Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mulairi! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! - Anjana Larka 13:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mulairi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mulairi. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Mulairi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName)). If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no i am not paid or willing to be paid by any company. It might be just a conflict of interest that is screaming out to you that i am being paid. It is totally a misunderstanding. I am just spreading that how Pakistan's financial industry is grooming which is probably not acted upon mostly, that is it Mulairi^{suggest/consult} 21:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain how this is your own work? PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it is certainly not my own work, i uploaded that from mobile and could not see author details that i should put in it so i thought to upload that and will change it when i m in my workspace but unfortunately forgot that. Now i must edit it. Sorry but that's the truth Mulairi^{suggest/consult} 22:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are two points here.

1. File:Standard Sadapay Card.jpg is up for deletion as a copyright violation on Wikimedia Commons. I have called your behaviour into question on your talk page there, which is where you must justify yourself
2. You state that you have a Confict of Interest: It might be just a conflict of interest that is screaming out to you that i am being paid.. Please elaborate on that. With precision, what is your COI?

Please answer the second point here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent I am not getting paid, I have stated that before too. The article had to be written for the respective company because it has that notability factor here in the country. Secondly I cannot provide you with a paperwork that states I am not getting paid so my words are all here. Mulairi^{suggest/consult} 22:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You said above: It might be just a conflict of interest that is screaming out to you that i am being paid. To me this says that you have a conflict of interest. These are your own words. Setting any issue of payment aside, please explain with precision your conflict of interest. What is your relationship with this organisation? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:38, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent I used conflict of interest in some other manner regardless of the Wikipedia guidelines. I have relation with that organization, and I gave you the reason of creating the article Mulairi^{suggest/consult} 22:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I have no relation* Mulairi^{suggest/consult} 22:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I find that your uploading copyright files to Wikimedia Commons despite all the declarations that you have to make that it is your own work when you know that it is not has stretched my good faith in you past its elastic limit.

Praxidicae, you raised that issue. What are your thoughts here, please? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's obvious undisclosed paid editing or a COI. If not, it's a wild amount of CIR that needs to be dealt with. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae It's not paid or a COI. Whatever reasons I have given are true and everything is disclosed from my end. I hope to edit Wikipedia with it's best interest like yourselves and eliminate the vandal or disruptive outputs. Mulairi^{suggest/consult} 23:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You say above I used conflict of interest in some other manner regardless of the Wikipedia guidelines. What manner is that? Be precise.

I agree with Praxidicae's thoughts about your editing precisely because of the way you are being very opaque here and your talk page on Wikimedia Commons shows aggression in response to your uploads being challenged.

While Commons has very different rules from here, aggression is tolerated nowhere.

I offer you the polite and firm suggestions that you choose to answer direct questions with direct answers, and that aggression is never present in any communication 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:39, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mulairi,

You moved this article from main space to Draft space SIX minutes after it was created. This is not appropriate. You also do not have enough editing experience to make decisions on which articles are appropriate to be draftified and which should be left in main space to be developed and improved. Please gain more experience improving existing articles or working on drafts of your own before taking on administrative duties.

If you have questions about draftification or editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mulairi

Thank you for creating Basti Ameer Shah.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

add the population figure as well

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|MPGuy2824)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824 will do. Mulairi^{suggest/consult} 09:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not draftify or otherwise attempt to "review" articles - you yourself are too new and lack an understanding of many of our policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mulairi,

I second this request. Inexperienced editors taking on advanced responsibilities is a quick way to lose your editing privileges. Do not do any more draftifications or other administrative tasks. Work on improving your editing skills by working on articles. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please get familiar with Wikipedia:Name pages Loew Galitz (talk) 21:14, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just as in the messages above, I strongly recommend you to get used to wikipedia by contributing to article content and durnig patrolling handle only obvious vandalism or other serious drawbacks. Placing various tags without really knowing rules in depth creates a disruption rather than help. Loew Galitz (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i agree some of my tags were not complying with wiki policies but many tags i added led to page deletion which is a good thing. I am looking forward to learn more about wiki guidelines and policies with time Mulairi^{suggest/consult} 21:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If a page is for deletion, this is a "serious drawback" I mentioned. Loew Galitz (talk) 21:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So if a person is promoting himself by creating a page and it led to deletion, It is considered as a drawback for you? or some page which has various issues that might be solved or that page might be created, complying with the policies. That seems a drawback to you? it does not seem to me Mulairi^{suggest/consult} 21:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, By-elections in Pakistan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Angel Tsvetkov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 03:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angel Tsvetkov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mulairi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Angel Tsvetkov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mulairi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Angel Tsvetkov, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the ((request edit)) template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Spicy (talk) 11:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Girth Summit _(blether) 13:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The reasoning for this block is set out in this diff. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Mulairi/Angel Valeriev Tsvetkov, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mulairi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:By-elections in Pakistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]