Welcome[edit]

Hello, PSPazW, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place ((Help me)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PSPazW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My old account was blocked some time ago, and I wanted to get a new start with a new account. I'm no longer using the old account - I lost the password. This is currently my only account. PSPazW (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

Not enough context here. Which old account are you talking about? Yamla (talk) 00:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PSPazW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

jsobel was the old account PSPazW (talk) 00:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dan Sander, that doesn't seem to be the case. only (talk) 10:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PSPazW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks, but I'm sorry - I'm not clear what the issue is. This is a new account, I no longer use or have access to the old jsobel account, and to best of my knowledge, I have not broken any Wikipedia guidelines. Can you please specify what the issue is, and how I can rectify it to be unblocked? Thank you. PSPazW (talk) 8:23 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Your editing patterns are consistent with what we usually see from paid editors, and in addition to that our technical logs (linked by Only above) suggest that a direct connection to several other accounts that have been engaging in covert advertisement. signed, Rosguill talk 21:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PSPazW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks so much for the feedback. Yes, in looking more closely at Wikipedia guidelines for paid contributions, I realize I should have added a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions that I made. I will make sure to do that in the future, and will do so for any post paid contributions that I have previously made. Regarding your comment about other accounts that have been engaging in covert advertisement, I do not have any connections to any other accounts. I'm not sure how you have gotten that information, but this must be a mistake. PSPazW (talk) 22:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Accept reason:

After consulting the CheckUser who delivered the SPI results, I am going to grant this unblock request. Please be sure that your future contributions are consistent with WP:PAID and WP:COI. I'm also blocking the Jsobel123 account – you can use this account or Jsobel123, but not both, so let me know if you'd prefer to use that one. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@L235: Thank you very much. I'll continue to use PSPazW. PSPazW (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC) @L235: I'm trying to add COI articles to my user page but it looks like it's still blocked. PSPazW (talk) 18:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You seem to be editing other pages so you should be able to edit your user page. If it still doesn't work let me know what the message is and I'll do my best to investigate. If it's just the "This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Dan Sander (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely" message you can remove that if you'd like – that's just a maintenance tag and doesn't actually create a block on its own. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@L235: Ah, I see that now. Thank you! PSPazW (talk) 18:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, PSPazW

Thank you for creating Christian French.

User:Barkeep49, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for disclosing your paid editing on this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Barkeep49)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Barkeep49 (talk) 19:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Jacks (band) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Jacks (band), has issues with our copyright policy and needs to be reviewed by an AfC reviewer owing to your paid editing disclosure. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nana (American rapper) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thank you for complying with our pay disclosure policy by placing a notice on the talk page. However, as a paid editor you are also required to submit new articles through WP:AFC, rather than creating them in mainspace. You can submit this draft by clicking on the template that has been placed at the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 23:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josie Man (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 19:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PSPazW! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 19:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nana (American rapper) (March 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No chart, no gold, no grammy = not yet notable
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah!💬 19:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phat Phunktion has been accepted[edit]

Phat Phunktion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pbrks (talk) 22:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stacy Amma Osei-Kuffour has been accepted[edit]

Stacy Amma Osei-Kuffour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

K.e.coffman (talk) 05:43, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SongVest has been accepted[edit]

SongVest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne McCabe (July 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Does not appear to meet the criteria for a bio on WP. Also lacks sufficient reliable sources for all statements in the text.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 13:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chrome Sparks (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please indicate how this person meets WP:MUSICBIO. I don't see any notable charting. Also needs extenal news sources that focus on Sparks's career not passing mentions and not interviews.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Adelman (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The cited sources often barely mention the subject. The couple sources about Adelman were interviews written in cooperation with him. I don't see enough for WP:GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 00:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nana (American rapper)[edit]

Information icon Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nana (American rapper), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nana (American rapper)[edit]

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loney Hutchins has been accepted[edit]

Loney Hutchins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MoonlightVectorTalk page 19:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OTR (musician) (November 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
They may be notable but there too many poor sources used. Quality sources have editorial oversight and a history of fact checking and most of the sources do not meet that criteria. You may find WP:WikiProject Electronic music/Sources helpful. Also need to include reviews in the prose.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Edgeout Records[edit]

Hello, I see you used to edit under the name Jsobel123, which is the editor who started the page Edgeout Records. Can you please confirm for me if you were paid to create this article? Thank you Chubbles (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Answer: Yes. (This was before I understood the disclosure rules.)

Ok Thank you Chubbles (talk) 15:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papo Vázquez has been accepted[edit]

Papo Vázquez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anne McCabe[edit]

Information icon Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anne McCabe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Steve Adelman[edit]

Information icon Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Steve Adelman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dallas String Quartet has been accepted[edit]

Dallas String Quartet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 05:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chrome Sparks[edit]

Information icon Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chrome Sparks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Steve Adelman[edit]

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Steve Adelman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chrome Sparks[edit]

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chrome Sparks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Courtney Stewart has been accepted[edit]

Courtney Stewart, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 18:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:OTR (musician)[edit]

Information icon Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OTR (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicolas Namoradze has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicolas Namoradze. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 19:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello - appreciate your check-in! I did this one unpaid. PSPazW (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Userpage paid disclosures[edit]

I have inserted a blank line in between each of your paid editing disclosures on your userpage. Before, they were all displaying as one unbroken line and wrapping at random places, making it difficult to read. With the blank lines it is far more legible. Please include a blank line with any new disclosures you add - thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Will do. PSPazW (talk) 17:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:OTR (musician)[edit]

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OTR".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:42, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bette Smith (May 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HenryTemplo (talk) 09:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Namoradze has been accepted[edit]

Nicolas Namoradze, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Israell (talk) 15:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pip Millett has been accepted[edit]

Pip Millett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bette Smith has been accepted[edit]

Bette Smith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 18:47, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nana (American rapper) (July 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 01:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wray Armstrong (August 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
97198 (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fousheé has been accepted[edit]

Fousheé, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ana Cristina Cash has been accepted[edit]

Ana Cristina Cash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 TT me 14:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg Suess (December 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Little more than routine announcements about him.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 08:36, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wray Armstrong[edit]

Information icon Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wray Armstrong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nana (American rapper)[edit]

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Milgrom has been accepted[edit]

Sam Milgrom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wray Armstrong[edit]

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Wray Armstrong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Sirota[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert Sirota requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jensenartists.com/robert-sirota. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 14:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Robert Sirota moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Robert Sirota, is not suitable as written to remain published. Since you have declared your paid editing status, this must go through AfC for review. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 16:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, OneI. I always submit my paid contributions through the editorial system, but in this case it didn't give me that option; somehow because a previous draft was still in the system, it only allowed me to directly publish my new one. I'll try again to submit properly and see if it works this time. PSPazW (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Sirota has been accepted[edit]

Robert Sirota, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 04:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pasquale Grasso has been accepted[edit]

Pasquale Grasso, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odunsi (The Engine) (April 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Charting on iTunes doesn't confer notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fair enough, but then why has the existing, inferior page been allowed to stay up so far? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odunsi_the_Engine PSPazW (talk) 15:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
User:AngusWOOF Why is the other page on the same non-notable subject still up? PSPazW (talk) 01:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You have some options:
1) If Odunsi is not notable, send the one in mainspace to AFD
2) Move your draft content to that page to improve it and make it a redirect to the mainspace one. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Greg Suess[edit]

Information icon Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Greg Suess, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Untitled Space has been accepted[edit]

The Untitled Space, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you Raydann!
If you're knowledgeable about art and galleries, is there any chance you could take a look at this one too? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Musichead_Gallery PSPazW (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeff Slate has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeff Slate. Thanks! Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 22:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've made some changes in response – thanks for your suggestions! PSPazW (talk) 14:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Slate (July 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Almost entirely sourced to articles etc by Slate rather than about him. Al st all the coverage about his music is minimal. Wikipedia isn't the place for resumes.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sionk (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blake Mills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feist. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabríel Ólafs has been accepted[edit]

Gabríel Ólafs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Numberguy6 (talk) 17:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Musichead Gallery has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Musichead Gallery. Thanks! Newystats (talk) 05:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musichead Gallery (August 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Newystats were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See comment below - the references seem to be about exhibitions, rather than establishing the notability of the gallery.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Newystats (talk) 05:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Odunsi (The Engine)[edit]

Information icon Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Odunsi (The Engine), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Summit has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Summit. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 03:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Pierson (October 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please list 3 articles that cover Pierson's career. This otherwise looks like a ton of name dropping.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Odunsi (The Engine)[edit]

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Odunsi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalie Jane (October 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Likely notable subject, but the draft needs better sources. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 11:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC).Reply[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spinster300 (talk) 11:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalie Jane has been accepted[edit]

Natalie Jane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 19:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Summit (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:BLP. All statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fahren Feingold has been accepted[edit]

Fahren Feingold, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- RichT|C|E-Mail 17:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Pierson (November 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not quite enough independent, significant coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Summit has been accepted[edit]

John Summit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Musichead Gallery[edit]

Information icon Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Musichead Gallery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 10:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jeff Slate[edit]

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeff Slate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

More