve copyvios and we'd need to deal with those promptly. As for the bare urls, I'm fully on board with you that they should be avoided. However, I don't think it's particularly unusual for a new editor to not know about that, and what I do find unacceptable is for experienced editors to be doing mass reverts of content additions simply because of subpar formatting. Uanfala (talk) 18:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I check them for copyvio. I do a before on them. I don't think its masses of redirects. Every time I do a session at npp, I might revert 2-3 article out of 40-60, and that is in a good day. If there was mass revert, I would out of there in a New York minute. This is more than normal because of those language/dialect articles. The guidelines on bareurls are about a decade behind, and folk want to get rid them. I work on the cat:nn for the last 3 weeks. scope_creep^Talk 19:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: I am sure that only one of the articles (Rangri dialect (Haryanvi) used a blog post as a source. The Makrani dialect and Kabutra language pages do not use any blog post or anything related to that. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 19:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Makrani dialect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rakhshani. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In the image you added to the Azerbaijani language article here, you've also included cyrillic Azerbaijani. The cyrillic script of the language is, as far as I'm aware, no longer officially used anywhere. I could not find any source about what script of Azeri is official in Dagestan either. So, I think it'd be best if you only included Latin and Perso-Arabic script name. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 13:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Golden: In Russia it is still used check these links - https://www.ethnologue.com/language/azj , https://omniglot.com/writing/azeri.htm , https://elearn.fiu.edu/e-dev/WorldExplorer/continents/asia/azerbaijan/azerbaijan_language.htm Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 13:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Omniglot and Elearn say nothing about cyrillic still being used officially in Russia. I can't check Ethnologue as it's paywalled. If you can, could you please provide me with the quote from Ethnologue that confirms cyrillic is the official script of Azeri in Dagestan? Thanks. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 13:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From the source: "Azerbaijani, North. <...> Arabic script, Naskh variant [Arab], used until 1920s. Braille script [Brai]. Cyrillic script [Cyrl], official usage in Dagestan. Latin script [Latn], official usage in Azerbaijan since 1992." Burzuchius (talk) 14:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 14:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've noticed that you have recently added infobox images for many Turkic languages. This is great as Turkic languages wee previously lacking in that field, however, please note that in a lot of cases, just the name of the language is not enough for infobox images. For example, in the recently added Azeri infobox image, the text reads "آذربایجان/Azərbaycan/Азәрбајҹан". This alone is not enough to disambiguate the language and can also be misinterpreted as the country name, or even the ethnic group. In most cases, Turkic languages add a suffix like dili/tili or cha/sha to point out it's a language. It would be nice if you could do that too! ThatDohDude (talk) 15:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sure thanks! Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the edits! ThatDohDude (talk) 02:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read wp:npa and wp:brd. Slatersteven (talk) 14:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven: shouldn't Wikipedia be "neutral"? When talking about the Donetsk People's Republic and Luhansk People's Republic, why is the term "puppet" added when they broke away from Ukraine with the ethnic population's help? When talking about the East (China, Russia, Iran), Wikipedia always portrays them as bad like the Uyghur genocide which is not even a genocide when the population is increasing. The real genocide is of Palestinians by Israeli authorities and "settlers". Please, can you send this to Wikipedia's high members or someone important in Wikipedia? Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 14:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We GO with what RS say, if RS say it is genocide so do we. If RS say it is a puppet so do we. If you are unhappy about this it is down to you to raise the issue, not me. Slatersteven (talk) 15:17, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also you had better read wp:not and [[wp:nothere]. Slatersteven (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is a bit ironic to be speaking about neutrality when you add to Azov Regiment that it is objectively Neo-Nazi, and remove information on the page about Russian war crimes without offering any explanation. In the future if you plan on removing content, espescially on contested articles such as the Azov Regiment, at least use an edit summary to explain your actions. You should also note that consensus on that article is to not label it as Neo-Nazi in Wikipedias voice, as you did. See the talk page for the RfC. TylerBurden (talk) 11:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this more "neutrality" enfocement from you? TylerBurden (talk) 21:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TylerBurden What's the big deal? Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 22:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The big deal is you pushing pro-Russia narratives ignoring references and consensus, do you realize this is an area covered by WP:AC/DS? It's not the first time I've seen this from you as you can see above. TylerBurden (talk) 22:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just added "Ukrainian government and it's Western allies". What's "pro-Russian" on that? Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 22:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about ignoring the fact that it's not just "Ukrainian government and it's Western allies" but the UN? You are clearly minimizing it. TylerBurden (talk) 22:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said on Urbanoc's page, only António Guterres condemned it, most countries abstained like China and India. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 11:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Baramulla district, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok will do. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 17:50, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shina Wikipedians has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 19:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this supposed to be related Sindhis. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 12:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muhafiz, you changed the religion reference in the template of the page Indian Maltese to " Islam (Majority), Hinduism (minority)". Do you have any sources about that? As far as I know, Indian Maltese are mainly Hindu and Christians; Muslims are the minority. Sindhi families who emigrated to Malta were mainly Hindu. Let me know, thanks. --Dans (talk) 16:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dans I added sources. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 21:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These sources are not reliable. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 04:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of your edit warring and disruptive editing, I have indefinitely blocked you from editing chapli kebab. I have observed you on a few articles removing content related to Afghanistan, India, and Hindi where it is relevant. Edits such as this and this reek of viewing Wikipedia as a battleground for nationalistic editing. Why would you remove Afghanistan and India when a reference shows that chapli kebabs are consumed in those countries? Why would you remove Hindi, the lingua franca of north India, from an article when the article states that chapli kebabs are eaten there? I see that you have appealed to WP:INDICSCRIPT but that applies equally to Urdu, which you retained. Please be aware that if you take your current style of disruptive editing to other articles, you may face a topic ban on all WP:ARBIPA articles or be blocked from the entire encyclopedia. Read the Guide to appealing blocks. Academic Challenger (talk) 02:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Academic Challenger Thanks. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But why are most names still in Urdu, Punjabi (Western), Kashmiri, and Sindhi while Devanagari script languages like Hindi, Rajasthani, and Marathi are not? Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 12:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uskut, Kashmir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uskut, Kashmir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gotitbro (talk) 10:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --1990'sguy (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But I added references Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 12:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Muhafiz-e-Pakistan: I reviewed that article. You need a reference for each notable person who is a Thari is the list. The reference will validate them. Great wee article. scope_creep^Talk 16:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep I also added people from the Category:Thari people and Category:Dhatki people. Doesn't that count? Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yea that fine, that is done all the time, but each one needs a ref. Usually you take from the source article, and just check its ok, and update the dates on it and your away. scope_creep^Talk 16:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep Ok thanks. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great work. 8:) scope_creep^Talk 21:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 21:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bilqees Khanum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 22:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Curbon7 She is notable for most of her songs and shows, not really her, isn't that a least a little notable. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa members indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Akto Turkmen elder.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((permission pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Gohari, Pakistan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 I just added a village, it doesn't have to be notable and I'm using Research Gate as one of the references so isn't that really a reliable source? Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If not notable, you have to show that it's a legally recognizable place. Usually census data will suffice for that. Hopefully this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 The Pakistani government (I'm pretty sure) has not taken any major census in Gilgit-Baltistan, so I don't really know where to find a census for it, I only found the census for 2017 on this website [11] which doesn't include Gilgit Baltistan or Azad Kashmir. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 10:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gohari, Gilgit-Baltistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:59, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following sanction has been imposed on you:

You are indefinitely topic-banned from Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, and topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, all broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned because of your continued disruptive editing in this topic area, after being made aware of the general sanctions and after being warned for past disrupion.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by the community's decision at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Uyghur genocide, and the procedure described by the general sanctions guidelines. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that topic. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 02:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. Judging from your edit to Draft:Uyghurs in Afghanistan, I'm wondering if there's something about the above you haven't understood? If you continue to edit in violation of your topic ban, I will have to enforce it via a block from editing. (For the avoidance of any ambiguity, this should be considered an only warning.) -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 15:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin Please listen, the media only really shows the Uyghurs in Afghanistan as militants. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 16:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to say that is itself a topic ban violation. If you would like to appeal your ban, you may follow the instructions above. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 18:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin What can I say, the media reports on the wrong things on Uyghurs. It's not my fault. I could only find 2 sources on Uyghur being described as non-militants and refugees who fled China in the 60s, 70s, and 80s. I am not against the Uyghurs, but reporting on what I can find on the internet. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 19:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had a quick look at refs #8-10 in the current version of the draft. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan, it appears that those sources talk of the presence of Uyghur militants in Afghanistan, but you have used them to support the rather different claim that militancy is what most Uyghurs in the country are engaged in. This seems to indicate fundamental misunderstanding of verifiability and original research. As you know, you're free to contribute to any non-Uyghur related topics, but I think that before doing so it will be a good idea to carefully study those two policy pages. – Uanfala (talk) 10:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TylerBurden (talk) 07:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:30, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:People's Anti-Fascist Front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the overwhelming majority of independent reliable sources and the international community consider Crimea to be Ukrainian territory under Russian occupation and consider Russia's alleged annexation illegal and invalid. You personally may feel differently, of course, but Wikipedia articles summarize what independent reliable sources state. If sources have changed what they say, please discuss on the talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot But it is not recognised to be part of Ukraine by all of the international community. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 12:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say all(though pretty much only Russia and its allies accept Russia's position), I said the overwhelming majority. What either you or I think does not matter, what matters is what independent reliable sources say- and the vast majority of them(with the exception of Russian state-controlled TV, which reports what the government tells it to and as such is not independent) say the alleged annexation is illegal and invalid according to the UN as a body and most of the international community. As such, that's what Wikipedia says. If that has changed and more countries recognize the alleged annexation, please offer your sources on the talk page. 331dot (talk) 12:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 12:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot But to be honest, only Western countries do not recognise the annexation. Nobody else has really commented on opposition except the West. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 16:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

China has not recognized it. I don't believe Pakistan has either. Even Kazakhstan has declined to recognize it. Even if you are correct, that doesn't change what I've said- you need to offer independent reliable sources that indicate the UN has changed its mind or that indicate countries are falling over themselves to recognize Russia's position. 331dot (talk) 16:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Ok, but I'm pretty sure the UN is neutral on the Crimean crisis and only condemns the invasion. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 16:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The UN secretary-general says annexation against the UN Charter and illegal [12] 331dot (talk) 16:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok that is fine. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 16:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Urtsuniwar. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 13:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan,

Thank you for creating Goharabad, Mansehra District.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! However, its refs are poor, relying on probably unreliable travel websites without any indication that the geographical notability guideline (WP:NGEO) is met. Could you show that this place has legal recognition as per an official census? The guideline states Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. Census tracts, Abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable. WP:GNIS and GEOnet Names Server do not satisfy the "legal recognition" requirement and are also unreliable for "populated place" designation. Further, the article is an orphan with no other articles linking to here, so I've tagged notability, unreliable sources, and orphan. If there is no improvement in an hour, I will move this to draft, as currently, it's sadly not ready for mainspace.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|VickKiang)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Goharabad, Mansehra District, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. VickKiang (talk) 22:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rajkot, Azad Kashmir, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the article! I haven't checked notability yet but be careful of bare URLs and unreliable travel websites or Trip Advisor (how do these refs meet the reliable source guideline, see WP:RS?). VickKiang (talk) 10:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kohistan District.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cyber.Eyes.2005. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)). Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 11:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Midna Ruda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ma Chuke Balochani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by the Sock, and un-notable article and unreliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Tomskiy Khutor, Russia

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FeralOink was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Article has not been changed sufficiently since prior submission to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pishori and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FeralOink (talk) 12:41, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hindko Alphabet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Twajeel Airport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see what Bonadea wrote in the comment and don't resubmit this article to Afc without improving it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rehmat Aziz Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 08:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Much of the content is unreferenced. (And what an odd collection or random factoids that content is, I might add.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gohari, Gilgit-Baltistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Twajeel Airport".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This file displays as a blank screen, so I've removed it from WP-en. I've checked it with Inkscape and can't discover what the error is. — kwami (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I told you about this issue on the talk page of that picture,[13] but you did not respond. My guess is that you didn't get the notification; I hope you can help me to correct the image here.Histo.beh (talk) 08:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Goharabad, Mansehra District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Pro-Russian, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Pro-Russian and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User Pro-Russian during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 14:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gohari, Gilgit-Baltistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Uyghurs in Afghanistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajkot, Azad Kashmir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page File:Mangocher.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.flickr.com/photos/57179092@N02/17200791554/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. ✗plicit 06:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gohari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Uyghurs in Afghanistan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 21:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajkot".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]