To get my attention on other talk pages, you can also try WP:Notifications, though I don't always seem to receive them, so please ((talkback)) to me if I keep editing and haven't responded. Thanks!

Hello, PC-XT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.   Introduction  5   The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place ((helpme)) on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

History archives: 1 Searchable selections (list) by type: Discussion: 1 Appreciation: -1 0 1 Trout slaps: 1 Cite this version: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?oldid=1144135300 [[Special:PermanentLink/1144135300]] on this wiki [[Special:Diff/1144135300]] for last edit by SDZeroBot

I looked at the Barcelona football seasons for which you added ((Futbol box plegable)) (and some other seasons after). They could do with ((cleanup-translation|ca|listed=no)), really. (I don't think it's worth listing at WP:PNT, but this should put them in view of ((WikiProject Catalonia)) one way or another, or if not that could be added to their talk pages). I don't want to do it myself (a) because I am lazy and (b) because I know nothing about football and would probably make translation mistakes. Si Trew (talk) 05:42, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Si Trew, I expect you are right. (I've only looked at two, so far, and both were still being edited. There was only one when I came onto the scene, and I changed it to use the English name. The others were created soon after.) I'll try to tag them, soon, assuming they don't improve before then. —PC-XT+ 06:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair play. I wouldn't bother tagging them if they are under construction, either: I can't imagine the'll ever get an enormous number of hits, but they are useful additions. (But then, I just translated a stub at Le Petit Quotidien yesterday, and I imagine that will be in the top five within the week - or not!) Si Trew (talk) 06:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS I don't know Catalan but I know Spanish and French so for the purposes of these kind of "technical" articles I can usually get by. Si Trew (talk) 06:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

letter gnome
Thank you, user who has fun here, juggling letters in many coding languages, for welcoming new users, for redirects and disambiguations including 4-letter-radio stations, for creating templates, discussing their clean-up and merging, for support and KIS, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! This is an honor! I appreciate it! —PC-XT+ 07:03, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1098 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! I've been absent, recently, but I hope to return. ;D —PC-XT+ 07:04, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm still around, but don't log in as much. It is nice to hear from you! —PC-XT+ 21:44, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... five years --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm mostly on mobile now. Thanks for stopping by! :-) —PC-XT+ 16:03, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

((Talkback|PC-XT)Erica Blatt Harkins Thank you. Now all we have to do is wait! Again thank you for all your support. (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 06:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Oh dear me! Seriously, I don't get pleasure pointing out the bleeding obvious, but really: "Merge seems sensible to me, as these are very close to each other" COMPLETELY misses the major issues (plural). Yes, they are "similar", but they are (again, here comes the block caps) COMPLETELY different and in most ways tangential. It's too late at night (here where I am) to go into detail now, but if you wish me to, please ask. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'd like more information, when it's convenient. I posted my reasons for saying that in the TfD. —PC-XT+ 13:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Expletive deleted! Sorry, I forgot to reply. I guess I'll also do so at the TfD. (Profuse apologies!) Pdfpdf (talk) 10:22, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PC-XT, I just saw your collapse of the "road map." We need links to the three separate TfD discussions (four including the DRV), so that new participants and returning participants can understand how we arrived at the present re-opened/re-listed discussion. Contrary to Andy's rather bizarre and unnecessary digression, my words were carefully chosen and there is nothing factually inaccurate about the recitation of the history or the links. I urge you to remove the collapse. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 13:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Dirtlawyer1 in this. I propose to keep the roadmap in sight, but then collapse the subthreads (from digression by Andy), because these are off-topic. -DePiep (talk) 14:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @DePiep:, don't do it: Andy will likely revert the collapse, as he often does with any collapse in a TfD discussion that he did not implement himself. It's not worth the resulting fuss.

