Please assume good faith.

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Jewish states and dynasties § Did attempts to change POV in this list go too far & make it more biased?. Peaceray (talk) 00:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is pretty obvious canvassing. Doug Weller talk 09:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have no opinion on either the article or the nature of Peaceray's post; I stub sorted the article once. *shrug* Thank you for continuing the conversation elsewhere. Her Pegship (?) 16:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just noting whether I was canvassing or not was discussed at User_talk:Peaceray#I'm_surprised_to_see_you_doing_what_appears_to_be_canvassing.. Enough said here, happy editing, Her Pegship! Peaceray (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, sorry about that. I've learned a good non-canvassing way to let editors know now! My bad, very bad. Doug Weller talk 07:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zafem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not at all surprised to learn that you're a Wikipedia admin on top of your day job. That's amazing. PS Ms Parraga got in touch a month ago because she recognised me in the news, haha. lizthegrey (talk) 01:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good grief, a voice from the past! Good to hear from you! Her Pegship (?) 04:46, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Chitral-geo-stub has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Union Councils of Upper Kohistan District, Pakistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not sure if a page should only have one stub, even though it refers to two different things. I don't believe that the stub article ever mentioned that. Положение my page right there 01:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

By all means! Articles frequently have more than one stub template. Thanks for asking. Her Pegship (?) 01:09, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not related but how do i add side pages? Like this: User:Pegship/userboxes Polozhenie, or for THAT type of people, Nonoxehne 01:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the location bar of your browser, you can just put

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Name/subpage

and when you press <enter> you can create the subpage. Hope this helps - Her Pegship (?) 19:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

((white|Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And a very merry one to you, too, old friend!! Her Pegship (?) 19:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Pegship!

First, merry Christmas--or whatever you celebrate or observe in this season.

Thanks for the heads-up about your proposal to change that Pyrausta stub template I created a few years ago. I think that was one of my first forays into creating stub categories and templates. I did a few around that time, and haven't touched the matter since; I'd need to go in and relearn everything if I wanted to do it now. (For one thing, I had to look at things for some time just now, to figure out that you're proposing to change the stub template, NOT the stub category; I'd forgotten that they're two different things.)

I actually don't figure on chiming in on the matter--whatever is correct or preferred is fine with me. But I wonder if I might presume to learn from your expertise?

Assuming that your proposed change for the stub TEMPLATE is made, do you plan on then proposing to change the name of the stub CATEGORY?

When I created the stub category, I used the parenthetical disambiguation term to match the non-stub category. Of course, I'd created that non-stub category a couple of months earlier, and I used the disamb. term to match the title of the article about the genus. (And that's there because the moth genus shares its name with a mythological insect.)

I have--unknowingly, early on, and then carelessly--created categories that SHOULD have had parenthetical disambiguations (in fact, I just did it again, and "mea culpa'd" about it on the project talk page). But now I'm wondering, do stub categories properly use those? I've been shooting in the dark just now, looking for a genus category that has a parenthetical disambiguation, and is large enough to have its own stub category. I'm sure there must be plenty, but I'm not finding any just now. Uporządnicki (talk) 19:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello again! Thanks for your note. The category is fine - I know we've used parens in stub category names before, but like you I can't seem to find one at the moment. I also don't know if there's a technical reason (i.e. server load, coding) to not use punctuation besides "-" in the template format; I just know it's part of the guidelines. I think I'll go looking for more information on that - but at any rate Category:Pyrausta (moth) stubs is "properly" formatted and I won't be proposing it for renaming. Happy holidays - Her Pegship (?) 20:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year!

Pegship,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Andumé (talk) 22:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Andumé (talk) 22:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aw, thanks! And the same to you! Her Pegship (?) 04:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome and thanks! Andumé (talk) 00:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I undertook a new "mini-megaproject" a while ago. There were well over 300 articles in the broad category for Beetle stubs. They're almost all individual species of beetles (and a fair number of higher taxonomic ranks), and virtually all of them should go into the labyrinth of sub stub categories. It looks like when I'm through, there will be five items in the top category--and one of those is the stub template (and another, I'm still thinking about moving.

And of course, I've been populating stub subcategories in the process.

There's a Template:Leiodidae-stub. It upmerges stubs to Category:Staphylinoidea stubs. But the Leiodidae stub template has over 120 links to itself. Not all are stub articles, but most of them are. And I expect there will be more when I finish going through the Beetle stubs. (I've done through the letter "O".)

So, yes, it will need the stub template for Leiodidae edited; I can see how that's done by comparing with others. And it will need a whole new category page for those stubs, since right now, they go onto the category page for Staphylinoidea stubs. I've created dozens of category pages, but only one or two for stub categories--and most recently, several years ago. I know they're different, but again, I can refer to existing ones. Uporządnicki (talk) 17:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks like you're doing it right. Thanks for checking! Her Pegship (?) 21:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, again! Actually, my original post here was meant as a kind of more detailed addendum to my question on that stubs talk page. Yeah, I'm pretty sure I've nailed the mechanics of what I propose to do. But I'm still wondering if I'm supposed to propose it first on the stubs proposal page; and if so, how do I do it as a speedy proposal (which it apparently qualifies to be)?

I see what you mean! Listing something on the proposals page as "speedy" is generally a courtesy to let other stub sorters know that you're going to create something. Creating a category for an upmerged template which has reached 60+ articles is typical of "speedy" proposals. You don't usually have to wait the whole 7 days - it's just a "heads up". Her Pegship (?) 22:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Union Councils of Upper Kohistan District, Pakistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]