Welcome OtterAM!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cygnus OB7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cygnus X. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Fixed! OtterAM (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Westerhout 40 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ṫ Ḧ ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 13:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a reply on the nomination page. Could you please clarify your comments so that I can better make the required changes? Best, OtterAM (talk) 00:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do any of the cites verify the hook? Ṫ Ḧ ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 14:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I clarified the citations for the hook and added a few more hook options... See the DYK discussion page. OtterAM (talk) 20:22, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Westerhout 40, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the molecular cloud in the Westerhout 40 nebula is shaped like a shepherd's crook and it is forming new stars? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Westerhout 40. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:03, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Serpens-Aquila Rift at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Serpens-Aquila Rift, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that several star-forming regions lie projected in or near the Serpens-Aquila Rift (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Serpens-Aquila Rift. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

Acanthinodera cumingii[edit]

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Female Acanthinodera cumingii.

• ... that the larva of the beetle Acanthinodera cumingii can reach 13 cm long? Source: "Todo su desarrollo ocurre en el interior del tronco. Allí crece hasta alcanzar unos 13 cm de largo." English: Its entire development occurs inside the trunk. There it grows until reaching about 13 cm long. ([1])
  • ALT1:... that the larva of the beetle Acanthinodera cumingii feed on dead wood? Source: "A. cumingii pasa la mayor parte de su vida como larva, alimentándose de madera al interior de troncos en descomposición (Porter, 1933)." English: A. cumingii spends most of its life as a larva, feeding on wood inside decaying logs (Porter, 1933). ([2])

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dickie Dick Dickens

5x expanded by OtterAM (talk). Self-nominated at 16:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

• This is an interesting article, expanded 5X within the last 5 days, therefore it is new enough and long enough. The article is neutrally written, and each paragraph has an inline citation. (a citation for the last sentence in "Conservation" would be nice, though). I find no close paraphrasing in the article. The main hook is interesting (the larvae is larger than either male or female adult). I don't find ALT1 compelling in any way, so I'd not use that. The hook is within policy regarding length/objectivity. The image is properly designated Creative Commons, so no issue there. The problem is that the hook is nowhere to be found in the article! You've sourced it in your nomination, why not add it to the article? 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your review. I've added the line you requested to the article under the section Life Cycle. OtterAM (talk) 17:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• We're getting real close here. My last concern has to do with the word "enormous" which is now contained in the sentence which is directly related to the hook. While I think 13cm makes the hook interesting, "enormous" is a superlative that might not really apply. What does the source use any superlatives regarding the size of the larvae? Thanks! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 23:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I removed the word "enormous" in reference to the larva. On the related issue of size, I added a sentence to the article's opening stating that the beetle is one of the largest in Chile, with a reference to a Chilean Ministry of the Environment fact sheet. OtterAM (talk) 13:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• This is good to go. Hook is directly tied and accurate to the source, no further concerns. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:16, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the X-ray astronomy page, your edit caused an arXiv error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Acanthinodera cumingii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OtterAM. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. OtterAM (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acanthinodera cumingii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the larva of the beetle Acanthinodera cumingii can reach 13 centimetres (5 in) in length? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Acanthinodera cumingii. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of RCW 36 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll make the suggested changes as soon as possible. OtterAM (talk) 15:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OtterAM, have you completed the changes yet? (I notice you've made some edits to the article.) If so, please post that you've done so on the nomination template; if not, a brief progress report there would be helpful. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article RCW 36, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 300 young stars in RCW 36 have been detected by the Chandra X-ray Observatory? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/RCW 36. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sh2-297, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a protostar in the Sh2-297 nebula is driving an outflow of gas more massive than the Sun? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sh2-297. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Qula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2002 Adora terrorist attack, OtterAM!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful article!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi. Gave your latest article a couple of incoming links. Nice addition to the project.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thanks for the links! OtterAM (talk) 00:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OtterAM. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tortit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello OtterAM,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Turkish border killings 2018 for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Syria–Turkey border#History.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CentreLeftRight ✉ 05:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

is covered by the 1RR. You are currently at 2 reverts. nableezy - 19:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually zero reverts. OtterAM (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Good luck with that argument. More reverts will result in a report. nableezy - 20:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I undid somebody's edit ONCE. And, that was to offer up an alternative suggestion, not a revision to a previous version. OtterAM (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And prior to that you removed material on it being a protest against the occupation of East Jerusalem, which has previously been discussed on the talk page for example here. Every year somebody thinks that because they see this in the news that they must remove facts in an encyclopedia article they dislike. I was hoping that wouldnt happen again this year, but alas you proved me wrong. nableezy - 20:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mhhossein ^talk 05:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've got this 100% backwards. This article is an embarrassment to Wikipedia in its present state. According to your version, Quds Day is primarily a festival for Berlin Jews who hate Israel rather than a political gimmick of the extremist regime presently in control of Iran. We could have worked this out with the RfC that I started, but instead you resort to violations of the page's 1 revert rule. OtterAM (talk) 05:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to enhance the quality of the article by committing Original Research? You've fabricated self made materials and pushed them in the article. Don't do that again. --Mhhossein ^talk 17:27, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you really think it is necessary to tag the article as disputed neutrality over the picture? Youre disputing the entire articles neutrality because of the picture in the infobox? That this is being edit-warred over is kind of astounding to me, but regardless of which picture ends up being used, thats enough to put a banner questioning the entire article? nableezy - 05:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tortit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tortit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited How to Cook in Palestine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Mandate of Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beersheba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OtterAM. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated the ARBPIA 1 revert rule at Military occupation. Please self-revert or you may be reported. nableezy - 02:23, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not self-revert soon I will be reporting you. nableezy - 02:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:The Spitzer Space Telescope's view of W40.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear OtterAM,

thank you for your work on Wikipedia. It is greatly appreciated. Just now I came across a page move from some years ago, of the article Acanthinodera cumingii [3], which I would like to run by you. You indicated the reason, that the article is about the species. I would like to undo this page move. That is because this is a monotypic genus, meaning there is only a single species in this genus. As such, our guidelines indicate we should describe both the genus and species in a single article: "In such a case, the ranks with identical member organisms should not be separated into different articles". Moreover, the naming convention says that the name should be that of the genus: "the article... ...should go under the scientific name of lowest rank, but no lower than the monotypic genus."

I hope to hear back from you, whether or not you agree with this move. Ofcourse I can make the necessary changes to the article text afterwards. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 07:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Taketa: Sounds fine. Go ahead. OtterAM (talk) 02:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

More than a year since was given previously. Selfstudier (talk) 22:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]