(edit conflict)I think it's too much of a matter of contention for any of us to collapse. It would probably require an uninvolved party. —PC-XT+ 14:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Dirtlawyer1 I was debating replacing the roadmap, but uncollapsed it since I haven't had time to do so. It's not my intention for editors to be uninformed, but it is a bit confusing this way. There are 4 separate discussions, but two, the DRV and the collapsed discussion, are mostly irrelevant, discussing procedure rather than the templates. I had linked to the previous discussion above, before the DRV, but it gets lost in text. I didn't find a template or procedure to provide a link to the DRV in the relisted discussion. (I am not sure it is commonly found relevant to the discussion, but I have no objection to providing it.) There was one part removed from the relisted discussion as apparently irrelevant that is still at the previous log page, but everything else should be the same. (I don't oppose linking to it, as long as readers aren't lead to believe it is a separate discussion.) The 4th discussion is on the same page, and could use a section link, but I'm not sure it is relevant, either. —PC-XT+ 14:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• PC-XT, thank you for removing the collapse. I also ask that you strike, revise or replace your comment regarding the "road map"; there is nothing "incorrect," inaccurate or misleading about it, and it is neutrally worded to provide links to the other three related TfD and DRV discussions since November 29th. If there is some particular problem with my phrasing which I have missed, please let me know, and I will change it to accommodate your concern. I am constantly surprised by how something as non-controversial as linked history can become a bone of contention, but that is part of the modus operandi of this particular nominator. You and I have no interaction history prior to this discussion (at least that I can recall), but I have little doubt that we will agree and work together on other TfD discussions. While we disagree in this particular TfD, I sincerely appreciate your polite and respectful approach to the discussion -- that's how these discussions are supposed to work. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dirtlawyer1, I know you were acting in good faith in this, and have nothing against you. I find you reasonable, and I think I understand your concerns regarding the templates in question. This is a side issue. I don't have a problem with a road map, either, and feel the links, themselves, are helpful. They are a bit confusing, but that is due to such things as the discussion being relisted, but still at the old log page, with part removed in the relisting, and a collapsed discussion on the same page, rather than anything you did. I could see your wording was chosen to be neutral, and I don't think you did anything wrong. I only feel a bit more context would be helpful in clarification. Regrettably, I don't really have time to discuss this, at the moment, but I don't think this is a huge deal. —PC-XT+ 15:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PC-XT. You have new messages at PC-XT's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Erica Blatt Harkins

Hi, I know that I should not write the above when I am on your talk page, but I am doing it anyway by precaution. I know that it is silly! The good new is that yesterday I received an Email from "Permissions" telling me that the Marta Scheiner from the bio of Nicolae Blatt was accepted and taken care. Probably the others will also be accepted gradually. Thank you for your continous help. (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 08:51, 25 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you for your kind note. Well, guess what? I just found out yesterday that the bumpy ride is not over yet! After I received the positive note from "Permission" somebody else deleted that picture. After I explained again a lot it was reinstated today. However, meanwhile I received other warnings that other files will be deleted; while at the same time I was receiving Emails from "Permissions" that they have taken care of those pictures! Apparently the warnings happened because of "redundancy", and I think that happened when I sent to "permission" the forms they requested. I again explained a lot and I hope those other 3 pictures will not be deleted. I will know tomorrow morning. Thank you again, and please keep in touch. (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]

I left you a new message on my talk page. Thanks! (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 06:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you very, very much! You are a wonderful sport. Regarding the picture: Nicolae Blatt in WWII, I did not put a tag on it because it seems to me that it was accepted from the very beginning, and also I received a message from "Permissions" that they took care of it. Should I have also tagged it? Thank you (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 07:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]

I left you a message on my talk page. (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 04:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]

You broke the template 8TeamBracket-Tennis3-v2. You could see how the seeds for the first round were all messed up here: 2015 Australian Open – Men's Singles Qualifying

I reverted it to the 30 January 2015‎ version for the time being

Rubyaxles (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks for reverting, Rubyaxles. I had accidentally messed up the testcases without realizing it. —PC-XT+ 12:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rubyaxles, your revert fixed the testcases, and I corrected the sandbox. Just to be sure, if you could also check that each section of Template:8TeamBracket-Tennis3-v2/testcases has 2 identical copies, I'd appreciate it. This is a lesson learned: I need to make sure the testcases are accurate before I do the comparison. —PC-XT+ 12:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i saw many words that is all are mechuka but its wrong in reality its MENCHUKHA.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.241.10.84 (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's discuss on Talk:Mechuka. —PC-XT+ 17:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PC, per my comment in the re-listed TfD discussion (see [1]), I believe that this is a discussion that would really benefit from a much wider circle of editors who have worked on this family of templates in the past. Please let me know if you would like to split the responsibility for notifying major contributors and perhaps individual members of WikiProject Flag Template (if they can be identified). Perhaps this is a good place to begin to shape a kinder, gentler TfD/TfM atmosphere, including examples of collegial TfD notices of potentially concerned and knowledgeable editors. What do you think? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I responded at the TfD. —PC-XT+ 17:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Seguro Popular, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PC-XT,

