On behalf of the people and government of our state, I congratulate Democrat Oye Owolewa, from homeland Omu-Aran (Kwara State), on his deserving victory in the US election. His victory is a reflection of his outstanding personality as a young man with a purpose. I also specially congratulate the Kwara State Association of North America (KSANG) family, especially Alhaji Lateef Amolegbe, for their unflinching support for candidate Owolewa.

Adeoye "Oye" Owolewa (born 1989) is a Nigerian American politician, pharmacist, and a member of the Democratic Party. In November 2020, he was elected as the shadow representative of the United States House of Representatives from the District of Columbia. As a shadow congressperson, Owolewa is tasked with lobbying for D.C. statehood; the unpaid position is authorized by D.C. voters in 1982, but never approved by Congress. Although mistakenly described in Nigerian media as the first Nigerian American to be elected to the U.S. Congress, Owolewa is not a member of Congress.

Hello, Old Man Consequences! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Willbb234Talk (please ((ping)) me in replies) 07:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please don't remove entries from day-of-year articles on the basis of the link being a redirect. There are a number of reasons for redirect pages, they do not invalidate the reason for the entry in the article. Thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 00:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schazjmd each DOY article, in its edit notice says : The births and deaths listed on this page are only for people for whom there is a Wikipedia article (no red links and no redirects).

Thus, redirects should be removed. I suggest you undo your reversions of their edits. Kind regards, Willbb234^Talk (please ((ping)) me in replies) 06:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize that, thanks for pointing it out, Willbb234! Sorry for my mistake, Old Man Consequences. Schazjmd (talk) 14:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! ((u|Sdkb)) ^talk 21:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change the original article? I’ve been told story’s for most of my life that im related to these people and just curious why the previous information was removed and how you know about them I guess? Haha TCunneen (talk) 03:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can you see this article Omar Al-Saadoun. Hamaredha (talk) 15:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Old Man Consequences, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 04:58, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding ((subst:Seasonal Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

May you be showered with good health, wealth, peace and prosperity. Merry Christmas to you and your family!RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 04:58, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sorting the stubs I added to some articles recently. Heres a nice kitten to say thanks.

Danielgray.me (talk) 16:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello a pleasure to greet you truthfully I was creating this Wikipedia entry about the Joey Mills but I want to connect it to Spanish and French can help me could you help me keep it in english language the article is relevant. Secretsgenius (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you. I've been wanting to sort the PR geo stub articles for years but didn't know how to. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 12:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your contribution! As your introduction, want to expand the article more TeRra Magazine, but can you let know how to you 'Non-free fair use in|Article' for the cover image in the infobox? and also in the wikimedia to prevent deletion ..? 134adsl (talk) 04:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images aren't allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If you want to use fair use images, upload them directly onto Wikipedia. Old Man Consequences (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for prompt help with Paper Doll (Mills Brothers song)‎. I am happy because "Paper Doll" is a great song and a big hit, and now it has a wiki page worthy of that. Best part was great collaboration and support, good decisions streamlining infobox, I learned today. Dave Tillywilly17 (talk) 23:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Are you using the WP:TYPO/MOSS lists? If you are, please remember to remove typos from the list once they are fixed - it wastes quite an amount of time to go into articles and see that the typos have been fixed already. Thanks! Vukky 🎒 ^{(talk • You're reading this!)} 11:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes I was, I'll do that next time. Old Man Consequences (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Can you add category and tag for Mohamed Yalouh’s page? 2001:8F8:1125:A532:4841:612E:9DEB:7FEE (talk) 17:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can you take off the orphan tag from Mohamed Yalouh’s page? Thanks! 2001:8F8:1125:A532:F02D:23BB:A471:BF73 (talk) 16:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Old Man Consequences (talk) 18:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Rachel (given name)

added links pointing to Rachel Jones, Rachel Roberts, Rachel Nichols, Rachel Joyce, Rachel Parsons, Rachel Thomas, Rachel Feinstein and Rachel White

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, you reverted a maintenance edit (More Tuscany) with the edit summary that it was not a stub. Marking an article as a stub is not derogatory but places it in a category for articles to be expanded.

There are generally not a lot of conflicts in identifying stub articles and I have never had one contested. Perhaps, you might read Wikipedia:Stub, specifically This page in a nutshell; An article too short to provide more than rudimentary information about a subject should be marked as a stub and the lead A stub is an article deemed too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, before assessing or reassessing articles. The "Basic information section states, A stub is an article that, although providing some useful information, lacks the breadth of coverage expected from an encyclopedia, and that is capable of expansion. The section goes on to give some examples (How big is too big?) of ten sentences. The article is full of continual run-on sentences but even at that after corrections, it would be hard to get to the minimum, which would still be argumentative at best. The next criteria would be 250 words and the article has 1469 B (238 words) of "readable prose size", so also falls short of the "1,500 characters in the main text".

Exceptions might include,

• 1)- if a subject is not expandable. This might mean you agree with a lack of notability, or maybe consider it falls under the
• 2)- Croughton-London rule, meaning that even though very short the article is fairly comprehensive in coverage. This article "stub" (identified by the above criteria) is neither well-written nor comprehensive.

