Full Disclosure: I have a vested interest in forum/social-related articles and to a lesser extent instant messaging, web browsing, and gaming related articles via my unincorporated business Ekunia, which is developing services in these areas; this disclaimer once warned of ecommerce issues, and likewise my family members own ecommerce website(s) (only one at present), although at present I only hold employment at one of them because Ekunia doesn't have any revenue. This could also be seen as a conflict of interest, but I've never actually edited any relevant articles, or been interested enough to read about them. This may be seen as a conflict of interest, but I usually only edit an article to fix issues I see while I am reading Wikipedia. Nuke (talk) 08:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here are my archives!
2009-2011: archive before I became active
2015-2016: first archive
2017: second archive

Hi Please check the news. I think we should create an article. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi I think we should espend the article and making a map. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Could you update the module after the Hadrami Elite forces offensive against AQAP ? --Panam2014 (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Panam2014: Got any sources? Nuke (talk) 17:30, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[1] --Panam2014 (talk) 17:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done, based on an assumption that "pro-legitimacy" in this case means Hadi govt. Nuke (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited America First (policy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Russian Reset. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Russian reset. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Russian reset. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Nanophosis (talk) 00:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I've tagged the article for deletion, as articles have a "move" button to correct any errors in the title. If you believe Russian reset is meant to be capitalized, go to the article and click the "more" tab in the upper right hand corner of the article. From there, you should see the move button, and can take appropriate steps to move the page to the correct name. Also, be sure to read MOS:TITLE to confirm that both words should be capitalized. Thank you! Nanophosis (talk) 00:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nanophosis: This was a redirect page I made because "Russian Reset" is not redirecting to the alternatively capitalized form of the title properly. Nuke (talk) 00:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah, I understand. The fact that it didn't properly redirect means the formatting was incorrect on the page you created for some reason or another, but it's already been deleted. I've created the redirect again here, which should properly redirect to the article in question. Nanophosis (talk) 00:57, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nanophosis: Alright, no problem. Thanks for recreating the redirect, and have a good night. Nuke (talk) 01:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure what happened during your edit here but wanted to alert you since the sentence is hanging and I'm not sure what you intended to finish it with. Ponydepression (talk) 21:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks a ton! I accidentally left the phrase "public option" incomplete. Nuke (talk) 21:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached.

To help move things along, I have started a discussion on the article talk page about the disputed edit, which you will find here. Please take the opportunity to make your views known there. It is best not to restore the material you added until there is a consensus among the editors there to do so. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:36, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi This account continue to do non neutral sources and remove sourced information.He is clearly attempting to impose Houthi POV in WP. There source said that the demonstration was pro-Houthi but the delete the words because the Houthis claims that the demonstration is not pro Houthi. He claims that Almasirah is reliable and he attempt to keep the info. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:23, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nope, re-doing what you've done. If you're going to lecture me on "Wikipedia policy" about citations, understand that "Wikipedia policy" specifically asks for good citations, to which MyAnimeList is not (in fact, it's the opposite). User-editted sources, such as MAL, cannot be used as citations. This also applies to Anime News Network's Encyclopedia and AniDB.net. I will find proper citations like I was doing before. Good day. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 06:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, NuclearWizard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, NuclearWizard. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.— Etchubykalo (talk) 15:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rick Perry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Pittenger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Syrian War map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kansas House of Representatives elections, 2010. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 1#Kansas House of Representatives elections, 2010 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DemonDays64 (talk) 19:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Washingon state legislature and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 14#Washingon state legislature until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 03:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, NuclearWizard,

Thank you for creating Turkish presidential elections.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

We need to know where these results were sourced from; please add references, perhaps for each line of the table.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Carwil)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Carwil (talk) 21:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:NuclearWizard/Userbox:CSA, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NuclearWizard/Userbox:CSA and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:NuclearWizard/Userbox:CSA during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sundostund (talk) 09:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:NuclearWizard/OldNukia, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NuclearWizard/OldNukia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:NuclearWizard/OldNukia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 11:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]