How very nice to hear from you! Upon Yngvadottir's suggestion I was ready to get in touch with you, but you were ahead of me! Thank you for the detailed answer. The Power-Point presentation I am talking about is the history of Eastern Europe and I created the presentation. I will get in touch with somebody to find out what format can be used and how to transfer it. You and Yngvadottir have been of great help and you continue to be. I am very grateful for all this. (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 03:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Hey, PC. This [2] should be incorporated into the TfD/TfM instructions on the WP:TfD page, as well as clarified on the documentation/instructions for the TfD/TfM notice template. I don't have the template editor permission; otherwise, I would make the latter change myself. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dirtlawyer1, I documented the two aliases of |type=sidebar for ((Tfd)) and ((Tfm)). I'm not sure about listing them in the TfD header instructions, as they simply duplicate the functionality of |type=sidebar, and I think shorter instructions are easier to follow. Feel free to add it if you think it is needed, though. Cheers! —PC-XT+ 22:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PC-XT,

With regards to your message on my talk page regarding the template named in the subject line, I created this template to help the user Llusiduonbach as I saw that his sandbox page contains a draft of an article for the Welsh Wikipedia, which I assume would appear under the title Eglwys Bresbyteraidd Rydd yr Alban (which stands for Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland). Originally I thought this was not allowed, drafting non-English articles in the English Wikipedia. But a web chat session host informed me that this was allowed (let me know if this is not the case), and since the template Eginyn exists on the Welsh wiki, I'd thought of making a placeholder for his sandbox page so that he could apply it to Wicipedia, that's it. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any other concerns!

<<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PC-XT

Here I am again after a long time of silence, I hope everything is OK with you; I am immersed in preparing for my classes, it seems to never end! Of course I again need advice and help. I probably mentioned before that by now the bio of Blatt is available on the Romanian Wikipedia. However, it still has no pictures. I am being advised, that instead inserting the pictures that have been already inserted by myself, as I did in the past, I should wait until they are transferred into Wikipedia Commons (if that is indeed correct) and after that I should insert them into the Romanian text, in order to avoid confusions. However, it seems to never happen. Out of all the pictures, ironically, it seems that only the picture of Marta Blatt is now on Wikimedia Commons.. My question is: is it any manner to expedite the transfer of licensed accepted pictures into Wikimedia Commons? or should I just insert them myself as I did in the past on the English Wikipedia? I sent this questions also to Yngvadottir because sometimes in the past you worked together on my issues. Looking forward to your answer, thank you very much. (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 01:32, 9 April 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Hello Pc-XT I sent you earlier a message with some questions and telling you that I sent the same questions to Yngvadottir. I just received a message from another user informing me that Yngvadottir is no more associated with Wikipedia. I feel that this is a terrible loss. Anyway I appreciate your continuous help, and I hope hearing from you. Thank you (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 03:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Hello PC-XY, I left you several days ago a message here on your talk page with some questions regarding pictures and Wiki Commons and never heard from you again which is unusual! I hope everything is OK and please respond if you can. Thank you! (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 04:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Hello PC-XT! Inadvertently in the previous message I misspelled your name. It was a typo! My apologies! (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 04:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Erica Blatt Harkins, Sorry I didn't answer, earlier. I've been distracted by other things, and somehow didn't receive a notification or email about your first two messages. I am also sorry to hear that Yngvadottir has left. I found the user especially helpful, knowledgeable, and understanding.

I'll try moving File:Ncolae Blatt at International Congress of Ophthalmology in Hague 1939.jpg, when I have time. I should probably add the missing "i" in the first name during the move. I'll also try to look into the others. (I tried authorizing a tool to automatically move images for me, but it keeps giving me token errors when I try to sign up, so I'll wait and try again. Before this, I've only moved images I created myself, manually.) It would be easier to move them to Commons than to upload them on the Romanian Wikipedia and go through that process, again, but there could be a technical reason that some can't be moved to commons. —PC-XT+ 09:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the followup discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Infobox college football player and Infobox NFL player based on your participation in the earlier TfD at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 December 14#Template:Infobox college football player. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 01:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Helo PC-XT,

