Hi Nannochloropsis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Nannochloropsis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 23:45, Thursday, July 26, 2018 (UTC)

South Church, Andover, Massachusetts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 07:09, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Reverend Samuel Phillips. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 22:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Samuel Phillips (reverend), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I appreciate your efforts to improve Wikipedia, but there are problems with your recent edit to the Allagash Lake article:

1st - you replaced sourced information with unsourced information

2nd - by removing the citation of the original information which defined the source for subsequent use, you orphaned subsequent use of that source in the article

3rd - the new uncited information appears inappropriately precise

One minute of latitude is approximately one mile; so one second of latitude is approximately 100 feet. Seconds expressed to two decimal places defines position to approximately one foot in latitude, and somewhat more accurately in longitude depending upon the latitude of the observation. Since Allagash Lake spans more than a minute of both latitude and longitude, I question the value of specifying decimal seconds. I might guess the more precise information reflects a GPS reading someone may have made while visiting the lake. While this may have been a good faith effort to improve Wikipedia, it would fit within the definition of original research considered inappropriate. Repairing the article would be a useful learning exercise; but I would be happy to offer suggestions if you have questions. Thewellman (talk) 19:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I understand that it is important to use sourced information and, to be honest, I was at first hesitant to make the edit for that reason. I have been thinking about making some more substantial improvements to this page such as images and more information in part because of a recent trip there this past summer. I was planning on inserting some of the pictures I took while there and doing some further research on the lake's logging history, establishment of the Allagash Wilderness Waterway, among other topics. The sourced coordinates were the first thing I noticed simply because they weren't in what I believed was the geographic center of the lake. I'm not excusing my edit. I agree that the unsourced coordinates were unnecessarily precise and I should not have removed the sourced information. Thank you again for your help and feedback. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia (since July 2018) and still to some extent learning the ropes. Best regards, Nannochloropsis (talk) 01:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I encourage you to improve the Allagash Lake article. Your photos would be a wonderful addition. I find the history of that area fascinating, and well-sourced information would be a valuable addition to either the lake article or articles of wider scope, such as the Maine North Woods. Thewellman (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Nannochloropsis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Van der Stucken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conductor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Claude Fuess, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great article creation in 'Claude Fuess'! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 09:32, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@SshibumXZ: Thank you!! Should've replied sooner, but means a lot to me! --Nannochloropsis (talk) 21:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks you so extremely much mr Nannochloropsis for your edition on my first article "Wizdom Khalifahd". Please help my article not to be deleted. Thanks for your reputations sir. Sufiabdul (talk) 06:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sufiabdul: Happy I could help! I cannot guarantee your article will not be deleted in part because Wizdom Khalifahd may not be notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Read WP:CREATIVE (the section "Creative professionals") for guidelines on what makes people in his field notable. Also see WP:GNG for a general outline of what makes a Wikipedia article notable. You can show that he is notable by citing reliable sources. Unfortunately, the sources you cite under "References" only show the songs he has published. Additionally, you should not heavily rely on sources published by the subject, as they may be biased. Try instead looking for articles where the songs are mentioned. Did a newspaper or online news website publish anything on Khalifahd's songs? Citing these kinds of sources show not only what songs he published, but also that he is well known (notable!). Also look for sources that confirm claims made in the "Early life" and "Personal life" sections and cite them. Where did you learn that he was born March 16, 1997? How do you know this, for example:"he enjoyed to core search for the reality of everything in cosmological and metaphysical sense and the reality of love of the whole"? The second thing you can do to improve this article is to only make objective claims rather than subjective ones. See WP:SUBJECTIVE for what I mean by this. You cannot describe for example that what Khalifahd learned from his mentor is "awesome knowledge" because others may perceive this as is your opinion. You can say instead that Khalifahd himself describes the knowledge from his mentor as "awesome" as long as you can cite a source that supports he said that. The third issue is formatting/style/grammatical errors. A general guide can be found at WP:MOS (Wikipedia's Manual of Style). These are easier to fix and are things I can assist with. Overall, I believe this article can remain on Wikipedia as long as reliable, third-party sources can be found. I'll see what I can do over the next few days but I do have commitments that will limit the time I can spend on Wikipedia. I hope this this helps! Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions. --Nannochloropsis (talk) 07:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sufiabdul (talk) 18:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)please give me a chance to convey additional references gor my article Wizdom Khalifahd. Am a beginner and the article is for my blood brother. All what I have written in the article is basically known to me. Please give me a chance. Thanks to the Wikipedia editors.Reply[reply]

