[[File:|90px|link=User talk:Noble Story|Leave me a message|center]]
Homepage	Talk	Contributions	Edit stats	Userboxes	Awards

Archives

Archive 1 (May 2007-May 2008) Archive 2 (May 2008-January 2009) Archive 3 (Jaunary 2009-April 2009)

Great work on filling the gaps in getting the article up to GA status. Glad to see other interest in the topic, as I wasn't sure many would come across it after I initially created it! Geaux Hornets! Patriarca12 (talk) 02:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really only had to add a couple sentences, at most. Your initial work was the real meat of the article. It was my pleasure to do it. Noble Story (talk • contributions) 03:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

replied YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 06:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Since you had interest in the Hornets/Katrina article, I took a stab at creating an article for the Minnesota Timberwolves failed relocation to New Orleans that you might have interest in. Enjoy! Patriarca12 (talk) 03:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Knicks–Nuggets brawl you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Knicks–Nuggets brawl for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Zodiiak (talk) 19:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed this article and have comment about the lead. Just to make sure that you know, cheers.—Chris! _ct 02:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for all the work you did on this. Because of your efforts, we were able to feature it on the main page on Magic's 50th birthday. Hope you're doing well. Regards, Dabomb87 (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user helped promote Magic Johnson to the main page as Today's Featured Article on 14 August 2009.

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the nominator of two of the FAs of players who have played in the NBA at the same time as Juwan Howard, I thought you might consider commenting at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive2.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you'd want to know that I edited your user page to link to an identical edit counter to the one you had linked, as it (the soxred93 one) has expired (Tparis has taken over the tools). Hope you don't mind. :-) --Gilderien Talk|Contribs 20:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Yao Ming (estimated annual readership: 1,411,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Yao Ming to Featured Article status.

I see that you haven't been on for a while, but I still wanted to leave this note to acknowledge your accomplishment and say thanks again on behalf of the millions of readers your work has served. I hope we'll see you here again some day! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noble Story! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]