I am so happy to hear from you! I was concerned that something happened to you and i also wondered if you still were with Wikipedia! I am glad that everything is OK with you;I hope so. You are a great friend! Thank you for you help again and for moving some of the pictures of Nicolae Blatt into Wikimedia Commons. I tried but I was not capable to do it!. I am asking again for your help: the one picture that I would like very much to move into Wikimedia Commons is the picture of "Blatt with Queen Helen and King Michael in front of the Foisor Palace". I hope you don't mind doing this. Thank you very much for getting in touch with me. Very sincerely. (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 21:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC))[reply]

I'm sorry I didn't write earlier. I was afraid it looked bleak that I became inactive at about the same time that Yngvadottir left, but it's normal for me to edit less, this time of year. I'm just very busy. I didn't make one edit during all of May, last year, and made a total of 3 edits during April and May the year before that. I was hoping to squeeze some Wikipedia in, but it gets crazy fast.

You're welcome. I had a bit of trouble figuring out how to transfer files, myself, but I think I have the hang of it, now. I moved the picture I think you requested and placed it in the list on your talk page. Enjoy! —PC-XT+ 02:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I actually did end up losing the end of my usual summer editing, after all. I expect to be back for the winter, though. :) —PC-XT+ 06:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Seguro Popular, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PC-XT. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Seguro Popular".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)) or ((db-g13)) code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you would like to add this edit of Lake Michigan to your list of amusing edits.^[1] Some guy named Tim Mack supposedly tried to drink Lake Michigan: he thought he could drink the entire lake. sounds like a hoax edit to me. I don't see how anyone can think they can drink a lake that huge. Spidersmilk (talk) 17:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it looks like a hoax. It's the only edit by that user, and an IP followed up on it. Thanks, the section is small, and could use a hoax edit. Haha. —PC-XT+ 07:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to thank you for your thoughtful suggestions on Amalia Carneri. I wish that more new editors would be given a chance on Wikipedia. Cheers!

MurderByDeletionism^"bang!" 05:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bijaya Kumar Gachchhadar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madhesi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this would happen. :p —PC-XT+ 21:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Bijaya Kumar Gachchhadar page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also thought this would happen, but maybe I'll try the help desk... —PC-XT+ 00:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
3		KCFX-HD2 (talk)						Add sources
1,651		Telangana (talk)						Add sources
2		Esophogeal doppler (talk)						Add sources
5		WRYD (talk)						Add sources
4		Directors Lounge (talk)						Add sources
16		KSJO (talk)						Add sources
10		Henry Bakis (talk)						Cleanup
24		Bundy Manufacturing Company (talk)						Cleanup
937		Southampton (talk)						Cleanup
1,762		Flash (Barry Allen) (talk)						Expand
13,732		Wiki (talk)						Expand
9		WBHT (talk)						Expand
233		Equity crowdfunding (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,395		Pomegranate (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
83		Life with Lucy (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
100		Ventricular pressure (talk)						Merge
30		Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state (talk)						Merge
127		Sufism in India (talk)						Merge
871		Tom Kenny (talk)						Wikify
646		XMPP (talk)						Wikify
308		Video game music (talk)						Wikify
26		Walter Naegle (talk)						Orphan
1		Thigul (talk)						Orphan
2		Ashley Walters (artist) (talk)						Orphan
11		KHKI (talk)						Stub
3		WKMO (talk)						Stub
3		WHHT (talk)						Stub
4		WYRY (talk)						Stub
166		Project Fi (talk)						Stub
9		WZAT (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your posts on the Help Desk about the Pleasant Valley Grange Hall article. I was glad to learn how the red dots wind up on a map! Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD|Talk 20:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm glad I could help! —PC-XT+ 23:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that at WP:HD#Got a meg for Spaming, why?? you said that you couldn't see the user's edit. If on Special:Contributions/98.177.254.166 you click on the "filter log" link at the top, it gives a clue what was going wrong. (In some filter log situations, however, the detail is hidden to prevent vandals finding their way past the filter.) --David Biddulph (talk) 08:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me, David Biddulph. I didn't know how to use that. I appreciate it. —PC-XT+ 09:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Municipalities of Telangana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vin09 (talk) 04:28, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This question was archived without being answered. I wouldn't know how but I try to see that all questions get some sort of response. You seem to know about the KIS template.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I've been busy, recently, but I'll post on the user's talk page. —PC-XT+ 11:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 May 11. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchyte, sorry I became inactive and the discussion closed before I could actually!vote, but the closer probably took my comment into consideration. I think it closed in favor of your proposal. Cheers! —PC-XT+ 17:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please do not delete the page. We are working on this. Thanks and regards Rtiwaripandey13 (talk) 03:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rtiwaripandey13, thanks for the reply. I don't intend for your sandbox to be deleted. I only nominated the blank template ((Dr. Marc Ruel)). If you don't need that, anymore, or if you do, you can reply at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 July 3#Template:Dr. Marc Ruel. Happy editing! —PC-XT+ 04:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, We are working on 'Dr Marc Ruel's' page, and intend to keep it. Soon we will send the draft for review.

