Hi N Oneemuss! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi N Oneemuss! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:36, Tuesday, October 25, 2016 (UTC)

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N Oneemuss. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
10		Terminative case (talk)	Add sources
329		Declension (talk)	Add sources
85		Morphosyntactic alignment (talk)	Add sources
8		Wentworth Beaumont, 2nd Viscount Allendale (talk)	Add sources
234		German grammar (talk)	Add sources
448		Genitive case (talk)	Add sources
27		Slovak declension (talk)	Cleanup
186		German declension (talk)	Cleanup
3		Colognian grammar (talk)	Cleanup
70		Thematic relation (talk)	Expand
20		Old High German declension (talk)	Expand
1,107		Jeans (talk)	Expand
34		Colognian dialect (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
37		Brexit and arrangements for science and technology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
644		Hangman (game) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
40		Panoramic painting (talk)	Merge
7		History of numerals (talk)	Merge
26		Five Dynasties (talk)	Merge
168		Deer in mythology (talk)	Wikify
47		Northampton School for Boys (talk)	Wikify
6		Mohammed Uthman al-Mirghani al-Khatim (talk)	Wikify
7		Declension of Greek nouns in Latin (talk)	Orphan
15		Ollantay (talk)	Orphan
2		Wołczenica (talk)	Orphan
15		Ja'alin tribe (talk)	Stub
31		Syncretism (linguistics) (talk)	Stub
12		Tony Travers (talk)	Stub
22		Soliman Pasha al-Faransawi (talk)	Stub
8		Mac Nimir Bridge (talk)	Stub
6		Comparative case (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks a lot for picking mallard up for a PR. I have hopefully resolved the issues you listed so far. Just thought you might have forgotten about the article. Adityavagarwal (talk) 03:06, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Adityavagarwal: I had forgotten about it actually, sorry! It looks a lot better to me, but I'll take a look now. N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 09:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No issues. I figured that you might have forgotten. Take your time, in no hurry. Adityavagarwal (talk) 09:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I think I have addressed all the issues on mallard. Thanks! Adityavagarwal (talk) 07:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@N Oneemuss: Could we archive it, if the PR is completed? Adityavagarwal (talk) 21:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Adityavagarwal: I think archiving it would be fine, I don't really have anything to add. I'm on holiday right now anyway, so I wouldn't be able to have a detailed look anyway. Sorry for the late reply! N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 07:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, alright! No issues for the delay, I hope you enjoy your vacations. Adityavagarwal (talk) 10:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I quickly reviewed your copy edit of Fairoz Khan. You did a good job, nice linking and layout and use of inline cleanup tags. Here are my notes:

• Acronyms (see MOS:ACRO) – There are two recommended styles for acronyms. They can either be lower-case with full points (periods) or upper-case without full points. It generally looks better to use one style consistently in an article, though there are a number of exceptions (e.g.: am or pm for time, and sometimes U.S. for United States). PhD, MA, LLB should be without full points.
  • PG was used in the article for post graduate, so I wrote that out in full on first appearance in body and lead (as should be done for most acronyms). CVPA was also defined later in the article, so I moved the expanded form up to first occurrence. A Wikipedia search for some other acronyms was able to turn up their definitions (from context).
• Capitalization – Regarding proper names, I believe it's a consideration of whether something is being used in a specific or generic sense. A post-graduate diploma from The Human Rights and Duties Education Department at Jammu University is specific. A post-graduate diploma in human rights and duties education from Jammu University is generic. (Just as political science was lowercase in the same sentence.)
  • On the other hand, national secretary of the NSUI is a specific position, and I believe that gets capitals.
• Linking – It didn't seem necessary to me to link to common things like Bachelor of Science, Bachelor of Law, etc., unless it's a link to a specific educational program. It's good to have helpful links, but links should only be provided for subjects the reader of the article is likely to follow. (see WP:OVERLINKING)
• Spacing at refs – In two places, there was a space between a series of references (caused by a blank line in the edit window). This can be tough to spot in the edit window but should be visible in preview. The problem with spaces at references is that a line-wrap could separate the reference note from what it's referencing – or leave the reference on its own line. If it makes it easier to read in the edit window, you can have a blank line inside the ref markup tags; but the <ref/><ref> tags should butt up against each other.
  • There was also a tiny bit of extra punctuation at refs. Try to get in a habit of checking at refs, as that's a common place for problems to crop up (I try to catch those on my first or last pass of an article).
• Conversions - Numbers given in lakh and crore are valid for articles about India, but I always try to convert them to thousands or millions. So 14 lakhs (1.4 million) students.
• Prose:
  • There was a weird "part of in the" that slipped through; I trimmed the "in". (I watch for adjacent prepositions, which can be confusing.)
  • "as well as" is a bit wordy and can usually be replaced with "and".
  • "also" can usually be trimmed.
  • typos: niversity → university, latter on → later on
  • Khan has spoken at many rallies and seminars, such as a seminar about deforestation which he spoke at on 31 July 2012. The sentence is talking about his speaking appointments, so the reader knows the example is about this and "which he spoke at" can be trimmed as redundant.
  • Good call on that incomprehensible line. I took my best guess at it and rephrased (trimming what appeared to be tone/trivia), and put a citation needed tag on it.
  • The following is an incomplete list of rallies that Khan has organised, spoken at or taken part in trimmed ", spoken at" since this is logically included by "taken part in".
• Captions sometimes get overlooked, but it's a good idea to copy edit them.
  • Fairoz Khan Khan Reception on becoming National Secretary of the NSUI in Jammu and Kashmir. Rephrased the beginning to "Fairoz Khan at a reception". Because this is a sentence fragment, it does not receive terminal punctuation.

