Orphaned non-free image File:NFCN-Uniform-MIN-2006.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NFCN-Uniform-MIN-2006.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Old detail

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005%E2%80%9306_UEFA_Champions_League_qualifying_rounds

Here and possibly few more years to check, regarding page of "steaua", its completely wrong. hope can fix 93.143.52.223 (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That whole situation is a mess and I'm not touching it with a ten-foot bargepole. Good luck. – Pee Jay 17:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Canvassing and POV-pushing. The Banner talk 18:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
11	Ole Haugsrud (talk)	Add sources
236	Principle of explosion (talk)	Add sources
118	Estadio Único Madre de Ciudades (talk)	Add sources
287	JibJab (talk)	Add sources
425	Club Atlético Tigre (talk)	Add sources
76	2015 New Orleans Saints season (talk)	Add sources
13	Evangelina Salazar (talk)	Cleanup
558	Claudio Pizarro (talk)	Cleanup
142	National Football League controversies (talk)	Cleanup
160	2012 Detroit Lions season (talk)	Expand
1,732	Luke Shaw (talk)	Expand
869	President of Egypt (talk)	Expand
6	Bedfordshire Blue Raiders (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
528	San Diego Stadium (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19	Stand Up Speak Up (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
355	SVNS (talk)	Merge
206	Search engine (computing) (talk)	Merge
113	Naturism in the United States (talk)	Merge
8	Rugby Europe Women's Championship (talk)	Wikify
91	Tony Currie (footballer) (talk)	Wikify
229	Blake Mills (talk)	Wikify
4	Gastón Torres (talk)	Orphan
6	Alejo Tabares (talk)	Orphan
2	Arkansas's 1st House of Representatives district (talk)	Orphan
10	Fiji women's national under-20 football team (talk)	Stub
18	Johan Carbonero (talk)	Stub
46	Phil McNulty (talk)	Stub
32	Jonathan Gómez (Argentine footballer) (talk)	Stub
8	Michel Pêcheux (talk)	Stub
18	Ronaldo (footballer, born October 1996) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
199	Football derbies in Italy (talk)	Add sources
6,890	Ineos (talk)	Add sources
3,225	Lord Byron (talk)	Add sources
1,069	BBC Sports Personality of the Year Award (talk)	Add sources
2	Italy at the UEFA Women's Championship (talk)	Add sources
7	2007–08 UEFA Cup first round (talk)	Add sources
39	Three-sided football (talk)	Cleanup
112	Campionato Sammarinese di Calcio (talk)	Cleanup
7	Marlborough Boys' College (talk)	Cleanup
406	Globalism (talk)	Expand
3,211	Ryan Giggs (talk)	Expand
56	Ashton-on-Mersey School (talk)	Expand
1,189	Argentina–Brazil football rivalry (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
14	European Union Military Operation in Chad and the Central African Republic (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
176	Nutmeg (association football) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4	Vietnamese one-hundred-dong bill (talk)	Merge
63	Renewal theory (talk)	Merge
312	Morgan horse (talk)	Merge
105	Minnesota–Wisconsin football rivalry (talk)	Wikify
420	Tiki-taka (talk)	Wikify
25	Little Minnesota (talk)	Wikify
1	WFC Rossiyanka in European football (talk)	Orphan
2	ATI Multi Rendering (talk)	Orphan
2	Apricena Città railway station (talk)	Orphan
270	2023 BBC Sports Personality of the Year Award (talk)	Stub
162	BRICS Games (talk)	Stub
3	Cho Hey-jin (talk)	Stub
1,198	Planet Earth III (talk)	Stub
16	Isaac Adongo (talk)	Stub
12	Jochiwon (talk)	Stub

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Frank Lampard. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). Aoidh (talk) 23:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PeeJay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sought input from other editors to resolve the dispute (see here) and provided rationales for all of my edits. The other editor did not. Sorry if I did more than some arbitrary number of edits in 24 hours, but this is ridiculous. – Pee Jay 23:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry PeeJay, but if you think this is ridiculous that alone is reason not to unblock you. The block is well justified. You broke the three revert rule, in a content dispute, and that's a bright line you really ought to know better than than to cross, especially given your block history. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

– Pee Jay 23:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I think this block was hasty and reactionary—which, I admit, is understandable given the number of reversions on the page. But PeeJay's edits protected the consensus standard—and correct information—from a relentless series of arbitrary and unexplained changes. Anwegmann (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Anwegmann and PeeJay: Then they should have stopped reverting and discussed, and ultimately reported the other user as needed. Please see user:deepfriedokra/ew for more information. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I did at WT:FOOTY. The other user was clearly uninterested in discussing their changes and was blindly reverting me across a series of articles, and one of them happened to get more than 3 reverts in a 24-hour span. But I did attempt to ameliorate the situation, which is more than can be said of anyone else involved here. – Pee Jay 08:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, this is directed at @Sir Sputnik too. – Pee Jay 08:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for assistance from other editors does not create an exception to the edit warring policy that allows edit warring, nor is adhering to consensus (which per this discussion doesn't appear to be as clear-cut as first suggested) per WP:EW (Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense.). It's also important to note that you also violated 3RR on another page (Ineos) at the same time, and were actively edit warring on several others (including Old Trafford (area)) without any apparent attempt at discussion, which also contributed to the block. - Aoidh (talk) 10:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoidh: How has User:StarryNightSky11 managed to get unblocked two days early, and then re-blocked and I'm still sitting here twiddling my thumbs? – Pee Jay 15:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because I've made several unblock requests to be unblocked, you made one and didn't make any more. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 15:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PeeJay, this isn't about happened to get more than 3 reverts in a 24-hour span. In future please take reverts to talk after the first. Trying to make sure you're playing within the rules isn't the point. Discussing is the point. Valereee (talk) 23:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once you are unblocked, there is a discussion about the piping links thing at WT:FOOTY#Frank Lampard, would be good if you could contribute thoughts there rather than edit war over piped links. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]