Hi North of Eden! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, welcome back! I note that you're still listed in the main volunteer list under your old username. Would you update that, please? Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC) (Not watching)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William J. McCauley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Party (United States). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please note that WP:NACD says: "Participants, including participating administrators, should not reopen non-admin closures. If this happens, any editor other than the closer may restore the closure..." Kraxler (talk) 23:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Understood, and my sincere apologies. I posted a longer response at Sandstein's talk. North of Eden (talk) 23:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Wisconsin Court of Appeals page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar
		Many thanks for your articles about WisconsinRFD (talk) 15:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi North of Eden! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:56, Sunday, August 2, 2015 (UTC)

North of Eden, while I appreciate the help at AfD, I have struck out your closing rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Mackenzie (2nd nomination), though it does not change the result. Please see Wikipedia:Non-admin_closure#Appropriate_closures: it is clear that those conditions do not apply, since there is much contention over the acceptability of the sources. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there Eden! I was wondering if I could lend my hand in WP:DRN. I know that I could just add my name but, I thought an advice from a familiar editor would be supportive. Can you just run a check on me, my histories, my edits etc., and notify me if I can make a good volunteer out of me? Feel free to make any sort of comments on my background and I'll happily accept it. Thanks in advance. Regards --JAaron95 ^Talk 05:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• @Jaaron95: Certainly! I'd be happy to look things over in more detail, and I'm sure you'd make a great contributor at DRN. From what I saw from a very cursory look, you've received a number of userrights (indicative of high community trust) and your work making the AfD process run smoothly is also a plus. Anyone is welcome to moderate discussions at DRN; I'm just getting back in the hang of it myself, and I'd be happy to help out as you get started. North of Eden (talk) 05:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@North of Eden: Thanks for the input! Appreciate it !! I'll go ahead and add my name to the list (once you provide me a detailed report second go ahead) and monitor the going for a few days before involving myself into the discussions which are non-complex. You have the absolute privilege to comment/correct my volunteer work in DRN and I'll accept it happily without any reprimands. Once again, thanks for considering my request. Regards--JAaron95 ^Talk 05:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jaaron95: No problem, happy to help! I looked over some of your contribs, and was especially impressed by your demeanor and civility at Talk:Supercarrier. That's the kind of attitude that can make a major difference at DRN, especially when disputants are furious at each other. Also, your involvement at AfC indicates that you have an understanding of the policies governing article content. WP:RS and WP:OR come up a lot at DRN. Just as a suggestion, my guiding rule at DRN is to encourage the editors, ask provocative questions at times, and occasionally summarize how the discussion is going. If there's something I think is a key issue, or a possible resolution, I will generally mention that, as well. Also, I know User:TransporterMan and User:Keithbob, among others, are very experienced DRN moderators. It might be helpful to look in the DRN discussion archives for some successful disputes they helped resolve; you might find some ideas there. North of Eden (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Very thanks for the in-detail report.. Happy that I'd be able to help DRN. And I'll take your suggestion as a guiding line. I'll go through the archives too. Thanks once again. Regards--JAaron95 ^Talk 02:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Keithbob: You should've pinged me . Anyways, thanks.—☮JAaron95 ^Talk 17:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mark Seidl

added a link pointing to Wausau

Michael W. Hoover

added a link pointing to Wausau

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Eden, just added my name to DRN and added a suggestion on the above case.. I would like to have you take a look at the case and file your opinions (Close the case if it's appropriate). Thank you. Regards--JAaron95 ^Talk 05:52, 8 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's ok, no big deal. I forgive you. But you shouldn't go on fishing expeditions , I didn't know warning someone about a username violation meant that person was a sock. I have AIN on my watch list and when I saw a user with that username I reported it and was told to go to his/her talk page to warn him/her about it. Hundreds of people signed up since August 1st, are they all socks of TEOTW?? RbAxM33320 (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• @RbAxM33320: Understood; that makes sense. I wasn't out looking for other socks or something, I just noticed your comment; its circumstances reminded me of some comments posted by the sockpuppet (User:Cityside189) used by TEoATW. The modus operandi of this sock was to somewhat stridently criticize the other, and warn of possible consequences if the other did not comply. Given your reply, it seems like it was an innocent edit that, given its timing, seemed suspicious. North of Eden (talk) 17:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It was also just flat-out wrong. There is no username violation. If there was one of the half-dozen admins involved in that situation would have noticed it. And even if there was a violation, coming on all threatening isn't how we discuss username issues. Personallky I'm not convinced you weren't right all along about this. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:29, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First of all, thank you very much for your assistance in the Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry dispute resolution discussion. As you suggested, Chrisuae initiated a mediation request: [1], which was declined because PeeJay refused to agree to the mediation, despite being a very active editor. Yet another editor has agreed with our proposed edit in the article's talk page, further to the consensus we pretty much reached in the dispute resolution (prevented from happening due, again, to PeeJay's refusal), so I have implemented the edit. I wanted to ask, if PeeJay reverts the edit, which I predict he will, what further action can be taken? It seems that if an editor wants to hold a monoploy on an article, which is what's happening here, they can do so if they are determined and stubborn enough, by simply refusing to participate in the proper discourse. Sorry to trouble you with this again, but it seems all our good work will be for nothing because one editor gets to call all the shots for the article, contrary to everyone else's opinion. Thanks again. Autonova (talk) 18:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• @Autonova: It looks like PeeJay has consented to formal mediation. Not sure how MedCom will proceed from here, but I would think they'll take the case. Thanks, North of Eden (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Despite the current situation, Together Against The Death Penalty (ECPM) continues its efforts to support and strengthen the abolitionist movement in the MENA region. " is just one example of the promotionalism for its cause. I deleted it. DGG ( talk ) 03:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Max Raskin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DonCalo -- DonCalo (talk) 01:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Max Raskin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Max Raskin for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DonCalo -- DonCalo (talk) 01:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Max Raskin you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Max Raskin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DonCalo -- DonCalo (talk) 14:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have two cases open at the dispute resolution noticeboard, one about the US presidential election and one about a movie. One of the cases hasn't been edited in three days, and one in nine days. I see that you haven't edited in about four days. If you do log on and get this message, please let the coordinator know whether to assign the movie case to another moderator or what. I think that the election map case can probably be closed as stale. If you are on vacation, enjoy. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hugh R. O'Connell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 20:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year!

North of Eden,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William O'Donnell (Wisconsin politician) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 14:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article William O'Donnell (Wisconsin politician) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William O'Donnell (Wisconsin politician) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 15:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article William O'Donnell (Wisconsin politician) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:William O'Donnell (Wisconsin politician) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 14:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martha Laning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Laning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:19, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, North of Eden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, North of Eden. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion/Archive_56#G5. I am thinking of writing an article (Op-ed) for The Signpost about this. This issue is a dead horse on Deletion policy pages, but I think the wider community not aware of G5 may be interested in seeing this (IMHO) idiotic and destructive rule. (I say this as someone who already wrote an article for TS calling for more actions to be done re paid-for spam, see WP:CORPSPAM, and I weakly support the current G5 proposal to extend it to paid edits). But fighting spam and vandalism should never detract us from our primary mission of creating an encyclopedia. I wonder if you'd be interested in writing the article for TS together with me? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:16, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]