I hope this helps you refine your copyediting. I know a lot of this is nit-picky, but this attention to detail is a big part of copy editing. You might want to read through the Manual of Style (a bit at a time, it's a tough read) or try out some of the exercises at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to. The more copy editing you do, the more your brain will organize itself to catch these little things. Overall, I think you did a good job and definitely deserve a barnstar. Thank-you for your edits, and please keep up the good work! – Reidgreg (talk) 15:04, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Reidgreg for the detailed feedback, it seems very helpful! I'm actually on holiday right now so I don't have my laptop with me but I'll definitely have a closer look once I get back. I am certainly interested in taking part in the next drive or blitz. N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 16:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to N Oneemuss for copy edits totaling over 8,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE July 2017 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 14:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of your hard work on the drive! – Reidgreg (talk) 14:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, my first barnstar! Thank you, I'm flattered – I found the whole experience very interesting actually. N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 20:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Thank you very much for your awesome peer review on the mallard. It is highly appreciated! Adityavagarwal (talk) 04:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to be the first to have given you a barnstar, but am second now. Adityavagarwal (talk) 04:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I'm sorry to see that your FA nomination didn't work out, but if you nominate Mallard again then leave me a message on my talk page, I'll be happy to review it. N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 08:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thank you again! Adityavagarwal (talk) 09:41, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N Oneemuss. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N Oneemuss. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to inform you that I've finished copy-editing Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency), an article you requested at the GOCE Requests Page. Good luck on the GAN! Puddleglum^2.0 22:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you! N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 08:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you won't know me but I've noticed your efforts to bring the Boston and Skegness constituency page to GA standard – great work! If you ever want to work on Sleaford and North Hykeham, I'd be happy to help/offer some pointers: improving Sleaford's articles was a pet project of mine for a while though I have less time to work on that sort of article improvement now. I still have a lot of useful reference material though. Anyway, if you're up for it, do drop me a message at some point. Happy editing, —Noswall59 (talk) 13:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Only (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Bilorv (talk) 01:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N Oneemuss. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for 2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 17:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 18:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, sorry for leaving some minor errors in there. Good luck with your planned GA nomination. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 20:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkPanda272 -- PinkPanda272 (talk) 12:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkPanda272 -- PinkPanda272 (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkPanda272 -- PinkPanda272 (talk) 18:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi N Oneemuss, I just wanted to let you know that I have nominated Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency) at did you know. The nomination is located at Template:Did you know nominations/Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency). Thanks, PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 08:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Boston and Skegness is estimated to have the highest percentage of "Leave" votes in the 2016 EU referendum of any parliamentary constituency in the UK? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one Labour MP said that the result of the 2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election could foreshadow an "electoral disaster" for the party? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, I had a look over and left some comments on the talk page. I also compared it to some of the the few featured articles we have on elections (all from the US; I believe this would be the first British election to get a star) and I think you have a good chance at FAC. My one caveat would be that I don't know a lot about elections, and it's a more recent bit of history than I usually get involved in, so I'm not an expert. Great work, and let me know if or when you nominate it and I'll watchlist the FAC. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell: Thank you very much for your feedback! I've addressed it and have nominated the article for FAC.N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 20:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, N Oneemuss! The article you nominated, 2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:06, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears, and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for December 8, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 8, 2021. Congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article "about a parliamentary by-election in Lincolnshire, England, in December 2016, back when Brexit dominated British politics (as it would for years). A Brexit-supporting Conservative MP resigned to protest Prime Minister Theresa May's handling of the issue, triggering an election in his safe seat. The Conservatives held the seat easily, while UKIP rose to second and Labour fell to fourth. It's a fairly short article, but I think it's comprehensive.", and enjoy your first TFA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

rivers in Poland

Thank you for quality articles such as 2016 Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election and Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency), for Polish topics and translations including Niemica (river), for high class reviewing, for you plan to rewrite Dame Alice Owen's School, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2676 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2017 Manchester Gorton by-election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]