Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Patricia Kennealy-Morrison are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 00:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Miss Kennealy's memoir is included in her page but if a question comes up that might considered a little thorny the question is simply dismissed? Care to provide an explanation as to why you flat-out reject any information that doesn't serve Kennealy's interests? Pamela Courson-Morrison is treated with a dismissive tone on Jim Morrison's page and yet Kennealy's claims were allowed to be included on that page.
Guess there is no point in my asking why Miss Kennealy felt the need to track down Tandy Martin-Brody, an former girlfriend of Jim Morrison's when he was a young teen and then include the picture in her first memoir. (Was that supposed to prove something? Did she REALLY leave the picture on Jim Morrison's windshield just to "make him crazy"?)
Interesting. I'll have to do some investigating.
Thank you for your warm and friendly welcome but I'll take your response to mean that anything Miss Kennealy does care to discuss is simply not allowed. Very strange policy for a site like Wikipedia, a site that depends on the financial support of people who utilize it.
"Encyclopedic content must be verifiable" - I thought for sure that such a well-known publication like 'No One Here Get's Out Alive' and Miss Kennealy's statements contained in it would certainly be considered "verifiable". So many issues with this page and this topic. The only "sources" allowed are those written by and approved by Miss Kennealy herself.
So you removed the reference to the abortion story Miss Kennealy willingly shared with the public on more than one occasion, not just in her first memoir, that you personally answered when the topic of Miss Kennealy's conversation with Pamela Courson-Morrison was brought up. Wow. It would appear that you really do like to control the narrative when it comes to Miss Kennealy. I'd ask you to explain why, but I'm sure I wouldn't get an answer.
Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. I moved your edit request to Talk:Jim Morrison, the article's talk page. Just a reminder that Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is only for requesting articles to be protected, not for submitting edit requests to protected articles. Thanks. Minima© (talk) 20:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Nyaja Aibhlinn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #21830 was submitted on Jun 16, 2018 04:23:43. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 04:23, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Dear Nyaja Aibhlinn,
I would like to inform you that I have removed your arbitration request as malformed. Please read thoroughly the guide to arbitration and if you still believe that your request is suitable for arbitration, fill in this template accordingly.
For the Arbitration Committee, Kostas20142 (talk) 15:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Bbb23 (talk) 02:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Nyaja Aibhlinn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Bbb23, I am genuinely confused. I added the article to Jim Morrison's "Talk" as an FYI, something to watch for as far as news about Jim Morrison, I thought the Talk page was the appropriate place for it, if it is not I will take it down. I did not try to add it to Jim Morrison's page, I just put it out there as an interesting little bit of news. Can you please clarify what I did wrong? Nyaja Aibhlinn (talk) 02:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The block is valid, and you've only confirmed that it is necessary. 331dot (talk) 11:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
((unblock|Bbb23 - I intended to move the article not the page, I apologize. This was not a "stunt" but given what has been going on over the past few days I can understand why you thought it was. Well, we tried to make it work and I bid you and Wikipedia farewell. This has been a very eye-opening experience. VERY eye-opening. I want to sign off with something nice but I just can't bring myself to do it. So long "Bbb23", hope your outlook on life improves.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
5 albert square (talk) 11:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC)