Please read this notification carefully: it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Hi Pahlevun,

The excessive number of minor edits flooding the foundation for defense of democracies page's content and page's log, and overall nature of provided edits are violating Wikipedia's policy for spamming and vandalism. After reviewing the log of spammed edits for this page, it appears these edits also are

1.) spamming of edits which are excessive, and could be resolved by simple proofreading prior to submitted changes, and minor and nature, making it difficult if not almost impossible to undo and arbitrate specific meaningful edits. The edit log is overwhelmed. This editing behavior is not acceptable under Wikipedia guidelines. 2.) Not just adding content, but removing old content that is not in line with the message of new content, and making it nearly impossible to discern meaningful edits from minor and unnecessary ones.

3) Also, Wikipedia's intent is to create an objective, unbiased information about subjects for the public. All edits appear to be attempting to portray to subject in a more negative light throughout the article, while deleting content that does not agree, and removing old sources that may contradict new edits. Hello, I'm Mavit1333. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_for_Defense_of_Democraciess seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

If this continues, your account will be flagged for higher level page vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_for_Defense_of_Democraciess. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Guardian council approves legislature and is iranian upper house. Experts assembly helps guardian council and islamic council assembly. Next time do your homework

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Pahlevun. Thank you.