Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Gas Game, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Gas Game is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Gas Game, please affix the template ((hangon)) to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to GasBuddy, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove relevant, sourced information from the article just because it's negative toward the company. ... discospinster _talk 23:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

an opinionated piece published by a blogger is hardly relevant. imagine how toxic wikipedia would get with unsubstantiated opinion pieces being added to every company. in addition, same with content about a third party lawsuit. it's meritless. Pdhaudio83 (talk) 23:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not the lawsuit is meritless, that's a matter for the courts. The lawsuit is relevant to the article. I should also point out that editing an article about a company that you are involved with is considered a conflict of interest and this should be disclosed on the talk page. ... discospinster _talk 23:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

one of those pieces mentioned is literally an opinion piece by a journalist- how is that remotely close to Wikipedia standards for notability? Pdhaudio83 (talk) 00:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]