Thanks again, Rtiwaripandey13 (talk) 04:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged several templates for deletion. e.g. ((Fb team Murray Bridge)) and mentioned in your rationale that we should look at the TFD entry but you did not link it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I almost linked it, but just eluded to the link already in the TfD tag, instead. I'll try to be clearer, next time. —PC-XT+ 03:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:No redirect conditional. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with speedy cancelling the merge. I suspected a catch may exist, and so did the closer, so I don't think either of us are that surprised that the merge didn't work out. —PC-XT+ 00:23, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lang-zh has been nominated for merging with Template:Zh. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Beland (talk) 06:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is gonna be a little out of the left field but a couple years ago you volunteered to write some scripts for the Citizendium porting project. Did anything come out of that? I've been involved with Wikivoyage of late and was looking for tools that could be used to compare both WV's and Wikitravel's databases (though Wikitravel doesn't release DB dumps, it would have to be live). Get a list of articles we're missing. Also something like Special:ComparePages that worked with external pages. Do you know if anything similar exists? And if not, are they within the realm of possibility? :). I'm not asking you to do it by the way, I'll make a request at the technical boards, just wanted to avoid duplication in case you had already done the work and get a bearing if it's actually possible. Thanks, Acer (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Acer, Wikitravel has the API, which can retrieve lists of pages. This method has some limitations that database dumps don't, but it usually gives the most recent information. To save bandwidth and server time, efficiency is more important for large queries. (After running through the file list once, an updating run may be more efficient if it only checks new page titles.) The titles could be compared with Wikivoyage's database, or even via its API. Other general tools for the API, such as a page comparison script, could probably be modified to work between these two wikis. I don't know much about these wikis, so there may be a better way, but I'd at least say this is possible within API limitations. :) —PC-XT+ 23:44, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that worked. I tried searching around for info on the API and found this. They're using it for backup purposes but before the script begins archiving it generates a full file list. Got the lists, fgrep did the rest. Just what I needed. Thank you! Acer (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad I could help point you in the direction to a solution! —PC-XT+ 16:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PC-XT. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PC-XT. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Userpage Barnstar
		Nicely written and designed user page. —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC) P.S. KIS project is also great![reply]

Thanks! —PC-XT+ 21:57, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PC-XT. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I see that you were one of the people who supported the Global-Wiki idea on Meta. It was closed as "consensus", but it's far from being fully implemented. We did get global personal JS and CSS, global user pages, and global preferences, and all of this is excellent. However, we still don't have Global templates, and this is the most important thing.

I am trying to reboot the Global templates project. It's ambitious, but I am trying to make it focused on only templates and modules, and to break it up further into manageable and doable parts.

I wrote this similar proposal: mw:Global templates is the introduction, there are more details in mw:Global templates/Proposed specification, short version, and even more details in mw:Global templates/Proposed specification.

This proposal is a little smaller in scope than meta:Global-Wiki, but I have reasons to think that in this format it has a better chance of actually getting implemented.

I'd love to hear what do you think about it. In particular, you wrote on that page:

Would there be a way to set up a different default for each of several languages? I don't think I would care if it used selective transclusion or some other method.

In my proposal, this issue is addressed specifically. In the short version of the proposal I wrote: "Each editors community will keep its independence to maintain local templates and to make local changes to global templates’ functionality and the information they present to readers." In the long version it is described in the sections "It must be possible to make some templates non-global" and "It must be possible to override some functionality or appearance of a global template". I am very interested in knowing whether the way I wrote it there makes sense to you.

If you support it, please sign at mw:Global templates/Discuss.

Thank you! --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Tennis events has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —PC-XT+ 23:03, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

... and seven --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krishnampalli, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishnampalli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]