Of course, your opinion on how you arrived at the conclusion the article is not a stub, might include a rationale not found in the above-mentioned editing guideline. -- Otr500 (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My conclusion was based on article length as well as the number of references. Since it was not quality-assessed by a WikiProject, I decided to be bold and removed the template. This was not an obvious case, however. Old Man Consequences (talk) 16:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but the number of references doesn't really factor in. That is just a good example that an article "may" be expandable. As for article size, it is below the minimum of listed examples. I have seen junk articles, that were well dummy sourced, that did not pass AFD when sources were examined. Many Italian-based articles, especially political ones, are not assessed. When a new class assessment is very quickly reverted it makes one wonder, especially with the thousands of stub-classed articles under-assessed. -- Otr500 (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Patrick Lancaster 666hopedieslast (talk) 23:53, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Old Man Consequences (talk) 23:54, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dear Rockybhai3 (talk) 01:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted a maintenance edit [1] for NewSpring church. Marking an article as a stub is not meant to be derogatory but places the article in a category that will attract editors to help expand the article. I see you have been queried over this before and recently. I have opened a section on the article talk page explaining why it is a stub. The referencing is poor on the page, and the information on what ought to be a notable subject is miniscule. I would invite you to return the stub template so that the page can be improved. Thanks Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for acting so quickly. Cheers. :) Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for all the stub sorting work you do! Kj cheetham (talk) 19:52, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Old Man Consequences (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Old_Man_Consequences: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, RV (talk) 01:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Really like your username! BloxyColaSweet (talk) 04:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Old Man Consequences (talk) 15:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like cookies better @BloxyColasweet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metro2fsb (talk • contribs) 03:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This Barnstar is awarded to Old Man Consequences. It is the little things that matter most, and the little edits make all the difference! Metro2fsb (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I'm fairly new to wikipedia but had an account before but that was many years ago forgot many things including the password lol Im experienced in journalism and script writing way back in my previous life...but am rusty so I was just wondering why the article stub template got removed? and if you could you rate the quality of my article out of 10 which would it be? I would love to learn from your edits/knowledge and improve my skills on wikipedia to help better and provide accurate reliable independent sources for future works. Thanks Defunkedmaster (talk) 23:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I removed the stub template because the article was too long to be considered a stub. See WP:Stub for more detail. As to the quality of the article, I would say probably start-class. Instead of rating articles on a scale of 1 to 10, we use WP:ASSESSMENT. Old Man Consequences (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay thank you for the fast reply, i read the WP:ASSESSMENT but am I understanding it right that the rating start-class doesn't mean my article will be deleted but does however have the potential to be a article in the main space? also would you rate my first article I created too, please!? which is Nina Hastie thank you!

Defunkedmaster (talk) 07:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the Nina Hastie article is also start-class. As to whether your articles will be deleted, see WP:N. A start-class article is less likely to be deleted than a stub, but it can still happen. Old Man Consequences (talk) 15:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! could u maybe help me with something please? also have I told you I really like the name you chose!? One of my articles Draft:B Major (Bjorn Martin) got an administrator creation/protection on the page. i had no idea that will happen yesterday while the wiki article i created is start-class quality.. it was moved to Draft space yesterday and that's when someone protected the page, it might be someone who has a personal vendetta with the topic or i don't know really. but that's not allowed on wiki, the person seems to have a personal issues with the subject i wrote about and I'm just curious as to what you think about that? and what WP article can i send him which shows that having personal issues with a topic shouldn't affect the article of being created because of his or her feelings. I'm basically asking if you could help move the page back to the live space and rate it as start-class please, if it gets deleted in future i'll do my best to defend the works.

I will be a extended confirmed user very soon and I will contributing a lot to the encyclopedia but the page needs administrators permission to move it, my Nina Hastie article is still live and no one marked it start-class or anything.. could you consider doing that for me also please?

Thank You & One Love!

Defunkedmaster (talk) 10:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I deal with the maintenance of municipalities in the Czech Republic and their destubbing. I noticed that you interfere with sorting the stubs. It is not necessary. All the municipalities are uniformly sorted by regions and these interventions are not systematic. The only region that is slighty "oversized" is the Central Bohemian, but for the size of its districts there would be only a few dozen stubs in each (average 69, but in reality some would be less than 50, and none over 100), and I am continuously reducing the number of these stubs. It is better to temporarily have one category slightly over 800 than to permanently have 12 undersized categories. I consider the current uniform division to be sufficient and I would not like you to do unnecessary work. Thanks FromCzech (talk) 05:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me, I’ll leave those articles alone from now on. Old Man Consequences (talk) 13:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe for the reasons mentioned above it would be good to delete these categories, but I can't judge if those reasons are sufficient. And I haven't figured out if it's possible to put a proposal on all of them at once within one proposal. FromCzech (talk) 05:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Digne station. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Losipov (talk) 19:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mezmur. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Losipov (talk) 19:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for contributing to the NSAA (new school for the arts and academics) page, glad to know its not just me :3

Dinoroki (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Old Man Consequences! I noticed you've been adding various stub tags to a lot of articles. First of all, thank you! Second, you may find it useful to use StubSorter, which makes it a lot easier to find relevant stubs. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Old Man Consequences, thank you for your edit on Washer_Electrical_Equipment_Bond. I do not agree that the article is about Electronics. Rather, it's about Electrics or Electrical wiring or Electrical engineering.

Would you please consider to revert your stub tag. Thank you!

DouglasHeld (talk) 23:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I changed it to electricity stubs, as there is no stub template for electrical wiring or electrical engineering.Old Man Consequences (talk) 23:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Old Man Consequences!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]