Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Image notices, Misc. notices

Have you ever got this figured out? I'm having the same issue, and I love that thing when it works.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 9, 2021; 14:53 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for asking. No, I never did figure out why Advisor wasn't showing up. Years ago on WP, it showed up every time without fail, but nowadays it only appears when I least expect it. It's surprising that no one has replied to my inquiry from two years ago. I wonder if anyone else would know. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 14:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure if anyone has done anything in the past two weeks, but as of today, Advisor is working for me again. I'm a happy camper now :) Let's see if that lasts.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 21, 2021; 14:45 (UTC)

There’s an ongoing good article nomination for the page and the reviewer deemed the link non-reliable. It’s not my rules, I’m just following that because he said we should remove it and I want to get the page listed as a good article. SlySabre (talk) 13:42, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To be more specific, it’s because the reference wasn’t a direct source. It would’ve been fine had the video been uploaded directly by Fox News, however, since it was an unofficial re-upload, it needed to be removed for the Good Article nomination review because it wasn’t a direct source. SlySabre (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Paper Luigi; it has been a minute! I hope things are goin' well for you. I'm currently working on a dissertation about the information behavior fan editors on Wikipedia, and as a result, I've been reaching out to people who I think might have some interesting insights. Given your interest in animation, I was wondering if you'd be interested in chatting with me about your information experiences on the site? The questions are going to be things like "where do you get info", "how do you organize it," etc.? I can send over an email your way if you're interested! Just let me know.--Gen. Quon_[Talk]^{(I'm studying Wikipedia!)} 18:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, @Gen. Quon, I hope you're doing well. After reading your autoethnography subpage, I would be pleased to participate in an interview about my experiences editing pop culture pages. Send me an email at your convenience, and I'll get back with you as soon as I can. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 20:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, that's wonderful to hear! I've sent out an email with some more detail. Let me know if you didn't get it!--Gen. Quon_[Talk]^{(I'm studying Wikipedia!)} 14:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I sent a reply. If you reply this evening and I cannot get back to you in time, it will probably have to wait until early next week (personal reasons and such). — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 01:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Paper Luigi

Wondering if you could update the Brian A. Miller page with this article:

https://www.animationmagazine.net/tv/twentyone14-media-forms-animation-pact-with-brian-a-miller-dan-abnett-team-legend/

Thanks for considering.

76.87.135.179 (talk) 23:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I know you contribute a lot to WP:WikiProject Television and so you would be familiar with specific approaches the project takes. I recently nominated two season articles of The Chosen (TV series) for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chosen (season 1) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chosen (season 2). In both cases, they are essentially verbatim copies of the main article content and they don't meet the project's critieria for splitting (IMO). We don't count episode summaries per WP:NOTPLOT, leaving the article with about 500 words of redundant prose. Per my arguments in the deletion discussion, we don't create season articles for every show simply because the show itself is notable. Notability for the season itself is necessary. Am I off on this? I'd appreciate your input. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, generally there is no need to remove old talk page sections on articles, especially if having those previous discussions around is context so that a recent issue isn't brought up again. Better than archiving, in that case, is to set up automatic archiving so that the talk page maintains itself, but even this is best done as a contributor to the article rather than on a "drive-by" basis. And of course if the talk page is unfrequented, there is especially no case to add ((talk header)) to the talk page as there is no frequent discussion to warrant the links for newcomers (though it's unproven at all whether newcomers even read it). czar 05:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I saw that you worked on this article, and I wanted to hear your thoughts on merging this with Austin Powers: Welcome to My Underground Lair!. I think it'd be appropriate considering that they are quite similar and, in my experience, were often reviewed as a pair. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential primary campaign, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential primary campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Courage the Cowardly Dog characters.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Luigi, do you remember me? It's Mr. Inox, I'm back. How have you been? It's been over ten years and we still didn't manage to find the last airdate for I Am Weasel. I've been watching and improving the article for all these years as anonymous. I'm the one who improved it in 2017. It's not perfect, but it's way better than years ago. Lord Zaxor (talk) 07:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Mr. Inox/Lord Zaxor. It's good to read that you're still around. I just finished rereading the old thread about the I Am Weasel broadcast on November 26, 1999, from the ccffreak YouTube video. I can't believe that it's been this long and there's still no conclusion on the matter. Thank you for your contributions to the article. Hopefully we will get this issue resolved some day! — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 02:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So, this thing has been around for such a long time, I was even thinking about asking David Feiss himself. lol He was recently interviewed by some YouTube channel, by the way. Lord Zaxor (talk) 05:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article List of Shout! Studios releases has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTCATALOG; WP:INDISCRIMINATE. All lists of this nature have previously been deleted: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Criterion Collection releases (2nd nomination); Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Powerhouse Films releases; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British Film Institute releases; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Twilight Time releases; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of BBC home video releases, the list goes on...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --woodensuperman 12:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello and@Woodensuperman,

I DpDd it. Feel free to redirect it to the Shout! Studios if you think that solves the problem. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 15:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, I've sent it to AfD. --woodensuperman 16:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Shout! Studios releases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Shout! Studios releases until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--woodensuperman 16:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]