Myself and others would like to give you a chance to improve the article. My hope is that this article can remain on Wikipedia. Just go online and find reliable, third-party sources and cite them in the article just like you did in the first section. I did my own search on Google and couldn't find any biographical information. I found several sites listing his music but none that discuss his early or personal life. Unfortunately, if parts of the article are only known to you, they cannot be included in the article. Wikipedia does not allow original research. Original research is basically any claim that cannot be supported by reliable published sources. For more on what I mean read WP:ORIGINAL. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and everything written in Wikipedia must be backed up by someone else's published work. Let me know if you had any better luck finding sources. Also let me know if you have any questions. --Nannochloropsis (talk) 23:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sufiabdul: Just so you know, I'm going to add a banner to the page about a lack of references or sources. The idea is not to get the article out right deleted, but rather to get the attention of other editors on Wikipedia, especially more experienced ones, to help see what can be done to address the lack of sources in the article and whether or not the article should or should not be removed. The banner includes links to places that you can potentially find sources on Khalifahd published by other people online. The banner will be removed and article will remain on Wikipeida once these sources are found and put into the article. Thanks for understanding! --Nannochloropsis (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Nannochloropsis! You created a thread called Help resolving an issue at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) (ban this bot) or ((nobots)) (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Cecil Bancroft.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

nice article!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Britishfinance)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 16:08, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Britishfinance:I realize I never replied but better late than never. Thank you! -Nannochloropsis (talk) 00:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Nannochloropsis - Many thanks for you help in reviewing Alfredo Antonini--As per your kind insights, I have removed the numerous "Unreliable Source" reference citations to IMBD.com which were found within the article. Since this seemed to be the only problem which you identified, I have also reverted the downgrading of the article to "Start" and restored its rating as a "C class" I hope that this is OK. --If not, kindly accept my apologies in advance. Many thanks for your kind and thoughtful consideration and best wishes for your continued suuccess on Wikipedia respectfully 104.207.219.150 (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)PSReply[reply]

It sounds like the article can be restored to C class. I removed the IMDB links I could find and located one spot where new sources need to be used as a result. Thanks!--Nannochloropsis (talk) 20:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Nannochloropsis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of protected areas in Andover".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 04:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

At first glance at this, I thought you had been bitten by the system error that randomly reverts recent edits. But since the word "somber" was removed earlier it appears that you edited an old revision of the article, resulting in reversion of every edit that occurred after that revision. Please be careful not to edit an old revision unless that's your intent. ―Mandruss ☎ 00:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mandruss: Thanks, that was not my intention. I'll be more careful in the future. I assume it can be reinstated in the current version of the article in 24 hours? --Nannochloropsis (talk) 00:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As I said, the word "somber" was removed earlier. When you saw the word it was in an old revision, not the current article. The article does not currently contain the word, so you have nothing to reinstate. ―Mandruss ☎ 00:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mandruss: Got it. --Nannochloropsis (talk) 00:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Nannochloropsis

TheLonelyPather (talk) 01:53, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	Thanks for helping out on the WikiProject Biography assessment backlog :) Nerd1a4i (talk) 07:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nerd1a4i: Thank you! Looking forward to the day this backlog is under control. --Nannochloropsis (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]